China Holds Back Key Rare Earths Despite Easing Other U.S. Export Curbs

Key Points:
– China lifts some trade curbs on 28 U.S. firms, but keeps rare earth metals off the table
– Export ban on 7 critical rare earth elements remains intact
– Dual-use export restrictions paused for 90 days amid renewed U.S.-China diplomacy
– Defense, energy, and EV sectors in U.S. remain exposed to supply risks

In a carefully calculated move, China announced on Thursday a temporary suspension of some trade restrictions targeting 28 American firms—but stopped short of lifting its export ban on seven critical rare earth elements, underscoring its ongoing strategic leverage over the United States.

The easing of some non-tariff measures comes just days after high-level trade talks in Geneva, where U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng appeared together in a rare public show of diplomatic engagement. But while China’s Commerce Ministry agreed to suspend dual-use export curbs and temporarily removed 17 companies from its “unreliable entity list,” it retained export controls on key minerals like dysprosium, terbium, and yttrium—materials vital for U.S. defense and clean energy production.

The seven rare earths still restricted—samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium—are central to everything from guided missiles to EV motors. According to analysts, this deliberate exclusion signals Beijing’s intent to maintain strategic pressure even as it opens the door to limited cooperation.

“This is China drawing a line in the sand,” said one Asia-based commodities analyst. “They’re signaling flexibility on diplomacy, but the core leverage—rare earth dominance—is not being sacrificed.”

The freeze on rare earth exports was initially introduced in early April as part of China’s retaliation against President Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs. That package included export licensing controls for the seven elements and the addition of several U.S. defense-adjacent companies to blacklists. While some of those companies, including Teledyne Brown Engineering and Kratos Unmanned Aerial Systems, received a 90-day reprieve, the rare earths ban remains firmly in place.

Notably, China’s Commerce Ministry released a parallel statement this week emphasizing the need for stronger national security oversight of its rare earth industry, including measures to combat smuggling and tighten internal supply chain controls. This was reinforced by state-linked social media accounts hinting at the metals’ impact on U.S. military readiness.

The U.S. currently sources over 70% of its rare earth imports from China, a vulnerability that has become more politically charged amid renewed trade hostilities. American efforts to diversify rare earth supply chains—such as investing in Australian mining firms or restarting domestic refining—remain years from full-scale viability.

For investors, the bifurcated approach by China suggests that while the broader trade environment may be softening temporarily, core strategic resources like rare earths are unlikely to be freely accessible in the near term. Defense contractors, energy manufacturers, and EV suppliers will continue to face uncertainty, potentially pushing up costs and driving supply chain shifts.

Until rare earth independence becomes a reality, this remains a pressure point Beijing is unlikely to relinquish.

Take a moment to take a look at more emerging growth natural resources companies by taking a look at Noble Capital Markets’ Research Analyst Mark Reichman’s coverage list.

Janet Yellen Signals Potential Tariffs on Chinese Green Energy Exports

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen escalated trade tensions with China over its massive subsidies for green industries like electric vehicles, solar panels and batteries. During her recent four-day visit to Beijing, Yellen bluntly warned that the Biden administration “will not accept” American industries being decimated by a flood of cheap Chinese exports – a repeat of the “China shock” that hollowed out U.S. manufacturing in the early 2000s.

At the heart of the dispute are allegations that China has massively overinvested in renewable energy supply chains, building factory capacity far exceeding domestic demand. This excess output is then exported at artificially low prices due to Beijing’s subsidies, undercutting firms in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere.

“Over a decade ago, massive Chinese government support led to below-cost Chinese steel that flooded the global market and decimated industries across the world and in the United States,” Yellen said. “I’ve made it clear that President Biden and I will not accept that reality again.”

While not threatening immediate tariffs or trade actions, the stark warning shows Washington is seriously considering punitive measures if Beijing does not rein in subsidies and overcapacity. Yellen said U.S. concerns are shared by allies like Europe and Japan fearing a glut of unfairly cheap Chinese green tech imports.

For its part, China is pushing back hard. Officials argue the U.S. is unfairly portraying its renewable energy firms as subsidized, understating their innovation. They claim restricting Chinese electric vehicle imports would violate WTO rules and deprive global markets of key climate solutions.

Escalating tensions over green tech subsidies could disrupt trade flows and supply chains for renewable energy developers, electric automakers, battery manufacturers and more across multiple continents. Some key impacts for investors:

Rising Costs: Potential tariffs on Chinese solar panels, wind turbines, EV batteries and other components could increase costs for green energy projects in the U.S. and allied countries, slowing roll-out.

Shifting Competitive Landscape: Non-Chinese exporters of renewable hardware like solar from countries like South Korea, Vietnam or India may benefit from U.S. trade actions against China, increasing overall competition.

Consumer Prices: Green tech price inflation could be passed through to consumers for products like rooftop solar systems, home batteries and EVs if tariffs increase costs.

Strategic Decoupling: If tensions escalate towards a full “decoupling”, it could accelerate efforts by the U.S., Europe and others to secure their supply chains by bringing more critical green industries in-house through domestic investments and subsidies.

Stock Impacts: Depending on how tensions unfold, stocks of firms exposed to U.S.-China green tech trade flows could face volatility and disruptions in both directions. Tariffs would likely create clear winners and losers.

For now, Yellen says new forums for discussions have been created to potentially resolve overcapacity concerns. However, her blunt warnings suggest the U.S. will not hesitate to take tougher actions to protect America’s fledgling renewable energy and electric vehicle industries from alleged unfair Chinese trade practices.