Category: Markets

FedEx Gains Market Share Amid Rival Struggles

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Shares of FedEx jumped over 5% on Thursday after the shipping giant reported better-than-expected fiscal first quarter results. The stock rally comes amid a broader market selloff, with investors cheering FedEx’s improved profitability and outlook.

FedEx earned $4.55 per share last quarter, handily beating analyst forecasts of $3.70. Though revenue declined 6.5% year-over-year to $21.7 billion, the company boosted its operating margin to 7.3%, surpassing expectations.

The strong quarter was driven by effective cost-cutting under CEO Raj Subramaniam and higher shipping volumes as key rivals dealt with challenges. FedEx gained U.S. market share in recent months which it expects to retain.

Management raised full-year EPS guidance to a range of $17.00 to $18.50, up from prior outlook of $16.50 to $18.50. The company also announced new demand surcharges for the holiday peak season and a January rate increase.

FedEx continued benefiting from its DRIVE cost savings program which seeks $1.8 billion in total reductions. Steps like reducing flights, realigning staff and shifting to one daily delivery wave boosted efficiency.

The Ground segment was a standout with a 59% jump in operating income as volumes improved. The Express unit grew operating income 18% despite lower revenue. But the Freight division saw income drop 26% on reduced shipments.

The outperformance comes as labor negotiations weighed on service levels at rival UPS. UPS disclosed it lost 1 million packages daily to other carriers, which FedEx said it captured 400,000 of. The bankruptcy of trucking company Yellow also benefited FedEx.

Demand for logistics and shipping services remains resilient despite economic uncertainty. And challenges at competitors created an opening for FedEx to flex its network strength and snatch market share. It expects to maintain most new volumes.

Take a moment to take a look at a few shipping and logistics companies covered by Noble Capital Markets Senior Analyst Michael Heim.

The results suggest FedEx has turned a corner after recent struggles with costs and service issues. The company’s turnaround plan is clearly bearing fruit. And investors have taken notice, bidding the stock price higher after the earnings beat.

FedEx shares have now rebounded nearly 20% from 52-week lows hit in June. The stock remains down 25% year-to-date amid broader market volatility. But it has outpaced the S&P 500 recently.

Thursday’s post-earnings pop provides encouragement that FedEx may sustain its momentum if execution remains solid. But the company still faces macro uncertainty and must continue improving productivity.

The holiday quarter is crucial for delivery firms like FedEx. The company aims to avoid last year’s service shortfalls. Management expressed confidence its initiatives will enable strong peak season performance.

While risks remain, FedEx has proactively adapted its network for holiday demand spikes. And it should reap continued benefits from rival struggles if recent market share gains stick.

Ongoing cost discipline also remains key. As higher rates kick in, boosting revenue, FedEx must maintain focus on trimming unnecessary expenses. Investors want to see margins continue expanding.

The quarterly beat suggests the shipping titan is making strides in its turnaround bid under new leadership. If FedEx sustains stronger operational execution, its stock price could continue recovering lost ground.

But the company must keep innovating and finding efficiency gains in the rapidly evolving logistics arena. Satisfying customers and shareholders means continually improving services and profitability, even in a weakened economic climate.

Cisco to Acquire Cybersecurity Firm Splunk in $28 Billion Cash Deal

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Cisco Systems announced Thursday it will acquire cybersecurity company Splunk in an all-cash deal valued at around $28 billion. The acquisition, Cisco’s largest ever, aims to expand its presence in the security software market and boost recurring revenue streams.

Under the agreement, Cisco will pay $157 per share to buy Splunk, representing a premium of over 20% to Splunk’s recent stock price. Splunk shares jumped 21% on the news, while Cisco stock slipped nearly 5%.

The network gear giant has been on an acquisition spree lately to grow its software offerings. Splunk provides data analytics software and services focused on security, internet of things and infrastructure monitoring.

Take a look at One Stop Systems Inc., a company that designs and manufactures innovative AI Transportable edge computing modules and systems, and data recording software for AI workflows.

Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins said Splunk’s data capabilities combined with Cisco’s network telemetry presents an opportunity for more AI-enabled security solutions. The deal is expected to close in late 2024 after clearing regulatory approvals.

Cisco aims to leverage Splunk’s analytics tools to improve threat detection and better predict cyber risks. Splunk’s software is used by over 9,000 customers including over 90 of the Fortune 100. The acquisition provides Cisco an avenue into more subscription-based software sales.

The company said it expects the deal to be cash flow positive and accretive to gross margins within the first year post-closing. Cisco forecasts the acquisition boosting adjusted earnings per share starting in the second year.

Splunk CEO Gary Steele will join Cisco’s executive leadership team once the merger is finalized and report directly to Robbins. Together the companies aim to become a leading force in security infrastructure.

The acquisition reflects Cisco’s ongoing shift toward software and subscription revenue. It provides both an expanded customer base and advanced analytics capabilities around security, core focuses for Cisco. The company will fund the sizable purchase through cash reserves and new debt financing.

Fed Keeping Rates Higher Despite Pausing Hikes For Now

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged on Wednesday but projected keeping them at historically high levels into 2024 and 2025 to ensure inflation continues falling from four-decade highs.

The Fed held its benchmark rate steady in a target range of 5.25-5.5% following four straight 0.75 percentage point hikes earlier this year. But officials forecast rates potentially peaking around 5.6% by year-end before only gradually declining to 5.1% in 2024 and 4.6% in 2025.

This extended timeframe for higher rates contrasts with prior projections for more significant cuts starting next year. The outlook underscores the Fed’s intent to keep monetary policy restrictive until inflation shows clearer and more persistent signs of cooling toward its 2% target.

“We still have some ways to go,” said Fed Chair Jerome Powell in a press conference, explaining why rates must remain elevated amid still-uncertain inflation risks. He noted the Fed has hiked rates to restrictive levels more rapidly than any period in modern history.

The Fed tweaked its economic forecasts slightly higher but remains cautious on additional tightening until more data arrives. The latest projections foresee economic growth slowing to 1.5% next year with unemployment ticking up to 4.1%.

Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, is expected to fall from 4.9% currently to 2.6% by late 2023. But officials emphasized inflation remains “elevated” and “unacceptably high” despite moderating from 40-year highs earlier this year.

Consumer prices rose 8.3% in August on an annual basis, down from the 9.1% peak in June but well above the Fed’s 2% comfort zone. Further cooling is needed before the Fed can declare victory in its battle against inflation.

The central bank is proceeding carefully, pausing rate hikes to assess the cumulative impact of its rapid tightening this year while weighing risks. Additional increases are likely but the Fed emphasized future moves are data-dependent.

“In coming months policy will depend on the incoming data and evolving outlook for the economy,” Powell said. “At some point it will become appropriate to slow the pace of increases” as the Fed approaches peak rates.

For now, the Fed appears poised to hold rates around current levels absent a dramatic deterioration in inflation. Keeping rates higher for longer indicates the Fed’s determination to avoid loosening prematurely before prices are fully under control.

Powell has reiterated the Fed is willing to overtighten to avoid mistakes of the 1970s and see inflation fully tamed. Officials continue weighing risks between high inflation and slower economic growth.

“Restoring price stability while achieving a relatively modest increase in unemployment and a soft landing will be challenging,” Powell conceded. “No one knows whether this process will lead to a recession.”

Nonetheless, the Fed chief expressed optimism that a severe downturn can still be avoided amid resilient household and business spending. The labor market also remains strong with unemployment at 3.7%.

But the housing market continues to soften under the weight of higher rates, a key channel through which Fed tightening slows the economy. And risks remain tilted to the downside until inflation demonstrably falls closer to target.

For markets, clarity that rates will stay elevated through 2024 reduces uncertainty. Stocks bounced around after the Fed’s announcement as investors processed the guidance. The path forward depends on incoming data, but the Fed appears determined to keep rates higher for longer.

The Perfect Storm Brewing in US Housing

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

A perfect storm is brewing in the US housing market. Mortgage rates have surged above 7% just as millennials, the largest generation, reach peak homebuying age. This collision of rising interest rates and unmet demand is causing substantial disruption, as seen in the sharp decline in home sales, cautious builders and a looming affordability crisis that threatens the broader economy.

Mortgage rates have taken off as the Federal Reserve aggressively raises interest rates to fight inflation. The average 30-year fixed rate recently hit 7.18%, according to Freddie Mac, the highest level since 2001. This has severely hampered housing affordability and demand. Fannie Mae, the mortgage finance giant, forecasts total home sales will drop to 4.8 million this year, the slowest pace since 2011 when the housing market was still recovering from the Great Recession.

Fannie Mae expects sales to struggle through 2024 as rates remain elevated. It predicts the US economy will enter a recession in early 2024, further dragging down the housing market. Home prices are also likely to drop as high rates impede sales. This could hurt consumer confidence and discretionary spending, considering the critical role housing plays in household wealth.

Higher rates have pumped up monthly mortgage payments and made homes less affordable. Take a $500,000 home purchased with a 20% down payment. At a 2.86% mortgage rate two years ago, the monthly payment would have been $1,656. With rates now at 7.18%, that same home has a monthly cost of $3,077, according to calculations by Axios. That 87% payment surge makes purchasing unattainable for many buyers.

These affordability challenges are hitting just as millennials reach peak homebuying age. The largest cohorts of this generation were born in the late 1980s and early 1990s, making them between 32 and 34 years old today. That’s when marriage, childbearing and demand for living space typically accelerate.

However, homebuilders have been reluctant to significantly ramp up construction with rates so high. Housing starts experienced a significant decline of 11.3% in August, according to Census Bureau data, driven by a decline in apartment buildings. Single-family starts dipped 4.3% to an annual pace of 941,000, 16% below the average from mid-2020 to mid-2022. Homebuilder sentiment has also plunged, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

Take a look at Orion Group Holdings Inc., a leading specialty construction company servicing the infrastructure, industrial and building sectors.

This pullback in new construction comes even as there is strong interest from millennials and other buyers. Though mortgage rates moderated the overheated housing market earlier this year, national home prices remain just below their all-time highs, up 13.5% from two years ago, according to the S&P Case-Shiller index.

Some analysts say the only solution is to significantly boost supply. But that seems unlikely with builders cautious and financing costs high. The housing crisis has no quick fix and will continue to be an anchor on the broader economy. Millennials coming of age and mortgage rates spiraling upwards have sparked a perfect storm, broken the housing market, and darkened the country’s economic outlook.

U.S. National Debt Tops $33 Trillion

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The U.S. national debt surpassed $33 trillion for the first time ever this week, hitting $33.04 trillion according to the Treasury Department. This staggering sum exceeds the size of the entire U.S. economy and equals about $100,000 per citizen.

For investors, the ballooning national debt raises concerns about future tax hikes, inflation, and government spending cuts that could impact markets. While the debt level itself may seem abstract, its trajectory has real implications for portfolios.

Over 50% of the current national debt has accumulated since 2019. Massive pandemic stimulus programs, tax cuts, and a steep drop in tax revenues all blew up the deficit during Covid-19. Interest costs on the debt are also piling up.

Some level of deficit spending was needed to combat the economic crisis. But years of expanding deficits have brought total debt to the highest level since World War II as a share of GDP.

With debt now exceeding the size of the economy, there is greater risk of reduced economic output from crowd-out effects. High debt levels historically hamper GDP growth.

Economists worry that high debt will drive up borrowing costs for consumers and businesses as the government competes for limited capital. The Congressional Budget Office projects interest costs will soon become the largest government expenditure as rates rise.

Higher interest rates will consume more tax revenue just to pay interest, leaving less funding available for programs and services. Taxes may have to be raised to cover these costs.

Rising interest costs will also put more pressure on the Federal Reserve to keep rates low and monetize the debt through quantitative easing. This could further feed inflation.

If interest costs spiral, government debt could eventually reach unsustainable levels and require restructuring. But well before that, the debt overhang will influence policy and markets.

As debt concerns mount, investors may rotate to inflation hedges like gold and real estate. The likelihood of higher corporate and individual taxes could hit equity valuations and consumer spending.

But government spending cuts to social programs and defense would also ripple through the economy. Leaner budgets would provide fiscal headwinds reducing growth.

With debt limiting stimulus options, creative monetary policy would be needed in the next recession. More radical measures by the Fed could introduce volatility.

While the debt trajectory is troubling, a crisis is not imminent. Still, prudent investors should account for fiscal risks in their portfolio positioning and outlook. The ballooning national debt will shape policy and markets for years to come.

How to Use Small Caps to Diversify Your Portfolio

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Small cap stocks are an often overlooked opportunity for regular investors. While most focus their attention on big household names like Apple and Microsoft, small caps can provide key benefits to your portfolio. In this article, we’ll look at what makes small cap stocks different, reasons to consider investing in them, and how best to include them in your overall investing strategy.

What are Small Cap Stocks?

Small cap simply refers to small capitalization companies. They have a total market value or capitalization that is relatively small. In the U.S. stock market, small caps are generally defined as companies with a market cap between $300 million to $2 billion. Meanwhile, large cap stocks are the big boys like Walmart with market caps over $10 billion.

The most obvious trait of small caps is that they are younger, newer companies. Think of spunky young upstarts versus mature bluechip firms. Many small caps are still working to find their footing and carve out their niche, whereas large caps dominate established sectors.

This gives small caps more room for rapid growth, but also higher risk. Their smaller size means limited resources, unproven track records, and uncertainty around whether they will achieve scale. Volatility comes with the territory.

But with greater risk can also come greater reward if you pick the right small caps. For investors, this asset class offers plenty of overlooked potential.

So why should investors even bother with small caps? A few good reasons:

Growth Potential

The biggest appeal of small caps is their high growth potential. While large established companies have already reached maturity, small caps are still in their early stages where rapid expansion is possible. Getting in early on promising small cap stocks can lead to massive returns over time.

For example, buying shares of a company like Etsy or Shopify in their early days as small caps could have generated 10x or even 100x returns for patient investors as those companies grew to multi-billion dollar valuations. The chance to identify and own the next Apple or Amazon while their market cap is just a few hundred million dollars is an enormous opportunity.

Of course, investing in any small cap is high risk and many will not succeed. But a diversified portfolio of thoughtfully selected small caps tilted towards sectors with strong tailwinds can unlock tremendous growth. Taking some calculated risks while sticking to sound fundamentals is key.

Diversification

Owning small caps is a great way to diversify a portfolio heavy on mature large cap stocks. Because small caps operate in different niches and have unique risk factors, their stock prices behave differently than large caps. This means including small caps can actually lower overall portfolio risk and volatility.

Small caps also shine at different points of the economic cycle than large caps. When growth is sluggish, investors tend to favor large caps for their stability. But in periods of economic expansion and bull markets, small caps tend to deliver stronger returns. This cyclicality means pairing both provides more balanced exposure across market environments.

And importantly, the returns of small caps have low correlation to large caps. This low correlation is a crucial benefit, since it smooths out portfolio performance over time. For example, when large cap stocks are declining, small caps may be stable or even rising. This illustrates why allocating 20-30% of a portfolio to high-quality small caps can improve overall diversification.

Innovation Appeal

Another major reason to invest in small caps is the innovation factor. Small companies are often pioneers in developing cutting-edge technologies, medicines, software platforms and other game-changing solutions. Unlike large caps, small caps have agility and risk tolerance to focus intensely on bringing new ideas to market.

For example, most breakthrough biotech and pharma firms start out as small caps, racing to get FDA approval for their patented drugs. Software firms disrupting industries also tend to be younger and more nimble. And emerging sectors like green energy and electric vehicles are being driven by upstart small cap companies.

Getting in early with innovative small caps developing disruptive technologies provides exposure to future trends that large caps simply don’t offer. It allows investors to tap into new niches before they become mainstream. And investing alongside visionary founders and entrepreneurs in new fields generates exciting upside.

Of course, betting on unproven technologies and markets comes with risk. But a basket approach of diversifying across several promising small caps in high-potential areas prudently taps into this appeal. Backing innovation via calculated small cap investments generates asymmetric reward versus risk.

Investing Strategies with Small Caps

The most popular approach is investing in small cap mutual funds or ETFs. This provides instant diversification across dozens or hundreds of small cap stocks. Low cost index funds like the Vanguard Small-Cap ETF are a great starting point because they track the overall small cap market at low cost. Actively managed small cap funds aim to outperform by utilizing research and stock picking. Either method offers a simple way to add small cap exposure.

For a more active approach, investors can hand pick individual small cap stocks. This requires rigorous research to identify quality companies within attractive niches that have strong leadership, a durable competitive advantage, and metrics pointing to high growth potential.

Since small caps carry more risk, it’s crucial to diversify and size positions appropriately when buying individual stocks. Use them to complement a core portfolio of sturdy large caps. Blending individual stock picks with a small cap index core allows concentrating assets in your highest conviction ideas. Overweighting small caps beyond 20-30% of your total portfolio exposure adds undue risk.

While small caps demand more research and carry greater risk, they can supercharge portfolio returns. Blending small caps strategically with large caps allows investors to capitalize on this untapped potential while minimizing the downside.

Newer Traders Have A Lot Going For Them; That Could Be a Problem

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com

Deciding if Buy and Hold or Trading is Best for You?

New investors today have powerful tools that may exceed what was available even at institutions just a decade ago. This provides a leg-up on those of us who had to cover high trading fees, buy and sell, before we made a dime. Then, there is today’s information availability. Stock prices were printed in the morning from the day before close; that is how investors were updated. Then there is all the other up-to-the-minute information from your broker and company data and research from platforms like Channelchek and others.  

This can be both helpful and overwhelming to a new investor deciding where to focus and what type of investment style suits them. 

The least expensive discount brokers, when I bought my very first hundred shares cost $100 in and $100 out ($200 round trip). So exceeding two dollars per share on each round lot (orders not in lots of 100 cost more) was necessary to break even. Between this and the non-current price information, a buy-and-hold position was the only position that made much sense.

Now, transacting is just point-and-shoot. Even bid versus ask spreads are minuscule. This makes it more practical for an investor to decide not to ride out a perceived slide even if they have confidence that it will reverse later. Instead, with the ability to unload before an expected trouble spot develops, an investor that waits instead, may become angry with themselves that they held and their account value has declined.  

Today’s set of circumstances has a lot more investors acting like traders and trying to time the market. The tolerance for seeing a holding is up, say 6% over a period of time, only to be down 2% over a longer period, then up 7% down the road is much more rare. Newer investors don’t have as much price swing tolerance, they want to take a profit before the market drops. Some then expect as much as a 20% dip that they can buy back into.

Of course, hitting the near tops and low points to maximize profit is unlikely. And trying to do it usually leads to frustration from missed opportunity when it doesn’t then move in the direction that would benefit the trader.

So is it prudent to try to time price moves up and down and trade the shares, to take advantage of so much information? Or, should they do research, find companies they expect will do well, and then look for a good entry point, not even thinking about an exit unless it begins to behave outside of expectations?

This is particularly relevant in a year where the market is up above average, which means if it gravitates back to its mean average annual return, the overall market will end the year lower than it is now.  

There is no one simple answer, but a practical approach is to have core holdings to take the long ride with, and then view other stocks separately that maybe move a little faster, up and down, that are for  timing moves. This leads to diversification in holding periods. But, in order to work, one has to not forget or give up on the individual strategies of the two investment styles that are to be thought of separately, perhaps even in two different accounts.

But when does one sell from the buy-and-hold portion, is there a trigger? And what is the trigger with the assets in the trading portion?

The same idea could apply to both sets of assets. Set the parameters for every trade and stick to them. Take a profit or a loss when the parameter is met, regardless of what you may feel at that time. Good decisions and “if-this, then-that” thinking is best when not in the heat of battle. Plan your trade and trade your plan regardless. In some cases it may have worked out better if you had acted differently than planned, but if it is based on realistic expectations or probabilities, then chances are, over the years it will reap greater rewards.

This ongoing reassessment, regardless of expected holding time,  has the investor set levels, both above and below a stock’s current price, that, when struck causes the investor to evaluate. That evaluation may simply be asking oneself has anything changed since I set this parameter? If not, act. It may also be asking oneself, is this the best use of my capital right now, or is there a better place that I believe has the potential to outperform the current holding?

Take Away

An investment portfolio plan with meaningful rules to follow helps reduce the anxiety of investing. Whether 90% is earmarked buy-and-hold, or 90% is to achieve short-term gains and avoid big drawdowns, the trades must be managed to a pre-thought-out sensible plan. The expectation then is that none of the positions will work out perfectly timed, but as a whole, over a long enough period, the investor will be better off than if they had no guidelines or fewer boundaries.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channechek

Hurricane Damage at the Individual Stock and Industry Level

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com
Image Credit: Darryl Kenyon (Flickr)

Avoiding a Hurricane May Mean Adjusting Your Portfolio

Like most people that live in Florida, I usually first learn of approaching hurricanes from concerned family members up North. My reaction is probably different than others. My first thoughts on rare news events is to ask myself, “is this bullish or bearish?” When it comes to hurricanes, there is an answer – like most events that impact stocks, the answer is, “it depends.” Getting out of the way of a hurricane could also mean a slight adjustment to holdings.

I will mention that the toll on life and property of natural disasters, or any travesty, is not lost on me. But as investors, we must control the risks that we can and look for the rainbow in situations we have no control over.

Economic Damage

Dubravko Lakos-Bujas, JP Morgan’s head of U.S. equity and quantitative strategy, shared insights on the economic impact of hurricanes a couple of years before hurricane Ian struck Naples Florida. But the value of the information has not changed. “Major U.S. hurricane landfalls have had less significant impact on aggregate market performance (~2% decline) given the subsequent pick-up in disaster-induced public and private spending,” Mr. Lakos-Bujas said. “The most significant impact on equity performance is seen at the stock and sub-industry level.”

Money May Grow on Trees

Does your portfolio contain Orange Growers? Gulf Coast REITS? Companies that operate in the affected area of the storm see a loss in production as they close up and, at the same time, a jump in costs as they make repairs. These stocks are most likely to underperform. For those companies in the repair business, for example, lumber and roofing supplies, they could generate business whether a storm actually makes landfall or not. The rebuilding effort will cost insurance companies with a concentration of insured properties in the path of a storm.

Lakos-Bujas warned, “The underperformance should be concentrated in insurance (i.e. property loss coverage), and companies with Hotels, Restaurants, Leisure, & Airlines (i.e. based on occupancy/traffic, rising commodity costs), Telecom and Cable (i.e. capital expenditure tied to repair and potentially lower revenue per unit), and Industrials (i.e. rising input costs, disruption in production and transportation) depending on geographic footprint.”

Solutions tend to gravitate toward problems, even if those problems include damage and destruction. This is a good thing, it is capitalism working in a way that helps others. This help is profitable and could make some sectors outperformers. “The largest outperformers include industries tied to replacing and/or repairing existing capital stock (i.e. Energy Equipment & Services, Communication Equipment, Autos), transportation and logistics (i.e. Distribution, Air Freight, Trading Companies), and construction (Basic Materials and Engineering),” Lakos-Bujas’ said.

The analysis of the JP Morgan equity strategist is based on a study of 31 hurricanes between 1965 and 2014, which had a combined cost of $520 billion. Two o the large storms, Irma and Harvey, represent a high percentage of the total cost.

“Based on current unofficial damage estimates for hurricanes Harvey and Irma, losses this year are expected to exceed 50% of combined costs over the last 50 years,” he said. “These outsized losses could currently drive more pronounced moves at the stock and sub-industry levels than historically.”

So, a person may live across the country or around the globe from the storm and still feel an impact. For historical context, the S&P 500 (^GSPC) has seen an average decline of 2% in the week following a hurricane’s passing.

Rebuilding Benefits Stockholdings Differently

Much of the backstop in the economy and the markets is based on the idea that rebuilding after a storm is stimulative. Households and businesses suddenly jam work that needed to be done into a short time span and spend much more on what could’ve been routine maintenance. Economists say that the near-term impact on GDP is a net positive once the hurricanes pass. A lasting positive impact occurs if a natural disaster brings about rebuilding that improves on the existing structures or facilities instead of just restoring them to their previous state.”

One caveat is that labor markets have been tight. Most other years, roofers and builders flocked to the highest bidders and the flow of money helped speed the rebuilding process. If there are currently not sufficient human resources, this will push costs up more than they otherwise would have. Unfortunately, there continue to be reports of labor shortages in many industries, including construction. Fox Business News reported on August 28, 2023, “America’s shortage of skilled workers is impacting the ability of businesses in the construction and manufacturing industries to staff their businesses and complete jobs on time.” This situation could certainly slow any needed rebuild.

As wildfires in Hawaii have shown us, funds for rebuilding efforts are further complicated by politics. Three of the Floridian candidates for president, including the governor, are from a party that is not in power

Take Away

Opportunity comes in all forms. This includes opportunity to avoid a dip in some of your holdings, and an opportunity to capitalize on increased company profits this includes disasters of all types. Weather events can impact stock performance of individual companies and industry subsets. At roughly a negative 2% average, the overall market could impact investors over the following 30 days at a rate that feels like normal monthly swings.

As a positive thought, after the storm clears, come join Channelchek, Noble Capital Markets and an expected 150 public companies companies all converging on South Florida in early December for NobleCon19, the investment conference where you’ll discover actionable investment ideas inspired directly from company management. Learn more here.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.wtwco.com/en-us/insights/2023/08/how-is-labor-shortage-impacting-the-construction-industry

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/americas-skilled-worker-shortage-impacting-construction-manufacturing-industries

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hurricane-irma-mean-stocks-105038376.html

The Week Ahead – Look Out For Light Trading and Pre-Holiday Volatility

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com

Heading Into the Unofficial End of Summer, Powell Gave the Market a Lot to Think About

The last “unofficial” week of summer will likely be characterized by light trading, which could amplify volatility. This week follows what is viewed by many as a more hawkish tone than expected by Fed Chair Powell on Friday. The next FOMC meeting is not until September 19–20; that is a long time to obsess over every economic number, and there are many key numbers that will be released this week. Investors will be watching the labor report, alongside the PCE price index, personal income and spending data, JOLTS job openings, ISM Manufacturing PMI, and the second estimate of Q2 GDP growth.

Monday 8/28

•              10:30 AM ET, the Dallas Fed Manufacturing Index is expected to post a 16th straight negative number, at a steep minus 21.0 in August versus minus 20.0 in July. The survey asks manufacturers whether output, employment, orders, prices and other indicators increased, decreased or remained unchanged over the previous month. Responses are aggregated into an index where positive values generally indicate growth while negative values generally indicate contraction.

Tuesday 8/29

•              10:00 AM ET, Consumer Confidence is expected to dip slightly in August, at a consensus 116.5 versus July’s 117.0. This report has exceeded not only the consensus in the last three reports but the full consensus range as well.

•              10:00 AM ET, The JOLTS report consensus for July is 9.559 million near its June’s 9.582 million level. Economist consensus have been fairy accurate for this well monitored indicator. The JOLTS report tracks monthly change in job openings and offers rates on hiring and quits.

Wednesday 8/30

•              8:30 AM ET, GDP (the second estimate of second-quarter) is expected to show no change from 2.4 percent growth in the quarter’s first estimate. Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), at 1.6 percent growth in the first estimate, is expected to come in at 1.7 percent in the second estimate.

•              10:00 AM ET,  Pending Home Sales are expected to fall by 0.4% after rising .3% in June. The National Association of Realtors developed the Pending Home Sales report as a leading indicator of housing activity. Specifically, it is a leading indicator of existing home sales, not new home sales. A pending sale is one in which a contract was signed, but not yet closed. It usually takes four to six weeks to close a contracted sale. Home transactions are a harbinger for economic activity.

•              10:00 AM ET,  The State Street Investor Confidence Index measures confidence by looking at actual levels of risk in investment portfolios. This is not an attitude survey. The State Street Investor Confidence Index measures confidence directly by assessing the changes in investor holdings of equities. The prior number (July) was 96.2%.

•              10:30 PM ET, EIA The Energy Information Administration (EIA) provides the Petroleum Status Report weekly with information on petroleum inventories in the US, whether produced in the US or abroad. The level of inventories helps determine prices for petroleum products.

Thursday 8/30

•              7:30 AM ET, The Challenger Job-Cut Report for August will be reported and compared to last months 23,697 job cuts.

•              8:30 AM ET, Jobless claims for the week ended 8/26 are expected to come in at 238,000. The prior week the figure was 230,000.

•              8:30 AM ET, Personal Income is expected to have risen 0.3 percent in July with Consumption Expenditures expected to increase a solid 0.6 percent. These stats will be compared with June’s 0.3 percent increase for income and 0.5 percent increase for consumption.

•              9:45 AM ET, The Chicago PMI is expected to have risen in August to 44.6 versus 42.8 in July which was the eleventh straight month of sub-50 contraction.

•              3:00 PM ET, Farm Prices for July are expected to have risen month over month by 0.4%, however year-on-year declined by 5.3%. Farm prices are a leading indicator of food price changes in the producer and consumer price indices. There is not a one-to-one correlation, but general trends move in tandem. Inflation is a general increase in the prices of goods and services.

•              4:30 PM ET, The Fed’s Balance Sheet totaled $8.139 trillion last week. Further declines in line with the Feds quantitative tightening (QT) is expected.

Friday 9/1

•              8:30 AM ET, the Employment Situation report is expected to show a moderating but still strong 170,000 increase for nonfarm payroll growth in August versus 187,000 in July which was a bit lower than expected. Average hourly earnings in August are expected to rise 0.3 percent on the month for a year-over-year rate of 4.4 percent; these would compare with 0.4 and 4.4 percent in the prior two reports. August’s unemployment rate is expected to hold unchanged at 3.5 percent.

•              10:00 AM ET, The ISM manufacturing index has been in contraction the last nine months. August’s consensus is 46.8 versus July’s 46.4.

•              10:00 AM ET, Construction Spending for July is expected to have risen 0.5% to match June’s 0.5% increase that had benefited from a second strong month for residential spending.

What Else

There is no early close scheduled for the US markets on Friday before the three day Labor Day weekend.

Have you attended an in-person roadshow organized by Noble Capital Markets. Noble has been reaching out to retail and institutional investors and holding these events designed for investors to meet management teams. Investors have been able to discover more about their companies, often enough to make an informed decision. The forum has been getting rave reviews from investors and company management teams. Use this link to see if a roadshow is scheduled near you.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm

www.econoday.com

Should We Be Bullish on Small Caps?

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com

Powell’s Right About the Resilient Economy, How it May Affects Some Stocks

One can generalize and say small cap companies are more sensitive to recessions than large caps – and they would be correct. In his speech in Jackson Hole, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said, “But we are attentive to signs that the economy may not be cooling as expected. So far this year, GDP growth has come in above expectations and above its longer-run trend, and recent readings on consumer spending have been especially robust.” His words sound like a soft landing, no landing, or puts any hard landing far off into the future. Over the past few years, the performance of small-cap stocks has not held its own relative to the performance of large caps when highly weighting the stratospheric performance of mega caps. 

After the most recent year and a half of both business news and investors expressing recession concerns, the newer conversation is one of an economic soft landing. Those mentioning the inverted yield curve “proof” has been silenced as rates out on the curve have begun to move steadily higher. The conversation has now been replaced with expectations of increased economic activity. Even if expectations don’t fully come to fruition, it is expectations that move markets – just look at last year’s down stock market which was the result of investors expecting a recession was imminent. 

Will Small Caps Finally Run With the Bulls?

The S&P 600 Small Cap Index is is at the same level as December 2020
(Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices)

The S&P 600 small cap index is up by nearly a third as much as the S&P 500 this year (4.40% versus 13.98%) and trades at only 15 times earnings. BofA Securities using Russell Index numbers for its analysis of Russell 1000 large cap and Russell 200 small cap indexes, calculated that small companies are 30% cheaper than usual in comparison to big ones. Over the next decade, according to BoA Securities estimates, small caps are poised to gain an average of 11% a year versus 4% for large caps.

Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices

The S&P 600 Small Cap Index has underperformed the S&P Large Cap Index by nearly 10% over the past year. Another well-respected firm, T. Rowe Price, takes the expectations in small-caps a step further in its August insight report titled: The Outlook for U.S. Smaller Companies Looks Increasingly Compelling (Now is not the time to wait on the sidelines). The report highlights additional factors supporting the increased probabilities of small-cap performance.

T. Rowe Price discussed how smaller companies are more oriented towards U.S. economic activity. The author,  Curt Organt, the portfolio manager of the firms smaller company equity strategy, also pointes to the many bills in Congress that support capital spending projects in the U.S., explaining this will also provide a tailwind.

•             “While the U.S. equity market has become increasingly concentrated at the top end over the past decade, smaller‑company valuations are at their most compelling levels in decades.”

•             “History shows that as high concentration in the S&P 500 Index begins to unwind, a new cycle of small‑cap outperformance usually begins.”

•             “Shifting trends in the U.S. economy are particularly supportive of smaller companies, providing a potential catalyst for higher earnings growth.”

The portfolio manager discussed how, through history, investors in small-cap stocks ordinarily command higher relative valuations compared to their larger counterparts. At present, as mentioned before, small-cap stocks are currently trading at a substantial discount in relation to large-cap stocks.

Downside protection is also seen as a positive in small-caps, whether compared to its own history, or to today’s large cap valuations. The low valuations in the smaller companies do offer a degree of downside protection during market downturns.

Take Away

 At the conclusion of his Jackson Hole speech, Powell said, “As is often the case, we are navigating by the stars under cloudy skies. In such circumstances, risk-management considerations are critical.” Although he was talking about U.S. monetary policy, the words apply equally well if applied to a portfolio’s investment policy. One can never be completely sure of what is around the corner that can either accelerate returns or set the portfolio back. But, placing probabilities on your side, over time, is good practice.

One can never have too much information when selecting companies to invest in. Small company information is particularly challenging for investors to find. Creating a login to Channelchek allows access to data on 6,000 small and microcap companies; this may be the key to further placing investment probabilities on your side. And, if you’d like to take your exploration for the ideal smaller companies to invest in to a higher level, join Noble Capital Markets and Channelchek at its annual investment conference, NobleCon19, this fall.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://advantage.factset.com/hubfs/Website/Resources%20Section/Research%20Desk/Earnings%20Insight/EarningsInsight_080423.pdf

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-600/?utm_source=pdf_commentary#overview

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-600/#overview

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/indices/equity/sp-500/#overview

https://www.troweprice.com/content/dam/gdx/pdfs/2023-q3/the-outlook-for-us-smaller-companies-looks-increasingly-compelling.pdf

Insider Trading − The Legal Kind − Is a Lot More Profitable If You Work for a Multinational Company

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com

Here’s How Big the Multinational Insider Advantage Is

Corporate insiders who trade stocks based on the information they gain on the job earn a lot more if they work at multinational corporations than their peers at U.S. companies with no sales abroad. That’s the main finding of our new peer-reviewed research. We wanted to know if multinational insiders stand to make more money because of the complexity of the information they could possess relative to outsiders.

Insider trading happens when a director or employee trades their company’s public stock or other security based on important or “material” information about that business. Insider trading isn’t illegal as long as the person reports the trade to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the information is already in the public domain.

This article was republished with permission from The Conversation, a news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It represents the research-based findings and thoughts of, D. Brian Blank, Assistant Professor of Finance, Mississippi State University, and Dallin Alldredge, Assistant Professor of Finance, Florida International University.

We wanted to know if multinational insiders stand to make more money because of the complexity of the information they could possess relative to outsiders.

So we examined returns from over 2.5 million trades reported to the SEC from 1987 to 2019 by insiders at over 10,000 companies. This is only a subset of all insider trades reported during the period because we focused on only those transactions most likely to be informed by the employee’s insight. We then compared monthly returns for insiders at multinational and domestic companies with those for a typical investor.

We found that all insiders beat the market, but those at multinationals did better – especially if they were on the highest rungs of the corporate ladder. While insiders at domestic companies typically obtained a return of 2.4% in the month following a stock purchase, those at multinational corporations reaped 2.8%. That may not sound like a lot, but, assuming consistent returns, it could amount to earning $170,000 more if an insider traded $1 million over several months. And it’s triple the typical stock market monthly gain of 0.9%

The most in-the-know insiders – executives and others with the most intimate knowledge of the company and its operations – at multinationals got an even bigger advantage, earning 3.6% per month vs. 2.7% at domestic companies.

Why it Matters

Insider trading is familiar to most people from movies that portray it in criminal terms, such as Gordon Gekko of “Wall Street.” In the film, he makes millions off others’ inside information.

But even when it is legal, insider trading is very profitable. That’s because insiders trading on public information are more knowledgeable about their industry and process information more effectively than outside investors.

With global companies, the advantage of being an insider increases. Since multinational companies generate earnings in foreign countries, with different currencies, cultures, economies and operating environments, it can be hard for an outsider or analyst to accurately value the company and its stock price. This is especially true when the company does business in regions that are culturally and linguistically distinct from the U.S. This helps insiders trade more efficiently, by buying underpriced stocks at a bargain and selling them later for a windfall.

Companies often motivate their employees to work harder by offering them a stake in their success, but if insiders seem to be getting an unfair advantage over ordinary investors, it may undermine trust in financial markets. The size and profitability of such trades – particularly in light of our data – mean regulators and policymakers may want to consider whether new restrictions on insider trading are needed, such as placing additional limits on the timing or frequency of trades.

What Other Research is Being Done?

Scholars, including us, are pursuing many avenues of research on insider trading, such as how insider trading restrictions are determined and how insider trades inform markets when news is limited. We’ve recently conducted research on how insider trades by colleagues at the same company tend to cluster together, and we are currently looking at how innovation affects insider trading.

Another recently published project relates to how information is incorporated into stock market prices and how investors underreact to news that may affect insiders’ ability to trade profitably. Similarly, ongoing research uses a GPT language model to assess the complexity of business regulatory filings and financial statements by analyzing technical jargon that can confuse investors, which could also affect how outside investors understand stock prices compared with insiders.

Are Reverse Stock Splits a Red Flag?

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com

There are Many Reasons for a Reverse Split; All are Designed to Benefit Stakeholders

So far this quarter, there have been 59 reverse stock splits. These include industries as diverse as the apparel company Digital Brands Group (DBGI), which is consolidating its shares today, and Blue Apron (APRN), an e-commerce food prep provider, back on July 8th. In theory, this is a financial arrangement similar to asking for a $100 bill in exchange for five $20 dollar bills. But the reasons are more complicated and diverse. Understanding why a company you own, or are considering buying or shorting shares in, is consolidating ownership units can help you understand if the new shares are more likely to gain or lose value.

Background

As with the exchange of smaller denominated bills for larger ones, a reverse stock split is an action in which a company reduces its total outstanding shares while proportionally increasing the price per new share. It’s done by the company’s registrar by combining a certain number of existing shares into a single new share. For example, a 1-for-10 reverse stock split would result in every 10 shares of the company being converted into 1 new share.

From the shareholder side, their percentage ownership in the company remains unchanged; the value of that percentage will change as market forces revalue those shares.

Reasons for a Reverse Split

A corporate action such as a reverse split is not inexpensive for the company, so if it is conducting one, it must see a benefit. The primary reasons range from crisis management to an attempt to broaden the share’s appeal.

The category of crisis management includes working to prevent delisting from an exchange. The major stock exchanges have minimum share price requirements. If a company’s stock price falls below this minimum, it will be delisted from the exchange. Back in March, Bed Bath and Beyond went to shareholders asking for permission to do a reverse split in order to not be delisted for having a stock price lower than the Nasdaq threshold. The company was criticized as it showed that management did not have confidence that the price would rise on its own. At times when a company is approaching the minimum threshold for being listed on an exchange, they will look to do a reverse split, this can boost the per share price and prevent delisting.

In some cases there isn’t a crisis; management is simply managing perception in an effort to improve the stock’s image. This is because a stock that trades at a low price may be perceived as being risky or unpopular. A reverse stock split can give the appearance of a more valuable stock, which may attract more investors.

Conforming to the requirements of certain buyers, specifically institutional investors may also lead to a reverse split. Many institutional investors have minimum investment requirements. A reverse stock split can help to make a stock more attractive to these investors.

Bringing up the dollar price to simplify trading is another reason. A reverse stock split can make it easier to trade a stock, especially if the shares have a price below one dollar.

The Caution Signs When a Company Undergoes a Reverse Split

There are certainly potential negatives to shareholders when a company has a  reverse stock split. For example, a reverse stock split can decrease liquidity, making it less liquid; for example, it may be more difficult to buy or sell.

Some investors may view a reverse stock split as a negative signal about the company’s financial health; if the action isn’t expected to cure the ailment, it may serve to feed into a growing list of things investors don’t like about the company.

Shareholders could wind up owning a lesser portion of the company if the split results in fractional shares. For example, if the stock you own 97 shares in reverse 1 for 10. You’ll receive 9 shares and, most often, the cash equivalent of seven shares.

Ultimately, whether or not a reverse stock split is a good idea for a company depends on the specific circumstances. Investors should carefully consider the pros and cons before making a decision about whether or not to buy or sell a stock that has undergone or is being talked about as considering a reverse stock split. In most cases only board of director approval is required.

Opportunity for Investors?  

The opportunities for investors after a reverse stock split depends on the reasons for the split. If the split is done to prevent delisting, it is likely that the stock price will increase in the short term. However, if the split is done for other reasons, such as to improve the stock’s image or to make it more attractive to institutional investors, the long-term impact on the stock price is uncertain. Remember, management presumably got board approval as they thought it was in the best interest of the company; as a shareholder, you are technically an owner and would reap any benefit of it turning out to be a good move.

Take Away

A reverse stock split means the number of shares owned will be reduced, but the ownership level will remain the same. The price per share will increase, but the market capitalization of the company will change little. The reverse stock split may have a negative impact on the liquidity of the stock. It may also be seen as a negative by some investors.

Overall, reverse stock splits are always conducted for with the best interest of the company onwers in mind. But the reasons for the move, and if it will be successful needs to be evaluated by stockholders.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dbgi-announces-1-for-25-reverse-stock-split-effective-august-22-2023-301905859.html

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com

AMC Converting APEs and Reverse Splitting

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com

AMC Theatres APE Units Will Cease to Exist After Thursday

The last day of trading for AMC Entertainment (AMC) Preferred Equity Units (APE) is Thursday, August 24th. The dividend shares that were provided 1:1 for AMC shareholders one year ago, will be converted to AMC common stock, which will then be the only class of stock AMC Entertainment has outstanding. But the company still has mounds of debt, which is part of the reason for rolling the preferreds into common shares. The move doubles the number of common shares outstanding, which the company then has plans to address.

On August 11, the wild ride shareholders had been on got a bit wilder as a Delaware Court judge gave the green light to AMC proceeding with a revised plan to convert its preferred shares. This drove up shares of APE units and down the price of AMC common stock.

Month to date, APE units, which will not be trading by the end of the week, are up nearly 15% while AMC common stock is down over 37%. Since the court notice, volume has been significantly higher in both preferred and common.

Source: Koyfin

The single AMC common share class is part of the movie theater chain’s recovery from the pandemic era debt built up. AMC is also planning a reverse 1-for-10 split of its common stock and an increase in its authorized common shares.

In Form 8-K filed with the SEC last week, AMC explained that the reverse stock split is expected to also occur on Aug. 24. The market will open on August 25th with the conversion complete, and the ticker APE delisted from the New York Stock Exchange.

Expectations of the stock-conversion is that AMC will be more resilient and will eliminate capital-raising inefficiencies of APE units trading at a significant discount to AMC shares, said CEO Adam Aron.  

Analysts expect the shares to converge around the $3 price range.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://public.com/learn/ape-stock-amc-dividend#:~:text=%24APE%20is%20a%20new%20class,22.

https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=351520