Category: Markets

August Jobs Report Just Blew Past Every Forecast. That Might Be Bad News for Rate Cuts

Posted on by [email protected]

US employers added 162,000 jobs in August, nearly tripling the 55,000 economists surveyed by Bloomberg had expected, the Labor Department reported Friday. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.1%. Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, summed up the reaction in three words on social media, calling it a huge report.

The strength ran across several sectors. Food services added 59,000 jobs, public education gained 42,000 positions, and healthcare, which has driven much of this year’s job growth, added another 13,000, though at a notably slower pace than earlier in the year. Not every corner of the economy shared in the strength. The information sector lost 23,000 positions, a continuation of the white-collar employment pressure that has shown up repeatedly in recent months.

Just as notable as August’s headline number were the revisions attached to it. July’s initially reported job loss, a figure that rattled markets when it first came out, was revised into positive territory. June’s numbers were also revised modestly higher. Taken together, the picture emerging is considerably stronger than what the raw data suggested just a month ago, a meaningful shift from the low hire, low fire stagnation that recent labor market data, including the JOLTS report we covered earlier this week, had pointed toward.

That shift matters enormously for what happens next. This is the last major jobs report the Federal Reserve will see before its September 16-17 meeting, and it lands with the committee genuinely split on what to do. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh signaled in his Jackson Hole speech last week that the central bank needs to do more to bring inflation under control, a stance we detailed closely at the time. Fed Governor Christopher Waller struck a different tone Thursday, saying he would lean toward holding rates steady if incoming data continues showing inflation improving. A labor market this strong genuinely complicates the case for anyone hoping a softening job market would tip the Fed toward patience, and it hands ammunition to the more hawkish members of the committee heading into their final deliberations.

For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this report carries real weight. Small and microcap businesses typically carry more variable-rate debt than large cap companies, making their borrowing costs unusually sensitive to shifts in how confident the Fed feels about the broader economy. A jobs report this much stronger than expected reduces the odds the Fed sees any urgency to ease, and increases the odds that Warsh’s more hawkish read on the economy carries the day at this month’s meeting. With the labor market and inflation data now sending genuinely conflicting signals, the September decision looks less like a formality and more like a real, live debate.

The 10-Year Treasury Just Hit Its Highest Level Since 2023

Posted on by [email protected]

The 10-year Treasury yield touched 4.814% Wednesday, its highest level since November 2023, before easing slightly to 4.77%. The 30-year yield sat at 5.26%, still hovering near the multi-decade highs that rattled markets last month. This is not a new, isolated story. It is the direct convergence of three separate threads that have each been building independently over recent weeks.

The first is oil. Crude prices pushed toward $95 a barrel this week after fresh US strikes on Iran, extending the renewed escalation we covered when fighting resumed after the earlier ceasefire lapsed. Elevated energy prices continue feeding directly into inflation expectations, and rising inflation expectations are one of the most reliable drivers of higher long-term bond yields.

The second is the Fed itself. Chair Kevin Warsh’s hawkish tone at his debut Jackson Hole speech last week set the stage, and Fed Governor Michelle Barr reinforced that posture Tuesday, stating the central bank should raise rates in September if inflation does not show sufficient signs of moderating. Prediction markets responded accordingly, with odds of a September rate hike on Polymarket climbing to 56% following Warsh’s initial remarks, up meaningfully from where they stood before Jackson Hole.

The third thread is less obvious but genuinely important. Rising yields are not only about oil and Fed policy, they also reflect growing investor concern over government debt levels and expanding fiscal deficits, alongside a separate but related dynamic in corporate debt markets. Technology companies building out AI infrastructure are increasingly turning to bond markets to fund that buildout, since the scale of spending required has outpaced what free cash flow alone can cover, a dynamic we detailed closely when BlackRock priced its $12.3 billion data center bond offering for Meta and when CoreWeave raised its own capital expenditure guidance earlier this summer. That wave of new corporate debt issuance adds further supply pressure to long-term bond markets at the exact moment government borrowing is already elevated, a combination that tends to push yields higher independent of any single catalyst.

The market reaction Wednesday reflected this convergence clearly. Rate-sensitive technology and growth stocks sold off sharply, with several names in the AI infrastructure and networking space falling double digits on the day, a pattern consistent with what happens whenever long-term borrowing costs move decisively higher.

For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this is precisely the kind of environment worth watching closely. Small and microcap companies carry disproportionately more variable-rate debt than large cap peers, and when oil, Fed policy expectations, and corporate debt supply are all pushing in the same direction simultaneously, the resulting pressure on borrowing costs tends to be more durable and harder to reverse with any single piece of good news. The individual pieces of this story are all familiar. What matters now is that they are no longer moving independently, they are compounding.

JOLTS Report July 2026: Job Openings Rise to 7.3 Million as Hiring and Layoffs Both Stay Low

Posted on by [email protected]

The Labor Department’s July Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, known as the JOLTS report, showed job openings rose slightly to 7.3 million, up from a revised 7.2 million in June. Hiring and layoffs both stayed low, reinforcing what economists describe as a low hire, low fire labor market, a pattern that has now defined US employment conditions for most of 2026.

Hiring slowed slightly in July, with 5.1 million workers finding new positions compared to 5.3 million in June, driven partly by job losses in the professional business services sector. The July hiring rate came in at 3.2%. Layoffs also edged lower, dropping to 1.7 million with a layoff rate of 1.1%. The quits rate, a key measure of how confident workers feel about finding better opportunities elsewhere, held steady at just 1.9%.

Job openings, hiring, layoffs, and quits are the four core JOLTS metrics economists and the Federal Reserve use to gauge labor market health each month. This month’s data shows employers are not cutting staff aggressively, but they are not hiring aggressively either, and workers are staying in their current jobs rather than testing the market for new roles.

The July JOLTS report matters for interest rate expectations because it lands just days after Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh’s debut Jackson Hole speech, where he focused almost entirely on inflation and gave no indication that a softening labor market might justify easing sooner. This report is a reminder that the labor side of the Fed’s dual mandate has not disappeared. July’s official jobs report already showed the economy unexpectedly shed 23,000 positions, with the unemployment rate falling only because discouraged workers stopped actively searching for jobs, not because underlying conditions genuinely improved.

The next major labor market data point arrives Friday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases its August employment report. That release will offer a clearer read on whether the current stagnant hiring pattern is holding steady or beginning to deteriorate more meaningfully, and it will likely shape how markets price the odds of a Federal Reserve rate move at the September meeting.

For investors tracking small and microcap stocks, this labor market data carries direct implications for interest rates and borrowing costs. A genuinely weakening labor market would typically build pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut rates, which would benefit smaller, more leveraged companies through lower borrowing costs. But a labor market that is merely stagnant rather than clearly declining gives the Fed room to keep its primary focus on inflation, the exact posture Warsh signaled at Jackson Hole. That means the higher-cost-of-capital environment currently weighing on small cap stocks may persist longer than some investors expect. Friday’s jobs report, and how the Fed ultimately weighs it against still-elevated inflation, will be an important catalyst to watch heading into the September Federal Open Market Committee meeting.

Why Long-Term Rates Are Rising After Warsh’s Jackson Hole Speech

Posted on by [email protected]

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh gave his first major speech as chair on Friday at the Fed’s annual Jackson Hole gathering, and the tone caught markets off guard. Warsh said inflation remains above the Fed’s target and that fighting price pressure needs to stay the Fed’s top priority right now. Investors had hoped for some hint of a coming rate cut or at least a softer tone. They got neither. All three major stock indexes closed lower after his remarks, and traders quickly raised the odds of a rate hike at the Fed’s September meeting to nearly 61%.

The bigger story is what happened in the bond market afterward. The 30-year Treasury yield has climbed since Warsh spoke Friday, pushing back toward 5.27%, close to the high that rattled markets in late July and led the Treasury Department to step in and buy back more bonds to calm things down, a move we detailed closely at the time. Part of Monday’s move also came from oil prices jumping after renewed fighting between the US and Iran over the weekend.

Here is the part worth understanding clearly. When long-term Treasury yields rise, it usually means one of two things is happening, either investors expect higher inflation ahead, or they simply want more return for tying up their money for 30 years, regardless of inflation. Right now, it is almost entirely the second reason. Expectations for long-term inflation have barely moved, and have actually ticked down slightly. Investors are not panicking about inflation over the next three decades. They are just demanding a higher price to hold long-term government debt, a shift that can be driven by how much the government is borrowing, how fast the economy is expected to grow, or simply less certainty about where policy is headed. Warsh himself hinted at this Friday, saying he would be hard-pressed to call current financial conditions restrictive, a comment that leaves plenty of room for long-term rates to keep climbing even without the Fed making another official move.

That makes 5.3% the level worth watching most closely. A sustained move above it would push borrowing costs back into the same territory that unsettled markets last month.

For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this distinction matters. Small and microcap companies typically carry more variable-rate debt than large companies, so their borrowing costs are especially sensitive to moves like this. If rising rates are being driven by investors simply wanting more compensation to hold long-term debt, rather than fear of runaway inflation, that pressure may prove harder to ease with a single Fed decision than markets first assumed when Warsh took over.

The US and Canada Are in a Trade War. Here Is the One Product Both Sides Are Deliberately Leaving Alone

Posted on by [email protected]

Trade talks between the United States and Canada collapsed over the weekend, prompting Washington to impose 50% tariffs on a wide range of Canadian goods, including furniture, dairy products, electrical equipment, and plywood. Canada’s Finance Department responded Tuesday with its own retaliatory tariffs. Markets, notably, barely flinched. The Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq all posted modest gains Tuesday, and the Russell 2000 advanced as well, suggesting investors are treating this escalation as manageable rather than systemically threatening, at least for now.

What makes this dispute genuinely interesting from a market perspective is not what got tariffed, it is what deliberately did not. Crude oil, one of the largest categories of trade flowing between the two countries, was left entirely out of the new 50% tariffs, and neither government appears eager to bring it into the fight.

Why Oil Is the One Line Neither Side Wants to Cross

The scale of that exemption is significant. The United States buys roughly 90% of all Canadian crude exports, worth approximately CA$126 billion of Canada’s CA$140 billion total in 2025, while Canada supplies roughly 63% of all US crude imports. That dependence reflects decades of physical infrastructure investment rather than a relationship either country could quickly unwind. Alberta’s oil sands produce heavy bitumen, and US refiners, particularly across the Midwest and Gulf Coast, spent billions of dollars building capacity specifically configured to process that heavier crude. Meanwhile, America’s own shale boom has made it the world’s largest oil producer, but that production is overwhelmingly light, sweet crude, creating a structural mismatch where the US exports large volumes of its own light oil while importing millions of barrels of heavier Canadian crude every single day.

Canada, for its part, has limited ability to simply redirect that oil elsewhere. The expanded Trans Mountain pipeline gives Alberta producers new access to Pacific coast export markets, but its roughly 890,000 barrel-per-day capacity is dwarfed by the nearly 3.9 million barrels shipped south to the US daily. President Trump acknowledged this interdependence directly in public comments this week, pointing to Canada’s own reliance on US infrastructure to move electricity, oil, and gas between its own provinces, a reference to cross-border pipeline routes like Enbridge’s Line 5, which carries Canadian oil through Wisconsin and Michigan before crossing back into Ontario. That mutual physical dependence is precisely why energy has remained exempt even as tariffs on nearly everything else have escalated sharply.

If oil were eventually pulled into this dispute, the consequences would ripple in multiple directions. US refiners, as the importers of record, would bear the tariff directly and would likely respond by demanding steeper discounts from Canadian producers, while also passing at least some of the higher input costs through to consumers at the pump, directly reversing the gas price relief seen earlier this summer. Canadian producers would face the opposite squeeze, a shrinking pool of buyers willing to pay full price for barrels with nowhere else to go at comparable volume.

For investors tracking the small and microcap space, this dispute carries two distinct layers of exposure. Companies with direct supply chain exposure to the newly tariffed categories, furniture, dairy, electrical components, and building materials like plywood, are facing real, immediate cost pressure right now. Energy-adjacent companies, meanwhile, are watching a very different, still-hypothetical risk: what happens if this trade fight eventually escalates into the one category both governments have so far treated as off-limits. Markets shrugging off Tuesday’s escalation suggests investors currently believe that line will hold. Whether it actually does may prove to be the more consequential question heading into the fall, particularly with the Fed’s Jackson Hole speech still ahead and the Treasury’s bond market intervention already testing how much stress the system can absorb at once.

Mortgage Rates Barely Budged During the Wildest Bond Week in Years

Posted on by [email protected]

Mortgage rates edged only slightly lower this week despite a genuinely dramatic stretch in the bond market that saw the 30-year Treasury yield hit its highest level since 2007. The average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage came in at 6.65% through Wednesday, according to Freddie Mac data, down marginally from 6.67% a week earlier. As of Thursday, Zillow data put the 30-year fixed rate at 6.52%.

The relative calm in mortgage rates masks real volatility underneath. Long-term government bond yields briefly topped 5.3% on Tuesday, the highest level in 19 years, as markets grew increasingly anxious about inflation and the country’s expanding fiscal deficit, a move we detailed as it happened earlier this week. The following day, the Treasury announced it was doubling the size of its long-term bond buying program specifically to support prices and bring yields back down. That intervention worked in the immediate term, yields fell sharply Wednesday, before climbing again Thursday, underscoring just how unsettled this corner of the market remains.

Because most homeowners refinance or sell well before their 30-year term is actually up, mortgage rates track the 10-year Treasury yield far more closely than the 30-year. The 10-year saw comparatively smaller swings than its longer-dated counterpart this week, which is largely why mortgage rates held relatively steady even as headlines focused on the 30-year hitting a 19-year high.

That stability may prove temporary. Economists covering the housing market have cautioned that the forces driving this week’s bond market shock, elevated concern over the fiscal deficit, oil price volatility, and rising debt tied to AI infrastructure spending, have not actually gone away, they were simply papered over mechanically by the Treasury’s buyback intervention. Several housing economists have specifically warned that mortgage rates are unlikely to fall meaningfully in the weeks ahead and could even drift higher, a genuinely difficult setup heading into a stretch of the year that has traditionally favored buyers.

For investors tracking the small cap space, this dynamic extends well beyond individual homebuyers. The same structural forces keeping a floor under mortgage rates, deficit concerns, energy price volatility, and the sheer scale of debt now being issued to fund AI infrastructure buildouts, are the identical pressures keeping borrowing costs elevated for smaller, more leveraged companies. Small and microcap businesses carry disproportionately more variable-rate debt than large cap peers, and a bond market that requires direct Treasury intervention just to stabilize, rather than genuinely ease, is not the kind of environment that delivers meaningful relief to smaller companies’ cost of capital anytime soon. Investors should treat this week’s mortgage rate stability as a temporary, mechanically induced calm rather than evidence that the broader rate pressure weighing on small caps has actually resolved.

Trump Paused 50% Tariffs on Canada Hours Before They Hit and the Markets Barely Moved

Posted on by [email protected]

President Trump announced late Tuesday night he is pausing a scheduled 50% tariff on Canadian goods just hours before it was set to take effect at midnight, following eleventh-hour talks between US officials and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s team. Trump posted that the three-day pause reflects an agreement in principle between the two countries, subject to finalizing formal documents. Notably, US equity futures were essentially unchanged on the news, a muted reaction that tells its own story about how markets are actually reading this development.

Stocks were already under pressure heading into Wednesday, weathering a losing week driven by rising bond yields and oil prices, compounded by a Tuesday tech selloff that spread overnight into Asian markets, where Japan’s Nikkei fell 3% and South Korea’s KOSPI dropped 5%. Against that backdrop, a last-minute tariff pause registering as a non-event for futures markets is itself informative. Trade policy experts have noted the Canadian tariffs, even if implemented, would likely have had limited direct economic impact given the narrower scope of affected goods compared to broader tariff actions earlier in the year. What markets appear to be reading instead is the signal this sends ahead of the larger prize: negotiations over the US-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement, the actual trade framework governing the bulk of cross-border commerce among the three countries, which remains the more consequential outcome still to be determined.

This tariff pause arrives during an already data-heavy stretch for markets. The Federal Reserve released minutes from its July FOMC meeting the same day, offering additional detail on the internal debate over inflation and the path for interest rates that we detailed in our recent coverage of the divided committee heading into Jackson Hole. Separately, a wave of retail earnings from Target, Lowe’s, and TJX Companies is set to give investors a clearer read on consumer spending trends through the spring and summer, adding yet another variable competing for market attention this week.

For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, trade policy volatility of this kind carries outsized relevance. Smaller manufacturers, industrial suppliers, and companies with meaningful cross-border supply chains into Canada are directly exposed to tariff uncertainty in a way large multinational companies, with more diversified sourcing and pricing power, often are not. A three-day pause is not resolution, it is a postponement, and the underlying uncertainty over how USMCA negotiations ultimately land remains an open variable for exactly the kind of domestically focused small cap companies that make up a large share of the Russell 2000. Investors in this space should treat this development as one to watch closely rather than a settled outcome, since the finalized documents Trump referenced, and the broader trade framework they sit within, are what will actually determine whether this becomes a durable resolution or simply a delay before the next deadline.

30-Year Treasury Yields Just Hit Their Highest Level Since 2007. Four Forces Are Colliding at Once.

Posted on by [email protected]

The 30-year US Treasury yield climbed to 5.327% on Tuesday, its highest level in 19 years, as stalled talks to end the US-Iran war and renewed fears of escalation pushed oil prices above $90 a barrel and reignited inflation concerns across global markets. The benchmark 10-year yield rose to 4.739%. The selloff was not contained to US markets either, spreading to Japan, where the 10-year government bond yield hit a 30-year peak, and to Europe, where Germany’s 10-year Bund yield touched its highest level since 2011 and France’s 10-year yield reached a 17-year high.

The proximate trigger is the same conflict that has driven energy markets and inflation expectations for much of the year. Iran told officials it would shift to a fully offensive military posture after negotiations toward a permanent end to the war stalled, while Washington has ruled out extending the ceasefire agreement reached in June. With the Strait of Hormuz still effectively shut, the best-case scenario according to strategists covering the region is a prolonged standoff that continues restricting crude flows, while the worst case is a resumption of active fighting.

This Is Not Just an Oil Story

What makes this move genuinely notable is that oil and geopolitics are only part of the explanation. Analysts covering global rates point to at least three additional structural forces pushing long-term yields higher independent of the Iran conflict. The surge in borrowing from AI hyperscalers, whose capital expenditure plans have accelerated sharply throughout 2026, is forcing bond buyers to demand higher returns to absorb the flood of new debt hitting markets. A rising US budget deficit is compounding that pressure, with recent Treasury auctions drawing unusual attention, a 10-year note auction clearing at 4.683%, its highest yield in 19 years, and a 30-year bond auction stopping at 5.216%, a 25-year peak.

Notably, one strategist covering the move specifically named Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh’s shift toward a more opaque communication style as a contributing factor to rising yields, a shift in tone that has drawn scrutiny ahead of his upcoming Jackson Hole address and the market confusion that followed his July press conference. Reduced clarity from the Fed appears to be compounding, rather than easing, the uncertainty already priced into long-duration debt.

For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this combination of forces is directly consequential. Small and microcap companies carry disproportionately more variable-rate debt than large cap peers, and a 30-year yield at its highest level since 2007 signals that the higher-cost-of-capital environment weighing on smaller businesses is not easing, it is intensifying. One market strategist noted that for much of the past 15 years, investors operated in a market where stable-to-falling rates consistently supported higher stock prices, but recent Treasury auctions suggest that landscape is genuinely shifting, with investors increasingly focused on the growing scale of US debt and questions about fiscal discipline. For small cap investors, that shift deserves close attention heading into the fall.

QuoteMedia Inc. (QMCI) – Double-Digit Revenue Growth, Improving Margins Signal Operating Leverage

Posted on by [email protected]


Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Michael Kupinski, Director of Research, Equity Research Analyst, Digital, Media & Technology , Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

George Proost, Research Associate, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

Solid Q2 revenue growth. QuoteMedia reported Q2 revenue of $5.45 million, up 11% YoY from $4.93 million, although below our $5.63 million estimate. The quarter marked the company’s second consecutive quarter of double-digit revenue growth, supported by new client wins and expansion within existing enterprise relationships.

Improving profitability. Gross margin increased to 50% from 46% in the year-earlier period, while adj. EBITDA increased to $241,000 from $99,000. The net loss narrowed substantially to $362,000 from $854,000. We believe the improving results provide early evidence of the operating leverage inherent in the company’s business model.


Get the Full Report

Equity Research is available at no cost to Registered users of Channelchek. Not a Member? Click ‘Join’ to join the Channelchek Community. There is no cost to register, and we never collect credit card information.

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

The Fed’s September Decision Comes Down to One Number Nobody Has Seen Yet

Posted on by [email protected]

Federal Reserve officials gather in Jackson Hole in two weeks for a symposium that arrives at a genuinely pivotal moment for the central bank. All eyes will be on Chair Kevin Warsh’s first speech in that role, historically a venue Fed chairs use to set the table for upcoming policy decisions or signal structural shifts in approach. This year, the stakes are higher than usual, following a July 29 meeting that left markets confused and a policy committee that appears genuinely divided.

At that meeting, the Fed held rates steady at 3.50% to 3.75% for a fifth consecutive session, as expected. What rattled markets was Warsh’s press conference performance, where he repeatedly deflected questions about why the Fed was not raising rates and suggested that rising bond yields themselves were doing some of the Fed’s tightening work. Markets responded by aggressively pricing in more than two rate hikes in the weeks that followed, alongside genuine uncertainty about whether the committee has a coherent strategy at all.

Since that meeting, the incoming data has offered modest relief. Core CPI rose 2.5% year over year in July, marking a second consecutive month of cooling from 2.6% in June and 2.9% in May. Producer price data told a more mixed story. Core PPI, excluding food, energy, and trade services, rose 4.7% year over year, slightly hotter than expected though down from June’s 5.1% pace, while the monthly reading cooled to 0.2% from an upwardly revised 0.4% in June.

Both figures feed into the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, due for release August 26, just days before the Jackson Hole gathering. Economists estimate core PCE rose somewhere between 0.16% and 0.3% in July, a range wide enough that it genuinely could push the committee in either direction.

The range of professional forecasts illustrates just how unresolved this debate is. Some economists estimate July’s core PCE reading held firm enough to keep the annual rate sticky near 3.3%, arguing that could actually harden the resolve of policy hawks rather than ease it. Others view the broader disinflation trend, tied to fading tariff effects and easing oil prices following the resolution of Strait of Hormuz disruptions, as evidence the Fed can remain patient through year-end, while still leaving the door open to tightening if price pressures reaccelerate. A third camp sees the data pointing toward a soft enough reading to pull the three-month annualized core PCE rate down to 2.5%, which would make a September hike look considerably less likely than markets currently expect.

That range of outside opinion mirrors a genuine split inside the Fed itself. Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, who dissented in favor of a hike at the July meeting, has continued arguing publicly that more than one rate increase is needed to bring inflation fully under control. Meanwhile, New York Fed President John Williams has suggested that if monthly core PCE consistently prints around 0.2% through the second half of the year, it would signal inflation returning to target on its own, without further tightening. Former Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart, now outside the institution, has cautioned that one or two encouraging months of data is not persuasive evidence that underlying inflation pressure, elevated for more than five years, is genuinely breaking, particularly with the labor market still near full employment.

For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, this unresolved debate matters directly. Small and microcap companies carry disproportionately more variable-rate debt than large cap peers, making their borrowing costs highly sensitive to exactly the kind of uncertainty currently surrounding the Fed’s next move. The market will receive one more full month of inflation data, including the volatile August CPI report, before the September meeting itself, meaning the path forward remains almost entirely data-dependent. Warsh’s Jackson Hole speech will be the first real signal of how he is weighing that data, and small cap investors watching the cost of capital heading into the fall would do well to treat it as required listening.

July CPI Report Preview: Inflation Expected to Ease to 3.4% as Fed Weighs a September Rate Hike

Posted on by [email protected]

What the July CPI Report Is Expected to Show

New inflation data due out Wednesday is expected to show consumer prices rising 3.4% year over year in July, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg, a slight improvement from June’s 3.5% annual increase. On a monthly basis, economists expect prices to rise just 0.1% from June, when the Consumer Price Index posted a surprise 0.4% monthly decline.

Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy costs and is the measure the Federal Reserve watches most closely, is expected to come in at 2.5% year over year and 0.2% month over month. Both figures would represent continued, if gradual, progress toward the Fed’s 2% inflation target, even as the overall trajectory remains well above where policymakers want it.

Why Energy Prices Complicate the Inflation Picture

The July reading arrives against a genuinely unusual backdrop. Energy prices rose over the course of the month after the ceasefire between the United States and Iran broke down and oil prices moved higher in response. Despite that renewed volatility, gasoline prices at the pump remained slightly lower on average in July than they were in June, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration.

That divergence between crude oil price movement and retail gasoline prices reflects the lag between wholesale energy costs and what consumers actually pay at the pump, and it is one reason economists still expect the headline CPI figure to show only modest sequential price growth despite the renewed geopolitical volatility.

What a Hot Inflation Print Would Mean for the September Fed Meeting

The stakes attached to Wednesday’s release extend well beyond the number itself. A hotter-than-expected inflation reading would likely push a divided Federal Reserve toward raising interest rates at its September meeting, even as other parts of the economy show signs of cooling. That tension is precisely what makes this month’s data release so consequential. The Fed is currently navigating contradictory signals: inflation readings remain well above target, while the labor market has shown genuine weakness, with the July jobs report showing the US economy shed 23,000 jobs, far short of what economists had expected.

As of this week, traders are pricing in roughly 50-50 odds of a 25 basis point rate hike at the Fed’s September meeting, according to CME FedWatch data, reflecting just how finely balanced the policy decision has become.

What the July CPI Report Means for Small Cap Investors

For companies operating below the $2 billion market cap threshold, Wednesday’s inflation data carries direct implications for the cost of capital heading into the fall. Small and microcap companies typically carry more variable-rate debt than their large cap counterparts, making them more sensitive to shifts in rate expectations than almost any other segment of the market.

A cooler-than-expected CPI print would strengthen the case for the Fed to hold steady in September, providing meaningful relief for smaller, more leveraged companies. A hotter print, particularly one showing energy-driven price pressure spreading into core categories, would sharpen the odds of a rate hike and extend the higher-cost-of-capital environment that has weighed on small cap valuations throughout much of this year. Either way, Wednesday’s release is one of the most consequential data points small cap investors will see before the Fed’s September decision.

Back-to-School and the Stock Market: Is There Really a September Effect?

Posted on by [email protected]

Every August, the same scene plays out: parents load up shopping carts with notebooks and sneakers, and almost like clockwork the stock market starts to wobble. Investors call this the “September Effect,” and it’s one of the most searched market patterns every fall. So is there really a connection between back-to-school season and the stock market? Here’s what the data says.

Is September Really the Worst Month for the Stock Market?

Since 1928, the S&P 500 has averaged a return of roughly -1.1% in September, by far the worst of any month on the calendar, and the only month with a meaningfully negative long-run average. August and September together have been the weakest back-to-back stretch since 1945. The index has closed lower in September more than half the time since 1928, no other month drops that often.

This year, back-to-school spending is bigger than ever. The National Retail Federation projects total 2026 back-to-school spending, kindergarten through college, will hit $146.8 billion, up from $128.2 billion in 2025, with college spending crossing $100 billion for the first time. So does all that retail activity actually move the market? Not directly, but the timing overlap is too consistent to ignore.

Why Does the Stock Market Drop in September? 3 Theories

1. Traders come back from summer vacation. The most credible explanation has nothing to do with school supplies and everything to do with vacation schedules. Trading volume and volatility run low through the summer as fund managers and everyday investors take time off. When everyone returns after Labor Day, that quiet gives way to a concentrated wave of rebalancing, all landing in the same few weeks.

2. Household spending shifts to essentials. As families shift spending toward school supplies and tuition, discretionary spending elsewhere slows, and consumer routines reset to budget-conscious mode. Some analysts argue that shift filters into earnings expectations right as September begins. It’s a compelling theory, but worth being honest about, it’s a theory, not a proven cause.

3. Mutual funds “window dress” before fiscal year-end. Many mutual funds close their fiscal year on September 30th, and beforehand, managers often trim losers and buy winners to make year-end portfolios look better, a practice known as “window dressing.” That selling pressure adds to September weakness for reasons that have nothing to do with backpacks or lunchboxes.

Does the September Effect Actually Predict Market Crashes?

Not on its own. Some of September’s worst historical drops happened during bear markets already underway for entirely unrelated reasons, the Great Depression, the dot-com crash, the 2008 financial crisis. The calendar didn’t cause those crashes; it just happened to be the backdrop. When the broader market has strong momentum heading into September, the seasonal weakness has historically shown up far less, if at all.

Should You Change Your Investing Strategy for September?

The back-to-school season and stock market weakness share a calendar and a shift in investor psychology, but the relationship is a tendency, not a rule. The smarter takeaway isn’t to sell in August and buy back in October. It’s to recognize seasonal patterns are noise layered on top of the real drivers: economic data, interest rates, and corporate earnings, and to stay invested through the noise rather than trying to trade around it.

This September, as retailers report record back-to-school numbers, the real story to watch isn’t the calendar. It’s what that spending says about the health of the consumer, because that, unlike seasonality, actually moves markets.

Amazon Just Crossed $3 Trillion. Only Four Other Companies Have Ever Gotten There

Posted on by [email protected]

Amazon surpassed $3 trillion in market value Monday, becoming just the fifth company in history to reach that milestone, joining Nvidia, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Apple in an extraordinarily exclusive club. Shares rose as much as 5.3% Monday morning, extending a rally that began after last week’s second quarter earnings report and adding to what has already been one of the more dramatic reversals among the Magnificent Seven this year.

The move caps a genuinely wild several months for the stock. Amazon had been mired in a steady selloff for much of the prior three months as investors grew increasingly skeptical of companies committing tens of billions of dollars to artificial intelligence infrastructure with uncertain near-term payoff. Shares fell nearly 18% between a record high on May 6 and a three-month low reached just last month.

What Changed the Story

That skepticism evaporated almost overnight last week. Amazon reported that Amazon Web Services revenue jumped by the most since 2021, and the stock surged more than 15% in response, its largest single-day gain in more than 14 years, adding nearly $400 billion in market value in a single session. That move, which we covered in detail last week, was driven by AWS posting $42.2 billion in quarterly revenue, up 36.7% year over year, alongside management raising full-year AI infrastructure spending guidance to approximately $220 billion.

The market’s willingness to reward that increased spending, rather than punish it the way it has with other companies pursuing similarly aggressive AI buildouts, is what ultimately propelled the stock across the $3 trillion threshold. Amazon has now reclaimed its position as the best performing Magnificent Seven stock of the year, a notable reversal given that the broader group of mega cap technology stocks has actually lagged the market in 2026, gaining only modestly compared to a stronger advance for the S&P 500 overall.

Still Historically Cheap Despite the Milestone

Perhaps the most interesting detail in this story is what it reveals about valuation. Even after this dramatic rally, Amazon trades at roughly 25 times forward earnings for the next twelve months, a level that remains well below its average valuation over the past decade. Despite crossing $3 trillion, the stock is still trading meaningfully cheaper than its own historical norm, a reminder that market cap milestones and valuation multiples do not always move in lockstep.

The speed of this achievement is also notable. Amazon took just over two years to move from $2 trillion, first reached in June 2024, to $3 trillion today. That is considerably faster than the more than six years it took the company to go from its first $1 trillion milestone in late 2018 to the $2 trillion mark.

What It Means for the Broader Market

For investors tracking the AI infrastructure ecosystem more broadly, Amazon’s rapid ascent back to record territory reinforces the same theme from last week’s earnings coverage: when massive AI capital expenditure is paired with visible, accelerating revenue growth, the market response can be dramatically positive rather than punitive. That distinction continues to matter for the smaller companies supplying components, infrastructure, and specialized hardware into hyperscaler buildouts, since sustained demand from a company spending at Amazon’s scale flows directly through an extensive supplier base well beyond Amazon itself.