Tag: Federal Reserve

Producer Prices Jump Most in 3 Years: Complicates Fed’s Rate Cut Timeline

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The Federal Reserve’s carefully orchestrated path toward interest rate cuts hit an unexpected roadblock Thursday as producer price data revealed the most significant inflationary surge in over three years, casting doubt on the central bank’s timeline for monetary easing.

The Producer Price Index (PPI) jumped 0.9% in July, dramatically exceeding economists’ expectations of just 0.2% and marking the sharpest monthly increase since early 2022. This surge pushed annual producer inflation to 3.3%, the highest level since February and a stark reminder that the battle against rising prices remains far from over.

More concerning for policymakers was the performance of core producer prices, which strip out volatile food and energy costs to provide a clearer picture of underlying inflation trends. These prices rose 0.6% monthly, representing the largest increase since March 2022 and a significant acceleration from June’s flat reading. The annual core rate also hit 3.3%, matching February’s peak.

The timing of this inflation shock couldn’t be more problematic for the Federal Reserve. Just days after consumer price data showed inflation pressures remaining stubbornly above the Fed’s 2% target, producer prices have delivered another unwelcome surprise. Markets, which had priced in a virtual certainty of rate cuts beginning in September, are now recalibrating their expectations.

This producer price acceleration tells a troubling story about cost pressures flowing through the economy. Unlike consumer prices, which measure what households pay, producer prices capture the costs businesses face when purchasing goods and services. When these prices rise rapidly, companies face a critical decision: absorb the higher costs and accept reduced profit margins, or pass them along to consumers through higher retail prices.

Recent evidence suggests businesses are increasingly choosing the latter option. Economists point to growing margin pressures from tariffs on imported goods as a key driver behind this trend. Analysis from Nationwide indicates that while companies initially absorbed most tariff-related cost increases, margins are becoming increasingly strained by higher costs for imported goods, leading to expectations of stronger price pass-through to consumers in coming months.

The mechanics behind July’s surge reveal interesting dynamics within the economy. Analysis from Capital Economics highlighted an unusual increase in margins for wholesalers and retailers, suggesting that some of the price increases reflect strategic business decisions rather than pure cost pressures. This margin expansion indicates companies may be regaining pricing power after years of competitive pressure.

Financial markets reacted swiftly to the news, with stock indices declining as investors grappled with the implications for Federal Reserve policy. The probability of a September rate cut, which stood at 100% just Wednesday, dropped to approximately 95% following the release, while expectations for a larger 0.5% cut nearly evaporated entirely.

The producer price shock arrives at a particularly sensitive moment for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who is scheduled to address the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium on August 22. This highly anticipated speech was expected to lay the groundwork for the Fed’s transition from restrictive monetary policy to a more accommodative stance. However, the recent inflation data complicates that narrative considerably.

For consumers already feeling the squeeze from elevated prices, the producer price surge offers little comfort. With businesses facing higher input costs and showing increased willingness to pass these expenses along, household budgets may face additional pressure in the months ahead. The disconnect between the Fed’s 2% inflation target and current price trends suggests that relief for American families remains elusive.

The path forward for monetary policy now appears more uncertain than at any point in recent months. While labor market softening and economic growth concerns continue to build the case for rate cuts, persistent inflation pressures argue for maintaining restrictive policies longer. Powell and his colleagues face the challenging task of balancing these competing forces while maintaining credibility in their inflation-fighting mission.

As markets await Powell’s Jackson Hole remarks, one thing has become clear: the Federal Reserve’s policy decisions will require careful calibration as conflicting economic signals continue to complicate the monetary policy landscape.

Who Could Lead the Fed Next? Waller’s Name Rises to the Top

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller is gaining traction as the leading candidate to replace Jerome Powell as Fed chair under a potential second Trump administration, according to individuals familiar with the ongoing discussions. The Trump team reportedly favors Waller’s approach to monetary policy, highlighting his emphasis on forward-looking analysis and his institutional understanding of the Federal Reserve system.

Though Waller has not yet met with former President Trump personally, he has held discussions with members of Trump’s economic circle. His recent dissent from the Federal Open Market Committee’s decision to hold interest rates steady has further elevated his profile. Waller, along with fellow Trump appointee Michelle Bowman, supported a rate cut in light of softening labor market data—a move that aligned with Trump’s long-standing desire for looser monetary policy.

Waller’s background adds weight to his candidacy. Before joining the Fed board in 2020, he was executive vice president and director of research at the St. Louis Fed. His nomination was narrowly confirmed by the Senate with a 48-47 vote. Since then, he has become a vocal figure within the central bank, notably clashing with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers in 2022 over inflation forecasts. Waller’s stance—that the Fed could rein in post-pandemic inflation without triggering a sharp rise in unemployment—ultimately proved accurate, strengthening his reputation among economic conservatives.

Trump’s shortlist includes former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and current National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett. Both men have also reportedly impressed Trump and his advisers, though Waller is viewed as the front-runner at this stage. Trump has confirmed that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Vice President JD Vance, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are leading the search process.

The Trump team is also preparing to fill a vacant Fed board seat following the early departure of Governor Adriana Kugler. Trump has stated that this position will be temporarily filled, with a longer-term appointment expected in early 2026. That nominee is likely to favor lower interest rates—mirroring Trump’s preference for a more accommodative Fed.

Waller’s policy stance represents a clear contrast to Powell’s patient approach to rate changes. While Powell has pointed to a still-solid labor market and the need to assess the economic impact of Trump’s proposed tariffs, Waller has pushed for preemptive rate cuts, citing signs of cooling job growth. That divide has created friction between Powell and the Trump administration, with the former president repeatedly criticizing Powell for not acting aggressively enough.

Despite speculation, Waller has publicly maintained that he has not yet been approached by Trump. Speaking in July, he said, “If the president contacted me and said, ‘I want you to serve,’ I would do it,” but confirmed no such outreach had occurred.

Waller has also made clear his support for the Fed’s independence, calling it essential for economic stability. His willingness to accept criticism—whether from markets, politicians, or the public—adds to his appeal as a pragmatic and disciplined candidate for the role.

Divided Federal Reserve Stands Firm on Rates Despite Trump Pressure

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com
Key Points:
– The Fed kept interest rates steady at 4.25%–4.5% for the fifth time in a row, signaling ongoing caution.
– Governors Waller and Bowman dissented, citing concern over employment and downplaying inflation risks.
– Trump intensified public pressure on the Fed, demanding steep rate cuts ahead of the September meeting.

The Federal Reserve voted once again to hold interest rates steady, maintaining its benchmark range at 4.25% to 4.5% for the fifth consecutive meeting. The decision, made despite visible pressure from President Trump, revealed growing internal division among Fed leadership. Two of the central bank’s governors, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman—both Trump appointees—dissented, calling for a quarter-point rate cut. Their disagreement marks the first time in over 30 years that two sitting Fed governors have opposed a monetary policy decision.

The Fed’s decision underscores a delicate balancing act as it navigates slowing economic growth, sticky inflation, and intensifying political scrutiny. While GDP rebounded to 3% in the second quarter—after contracting by 0.5% in the first quarter—much of that surge was attributed to importers rushing to beat new Trump-imposed tariffs. Policymakers downgraded their economic outlook, describing growth as having “moderated,” a step down from June’s “solid” assessment.

Still, the labor market remains resilient. Fed officials reiterated their view of job growth as “solid,” even as they acknowledged inflation remains “somewhat elevated.” That language signals continued caution as the central bank tries to determine the longer-term effects of trade policy on consumer prices and employment.

The political pressure from the White House, however, is intensifying. President Trump, who has long pushed for lower rates to stimulate borrowing and reduce debt costs, called for a three-point rate cut just hours before the Fed’s latest announcement. He accused Fed Chair Jerome Powell of being too slow, saying, “Too late. Must now lower the rate.”

This public campaign has added to tensions between the executive branch and the Fed, raising concerns over the independence of the central bank. Powell has so far maintained a measured tone, calling for patience and more data before making any policy changes. Traders now expect the first rate cut to come in September, contingent on upcoming inflation and employment reports.

The dissent from Waller and Bowman highlights the philosophical divide within the Fed. Both argue that the inflationary impact of tariffs is likely temporary and should not delay monetary easing. Waller insists that trade-induced price spikes are one-offs, and that monetary policy should prioritize employment. Bowman, who previously voted against rate cuts over inflation concerns, now believes downside risks to jobs may outweigh inflation threats.

Meanwhile, Trump’s rhetoric around Powell has continued, even as he pulled back from directly threatening to fire the Fed chair. In a recent public appearance, he labeled Powell’s renovation of the Fed’s Washington, D.C. headquarters a wasteful project and questioned the chair’s leadership.

Looking ahead, the Fed faces mounting political and institutional pressure. GOP lawmakers are pushing for investigations and possible legislative changes to the Fed’s mandate. While immediate changes to the Federal Reserve Act remain unlikely, the calls for internal reviews and oversight reflect growing skepticism from Capitol Hill.

As inflation trends cool and political heat rises, the Fed’s upcoming September meeting may become a turning point. Until then, the central bank remains caught between data-driven caution and an administration demanding urgency.

10-Year Treasury Yield Climbs After Strong GDP Data as Fed Decision Looms

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

U.S. Treasury yields rose on Wednesday as stronger-than-expected economic growth reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve will maintain its current interest rate stance, even amid growing political pressure and global market sensitivities.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield climbed to 4.368%, reflecting rising investor confidence in the strength of the U.S. economy. The 2-year and 30-year yields also increased, closing at 3.904% and 4.904%, respectively. The moves followed a sharp rebound in second-quarter GDP, which showed the economy growing at an annualized rate of 3% — well above forecasts and reversing a 0.5% decline from the first quarter.

This robust data supports the case for keeping rates steady, at least in the near term, as the Federal Reserve continues to weigh inflation trends, labor market resilience, and long-term growth prospects. The Fed is widely expected to hold its benchmark interest rate between 4.25% and 4.5% during today’s announcement, but all eyes are on Chair Jerome Powell’s comments for insight into what comes next.

Adding complexity to the current environment is an ongoing effort by former President Donald Trump to pressure the Fed into lowering interest rates. Trump has criticized Powell’s leadership and floated the idea of replacing him in a potential second term. Despite this political noise, bond markets appear to be looking past the rhetoric, focusing instead on macroeconomic fundamentals. The continued rise in the 10-year yield suggests investors believe any leadership changes at the Fed would have little immediate impact on market direction.

Moreover, foreign holders of U.S. Treasuries could react to political instability or aggressive fiscal policy by offloading U.S. debt. This would push yields even higher, particularly if confidence in long-term economic or monetary policy erodes. The bond market’s sensitivity to global sentiment means that political pressure campaigns are unlikely to meaningfully influence interest rates without broader structural changes.

Adding further pressure is the threat of new tariffs, a cornerstone of Trump’s proposed economic agenda. Tariffs on imported goods would likely raise costs across the board, fueling inflation and reducing purchasing power domestically. As the U.S. imports many essential goods, any significant tariffs would shift costs onto consumers and businesses. This could complicate the Fed’s effort to keep core inflation within its 2% to 2.5% target range and delay any potential interest rate cuts.

For now, financial markets are signaling confidence in the Fed’s ability to manage the current environment, even if political rhetoric intensifies. Investors appear to be aligning their expectations with strong economic indicators and current inflation data rather than political speculation.

As the Federal Reserve’s decision looms, the upward movement in Treasury yields reflects not just optimism about U.S. growth, but also a more complex web of factors — from global capital flows and inflation expectations to political interference and international trade risks. The road ahead for monetary policy remains uncertain, but the market’s message is clear: economic fundamentals, not politics, will drive yields.

Lawsuit Pressures Fed to Open Doors: Could Transparency Shift Market Dynamics?

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com
Key Points:
– Azoria Capital sues the Federal Reserve, demanding public access to FOMC meetings.
– The lawsuit challenges the Fed’s closed-door practices under a 1976 federal law.
– Rising political pressure may reshape how investors engage with monetary policy decisions.

In a dramatic turn that could upend decades of Federal Reserve protocol, asset manager Azoria Capital filed a lawsuit Thursday demanding the central bank’s monetary policy meetings be opened to the public. The suit, lodged in a Washington, D.C. federal court, accuses the Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) of violating a 1976 transparency law by continuing to hold closed-door deliberations.

The timing couldn’t be more critical. The FOMC is set to meet July 29–30, and Azoria is seeking a temporary restraining order that would force those discussions—typically among the most market-sensitive of any U.S. institution—into the public sphere.

Behind the suit is James Fishback, Azoria Capital’s CEO and a figure closely tied to the Trump administration. Fishback contends the FOMC’s secrecy isn’t just outdated—it’s damaging. “By operating beyond public scrutiny, the FOMC is deliberately undermining the accountability envisioned by Congress,” the lawsuit claims, adding that real-time access to Fed discussions would give investors critical tools to navigate volatility sparked by monetary shifts.

The move comes as President Trump, currently touring the Fed’s $2.5 billion refurbishment project in Washington, escalates his criticism of central bank leadership. Trump has long accused Chair Jerome Powell and other officials of keeping interest rates unnecessarily high—claims echoed in Azoria’s filing, which alleges the Fed’s policy stance is “politically motivated” and intended to sabotage the administration’s economic agenda.

While the Fed hasn’t raised rates during Trump’s term so far, it has also declined to cut them, preferring to take a wait-and-see approach to assess the impact of new trade and fiscal policies. Yet that inaction has drawn ire from two sides—those demanding tighter control of inflation and those, like the administration, calling for looser credit to fuel growth.

Market reaction to the lawsuit has been cautious but curious. The idea of live-streamed or even partially open FOMC meetings could fundamentally alter the pace at which market participants digest rate signals. That shift could lead to sharper intraday volatility but also present opportunities for nimble traders and small-cap managers who thrive in environments of rapid change.

For investors in the middle market and beyond, the lawsuit underscores a growing theme: political and legal challenges are no longer background noise—they are becoming tradable events. Should Azoria’s case gain traction, it could pave the way for real-time transparency around monetary policy, potentially giving smaller firms an edge over traditional gatekeepers.

Whether or not the courts side with Azoria, the message is clear—investors are demanding a seat at the Fed’s table. And in a climate where every basis point counts, that demand might just get louder.

Inflation Ticks Up in June as Tariffs and Essentials Drive Prices Higher

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

U.S. consumers felt a noticeable pinch in June as inflation climbed to 2.7% annually, up from 2.4% in May. With global trade tensions escalating and new tariffs on imports taking effect, everyday essentials like food, healthcare, and shelter are becoming more expensive—leaving many Americans bracing for what’s next.

The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, released Tuesday, signals that inflationary pressures remain persistent despite previous signs of cooling. While prices for airfare and automobiles—both new and used—eased slightly, other critical categories saw continued increases.

One key concern behind June’s uptick: the return of global trade tariffs. Analysts point to rising prices in categories that are closely tied to international trade, such as furniture, appliances, and clothing. Household furnishings, for example, jumped 1% in June—the sharpest increase since early 2022—suggesting that tariffs are starting to filter through to consumer prices.

Recreation and apparel costs also edged higher, adding to speculation that the economic fallout from tariffs may only be getting started.

Food inflation continues to strain household budgets. Grocery prices rose another 0.3% in June, matching May’s increase and marking a 2.4% year-over-year rise. Meat prices, particularly beef, have remained stubbornly high. Ground beef now averages $6.10 per pound—nearly 10% more than this time last year. Steak prices soared even higher, with a 12.4% annual jump.

While egg prices have finally begun to fall—dropping 7.4% from May—their average price of $3.78 per dozen remains significantly higher than the $2.72 average just a year ago. Eating out also became more expensive, with restaurant prices climbing 0.4% in June and up 3.8% year-over-year.

Healthcare costs continue to rise at a steady pace. Medical services were up 0.6% from May and 3.4% from a year ago. Hospital services and nursing home care saw even larger increases, at 4.2% and 5.1% respectively. Health insurance premiums also edged higher, up 3.4% from last year.

Shelter costs—typically the largest portion of household expenses—rose another 0.2% last month and are now 3.8% higher than June 2024. However, increased apartment construction and cooling home prices may offer a slight reprieve in coming months.

There was at least one bright spot for consumers: gasoline. Prices at the pump rose 1% in June but remain 8.3% lower than a year ago. AAA reports a national average of $3.15 per gallon, down from $3.52 last summer.

Used car prices dipped 0.7% monthly, and new vehicle prices fell 0.3%—further signaling stabilization after pandemic-era surges.

With inflation still above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, economists expect the central bank to keep interest rates unchanged at its July meeting. The hotter-than-expected June data may also delay hopes for a rate cut in September.

For now, households are being forced to navigate a landscape where necessities cost more and relief remains limited—especially if tariffs continue to ripple through the economy.

Federal Reserve Policy Uncertainty Creates Middle Market Investment Opportunity

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The Federal Reserve is positioning for interest rate cuts in 2025, but internal divisions over timing and magnitude are creating uncertainty that savvy investors can capitalize on. Recent FOMC meeting minutes reveal a central bank walking a tightrope between economic resilience and emerging warning signs. With rates held at 4.25% to 4.5% for the fourth consecutive meeting, Fed officials acknowledge that “most participants assessed that some reduction” would be appropriate before year-end. The drivers are clear: job growth is moderating, consumer spending is weakening, and policymakers believe tariff-related inflation pressures will prove “temporary and modest.”

However, the timeline remains contentious. Some officials floated cuts as early as July’s meeting, while others advocate waiting until 2026. This split reflects conflicting economic signals that make the Fed’s job increasingly complex. The data tells a nuanced story—June’s job growth of 147,000 exceeded expectations, pushing unemployment down to 4.1%, yet consumer spending declined for two consecutive months, and retail sales dropped 0.9% in May, suggesting Americans are pulling back on discretionary purchases. President Trump’s evolving tariff strategy adds another layer of complexity, with fresh threats of 200% duties on pharmaceuticals and shifting trade negotiations creating policy uncertainty, though recent data shows tariffs haven’t significantly impacted consumer prices.

For investors focused on publicly traded middle market companies, this rate environment represents both challenge and opportunity. These firms—typically valued between $100 million and $3 billion—occupy a strategic sweet spot between agile private companies and rate-insulated mega-caps. Middle market companies are particularly sensitive to interest rate changes because they rely more heavily on traditional debt financing for growth, face direct impacts on borrowing costs and capital allocation decisions, and trade at valuation multiples that respond quickly to rate expectations.

If aggressive rate cuts materialize, middle market stocks could experience significant multiple expansion. Lower debt servicing costs would boost margins while improved investor sentiment drives capital toward growth-oriented sectors like technology, manufacturing, and specialty services. Conversely, if cuts are delayed or modest, capital costs remain elevated, pressuring margins and slowing expansion plans. In this scenario, companies with fortress balance sheets and disciplined cash management will outperform leveraged peers.

Despite internal disagreements, the Fed’s message is clear: they’re ready to act when data justifies it. This creates a compelling setup for investors willing to position ahead of the eventual pivot. Middle market stocks with strong fundamentals appear particularly attractive, as rates normalize and these companies could benefit from renewed investor appetite for undervalued growth stories, improved access to capital markets, and enhanced M&A activity as strategic buyers regain confidence.

The Fed’s cautious approach to rate cuts reflects genuine economic uncertainty, but history suggests that patient investors who position during periods of policy transition often capture the most upside. For middle market investors, the current environment offers a rare opportunity to acquire quality companies at reasonable valuations before the market fully prices in lower rates. The key is identifying businesses with strong competitive positions, manageable debt loads, and clear paths to growth once monetary conditions ease. The spotlight is about to return to middle market stocks—the question is whether investors will be ready.

Treasury Secretary Pushes Fed for Rate Cuts as Economic Crossroads Looms

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The battle lines are drawn between the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent intensifying pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell to slash interest rates amid mounting evidence of economic deceleration.

Speaking on Fox News Tuesday evening, Bessent delivered a pointed critique of Fed policy, suggesting rate cuts could come by September or “sooner” if the central bank acknowledges that tariffs haven’t triggered the inflationary surge many economists predicted. His comments reflect growing frustration within the Trump administration over the Fed’s cautious stance on monetary policy.

“I think that the criteria is that tariffs were not inflationary,” Bessent stated, adding a dig at Fed officials by claiming “tariff derangement syndrome happens even over at the Fed.” This rhetoric underscores the administration’s view that monetary policymakers are overreacting to trade policy changes.

The Treasury Secretary’s comments align with increasingly direct pressure from President Trump, who posted a scathing message on Truth Social targeting Powell directly: “Jerome—You are, as usual, ‘Too Late.’ You have cost the USA a fortune. Lower The Rate—by a lot!”

Trump’s demand for rate reductions of up to 3 percentage points represents an unprecedented level of presidential intervention in Federal Reserve policy discussions. The political stakes are particularly high given that Bessent is reportedly being considered as a potential replacement for Powell when the Fed Chair’s term expires in May 2026.

Supporting the administration’s case for monetary easing, fresh employment data revealed troubling trends in the job market. ADP reported that private employers unexpectedly eliminated 33,000 positions in June—the first monthly decline since March 2023. This sharp reversal from May’s modest 29,000 job gains fell well short of economist expectations for 98,000 new positions.

The disappointing private payroll data comes ahead of Thursday’s comprehensive employment report, where economists anticipate just 116,000 nonfarm payroll additions and an unemployment rate climbing to 4.3% from 4.2%. These projections suggest the labor market momentum that characterized much of 2024 may be waning.

The employment weakness has created visible splits within the Federal Reserve system. Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman have both signaled openness to July rate cuts, expressing greater concern about labor market deterioration than inflation risks.

However, regional Fed presidents remain divided. Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic advocated for patience, stating he wants to “wait and see how tariffs play out in the economy” before committing to policy changes. This cautious approach reflects concerns that tariff-driven price increases could prove more persistent than the Treasury Department suggests.

Powell himself struck a measured tone at a European Central Bank conference in Portugal, acknowledging that rate cuts would have already occurred “if not for the tariffs introduced by the Trump administration.” He noted that “essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence of the tariffs.”

Financial markets are pricing in approximately a 23% probability of a July rate cut, with odds rising to 96% for at least one reduction by September. These expectations could shift dramatically based on Thursday’s employment data and ongoing political pressure.

The Fed’s next meeting on July 28-29 represents a critical juncture where monetary policy, political pressure, and economic data will converge in determining the central bank’s course forward.

Mortgage Rates Fall Below 6.8%, Offering Little Spark for Home Sales

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com
Key Points:
– Mortgage rates fell to 6.77%, the lowest since May, as Treasury yields dipped.
– High rates and home prices continue to constrain homebuyer activity.
– Forecasters expect only modest rate relief through the end of the year.

Mortgage rates have inched lower for a fourth straight week, offering a glimmer of relief for homebuyers, but not enough to spark a major rebound in the housing market. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate dropped to 6.77% this week, its lowest level since May, down slightly from 6.81% last week, according to data from Freddie Mac. The average rate for a 15-year mortgage also dipped to 5.89% from 5.96%.

This modest decline comes as geopolitical tensions ease and Treasury yields soften. A recent ceasefire between Iran and Israel helped calm global markets, while dovish comments from Federal Reserve officials increased expectations that rate cuts could come as early as July. These factors contributed to a dip in the 10-year Treasury yield, which mortgage rates tend to closely follow.

Though the Federal Reserve has not moved to lower interest rates yet, speculation around future cuts is already influencing mortgage rate behavior. Fed Chair Jerome Powell reiterated during recent congressional testimony that while rate cuts are not imminent, the central bank remains open to adjusting policy if inflation continues to cool or if economic conditions shift.

Despite the recent rate movement, mortgage rates are still hovering near the upper end of a narrow range. Since mid-April, rates have fluctuated within a tight 15-basis-point band, limiting their ability to meaningfully impact housing affordability.

High borrowing costs, coupled with persistently high home prices, have continued to dampen housing activity. While pending home sales rose by 1.8% in May from the previous month, and 1.1% year-over-year, the overall housing market remains subdued. New home sales, in contrast, fell sharply last month, plunging 14% — the steepest monthly drop in three years, highlighting buyer hesitation in the current rate environment.

Mortgage applications for new purchases were essentially flat last week, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, while refinancing activity saw a modest 3% increase. The latter suggests that some homeowners are finding incentive in even small rate drops to restructure their existing loans, though the overall refinancing market remains a fraction of what it was during the ultra-low rate environment of the pandemic.

Looking ahead, economists expect only gradual improvement. The Mortgage Bankers Association projects rates to close out the year around 6.7%, while Fannie Mae anticipates a slightly more optimistic 6.5%. Either way, most forecasts suggest a slow decline rather than a swift return to significantly lower levels.

For prospective buyers, this means affordability may improve modestly, but major relief remains unlikely in the short term. With inflation, Federal Reserve policy, and global uncertainty still in play, the mortgage market is expected to remain cautious.

Fed in No Rush: Powell Stands Firm as Trump Pushes for Rate Cuts

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com
Key Points:
– Fed Chair Jerome Powell signals patience on interest rates amid economic and geopolitical uncertainty.
– Rising political pressure, including sharp criticism from President Trump, has not swayed the Fed’s cautious approach.
– Internal divisions within the Fed highlight uncertainty over the timing and necessity of potential rate cuts.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has reaffirmed the central bank’s cautious stance on interest rate policy, signaling that the Fed is in no rush to cut rates as it awaits greater clarity on the economic impact of rising tariffs and geopolitical uncertainty.

In testimony before lawmakers, Powell said the Federal Reserve is “well-positioned to wait” before adjusting monetary policy, citing the need for more data on how recent trade actions and inflation trends will evolve. His remarks come at a time of heightened pressure from the White House, with President Trump calling for sharp and immediate rate cuts, and some Fed officials themselves suggesting a more dovish pivot.

“Increases in tariffs are likely to push up prices and weigh on economic activity,” Powell told members of Congress. He emphasized the uncertainty surrounding how lasting these effects might be. “The inflationary impact could be transitory, but it could also prove more persistent. We simply don’t know yet.”

The Fed has held rates steady for multiple consecutive meetings, keeping its benchmark range between 4.25% and 4.5%, and has maintained a data-dependent approach as economic conditions shift. Powell reiterated that any future move—whether a rate cut or continued pause—will depend on evolving inflation data, labor market health, and broader global developments.

The conversation around monetary policy has grown increasingly politicized. President Trump has sharply criticized Powell and the Fed’s decision-making, calling for rates to be slashed significantly. In public statements and on social media, Trump has demanded rates between 1% and 2%, going so far as to insult Powell personally and muse about removing him from his post.

Despite these attacks, Powell stood firm. “We are focused on one thing: delivering a good economy for the benefit of the American people,” he said. “Anything else is a distraction.”

While Powell maintained a neutral tone, some members of the Fed’s policymaking committee have expressed more urgency. Governor Michelle Bowman recently argued for potential rate cuts in the near term, citing weaker consumer spending and softening labor trends. Others, including Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, have countered that the economy remains too strong to justify immediate easing.

The division is also evident in the Fed’s internal projections. A recent summary of economic projections revealed a split among officials: some anticipate two rate cuts this year, while others favor keeping rates unchanged for longer, especially amid risks of renewed inflation due to tariffs and potential oil price shocks.

International developments, including tensions in the Middle East and volatile energy markets, add another layer of complexity. Some analysts warn that a sustained rise in oil prices—driven by potential disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz—could reignite inflation pressures and delay any rate relief.

Despite the political noise and market speculation, Powell has made clear that the Fed’s course will be guided by economic fundamentals. With inflation moderating but not vanquished, and growth showing signs of deceleration, the central bank faces a delicate balancing act in the months ahead.

Interest Rates on Hold Again as Fed Maintains Forecast for Two Cuts

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady on Wednesday for the fourth consecutive meeting, keeping its benchmark rate in the range of 4.25% to 4.5% and reaffirming its forecast for two interest rate cuts before the end of 2025. The decision, which was supported unanimously by the Federal Open Market Committee, underscores the central bank’s cautious approach as it navigates a complex economic environment shaped by persistent inflation, slower growth expectations, and growing political pressure from the Trump administration.

Despite recent signs that inflation has eased modestly, the Fed raised its inflation outlook for the year. Officials now expect core PCE inflation, the central bank’s preferred metric, to end 2025 at 3.1%, up from a previous estimate of 2.8%. That adjustment reflects concerns that tariffs and other policy shifts under President Trump’s administration may continue to elevate prices and complicate the Fed’s path to achieving its 2% inflation target. At the same time, economic growth projections were lowered, with the Fed now anticipating annual GDP growth of 1.4%, down from 1.7%. The unemployment rate is also expected to climb slightly, from 4.4% to 4.5%, signaling a potential slowdown in the labor market as higher borrowing costs weigh on hiring and business investment.

The Fed’s statement noted that “uncertainty about the economic outlook has diminished, but remains elevated,” marking a shift in tone from earlier warnings that uncertainty was rising. While this change suggests that some risks may be stabilizing, policymakers remain sharply divided over the appropriate course of action. Eight officials project two rate cuts this year, while seven expect no cuts at all. Two members see a single cut, and two others anticipate as many as three. This internal split reflects the complexity of balancing inflation management with support for economic growth, particularly in a volatile political climate.

President Trump, who has been increasingly vocal in his criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, once again expressed dissatisfaction with the central bank’s approach. Hours before the rate announcement, Trump took aim at Powell in front of reporters, joking that he might appoint himself to the Fed, claiming, “Maybe I should go to the Fed; I’d do a much better job.” He continued his push for lower rates by declaring that inflation is no longer a concern, stating, “We have no inflation, we have only success.” This political pressure has not gone unnoticed, but Powell and other Fed officials appear focused on maintaining their independence and credibility by anchoring decisions in economic data rather than political narratives.

Markets responded calmly to the announcement, with the S&P 500 rising 0.18% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average gaining 0.21%. Investors largely interpreted the Fed’s decision as a sign that rate cuts remain on the table, just not at the pace the White House may want. For now, the Fed continues to walk a careful line, seeking to bring inflation down without derailing a fragile recovery. With just months left in the year and political tensions rising, all eyes will remain on Powell and the FOMC as they weigh their next move.

Trump Pressures Fed for Deep Rate Cut, but Strong Jobs Data Dims the Odds

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com
Key Points:
– Trump called for a full-point rate cut, but the Fed is unlikely to move after May’s better-than-expected jobs report.
– The U.S. economy added 139,000 jobs in May, with unemployment steady at 4.2%, easing fears of a labor slowdown.
– Fed officials remain focused on inflation, signaling no near-term rate cuts despite mounting political pressure.

President Donald Trump ramped up pressure on the Federal Reserve Friday, calling for a dramatic interest rate cut just as new data showed the U.S. labor market remains relatively strong. Trump’s plea came via a social media post in which he declared “AMERICA IS HOT” and pushed Fed Chair Jerome Powell to slash rates by a full percentage point—what he referred to as “rocket fuel” for the economy.

The timing of Trump’s demand, however, clashed with Friday’s release of the May jobs report, which showed the U.S. economy added 139,000 nonfarm payrolls—comfortably ahead of economists’ expectations of 126,000. Unemployment held steady at 4.2%, defying fears of a sharp slowdown. Wage growth also ticked higher, with average hourly earnings rising 0.4% month-over-month and 3.9% over the past year, indicating that worker demand remains solid despite broader concerns about economic deceleration.

Market watchers and economists were quick to point out that the report effectively shuts the door on the possibility of a rate cut at the Fed’s upcoming June meeting. “The labor market is not cracking yet, even though it is decelerating,” said Brij Khurana, a fixed income portfolio manager at Wellington Management. He noted that while earlier in the week, weak private payroll data from ADP raised questions about a potential cut, the stronger-than-expected government report all but “takes away June.”

Trump, who has repeatedly branded Powell as “Too Late” in an effort to blame the Fed chair for past inflation missteps, has increasingly turned the central bank into a political target. On Friday, he argued the Fed is “costing our country a fortune” by keeping borrowing costs elevated, citing the European Central Bank’s series of rate cuts as a model for what the U.S. should emulate.

But the Fed has held its benchmark rate steady in 2025 after lowering it by a full percentage point at the end of last year, citing uncertainty around economic policy and inflation risks. Recent commentary from Fed officials suggests the central bank is far more concerned with reining in inflation than stimulating employment. “I see greater upside risks to inflation at this juncture,” said Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler, adding that current policy should remain unchanged unless inflation pressures abate.

Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid echoed those sentiments, warning that tariffs—some introduced by the Trump administration—could create further inflationary pressure. “While the tariffs are likely to push up prices, the extent of the increase is not certain,” Schmid noted, cautioning against prematurely loosening policy.

Still, some divergence within the Fed is emerging. Governor Chris Waller, speaking in South Korea last weekend, argued that any tariff-driven inflation would be temporary and should not alter the Fed’s long-term stance. “I support looking through any tariff effects on near-term inflation when setting the policy rate,” he said.

Yet with job gains still solid and inflation risks lingering, most analysts believe the Fed will remain on hold through the summer. Trump’s demand for a jumbo cut may resonate with some voters, but for now, the data simply doesn’t back him up.

Treasury Yields Slide Sharply as Market Bets Heavily on September Fed Rate Cut

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

U.S. Treasury yields fell significantly on Wednesday as soft economic data increased expectations for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by September. The decline was driven by weaker reports on private-sector job growth and a contraction in service-sector activity, leading traders to price in a more aggressive pace of monetary easing.

Yields across the curve, particularly from the 2-year to the 10-year notes, dropped to their lowest levels since early May. The benchmark 10-year yield declined to 4.35%, highlighting the bond market’s strong reaction to signs of slowing economic momentum.

The first catalyst came from the ADP employment report, which showed the slowest pace of job creation in two years. That was followed by the Institute for Supply Management’s services index, which signaled contraction for the first time in nearly a year. Together, these indicators pointed to a potential softening in the labor market and raised concerns about overall economic resilience.

Market participants increased their bets that the Fed could start cutting rates as early as September, with the probability of a move rising to around 95%, up from just over 80% the day before. Additionally, expectations for two rate cuts by the end of 2025—likely in October and December—also gained traction.

Adding to the market’s reaction was a sharp decline in oil prices, spurred by indications that Saudi Arabia may be open to increasing oil production. Falling energy prices helped reinforce the idea that inflation pressures could be easing, giving the Fed more room to support the economy with lower interest rates.

Despite these signals, not all data pointed to weakness. A separate government report released Tuesday showed that job openings increased in April, and hiring also improved. Furthermore, within the ISM services report, the employment component showed unexpected strength, and the prices paid index rose to its highest level since late 2022. These mixed signals reflect the complexity of the current economic environment and suggest that the Fed will continue to weigh multiple indicators before making a policy decision.

Recent volatility in rate expectations followed a series of mixed economic releases throughout the spring. While rate cut hopes grew late last year, persistent inflation and stronger-than-expected economic activity had cooled those expectations in recent months. May saw the Treasury market lose 1%, as measured by a Bloomberg index, though it remains up 2.1% year-to-date through early June.

All eyes now turn to the upcoming U.S. government employment report for May, due Friday. Economists expect a payroll gain of 130,000 jobs, down from April’s increase of 177,000, with the unemployment rate forecast to remain at 4.2%. A notable rise in the jobless rate could give the Fed additional justification to pivot toward rate cuts.

Investors will continue to monitor labor market indicators, inflation data, and Fed commentary as they navigate an uncertain path for interest rates heading into the second half of 2025.