Category: Markets

Is Bitcoin Primed for a Resurgence? BTC Tops $35,000

Posted on by cpatches

In a recent rally, Bitcoin briefly surpassed the $35,000 mark, marking a significant milestone not seen since May 2022. This resurgence has breathed new life into the world’s foremost cryptocurrency and left many wondering if Bitcoin is poised for a remarkable comeback.

A Rally of Remarkable Proportions:

The year 2023 has unfolded with tremendous vigor for Bitcoin enthusiasts. The cryptocurrency has ascended over 100% since the year’s inception, igniting optimism among investors and speculators alike. This remarkable rally could, in part, be attributed to a phenomenon known as a “short squeeze.” In essence, some investors who had bet against Bitcoin found themselves in a precarious position, compelled to buy Bitcoin to cover their short positions, thus driving its price higher.


Short Liquidations and Regulatory Hopes:

A staggering $167 million in short liquidations, predominantly on offshore exchanges, serves as evidence of the short squeeze’s impact. However, the Bitcoin market’s dynamics extend beyond short-term speculation. The recent decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) not to appeal a ruling in Grayscale’s lawsuit has sparked optimism in the cryptocurrency community. The hope is that this decision could pave the way for the approval of a Bitcoin-related exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the coming months. Momentum has been building as firms vying for a Bitcoin ETF updated their filings, and prominent investors such as Ark’s Cathie Wood and Galaxy’s Mike Novogratz have highlighted a shift in the SEC’s tone. The regulatory body appears to be engaging more positively with the cryptocurrency industry, increasing the odds of a Bitcoin ETF receiving the green light.

The Significance of a Bitcoin ETF:

A Bitcoin ETF would represent a pivotal development for both seasoned and novice investors. It would provide a structured and regulated way for individuals to gain exposure to Bitcoin’s price movements without the need to directly own the cryptocurrency. Such an ETF could bridge the gap between traditional financial markets and the digital asset realm, further legitimizing Bitcoin as a viable investment.

Bitcoin’s Checkered History:

To understand the significance of this potential resurgence, it’s crucial to reflect on Bitcoin’s journey. Since its inception in 2009, Bitcoin has weathered numerous storms, experiencing extreme volatility and wild price swings. It reached its all-time high of nearly $65,000 in April 2021 before experiencing a sharp decline.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Industry Challenges:

Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency industry have faced increasing regulatory scrutiny in recent years. The high-profile FTX bankruptcy case and Terraform’s legal troubles, where they are charged with defrauding investors, serve as stark reminders of the challenges the industry faces. Furthermore, the SEC has been actively cracking down on cryptocurrency companies. Firms like Coinbase and Ripple are currently embroiled in legal battles with the SEC, accused of violating securities laws. These legal skirmishes, along with others in the crypto space, have underscored the pressing need for regulatory clarity in the United States. As the industry navigates these challenges, the question that looms is whether Bitcoin is indeed primed for a resurgence. The recent rally, the prospects of a Bitcoin ETF, and the evolving regulatory landscape all point to a cryptocurrency with the potential for a triumphant return, promising exciting times ahead for Bitcoin enthusiasts and investors.

10-Year Treasury Yield Surpasses 5%: Implications for Markets, Investors, and Beyond

Posted on by cpatches

The yield on the 10-year Treasury note has once again crossed the 5% threshold. This benchmark yield has far-reaching implications for both the financial markets and the general public, serving as a barometer of economic conditions and influencing investment decisions, interest rates, and the cost of borrowing for governments, businesses, and individuals.

Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury
Data as of Oct. 20, 2023

Why Does the 10-Year Treasury Yield Matter?

The 10-year Treasury yield is a crucial indicator of the economy’s health and the state of the financial markets. It reflects the interest rate that the U.S. government pays on its debt with a 10-year maturity, which is considered a relatively safe investment. As such, it provides a reference point for other interest rates in the financial system.

Impact on Investors:

  • Fixed-Income Investments: The 10-year Treasury yield directly impacts the pricing and performance of bonds and other fixed-income investments. When the yield rises, the value of existing bonds tends to decrease, which can lead to capital losses for bondholders.
  • Stock Market: Higher Treasury yields can put pressure on stock prices. As bond yields increase, investors may shift from equities to bonds in search of better returns with lower risk. This shift can lead to stock market volatility and corrections.
  • Cost of Capital: Rising Treasury yields can increase the cost of capital for businesses. This may result in higher borrowing costs for companies, which can impact their profitability and, subsequently, their stock prices.

Impact on the General Public:

  • Mortgage Rates: Mortgage rates are closely tied to the 10-year Treasury yield. When yields rise, mortgage rates tend to follow suit. As a result, homebuyers may face higher borrowing costs, potentially limiting their ability to purchase homes or leading to higher monthly payments for existing homeowners with adjustable-rate mortgages.
  • Consumer Loans: The yield on the 10-year Treasury note also influences interest rates for various consumer loans, including auto loans and personal loans. When yields rise, the cost of borrowing for individuals increases, affecting their spending capacity.
  • Inflation Expectations: An increase in the 10-year Treasury yield can signal rising inflation expectations. In response, consumers may anticipate higher prices for goods and services, which can impact their spending and savings decisions.
  • Retirement and Savings: For retirees and savers, rising Treasury yields can be a mixed bag. While it can translate into higher returns on savings accounts and CDs, it can also result in increased volatility in investment portfolios, which may be a concern for those relying on their investments for income.

Market Sentiment and Economic Outlook:

A sustained rise in the 10-year Treasury yield is often seen as an indication of a strengthening economy. However, if the yield surges too quickly, it can raise concerns about the pace of economic growth and the potential for the Federal Reserve to implement tighter monetary policy to combat inflation.

In conclusion, the 10-year Treasury yield is not just a number on a financial ticker; it’s a critical metric that touches the lives of investors, borrowers, and everyday consumers. Its movements provide valuable insights into the state of the economy and financial markets, making it a figure closely watched by experts and the public alike.

Small Cap, Big Potential: Capitalizing on The Widening Valuation Gap

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

As we progress through earnings season, a concerning trend is becoming more apparent – the widening valuation gap between small and large cap companies. Across sectors like biotech, construction, media and more, large cap stocks are trading at significantly higher valuation multiples compared to their small and mid cap peers. For long-term investors, this divergence could signal an opportunity to start positioning in overlooked parts of the market.

Valuation refers to the process of determining the current worth of an asset or company. The most common valuation metric used by investors is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. This compares a company’s current stock price to its earnings per share, giving a sense of how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings.

Typically, investors are willing to pay higher multiples for larger companies perceived as higher quality investments. However, the gap in P/E ratios between large caps and small caps has expanded dramatically over the past year. The sizable disparity between the two classes is the largest it has been in over 20 years.  

For example, Pfizer trades around 13x forward earnings expectations. But the average forward P/E for biotech stocks with market caps under $500 million is only 5x. This means investors are valuing each dollar of Pfizer’s earnings twice as highly as the average small cap biotech peer. 

We see similar trends in other sectors. In construction & engineering, Jacobs Engineering trades at 25x forward earnings versus under 10x for small cap marine construction firms like Orion Group Holdings and Great Lakes Dredge & Dock. Media giants like Disney (14x) and Fox Corp (11x) also command far higher valuations than small cap peers like Direct Digital Media (DRCT), Entravision (EVC), or Townsquare Media (TSQ). 

What explains this growing divergence in how the market is pricing future earnings potential?

For one, large cap companies often have broader business diversification that allows them to navigate volatile economic conditions. Pfizer’s COVID vaccine gave revenues a shot in the arm during the pandemic. Meanwhile, smaller biotechs with narrower clinical pipelines carry more binary risk around drug development outcomes.

Bigger balance sheets also provide an advantage. Large caps can leverage financial strength to pursue acquisitions, ramp up buybacks and maintain dividends during downturns. With higher cash reserves and access to capital, they are better equipped to weather tightening financial conditions.

Many large caps also benefit from durable competitive advantages like strong branding, pricing power, high barriers to entry and economies of scale. This allows them to consistently deliver high returns on invested capital and cash flows sought by investors.

Smaller companies tend to deliver more volatile financial results. They lack established competitive positions and have less excess cash. Weaker balance sheets increase vulnerability to supply chain disruptions, rising input costs and tight financing conditions.

While these factors help explain higher valuations for large caps, the magnitude of the gap suggests investors may be overlooking the long-term potential of small and micro cap stocks.

Though more volatile, smaller companies offer greater growth potential. They can deliver exponential returns if new innovations gain traction or they carve out niche industry positions. With valuations already compressed, their risk/reward profiles appear skewed to the upside.

Noble Capital Markets’ Director of Research, Michael Kupinski states in his Q3 2023 Media Sector Review, “We believe that there is higher risk in the small cap stocks, especially given that some companies may not be cash flow positive, have capital needs, or have limited share float.  But investors seem to have thrown the baby out with the bathwater. While those small cap stocks are on the more speculative end of the scale, many small cap stocks are growing revenues and cash flow, have capable balance sheets, and/or are cash flow positive.  For attractive emerging growth companies, the trading activity will resolve itself over time.  Some market strategists suggest that small cap stocks trade at the most undervalued in the market, as much as a 30% to 40% discount to fair value.” 

Astute investors know that future unicorns often hide among today’s small and micro caps. Many current large cap leaders like Apple, Amazon and Tesla began as small companies trading at single digit earnings multiples. Yet these stocks generated huge returns for early investors.

Just because a company is small does not necessarily mean it is distressed. Many smaller firms boast solid fundamentals and growth drivers that are simply not apparent to short-term traders. Their lower valuations present a compelling entry point for long-term investors.

While large caps will remain a core portfolio holding for many, today’s environment presents a unique opportunity. The extreme valuation divergence has created asymmetric upside potential in overlooked small cap names. As legendary investor Warren Buffett said, “Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”

Digging Deeper into Valuation Metrics

When assessing valuation gaps between small and large caps, it helps to look beyond simple price-to-earnings ratios. Other useful metrics can provide additional context on relative value.

For example, the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio compares a company’s market capitalization to total revenue. High growth companies with minimal earnings often trade at elevated P/S multiples. However, small caps today trade at an average P/S ratio of just 0.7x versus 2.3x for large caps. Again, a sizable gap that favors small companies.

Enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) is another meaningful valuation yardstick. By incorporating debt levels and focusing on cash profits, EV/EBITDA provides a more holistic view of a company’s valuation. Currently, small caps trade at an average forward EV/EBITDA of 6x – roughly half that of large cap peers.

Across an array of valuation metrics, small and mid caps trade at substantial discounts relative to large caps. This suggests underlying fundamentals and growth prospects may not be fully reflected in their beaten-down share prices.

Small Cap Opportunities Across Industries

While small caps appear broadly undervalued, some industries stand out as particularly compelling hunting grounds.

For example, junior mining stocks have been ravaged during the recent crypto/tech selloff. But with inflation soaring and geopolitical tensions rising, demand for precious metals should strengthen. Many miners are generating robust cash flows at today’s elevated commodity prices. Yet their shares trade at deep discounts to book value.

Biotech is another area laden with small cap opportunities. Developing novel drugs carries substantial risk, so setbacks in clinical trials can decimate share prices. However, the sector remains ripe for M&A. Larger pharmas need to replenish pipelines, providing takeout potential. Investors can balance risks via diversification across promising development stage companies.

Oil and gas producers offer further value among small energy firms. Strong demand and restricted supply has sent oil prices surging. Many smaller E&Ps focused on prolific shale basins sport attractive cash flows and reserves value. Yet their shares lag larger counterparts, despite superior growth outlooks.

The bottom line is that while risks are higher with small caps, their depressed valuations provide a margin of safety. Reward far exceeds risk for selective investors focused on fundamentals.

Mitigating Volatility

Small caps carry well-known risks, including elevated volatility. Information flow and analyst coverage is more sparse for smaller companies. Major drawdowns can rattle investor nerves and sink long-term performance if not adequately prepared for. Resources like Channelchek is a great tool to help provide data to investors in the small cap space. 

Based on your age, time horizon, and risk tolerance, here are some tips to mitigate volatility while still capturing small cap upside:

  • Maintain reasonable portfolio allocation – small and microcaps should represent a smaller portion of your equity holdings
  • Diversify across sectors, industries and market caps to smooth volatility
  • Maintain a long-term mindset – don’t panic sell on temporary declines

With prudent risk controls, small caps can boost portfolio returns while diversifying away from large cap shares. Their more attractive valuations provide a compelling opportunity during these volatile times.

“In the equity markets history tends to repeat itself. At some point the smart money will start allocating more portfolio weight into these undervalued equities, which will narrow this historic valuation gap, offering potential for above average returns for small and microcaps,” said Nico Pronk, CEO of Noble Capital Markets.

Rising Housing Costs Drive Consumer Inflation Even Higher in September

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Consumer inflation accelerated more than expected in September due largely to intensifying shelter costs, putting further pressure on household budgets and keeping the Federal Reserve on high alert.

The consumer price index (CPI) increased 0.4% last month after rising 0.1% in August, the Labor Department reported Thursday. On an annual basis, prices were up 3.7% through September.

Both the monthly and yearly inflation rates exceeded economist forecasts of 0.3% and 3.6% respectively.

The higher than anticipated inflation extends the squeeze on consumers in the form of elevated prices for essentials like food, housing, and transportation. It also keeps the Fed under the microscope as officials debate further interest rate hikes to cool demand and restrain prices.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Surging Shelter Costs in Focus

The main driver behind the inflation uptick in September was shelter costs. The shelter index, which includes rent and owners’ equivalent rent, jumped 0.6% for the month. Shelter costs also posted the largest yearly gain at 7.2%.

On a monthly basis, shelter accounted for over half of the total increase in CPI. Surging rents and housing costs reflect pandemic trends like strong demand amid limited supply.

“Just because the rate of inflation is stable for now doesn’t mean its weight isn’t increasing every month on family budgets,” noted Robert Frick, corporate economist at Navy Federal Credit Union. “That shelter and food costs rose particularly is especially painful.”

Energy and Food Costs Also Climb

While shelter led the inflation surge, other categories saw notable increases as well in September. Energy costs rose 1.5% led by gasoline, fuel oil, and natural gas. Food prices gained 0.2% for the third consecutive month, with a 6% jump in food away from home.

On an annual basis, energy costs were down 0.5% but food was up 3.7% year-over-year through September.

Used vehicle prices declined 2.5% in September but new vehicle costs rose 0.3%. Overall, transportation services inflation eased to 0.9% annually in September from 9.5% in August.

Wage Growth Lags Inflation

Rising consumer costs continue to outpace income growth, squeezing household budgets. Average hourly earnings rose just 0.2% in September, not enough to keep pace with the 0.4% inflation rate.

That caused real average hourly earnings to fall 0.2% last month. On a yearly basis, real wages were up only 0.5% through September—a fraction of the 3.7% inflation rate over that period.

American consumers have relied more heavily on savings and credit to maintain spending amid high inflation. But rising borrowing costs could limit their ability to sustain that trend.

Fed Still Focused on Inflation Fight

The hotter-than-expected CPI print keeps the Fed anchored on inflation worries. Though annual inflation has eased from over 9% in June, the 3.7% rate remains well above the Fed’s 2% target.

Officials raised interest rates by 75 basis points in both September and November, pushing the federal funds rate to a range of 3-3.25%. Markets expect another 50-75 basis point hike in December.

Treasury yields surged following the CPI report, reflecting ongoing inflation concerns. Persistently high shelter and food inflation could spur the Fed to stick to its aggressive rate hike path into 2023.

Taming inflation remains the Fed’s number one priority, even at the risk of slowing economic growth. The latest CPI data shows they still have work to do on that front.

All eyes will now turn to the October and November inflation reports heading into the pivotal December policy meeting. Further hotter-than-expected readings could force the Fed’s hand on more supersized rate hikes aimed at cooling demand and prices across the economy.

IMF Economic Outlook: U.S. Growth Revised Up, Europe Down

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) recently released its updated World Economic Outlook report, providing insights into global economic projections. A key theme is diverging fortunes for major economies like the United States and Europe.

The IMF upgraded its 2023 GDP growth forecast for the U.S. to 2.1%, up 0.3 percentage points from its prior estimate. The upbeat revision reflects resilience in areas like business investment and consumer spending despite high inflation and interest rates. However, growth is still seen slowing in 2023 and 2024 as the impacts of tightening policy kick in.

Meanwhile, the IMF downgraded the euro zone 2023 outlook to 0.7% growth, 0.2 percentage points lower than previously expected. Slowing trade and higher rates are severely impacting Germany, while other euro economies face varied challenges. The IMF predicts gradual euro zone growth recovery to 1.2% in 2024, though still below pre-pandemic levels.

For the U.K., the IMF upgraded near-term growth slightly to 0.5% in 2023 but lowered its 2024 forecast on expectations of lingering damage from energy price shocks. The U.K. faces a difficult road ahead.

Overall, the IMF kept its global growth outlook unchanged at 3% for 2023. This sluggish pace reflects myriad headwinds including inflation, tight monetary policy, supply chain issues, and the war in Ukraine. IMF Chief Economist Gourinchas described the global economy as “limping along” below its pre-pandemic trend.

Positives like easing supply chain bottlenecks, lower Covid impacts, and stabilizing financial conditions will provide some uplift. But manufacturing and services slowdowns, synchronized central bank tightening, and China’s property crisis will constrain growth.

For investors, the IMF outlook sends mixed signals. U.S. economic resilience and continued consumer strength provide room for cautious optimism. But Europe’s downward revision and pervasive global headwinds like inflation suggest ongoing volatility and potential bumps ahead.

This outlook underscores the importance of defensive positioning and safe haven assets to balance riskier equities. Key takeaways for investors include:

  • Focus on U.S. sectors and stocks benefitting from higher business and consumer spending.
  • Tread carefully in Europe as weaker growth hits markets. Emphasize quality multinationals with less cyclical dependence.
  • Inflation and interest rates will remain challenges influencing markets and consumer behavior.
  • China’s faltering growth and property bubble pose threats worth monitoring.
  • Pay close attention to recession signals that could shift IMF forecasts and alter market psychology.

While the global economy is still expanding, momentum is slowing with many obstacles to navigate. Investors should build resilient portfolios capable of withstanding volatile conditions, while staying alert for any deterioration that could change the IMF’s cautious optimism.

Middle East Tensions Move the Global Markets

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The escalating conflict between Israel and Hamas has sent shockwaves around the world, with major implications for global financial markets. This past weekend, Hamas militants launched a deadly attack in Israel, killing over 700 people. Israel has retaliated with airstrikes in Gaza and a blockade, leading to rising casualties on both sides. As the violence continues, here is how the clashes could impact the stock market and oil prices.

Stocks Tumble Over 2%

Major US stock indexes fell sharply on Monday in early trading, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping over 700 points, or 2.1%. The S&P 500 declined 2.2% while the Nasdaq Composite sank 2.5%. The declines came amid a broader sell-off as investors fled to safe haven assets like bonds, but stocks trimmed losses as the day progressed.

By early afternoon, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down just 0.7% after falling over 700 points earlier. The S&P and Nasdaq posted similar reversals after opening sharply lower.

Energy and defense sector stocks bucked the downward trend, rising on expectations of higher oil prices and military spending. But the prospect of further violence dragged down shares of transportation, tourism, and other cyclical firms that benefit from economic growth. Stock markets in Europe and Asia also posted sizable losses.

Prolonged Instability Adds Downside Risks

While markets often rebound after initial geopolitical shocks, an extended conflict between Israel and Hamas could lead to a deeper, sustained selloff. Investors fear that rising tensions in the Middle East could upend the post-pandemic economic recovery. Supply chains already facing shortages and logistical bottlenecks could worsen if violence escalates. US fiscal spending could also spike higher if military involvement grows.

Surging oil prices feeding into already high inflation may spur the Federal Reserve to tighten policy faster. This risks hampering consumer spending and growth. Elevated uncertainty tends to erode business confidence and curb capital expenditures as well. From an earnings perspective, prolonged fighting dents bottom lines of various multinationals operating in the region. The potential economic fallout from persistent Middle East unrest weighs heavily on investors.

Oil Jumps Over 4%

Brent crude oil surged above $110 per barrel, gaining over 4% on Monday before paring some gains. West Texas Intermediate also vaulted over 4% to above $86 per barrel. The jump in oil prices came amid worries that supplies from the Middle East could be disrupted if violence spreads.

The Middle East accounts for about one-third of global oil output. While Israel is not a major producer, heightened regional tensions tend to lift crude prices. Oil markets fear that unrest could spill over into other parts of the region or lead oil producers to curb supply.

Prolonged Supply Issues

If the Israel-Hamas conflict draws in more countries or persists in disrupting regional stability, crude prices could head even higher. Any supply chain troubles that keep oil from reaching end markets will feed into rising inflation. High energy costs are already squeezing consumers and corporations worldwide.

Organizations like OPEC could decide to take advantage of conflict-driven oil spikes by reducing output further. Constraints on Middle East oil transit and infrastructure damage could also support higher prices. From an economic perspective, pricier crude weighs on growth by driving up business costs and crimping consumer purchasing power. Prolonged oil supply problems due to Middle East unrest would prove corrosive for the global economy.

Hope for Swift Resolution

With oil surging and equities declining, investors hope the clashes between Israel and Hamas wind down rapidly. Markets are likely to remain choppy and risks skewed to the downside in the interim. But a quick de-escalation and return to stability could spark a relief rally.

Energy and defense sectors may give back some gains while cyclical segments would likely rebound. Still, the massive human toll and damage already incurred will weigh on regional economic potential for years to come. The attacks also shattered a delicate effort to broker ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Hopes for a durable resolution between Israelis and Palestinians have once again been dashed. The economic impacts already felt across global markets are only a glimpse of the long-term consequences of deepening conflict.

Will Cathie Wood’s ARKK Fund Bounce or Break Down Further?

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Cathie Wood’s leading ARK Innovation ETF is exhibiting increasing technical weakness that threatens to push shares lower. The fund, known for its disruptive growth stocks, is flashing multiple sell signals after a sharp slide from summer highs.

ARKK delivered incredible gains through much of the past two years as Wood’s pandemic picks like Zoom, Teladoc and Roku surged. But the ETF has stumbled hard since peaking in February 2021, giving back almost 75% of its value.

After showing some resiliency this year, ARKK is now facing its most ominous setup yet. The ETF hit a 52-week high in mid-July but has trended steadily lower since, carving out a series of lower highs and lower lows.

This price action forms a textbook downtrend, with each bounce failing at lower levels. ARKK just sank to its weakest point since May after rejecting its 200-day moving average as resistance.

Adding to the woes, the 50-day moving average has been bending lower in a negative slope. The ETF closed Tuesday a stark 11% below its 50-day line, a clear sell signal in technical analysis. ARKK is also nearing its 2021 low just above $35, presenting major support.

Bearish momentum is apparent across indicators. The relative strength line has plunged sharply since August, reflecting severe underperformance versus the S&P 500. The on-balance volume line is also heading decisively lower.

Plus, the Accumulation/Distribution Rating, which gauges institutional buying and selling activity, sits at a dismal D- for ARKK. The up/down volume ratio shows selling swamping buying to the tune of a 0.6 ratio over the past 50 days.

ARKK’s top components have crumbled in tandem. Major positions Tesla, Zoom, Roku, Coinbase and Block are all deeply in the red over the past month. The lone bright spot is Exact Sciences, maker of a colon cancer screening test, up over 30%.

But weak action in former stars like Tesla and Zoom is a big weight, compounding growing doubts over their long-term growth outlooks. ARKK’s 11% allocation to struggling Tesla looks increasingly problematic.

Of course, periods of underperformance are inevitable even among top growth managers. ARKK still shows a solid 21% gain in 2022 when many indexes remain negative. So this could prove just a dry spell for Wood’s strategy.

However, with the economy potentially rolling over, the prospects for unprofitable growth stocks look even more precarious. This environment may lead investors to shift focus towards more defensive small and micro caps as well as emerging growth names.

ARKK’s technically damaged chart highlights the perils of sticking with high-valuation names in a deteriorating macro climate. For now, it continues to exhibit a troubling technical breakdown as it retests the 2021 lows. Given the backdrop, its chart damage signals additional volatility is still ahead.

Cathie Wood forged a glowing reputation in 2020’s frenzied rebound but is undergoing a brutal reality check. With ARKK flashing multiple sell signals, the next leg lower could further test the resilience of Wood’s innovation approach.

Jobs Report Rockets Past Wall Street Estimates

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The September jobs report revealed the U.S. economy added 336,000 jobs last month, nearly double expectations. The data highlights the resilience of the labor market even as the Federal Reserve aggressively raises interest rates to cool demand.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg had forecast 170,000 job additions for September. The actual gain of 336,000 jobs suggests the labor market remains strong despite broader economic headwinds.

The unemployment rate held steady at 3.8%, unchanged from August and still near historic lows. This shows employers continue hiring even amid rising recession concerns.

Wage growth moderated but still increased 0.3% month-over-month and 5.0% year-over-year. Slowing wage gains may reflect reduced leverage for workers as economic uncertainty increases.

The report reinforces the tight labor market conditions the Fed has been hoping to loosen with its restrictive policy. Rate hikes aim to reduce open jobs and slow wage growth to contain inflationary pressures.

Yet jobs growth keeps exceeding forecasts, defying expectations of a downshift. The Fed wants to see clear cooling before it eases up on rate hikes. This report suggests its work is far from done.

The September strength was broad-based across industries. Leisure and hospitality added 96,000 jobs, largely from bars and restaurants staffing back up. Government employment rose 73,000 while healthcare added 41,000 jobs.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics via CNBC

Upward revisions to July and August payrolls also paint a robust picture. An additional 119,000 jobs were created in those months combined versus initial estimates.

Markets are now pricing in a reduced chance of another major Fed rate hike in November following the jobs data. However, resilient labor demand will keep pressure on the central bank to maintain its aggressive tightening campaign.

While the Fed has raised rates five times this year, the benchmark rate likely needs to go higher to materially impact hiring and wage trajectories. The latest jobs figures support this view.

Ongoing job market tightness suggests inflation could become entrenched at elevated levels without further policy action. Businesses continue competing for limited workers, fueling wage and price increases.

The strength also hints at economic momentum still left despite bearish recession calls. Job security remains solid for many Americans even as growth slows.

Of course, the labor market is not immune to broader strains. If consumer and business activity keep moderating, job cuts could still materialize faster than expected.

For now, the September report shows employers shaking off gloomier outlooks and still urgently working to add staff and retain workers. This resiliency poses a dilemma for the Fed as it charts the course of rate hikes ahead.

The unexpectedly strong September jobs data highlights the difficult balancing act the Fed faces curbing inflation without sparking undue economic damage. For policymakers, the report likely solidifies additional rate hikes are still needed for a soft landing.

Bond Market Signals Recession Warning As Yields Invert

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The bond market is sounding alarm bells about the economic outlook. The yield on the 2-year Treasury briefly exceeded the 10-year yield this week for the first time since 2019. Known as a yield curve inversion, this phenomenon historically signals a recession could be on the horizon.

While not a guarantee, yield curve inversions have preceded every recession over the past 50 years. Here is what is happening in the bond market and what it could mean for investors.

Why Did Yields Invert?

Yields on short-term bonds like 2-year Treasuries tend to track the Federal Reserve’s policy rate. With the Fed aggressively hiking rates to combat inflation, short-term yields have been rising quickly.

Meanwhile, long-term yields like the 10-year are influenced by investors’ growth and inflation expectations. As optimism over the economy’s trajectory wanes, investors have been driving down long-term yields.

This dynamic inversion, where short-term rates exceed longer-duration ones, reflects mounting concerns that the Fed’s rate hikes will severely slow economic activity. Markets increasingly fear rates may cause a hard landing into recession.

Image credit: Cnbc.com

Growth and Inflation Concerns Intensify

The yield curve has flashed the most negative signal since the lead up to the pandemic recession. This suggests investors see a lack of catalysts for growth on the horizon even as inflation remains stubbornly high.

Ongoing supply chain problems, the war in Ukraine putting pressure on food and energy prices, and fears of a housing market slowdown are all weighing on outlooks. There is a sense the Fed lacks effective tools to bring down inflation without crushing the economy.

Meanwhile, key economic indicators like manufacturing surveys have weakened significantly. This points to activity already slowing ahead of when rate hikes would take full effect.

Implications for Investors

The risks of a recession are rising. Yield curve inversions have foreshadowed every recession since the 1950s. However, they have also sometimes occurred 1-2 years before downturns start.

This suggests investors should prepare for choppiness, but not panic. Rotating toward more defensive stocks like healthcare and consumer staples can help portfolios better weather volatility. At the same time, cyclical sectors like tech and industrials could face more pressure.

In fixed income, short-term bonds may offer opportunities as the Fed potentially cuts rates during a downturn. But credit-sensitive sectors like high-yield bonds and leveraged loans could struggle if defaults rise.

While uncertainty abounds, the inverted yield curve highlights the delicate balancing act ahead for the Fed and concerns over still-high inflation. Investors will be closely watching upcoming data for signs of how quickly the economy is slowing. For now, caution and safe-haven assets look to be in favor as recession worries cast a long shadow.

Crisis Averted: Government Stays Open

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

By averting a government shutdown, Congress has avoided rocking both the economy and financial markets. Shutting down federal operations would have created widespread uncertainty and turbulence. Instead, the move offers stability and continuity as the economy faces broader headwinds.

With virtually all government functions continuing normal operations, economic data releases, services, and programs will not face disruptions. Past shutdowns caused delays in economic reports, processing visa and loan applications, releasing small business aid, and more. These disruptions introduce friction that can dampen economic momentum.

Federal employees will continue receiving paychecks rather than facing furloughs. The last major shutdown in 2018-2019 resulted in 380,000 workers being furloughed. With over 2 million federal employees nationwide, even a partial shutdown can reduce economic activity from lost wages.

Government contractors also avoid financial duress from suspended contracts and payments. Many contractors faced cash flow crises during the 2018 shutdown as the government stopped paychecks. Reduced revenues directly hit company bottom lines.

Consumer and business confidence are likely to be maintained without the dysfunction of a funding gap. Surveys showed confidence dropped during past shutdowns as uncertainty rose. Lower confidence can make households and businesses reduce spending and investment, slowing growth.

The tourism industry does not have to contend with closing national parks, museums and monuments. The 2013 shutdown caused sites like the Statue of Liberty to close, resulting in lost revenue for vendors, hotels, and airlines. These impacts radiate through the economy.

Markets also benefit from reduced policy uncertainty. The 2011 debt ceiling showdown and 2018-2019 shutdown both introduced volatility as deadlines approached. Equities fell sharply in the final weeks of the 2018 impasse. While shutdowns alone don’t determine market trends, they contribute an unnecessary headwind.

With recent stock volatility driven by inflation and recession concerns, averting a shutdown provides one less factor to potentially spook markets. Traders never like surprises, and shutdowns heighten unpredictability.

On a sector basis, federal contractors and businesses leveraged to consumer spending stand to benefit most from the avoided disruption. Aerospace and defense firms like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman rely heavily on federal budgets. Consumer discretionary retailers and restaurants avoid lost sales from furloughed workers tightening budgets.

While shutdowns impose only marginal economic impact when brief, longer impasses can impose meaningful fiscal drags. The 16-day 2013 shutdown shaved 0.3% from that quarter’s GDP growth. The longer the stalemate, the greater the economic fallout.

Overall, with myriad headwinds already facing the economy in inflation, rising rates, and recession risks, avoiding a shutdown removes one variable from the equation. While defaulting on the national debt would produce far graver consequences, shutdowns still introduce unnecessary turbulence.

By staving off even a short-term shutdown, Congress helps maintain economic and market stability at a time it’s especially needed. This provides a breather after policy uncertainty spiked leading up to the shutdown deadline. While myriad challenges remain, at least this box has been checked, for now.

DoorDash Ditches NYSE for Nasdaq in Major Stock Exchange Switch

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Food delivery app DoorDash announced it will transfer its stock exchange listing from the New York Stock Exchange to the Nasdaq. The company will begin trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker ‘DASH’ starting September 27, 2023.

This represents a high-profile switch that exemplifies the fierce competition between the NYSE and Nasdaq to attract Silicon Valley tech listings. It also reflects shifting sentiments around brand associations and target investor bases.

DoorDash first went public on the NYSE in December 2020 at a valuation of nearly $60 billion. At the time, the NYSE provided the prestige and validation desired by the promising young startup.

However, DoorDash has since grown into an industry titan boasting a market cap of over $30 billion. As a maturing technology company, Nasdaq’s brand image and investor mix provide better positioning.

Tony Xu, co-founder and CEO of DoorDash, emphasized the benefits of the Nasdaq in the company’s announcement. “We believe DoorDash will benefit from Nasdaq’s track record of being at the forefront of technology and progress,” he said.

Nasdaq has built a reputation as the go-to exchange for Silicon Valley tech firms and growth stocks. Big name residents include Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Alphabet, and Facebook parent company Meta.

The exchange is also home to leading next-gen companies like Zoom, DocuSign, Crowdstrike, Datadog, and Snowflake. This creates an environment tailor-made for high-growth tech outfits.

Meanwhile, the NYSE leans toward stalwart blue chip companies including Coca Cola, Walmart, Visa, Walt Disney, McDonald’s, and JPMorgan Chase. The historic exchange tends to attract mature businesses and financial institutions.

Another factor likely influencing DoorDash is the investor makeup across the competing exchanges. Nasdaq generally appeals more to growth-oriented funds and active traders. The NYSE caters slightly more to institutional investors like pension funds, endowments, and passive index funds.

DoorDash’s switch follows ride sharing pioneer Lyft’s jump from Nasdaq to the NYSE exactly one year ago. Like DoorDash, Lyft desired a brand halo as it evolved past its early startup days.

“It’s a signal of us being mature, of us continuing to build a lasting company,” said Lyft co-founder John Zimmer at the time of the company’s NYSE listing.

Jared Carmel, managing partner at Manhattan Venture Partners, believes these exchange transfers reflect the “changing identities of the companies.”

As startups develop into multi-billion dollar giants, they evaluate whether their founding exchange still aligns with their needs and desired perceptions. Brand association and shareholder registration are becoming as important as operational capabilities for listings.

High-flying growth stocks like DoorDash also consider indexes, as the Nasdaq 100 often provides greater visibility and buying power from passive funds tracking the benchmark. Prominent inclusion in those indexes requires trading on Nasdaq.

Whether mature blue chips or emerging Silicon Valley darlings, the rivalry between Nasdaq and NYSE will continue heating up as each exchange vies to attract and retain brand name public companies. With lucrative listing fees on the line, exchanges will evolve branding, services, and capabilities to better cater to their target customers.

The DoorDash switcheroo exemplifies the changing perspectives and motivations influencing exchange selection. As companies lifecycles and personas transform, they reevaluate decisions made during those frenetic early IPO days.

Mortgage Rates Hit 23-Year High

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Mortgage rates crossed the 7% threshold this past week, as the 30-year fixed rate hit 7.31% according to Freddie Mac data. This marks the highest level for mortgage rates since late 2000.

The implications extend far beyond the housing market alone. The sharp rise in rates stands to impact the stock market, economic growth, and investor sentiment through various channels.

For stock investors, higher mortgage rates pose risks of slower economic growth and falling profits for rate-sensitive sectors. Housing is a major component of GDP, so a pullback in home sales and construction activity would diminish economic output.

Slower home sales also mean less revenue for homebuilders, real estate brokers, mortgage lenders, and home furnishing retailers. With housing accounting for 15-18% of economic activity, associated industries make up a sizable chunk of the stock market.

A housing slowdown would likely hit sectors such as homebuilders, building materials, home improvement retailers, and home furnishing companies the hardest. Financial stocks could also face challenges as mortgage origination and refinancing drop off.

Broader economic weakness resulting from reduced consumer spending power would likely spillover to impact earnings across a wide swath of companies and market sectors. Investors may rotate to more defensive stocks if growth concerns escalate.

Higher rates also signal tightening financial conditions, which historically leads to increased stock market volatility and investor unease. Between inflation cutting into incomes and higher debt servicing costs, consumers have less discretionary income to sustain spending.

Reduced consumer spending has a knock-on effect of slowing economic growth. If rate hikes intended to fight inflation go too far, it raises the specter of an economic contraction or recession down the line.

For bond investors, rising rates eat into prices of existing fixed income securities. Bonds become less attractive compared to newly issued debt paying higher yields. Investors may need to explore options like floating rate bonds and shorter duration to mitigate rate impacts.

Rate-sensitive assets that did well in recent years as rates fell may come under pressure. Real estate, utilities, long-duration bonds, and growth stocks with high valuations are more negatively affected by rising rate environments.

Meanwhile, cash becomes comparatively more attractive as yields on savings accounts and money market funds tick higher. Investors may turn to cash while awaiting clarity on inflation and rates.

The Fed has emphasized its commitment to bringing inflation down even as growth takes a hit. That points to further rate hikes ahead, meaning mortgage rates likely have room to climb higher still.

Whether the Fed can orchestrate a soft landing remains to be seen. But until rate hikes moderate, investors should brace for market volatility and economic uncertainty.

Rising mortgage rates provide yet another reason for investors to ensure their portfolios are properly diversified. Maintaining some allocation to defensive stocks and income plays can help smooth out risk during periods of higher volatility.

While outlooks call for slower growth, staying invested with a long-term perspective is typically better than market timing. Patience and prudent risk management will be virtues for investors in navigating markets in the year ahead.

What Investors Should Know About the Growing Disparity Between Large and Small Cap Returns

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Over the past year, large cap stocks have vastly outperformed their small cap counterparts. This widening rift between the biggest and smallest public companies has reached extremes not seen in over 20 years. While large caps continue charging ahead, small caps face mounting challenges that threaten their role in a balanced investment portfolio.

The stark contrast is evident in the returns of two major indices. The S&P 500, comprised of 500 of the largest U.S. companies, has delivered over -15% returns over the past 12 months. Meanwhile the Russell 2000 small cap index plunged over -25% over the same period.

This nearly 10 percentage point gap represents the highest divergence between large and small caps since 2001. The lopsided returns conjure memories of the late 1990s dot-com bubble, when mega cap tech stocks left smaller companies in the dust.

However, the current environment contains even stronger headwinds against small caps. Rampant inflation has battered small companies, which lack the pricing power of large cap brands. Ongoing supply chain difficulties and labor shortages have also taken a heavier toll on small business.

Moreover, the Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes to combat inflation have disproportionately impacted small caps. Not only are borrowing costs up, but higher rates dampen economic growth forecasts which small caps rely upon. With the Fed signaling even more hikes ahead, the path ahead looks rocky.

Large caps have also benefitted from a flight to quality. Investors have piled into mega cap stocks like Apple, Microsoft, and Procter & Gamble as safe havens amid volatile markets. These stalwarts deliver steady revenues and dividends that provide shelter from broader economic storms.

The growth versus value dynamic has also disadvantaged small caps. With recession fears looming, investors have favored large cap stocks of mature companies over risky, high-growth small caps. Additionally, large tech names like Amazon and Nvidia dominate future-facing themes like cloud computing, AI, and the metaverse.

Some analysts argue this gap has created a bubble, with popular large caps trading at overextended valuations. However, until inflation shows meaningful declines, small caps will likely continue struggling against their mega cap peers.

For investors, the uneven returns underscore the importance of diversification between company sizes. While small caps carry higher risks today, they historically deliver long-term outperformance. Once the economy stabilizes, the pendulum could swing back in favor of smaller dynamos. For those with the risk tolerance, small caps trading at multi-year discounts could offer an opportunity.

Looking ahead, economic uncertainty persists. But maintaining exposure across the market cap spectrum remains imperative. Having allocation to both large and small caps allows investors to weather various market cycles. With patience and prudence, this lopsided period will eventually balance out.