Tag: Economy

Nasdaq and S&P 500 Slip from Record Highs

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

June 14, 2024, marked a notable shift in the U.S. stock market as major indexes pulled back from record highs. Investors engaged in profit-taking while considering the implications of a hawkish Federal Reserve and signs of a slowing economy. This article delves into the key factors influencing the market’s performance and the broader economic context.

After a week of record-setting highs, U.S. stock indexes experienced their first session of decline. The Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC) and the S&P 500 (.SPX) fell from their peaks, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI) also retreated. By midday, the Dow was down 126.96 points (0.33%) to 38,520.14, the S&P 500 dropped 16.29 points (0.30%) to 5,417.45, and the Nasdaq decreased 30.57 points (0.17%) to 17,636.99.

Adding to market uncertainty, the Federal Reserve’s recent projections suggested a more conservative approach to rate cuts than previously anticipated. The Fed’s updated forecast scaled back expectations from three rate cuts this year to just one. This cautious stance contrasted with market expectations, which, according to the CME’s FedWatch tool, saw a more than 70% chance of a rate cut in September and two cuts by year-end.

Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester commented on the positive trend of lowering inflation, but this did little to alleviate concerns about the Fed’s restrained policy easing.

Economic data further complicated the market’s outlook. The University of Michigan’s preliminary Consumer Sentiment Index fell to 65.6 in June, significantly below expectations. This decline highlighted ongoing concerns about inflation and economic stability, contributing to the overall negative sentiment in the market.

The downturn was broad-based, with nine of the 11 S&P 500 sectors experiencing declines. Industrials led the losses with a 1.6% drop, while the economically sensitive small-cap Russell 2000 index lost 1.8%. Despite the general downturn, a few stocks stood out:

  • Adobe (ADBE.O): Adobe shares surged 14.5%, marking the company’s largest one-day gain in four years. The jump came after Adobe raised its annual revenue forecast, driven by robust demand for its AI-powered software, which helped mitigate losses on the Nasdaq.
  • Broadcom (AVGO.O): Broadcom continued its positive streak with a 1.7% rise following an upbeat forecast and the announcement of a 10-for-one stock split.
  • Arm Holdings (ARM.O): Shares of Arm Holdings rose 2.2% after news that the company would join the Nasdaq 100 index, replacing Sirius XM (SIRI.O), which slipped 0.8%.

The market’s optimism earlier in the week was driven by hopes of easing Fed policy and the strength of megacap stocks. Both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq were on track for their seventh week of gains out of eight. However, the possibility of a second-half recession, which could force the Fed to cut rates more significantly, remains a concern.

Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Baird, noted that the market is pricing in a small but significant probability of a recession in the second half of the year.

A Bank of America Global Research report indicated that U.S. value stock funds saw $2.6 billion in outflows, while U.S. growth stock funds attracted $1.8 billion in inflows for the week ending Wednesday. This shift underscores investor preference for growth stocks amid economic uncertainties.

On the NYSE, declining issues outnumbered advancers by a 3.34-to-1 ratio, while on the Nasdaq, the ratio was 2.77-to-1. The S&P index recorded eight new 52-week highs and 16 new lows, while the Nasdaq saw 19 new highs and 149 new lows.

The retreat in U.S. stock indexes reflects a complex interplay of profit-taking, hawkish Fed projections, and cooling economic data. While there is optimism about potential future rate cuts, ongoing concerns about inflation and consumer sentiment continue to weigh on investor confidence. As the year progresses, market participants will closely monitor the Federal Reserve’s actions and economic indicators to gauge the trajectory of the economy and financial markets.

Homebuyers Face Ongoing Affordability Challenges Despite Slight Mortgage Rate Dip

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The mortgage market has seen a slight reprieve this week, with average rates on a 30-year fixed mortgage dipping just below 7%. According to Freddie Mac, the average rate has decreased to 6.95% from 6.99% the previous week. However, for many prospective homebuyers, this minor drop may not be enough to make a significant difference in affordability.

Freddie Mac’s report on Thursday highlights a small but noteworthy dip in mortgage rates. A separate measure tracking daily averages by Mortgage News Daily shows fluctuations between 6.97% and 7.17% over the past week. Despite this slight decline, the rates remain relatively high compared to historical lows, creating challenges for budget-conscious homebuyers.

The Federal Reserve’s policies continue to play a crucial role in shaping mortgage rates. Recently, the Fed decided to hold the benchmark rates steady at 5.25% to 5.50%, signaling only one rate cut for the rest of the year. This decision suggests that any substantial decline in mortgage rates is unlikely in the near future. The Fed’s cautious approach indicates that significant rate drops might not occur until well into 2025.

A recent study indicates that a majority of homebuyers, particularly first-time buyers, need significantly lower rates before they feel confident returning to the market. Ralph McLaughlin, Realtor.com’s senior economist, emphasizes that for inventory-constrained buyers, current mortgage trends will likely maintain the “mortgage rate lock-in effect.” This effect, where homeowners are reluctant to sell and buy new homes at higher rates, is expected to persist until at least the end of the year.

The latest inflation data has shown signs of moderation, with the core Consumer Price Index (CPI) excluding food and energy costs, climbing just 0.2% monthly in May—the lowest since last June. Overall inflation has decelerated year-over-year compared to April. While this news initially caused a dip in mortgage rates, the Fed’s subsequent announcement to hold rates steady tempered this effect. The Fed now projects one rate cut for the rest of the year, a reduction from previous expectations.

Fannie Mae’s homebuyer sentiment survey from May reveals that only one in four Americans expect mortgage rates to decrease over the next 12 months. In contrast, more than 30% of respondents anticipate that rates will rise. This sentiment has led to a new low in consumer confidence, driven by the overall lack of purchase affordability.

Despite current challenges, there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon for homebuyers. Economists at Bank of America Global Research predict multiple rate cuts over the next 24 months—four in 2025 and two in 2026. These cuts, in increments of 25 basis points, could bring rates down to between 3.50% and 3.75% by 2026. This long-term outlook provides a potential path to more affordable mortgage rates, but significant declines in the short term remain unlikely.

Last week saw a brief surge in mortgage application volume, increasing by 16% according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. This surge was primarily driven by a short-lived drop in daily rates, which hovered near 7%. New mortgage applications increased by 9%, though they remain 12% lower than the same week last year. Refinancing activity also saw a notable increase of 28% week-over-week, particularly among VA borrowers who took advantage of the lower rates.

At the current average rate of 6.95%, a homebuyer would pay approximately $1,600 monthly on a $300,000 home with a 20% down payment, according to the Yahoo Finance mortgage calculator. This cost highlights the ongoing challenge of affordability for many potential buyers.

While the slight dip in mortgage rates below 7% offers a small reprieve for homebuyers, significant declines are still months away. The Federal Reserve’s cautious approach, coupled with persistent inflation concerns, suggests that substantial rate reductions are unlikely until 2025. Homebuyers must navigate these challenges with careful planning and realistic expectations, while keeping an eye on long-term trends that may eventually bring relief.

Inflation Cools in May, Raising Hopes for Fed Rate Cuts

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

In a much-needed respite for consumers and the economy, the latest U.S. inflation data showed pricing pressures eased significantly in May. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) remained flat month-over-month and rose just 3.3% annually, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics report released Wednesday. Both measures came in below economist expectations, marking the lowest monthly headline CPI reading since July 2022.

The lower-than-expected inflation numbers were driven primarily by a decline in energy costs, led by a 3.6% monthly drop in gasoline prices. The overall energy index fell 2% from April to May after rising 1.1% the previous month. On an annual basis, energy prices climbed 3.7%.

Stripping out the volatile food and energy categories, so-called core CPI increased just 0.2% from April, the smallest monthly rise since June 2023. The annual core inflation rate ticked down to 3.4%, moderating from the prior month’s 3.5% gain.

The cooling inflation data arrives at a pivotal time for the Federal Reserve as policymakers weigh their next policy move. Central bank officials have repeatedly stressed their commitment to bringing inflation back down to the 2% target, even at the risk of slower economic growth. The latest CPI print strengthens the case for interest rate cuts in the coming months.

Financial markets reacted positively to the encouraging inflation signals, with the 10-year Treasury yield falling around 12 basis points as traders priced in higher odds of the Fed starting to cut rates as soon as September. According to futures pricing, markets now see a 69% chance of a rate cut at the central bank’s September meeting, up sharply from 53% before the CPI release.

While the overall inflation trajectory is encouraging, some underlying price pressures remain stubbornly high. The shelter index, which includes rents and owners’ equivalent rent, rose 0.4% on the month and is up a stubbornly high 5.4% from a year ago. Persistent shelter inflation has been one of the biggest drivers of elevated core inflation readings over the past year.

Economists expect the housing components of inflation to eventually moderate given the recent rise in rental vacancy rates and slowing home price appreciation. However, the timing of that slowdown remains highly uncertain, keeping a key pillar of inflation risk intact for the time being.

Beyond shelter costs, other indexes that posted monthly increases included medical care services, used vehicle prices, and tuition costs for higher education. In contrast, airline fares, prices for new cars and trucks, communication services fees, recreation expenses and apparel prices all declined from April to May.

Despite the positive inflation signals from the latest CPI report, Federal Reserve officials have cautioned that the path back to 2% price stability will likely encounter bumps along the way. Last week’s stronger-than-expected jobs report reinforced the central bank’s hawkish policy stance, with the labor market adding 272,000 positions in May versus expectations for 180,000. Wage growth also remained elevated at 4.1% annually.

With both low inflation and low unemployment now seemingly achievable, the Federal Reserve will need to carefully navigate its policy path to engineer a so-called “soft landing” without tipping the economy into recession. Many economists expect at least a couple of 25 basis point rate cuts by early 2024 if inflation continues cooling as expected.

For investors, the latest CPI data provides a much-needed burst of optimism into markets that have been weighed down by persistent inflation fears and looming recession risks over the past year. Lower consumer prices should provide some relief for corporate profit margins while also supporting spending among cost-conscious households. However, the key question is whether this downshift in inflation proves durable or merely a temporary reprieve.

The Fed’s ability to deftly manage the competing forces of lowering inflation while sustaining economic growth will be critical for shaping the trajectory of investment portfolios in the months ahead. Keep a close eye on forward inflation indicators like consumer expectations, global supply dynamics, and wage trends to gauge whether this cooling phase proves lasting or short-lived. The high-stakes inflation battle is far from over.

Jamie Dimon’s Candid Warning on U.S. Fiscal Deficit

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

In a recent interview, Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, issued a stark warning to the United States regarding its fiscal deficit. Dimon’s stern warning has significant ramifications, not only for policymakers but also for investors closely monitoring economic trends and government policies that can influence market dynamics and investment strategies.

Dimon’s primary concern revolves around the rapid escalation of the fiscal deficit, which currently stands at a staggering 6% of the nation’s GDP. This surge is largely attributable to the extensive measures implemented during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, including interest rate hikes, tax cuts, and massive stimulus programs. While these actions were intended to buoy the economy during turbulent times, Dimon cautions that their long-term consequences, if not counterbalanced by fiscal discipline, could be detrimental.

A prominent issue highlighted by Dimon is the potential impact on inflation. Unchecked deficit spending can fuel higher inflation rates, eroding the purchasing power of investors and consumers alike. Inflation trends are closely watched by investors, as they can influence interest rates, asset prices, and overall investment strategies. Moreover, a ballooning deficit can signal underlying economic imbalances, potentially necessitating corrective measures in the future that could disrupt investment portfolios.

Moreover, Dimon’s remarks shed light on the broader economic outlook. A ballooning deficit can signal underlying economic imbalances and may necessitate corrective measures in the future. For investors, this underscores the importance of staying informed about macroeconomic indicators and government fiscal policies that can shape investment opportunities and risks.

Dimon’s call for addressing the deficit resonates with the broader theme of fiscal responsibility in investment strategies. Investors often seek opportunities in sectors or assets less vulnerable to fiscal uncertainties or inflationary pressures. Diversification across asset classes and regions can also mitigate risks associated with policy changes. Furthermore, Dimon’s commentary underscores the interplay between government policies and market dynamics, as policy decisions, such as deficit reduction efforts, can shape market sentiment, investor confidence, and long-term economic stability.

Furthermore, Dimon’s commentary touches on the relationship between government policies and market dynamics. Investors are mindful of how policy decisions, such as deficit reduction efforts, can influence market sentiment, investor confidence, and long-term economic stability. Understanding these interconnections is crucial for making informed investment decisions.

Beyond fiscal matters, Dimon’s advocacy for respectful dialogue and understanding across political divides is noteworthy. Political stability and consensus on economic policies can contribute to a favorable investment climate. Investors value predictability and clarity in policy frameworks, as they provide a foundation for long-term planning and investment allocation.

In conclusion, Jamie Dimon’s warning regarding the U.S. fiscal deficit carries significant implications for investors. It underscores the importance of fiscal responsibility, the potential impact on inflation and market dynamics, and the value of informed decision-making in navigating economic uncertainties. As investors evaluate opportunities and risks, staying attuned to developments in fiscal policy and economic trends will remain paramount in shaping investment strategies.

Want small cap opportunities delivered straight to your inbox?

Channelchek’s free newsletter will give you exclusive access to our expert research, news, and insights to help you make informed investment decisions.

Get Instant Access

Fed’s Preferred Inflation Gauge Stubbornly High at 2.8%, Locking in Higher Rates

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Inflation in the United States showed alarmingly little signs of cooling in March, according to the latest data on the Federal Reserve’s preferred price gauge released Friday. The stubbornly elevated readings essentially guarantee the U.S. central bank will need to keep interest rates higher for longer to fully constrain persistent price pressures.

The core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, which strips out volatile food and energy costs, rose 2.8% in March from a year earlier, the Commerce Department reported. This matched February’s annual increase and exceeded economists’ expectations of 2.7%.

On a month-over-month basis, the core PCE climbed 0.3% in March, in line with projections. The headline PCE price index including food and energy costs also rose 0.3% for the month and was up 2.7% annually.

The data highlights the challenges the Fed is facing in its battle to bring inflation back down to its 2% target after it surged to multi-decade highs last year on supply shocks, robust demand and pandemic-driven disruptions. Price pressures have proved remarkably persistent, defying the central bank’s aggressive interest rate hiking campaign that kicked off in March 2022.

“Inflation reports released this morning were not as hot as feared, but investors should not get overly anchored to the idea that inflation has been completely cured and the Fed will be cutting interest rates in the near-term,” said George Mateyo, chief investment officer at Key Private Bank. “The prospects of rate cuts remain, but they are not assured.”

The fresh PCE readings follow worse-than-expected inflation figures in Thursday’s GDP report that revealed the personal consumption expenditures price index surged at a 3.4% annualized rate in the first quarter. That was well above the 2.7% forecast and offset a decent 1.6% rise in economic growth over the same period.

The persistent inflation pressures backed bets that the Fed will likely leave interest rates unchanged at the current 4.75%-5% range at its next couple of meetings in June and July. According to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, traders now see around a 44% probability that the central bank could implement two quarter-point rate cuts by the end of 2023.

However, most analysts agree that the Fed would need to see clear signs that consistently high inflation is beginning to dent the still-robust labor market before feeling confident about pivoting to an easing cycle. Policymakers want to avoid making the same mistake of prematurely loosening monetary policy like they did in the 1970s, which allowed inflation to become deeply entrenched.

For investors, the path forward for markets hinges on whether the Fed can achieve a so-called “soft landing” by getting inflation under control without sparking a severe recession. Equity traders largely looked past Friday’s inflation data, with futures pointing to a higher open on Wall Street. But Treasury yields edged lower as traders increased bets on the Fed ultimately reversing course next year.

Still, the latest PCE figures underscore the Fed’s dilemma and the likelihood that interest rates will need to remain restrictive for some time to prevent inflation from becoming unmoored. That raises the risks of overtightening and potential economic turbulence ahead as the full impact of the most aggressive tightening cycle since the 1980s hits home.

Markets on Edge as Inflation Jitters Spark Volatility

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The red hot U.S. economy has financial markets caught between fears of overheating versus overtightening, leading to a tense environment of volatility and angst. U.S. stocks fell sharply on Tuesday, reversing early gains, as investors grew nervous ahead of this week’s critical inflation report that could help shape the Federal Reserve’s policy path.

All eyes are on Wednesday’s March Consumer Price Index (CPI) data, with economists forecasting headline inflation accelerated to 3.4% year-over-year, up from 3.2% in February. The more closely watched core measure excluding food and energy is expected to ease slightly to 3.7% from 3.8%.

The CPI print takes on heightened importance after a slate of robust economic data has traders quickly recalibrating expectations for Fed rate cuts this year. At the start of 2024, markets were pricing in up to 150 basis points of easing as worries about a potential recession peaked. But those easing bets have been dramatically pared back to just around 60 basis points currently.

The shift highlights how perspicacious the “no landing” scenario of stubbornly high inflation forcing the Fed to remain restrictive has become. Traders now only see a 57% chance of at least a 25 basis point cut at the June FOMC meeting, down from 64% just last week.

“Given the strength of the economic data, it’s getting easier and easier to defend the notion that we might be closer to an overheating economy than one nearing recession,” said Dave Grecsek at Aspiriant. “At the moment, three rate cuts this year seems a little demanding.”

Tuesday’s market turmoil underscored this increased skittishness around the inflation trajectory and its policy implications. Major U.S. indices fell, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 0.38%, the S&P 500 off 0.32%, and the Nasdaq Composite declining 0.17%.

The sell-off was broad-based, impacting many of the high-growth tech leaders that have powered the market’s gains so far in 2024. Megacap growth stocks including Nvidia, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft fell between 0.2% and 2.9%. Financial stocks, among the most rate-sensitive sectors, were the worst performers on the day with the S&P 500 Financials index down 0.8%.

The heightened volatility and economic uncertainty has been particularly punishing for the small and micro-cap segments of the market. These smaller, higher-risk companies tend to underperform during turbulent periods as investor appetite for risk diminishes. The Russell 2000 index of small-cap stocks fell 1.2% on Tuesday and is down over 5% from its highs just two weeks ago.

Cryptocurrency and blockchain-related stocks also got caught up in the downdraft, with Coinbase Global and MicroStrategy dropping sharply as bitcoin prices tumbled. Moderna bucked the bearish trend with a 6.9% surge after positive data for its cancer vaccine developed with Merck.

Geopolitical tensions around Iran’s threat to potentially close the critical Strait of Hormuz shipping lane added another layer of anxiety.

While some might view the market jitters as a buying opportunity, the unease is unlikely to dissipate soon given the Fed uncertainty. Investors will be closely scrutinizing the minutes from the March FOMC meeting due out on Wednesday as well for additional clues on policymakers’ latest thinking.

With inflation proving stickier than expected, the Fed has increasingly pushed back against market pricing for rate cuts this year. Several Fed officials have emphasized that any cuts in 2024 are far from assured if inflation does not moderate substantially. That will keep all eyes laser-focused on each CPI print going forward.

Markets have been whipsawed by conflicting economic signals and rampant volatility as investors try to game the unpredictable path ahead. With high stakes riding on the inflation trajectory and its policy implications, intense swings are likely to persist as markets grapple with this high-wire act between overheating and overtightening.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Warns of Higher Inflation Risk

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

In his latest annual letter to shareholders, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon struck a cautious tone about the economic outlook while renewing his criticisms of the stringent regulatory environment facing big banks.

The 67-year-old executive expressed concerns that persistently elevated inflation could prove “stickier” and force interest rates higher than currently expected. He pointed to the significant government spending programs, the Federal Reserve’s efforts to shrink its massive balance sheet, and the potential disruptions to commodity markets from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war as risks that could keep upward pressure on prices.

Dimon stated JPMorgan is prepared for interest rates to range anywhere from 2% to 8% or even higher levels if needed to tame inflation. This highlights the bank’s caution around “unprecedented forces” impacting the economy that Dimon says warrant a prudent approach.

While the U.S. economy has proven resilient so far, Dimon seems to be bracing JPMorgan and shareholders for a bumpier road ahead marked by elevated price pressures.

The letter also contained Dimon’s latest broadside against the intensifying bank regulation stemming from the 2008 financial crisis and its aftermath. He argued relationships between banks and regulatory agencies like the Federal Reserve “have deteriorated significantly” in recent years and become “increasingly less constructive.”

A particular flashpoint is a proposed new rule that would require banks to hold greater capital buffers as protection against potential losses. Dimon contends the rule would be damaging to market-making activities, hurt the ability of Americans to access mortgages and other loans, and simply push more activity into the less-regulated shadows of the financial system.

He questioned the entire post-crisis rule-making process, arguing it has been unproductive, inefficient, and potentially unsafe by driving more leverage into opaque areas. Dimon even raised the possibility of litigation if regulators refuse to change course on the new capital rule.

The increasingly embattled tone highlights the widening schism between the traditional banking sector and their regulators in Washington over the impacts of stringent new safeguards following the global financial crisis 15 years ago.

On the succession front, JPMorgan acknowledged that one of the board’s top priorities is “enabling an orderly CEO transition” from Dimon in the “medium-term” future. The filing named executives like Jennifer Piepszak and Daniel Pinto as potential candidates to eventually take over from Dimon as CEO once he steps down. Pinto, currently serving as President and COO, is viewed as immediately capable of taking over as sole CEO if a more abrupt transition is needed.

Dimon has been at the helm of JPMorgan since 2005 after joining from the bank’s merger with Bank One. In his letter, the long-tenured CEO reflected on JPMorgan becoming an “endgame winner” among the nation’s largest banks over the past two decades through that deal and others.

The bank also provided an updated estimate that its recent acquisition of the failed First Republic Bank will add closer to $2 billion in annual earnings going forward, above its initial $500 million projection. The accretive deal highlights JPMorgan’s firepower to act as a sector consolidator during times of crisis and instability.

Dimon spent part of his letter defending JPMorgan’s decision to withdraw from the Climate Action 100+ coalition focused on emissions reductions. He stated the bank will make its own “independent decisions” on emissions policies instead of being influenced by the group. Dimon also took aim at proxy advisory firms ISS and Glass Lewis, arguing they too often recommend splitting chair/CEO roles at companies without clear evidence it improves performance or operations.

While expressing pride in JPMorgan’s status as an “endgame winner,” Dimon’s latest letter also served as a defiant rejection of headwinds facing large banks from regulators, climate groups, and other outside forces. The combative leader who helped build JPMorgan into a banking titan is clearly positioning for more battles ahead as the second quarter of 2024 unfolds.

Janet Yellen Signals Potential Tariffs on Chinese Green Energy Exports

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen escalated trade tensions with China over its massive subsidies for green industries like electric vehicles, solar panels and batteries. During her recent four-day visit to Beijing, Yellen bluntly warned that the Biden administration “will not accept” American industries being decimated by a flood of cheap Chinese exports – a repeat of the “China shock” that hollowed out U.S. manufacturing in the early 2000s.

At the heart of the dispute are allegations that China has massively overinvested in renewable energy supply chains, building factory capacity far exceeding domestic demand. This excess output is then exported at artificially low prices due to Beijing’s subsidies, undercutting firms in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere.

“Over a decade ago, massive Chinese government support led to below-cost Chinese steel that flooded the global market and decimated industries across the world and in the United States,” Yellen said. “I’ve made it clear that President Biden and I will not accept that reality again.”

While not threatening immediate tariffs or trade actions, the stark warning shows Washington is seriously considering punitive measures if Beijing does not rein in subsidies and overcapacity. Yellen said U.S. concerns are shared by allies like Europe and Japan fearing a glut of unfairly cheap Chinese green tech imports.

For its part, China is pushing back hard. Officials argue the U.S. is unfairly portraying its renewable energy firms as subsidized, understating their innovation. They claim restricting Chinese electric vehicle imports would violate WTO rules and deprive global markets of key climate solutions.

Escalating tensions over green tech subsidies could disrupt trade flows and supply chains for renewable energy developers, electric automakers, battery manufacturers and more across multiple continents. Some key impacts for investors:

Rising Costs: Potential tariffs on Chinese solar panels, wind turbines, EV batteries and other components could increase costs for green energy projects in the U.S. and allied countries, slowing roll-out.

Shifting Competitive Landscape: Non-Chinese exporters of renewable hardware like solar from countries like South Korea, Vietnam or India may benefit from U.S. trade actions against China, increasing overall competition.

Consumer Prices: Green tech price inflation could be passed through to consumers for products like rooftop solar systems, home batteries and EVs if tariffs increase costs.

Strategic Decoupling: If tensions escalate towards a full “decoupling”, it could accelerate efforts by the U.S., Europe and others to secure their supply chains by bringing more critical green industries in-house through domestic investments and subsidies.

Stock Impacts: Depending on how tensions unfold, stocks of firms exposed to U.S.-China green tech trade flows could face volatility and disruptions in both directions. Tariffs would likely create clear winners and losers.

For now, Yellen says new forums for discussions have been created to potentially resolve overcapacity concerns. However, her blunt warnings suggest the U.S. will not hesitate to take tougher actions to protect America’s fledgling renewable energy and electric vehicle industries from alleged unfair Chinese trade practices.

Blowout U.S. Jobs Report Keeps Fed on Hawkish Path, For Now

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The red-hot U.S. labor market showed no signs of cooling in March, with employers adding a whopping 303,000 new jobs last month while the unemployment rate fell to 3.8%. The much stronger-than-expected employment gains provide further evidence of the economy’s resilience even in the face of the Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes over the past year.

The blockbuster jobs number reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday handily exceeded economists’ consensus estimate of 214,000. It marked a sizeable acceleration from February’s solid 207,000 job additions and landed squarely above the 203,000 average over the past year.

Details within the report were equally impressive. The labor force participation rate ticked up to 62.7% as more Americans entered the workforce, while average hourly earnings rose a healthy 0.3% over the previous month. On an annualized basis, wage growth cooled slightly to 4.1% but remains elevated compared to pre-pandemic norms.

Investors closely watch employment costs for signs that stubbornly high inflation may be becoming entrenched. If wage pressures remain too hot, it could force the Fed to keep interest rates restrictive for longer as inflation proves difficult to tame.

“The March employment report definitively shows inflation remains a threat, and the Fed’s work is not done yet,” said EconomicGrizzly chief economist Jeremy Hill. “Cooler wage gains are a step in the right direction, but the central bank remains well behind the curve when it comes to getting inflation under control.”

From a markets perspective, the report prompted traders to dial back expectations for an imminent Fed rate cut. Prior to the data, traders were pricing in around a 60% chance of the first rate reduction coming as soon as June. However, those odds fell to 55% following the jobs numbers, signaling many now see cuts being pushed back to late 2024.

Fed chair Jerome Powell sounded relatively hawkish in comments earlier this week, referring to the labor market as “strong but rebalancing” and indicating more progress is needed on inflation before contemplating rate cuts. While the central bank welcomes a gradual softening of labor conditions, an outright collapse is viewed as unnecessarily painful for the economy.

If job gains stay heated but wage growth continues moderating, the Fed may feel emboldened to start cutting rates in the second half of 2024. A resilient labor market accompanied by cooler inflation pressures is the so-called “soft landing” scenario policymakers are aiming for as they attempt to tame inflation without tipping the economy into recession.

Sector details showed broad-based strength in March’s employment figures. Healthcare led the way by adding 72,000 positions, followed by 71,000 new government jobs. The construction industry saw an encouraging 39,000 hires, double its average monthly pace over the past year. Leisure & hospitality and retail also posted healthy employment increases.

The labor market’s persistent strength comes even as overall economic growth appears to be downshifting. GDP rose just 0.9% on an annualized basis in the final quarter of 2023 after expanding 2.6% in Q3, indicating deceleration amid the Fed’s rate hiking campaign.

While consumers have remained largely resilient thanks to a robust labor market, business investment has taken a hit from higher borrowing costs. This divergence could ultimately lead to payroll reductions in corporate America should profits come under further pressure.

For now, however, the U.S. labor force is flexing its muscles even as economic storm clouds gather. How long employment can defy the Fed’s rate hikes remains to be seen, but March’s outsized jobs report should keep policymakers on a hawkish path over the next few months.

Red Hot Labor Market as U.S. Employers Add 184,000 Jobs in March

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The U.S. labor market showed no signs of cooling in March, with private employers boosting payrolls by 184,000 last month according to a report by payrolls processor ADP. The stronger-than-expected gain signaled the jobs machine kept humming despite the Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes aimed at slowing the economy and conquering inflation.

The 184,000 increase was the largest monthly jobs number since July 2023 and topped economists’ estimates of 148,000. It followed an upwardly revised 155,000 gain in February. The vibrant report sets the stage for the government’s highly anticipated nonfarm payrolls release on Friday, with economists forecasting a still-solid 200,000 jobs were added economy-wide last month.

“March was surprising not just for the pay gains, but the sectors that recorded them,” said Nela Richardson, chief economist at ADP. “Inflation has been cooling, but our data shows pay is heating up in both goods and services.”

Indeed, wage pressures showed little evidence of easing last month. The ADP data showed annual pay increases for those keeping their jobs accelerated to 5.1%, matching the elevated pace from February. Workers switching jobs saw an even bigger 10% year-over-year jump in wages.

The stubborn strength of the labor market and still-elevated pace of wage increases complicates the Federal Reserve’s efforts to tame inflation, which has started to moderate but remains well above the central bank’s 2% target. Fed officials have signaled they likely have more interest rate hikes ahead as they try to dampen hiring and pay growth enough to fully wrestle inflation under control.

“The labor market remains surprisingly resilient despite the Fed’s tightening of financial conditions over the past year,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. “The strong March ADP gain suggests we’re not out of the woods yet on inflation pressures.”

Job growth in March was fairly broad-based across sectors and company sizes. The leisure and hospitality sector continued to be a standout, adding 63,000 new positions as Americans kept splurging on travel and entertainment. Construction payrolls increased by 33,000, while the trade, transportation and utilities sectors combined to add 29,000 workers.

Hiring was also widespread geographically, with the South leading the way by adding 91,000 new employees. The data showed bigger companies with over 50 workers accounted for most of the overall job gains.

One blemish was the professional and business services sector, which cut payrolls by 8,000 in a potential sign of some pockets of weakness emerging amid higher borrowing costs.

While the ADP report doesn’t always sync perfectly with the government’s more comprehensive employment survey, it adds to recent signs that a long-predicted U.S. economic downturn from the Fed’s inflation-fighting campaign has yet to fully materialize. The labor market has remained extraordinarily buoyant, with job openings still far exceeding the number of unemployed and layoffs staying low.

Economists expect Friday’s jobs report to show the unemployment rate held steady at 3.9% in March. If confirmed, it would mark over a year since joblessness was last below 4%, an extremely tight labor market that has forced many companies to raise wages at an unusually rapid clip in order to attract and retain workers.

With paychecks still climbing at a relatively elevated pace, the Fed worries inflationary pressures could become entrenched in the form of a self-perpetuating wage-price spiral. That fear raises the risk the central bank could opt for even higher interest rates, potentially increasing recession risks.

Job Market Stays Resilient as Openings Hold Steady

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The latest employment data shows the resilience of the US labor market, even as the Federal Reserve remains locked in an inflation battle. The number of job openings across the country was essentially unchanged in February at 8.76 million, according to the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) released by the Labor Department.

While just a slight 0.1% uptick from January’s revised 8.75 million openings, the figure highlights how robust hiring demand remains from employers over a year into the Fed’s interest rate hiking campaign. Job vacancies have been sticky at extremely elevated levels, leaving Fed officials frustrated in their efforts to ease wage growth and inflationary pressures.

“The labor market continues to defy expectations of a meaningful cooling,” said Samantha Gunther, economist at Credence Economics. “With openings still so high, wage growth is likely to remain too strong for the Fed’s liking in the months ahead.”

The JOLTS data precedes this week’s highly anticipated March jobs report, which is forecast to show nonfarm payrolls increased by 230,000 positions. That would mark a fourth straight month of job gains over 200,000, underscoring the employment market’s enduring tightness.

There were some modest signs of a gradual loosening in labor conditions buried within February’s openings figures. Job vacancies fell in sectors like information, healthcare and retail trade. More notably, the overall level of layoffs jumped to 1.8 million, the highest since last April, led by a spike in the leisure and hospitality industry.

“While the bar remains high for calling a turn in the labor cycle, we’re seeing some initial hints of cracks starting to form,” said Ryan Bingham, lead labor economist at ADP. “Higher borrowing costs are clearly starting to bite for certain service-sector businesses.”

The report also showed rates of workers quitting their jobs to pursue other opportunities held steady at 2.2% in February, the lowest since the summer of 2020. The diminished quits rate could indicate employees are feeling less confident about switching roles in a more uncertain economic climate.

Another indicator pointing to some easing was the ratio of available workers to job openings, which slipped to 1.36 from 1.43 in January. While still a very tight ratio favoring employers over job seekers, it marked progress toward better balance after peaking above 2-to-1 last year.

For the Fed, the upshot is likely more patience in leaving interest rates elevated. Chair Jerome Powell reiterated last week that stronger labor market “gives” would be needed to bring down unacceptably high inflation back toward the 2% goal.

With payroll growth expected to remain solid and job openings still extremely elevated, it will take more time before productivity-enhancing labor slack emerges. The latest JOLTS figures suggest that process is underway, however gradual it may prove to be.

Government Shutdown Avoided With $1.2 Trillion Plan

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

Congress succeeded in narrowly averting a partial government shutdown by passing a $1.2 trillion spending package, but the contentious process laid bare the dysfunctional politics plaguing Washington D.C. This brinkmanship threatens to erode economic confidence and financial market stability, posing risks that small cap investors must monitor closely.

The House of Representatives advanced the 1,012-page omnibus bill by the slimmest of margins on Friday, with the 286-134 vote squeaking by the two-thirds majority required under an expedited procedure. A faction of 112 Republican lawmakers opposed the bipartisan compromise negotiated by House Speaker Mike Johnson, characterizing it as a bloated spending measure drafted secretly. The rancorous divide even prompted Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to file a long-shot bid to remove Johnson from his leadership role.

The legislative turmoil then shifted to the Senate, where certain conservative members like Rand Paul and Tommy Tuberville signaled they could employ dilatory tactics to temporarily force a shutdown before the bill’s ultimate anticipated passage this weekend. While a short-term partial shutdown would have limited fallout for government operations with retroactive funding, the perpetual governance crises fomented by such maneuvers are deeply concerning for the economic outlook.

“This inability to govern pragmatically and reach reasonable compromise shakes confidence in American economic leadership at a pivotal juncture,” said Brendan Walsh, a partner at investment advisor Woodridge Partners. “The brinkmanship and uncertainty could undermine the environment for sustained earnings growth that small-cap companies rely upon.”

Lack of fiscal discipline, long-term economic foresight, and stable policymaking tends to breed volatility that markets abhor. With the looming prospect of a debt ceiling standoff on the horizon, the headwinds for equity investors are magnified. Buoyant stock valuations appear increasingly discordant with the actual deteriorating governance backdrop, suggesting potential downside risks are being underappreciated.

Indeed, major credit rating agencies have already taken action reflecting these dynamics. Fitch downgraded its U.S. sovereign debt rating in August 2022, citing escalating budgetary dysfunction as a primary factor. Similarly, Moody’s revised its U.S. outlook to negative last November amid the fiscal policy disarray, signaling another downgrade could materialize.

“The perpetual political dramas surrounding basic government funding operations speak to deeper systemic issues that have now directly threatened America’s pristine credit rating,” said Liz Young, head of investment strategy at Renaissance Capital. “This turmoil should be highly concerning for small-cap investors sensitized to economic shifts.”

While equity markets exhibited nonchalance toward this latest shutdown scare, previous prolonged political standoffs over the debt ceiling and government funding have periodically roiled stocks. The S&P 500 fell over 10% in summer 2011 as partisan factions brawled over raising the debt limit before an eleventh-hour resolution, exemplifying how swiftly sentiment can sour during such imbroglios.

With the upcoming debt ceiling fight potentially catalyzing another such conflict before year-end, watchful small-cap investors must be vigilant for escalating dysfunction that could provoke turbulent volatility.

“At a certain threshold, this unproductive political rancor manifests tangible economic and market consequences that can no longer be easily dismissed,” Walsh cautioned. “Preparing defensive postures and hedging strategies may be prudent to navigate potential volatility spawned by these self-inflicted crises.”

The latest spending package does provide several pro-growth provisions appealing to corporations, including increased funding for medical research, childcare, and other Democratic policy priorities. But ultimately, the bruising legislative process highlighted that divided government paralysis remains intractable in the nation’s capital.

As these drawn-out fiscal policy standoffs grow increasingly commonplace, the risks of ebbing economic confidence and corporate earnings growth may become more acute for small-cap equity investors. Monitoring this governance turmoil will be crucial for calibrating prudent portfolio positioning in the months ahead.

Fed Keeps Rates Steady, But Signals More Cuts Coming in 2024

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The Federal Reserve held its benchmark interest rate unchanged on Wednesday following its latest two-day policy meeting. However, the central bank signaled that multiple rate cuts are likely before the end of 2024 as it continues efforts to bring down stubbornly high inflation.

In its post-meeting statement, the Fed kept the target range for its federal funds rate at 5.25%-5.5%, where it has been since last July. This matched widespread expectations among investors and economists.

The more notable part of today’s announcements came from the Fed’s updated Summary of Economic Projections. The anonymous “dot plot” of individual policymaker expectations showed a median projection for three quarter-point rate cuts by year-end 2024.

This would mark a pivotal shift for the Fed, which has been steadily raising rates over the past year at the fastest pace since the 1980s to combat surging inflation. The last time the central bank cut rates was in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other officials have signaled in recent months that softer policies could be appropriate once inflation shows further clear signs of moderating. Consumer prices remain elevated at 6% year-over-year as of February.

“While inflation has moderated somewhat since the middle of last year, it remains too high and further progress is needed,” said Powell in his post-meeting press conference. “We will remain data-dependent as we assess the appropriate stance of policy.”

The Fed’s updated economic projections now forecast GDP growth of 2.1% in 2024, up sharply from the 1.4% estimate in December. Core inflation is seen decelerating to 2.6% by year-end before returning to the Fed’s 2% target by 2026. The unemployment rate projection was nudged down to 4%.

With economic conditions still relatively strong, Powell stressed the central bank’s ability to move gradually and in a “risk management” mindset on raising or lowering interest rates. Markets expect the first rate cut to come as soon as June.

“The process of getting inflation down to 2% has a long way to go and is likely to be bumpy,” said Powell. “We have more work to do.”

The potential for rate cuts this year hinges on how quickly the lagging effects of the Fed’s aggressive tightening campaign over the past year feed through into lower price pressures. Policymakers will be closely watching metrics like consumer spending, wage growth, supply chains and inflation expectations for any signs that demand is cooling sustainably.

So far, the labor market has remained resilient, with job gains still robust and the unemployment rate hovering near 50-year lows around 3.5%. This tightness has allowed for solid wage gains, which risks perpetuating an inflationary price-wage spiral if not brought to heel.

While the road ahead remains highly uncertain, Powell stated that he feels the Fed has made enough policy adjustments already to at least pause the rate hiking cycle for now and switch into a data-driven risk management mode. This allows officials to be “patient” and avoid over-tightening while monitoring incoming information.

The Fed Chair also noted that discussions on reducing the central bank’s $8.4 trillion balance sheet began at this meeting, but no decisions have been made yet on adjusting the current runoff caps or pace.

In all, today’s Fed meeting reiterated the central bank’s intention to keep rates elevated for now while laying the groundwork for an eventual pivot to easier policy sometime later this year as disinflationary forces take deeper hold. Striking that balance between under and overtightening will be key for engineering a long-awaited soft landing for the economy.