Category:

Are U.S. Treasuries Jeopardizing Other Markets?

Posted on by aweinsoff@channelchek.com
Image Credit: Pixabay (Pexels)

How Liquid Has the Treasury Market Been in 2022?

The health of the US Treasury market impacts almost all other markets. This is because the “risk-free” market (US Treasuries) and its relationship to the US dollar is the foundation from which other markets stand. If it is in trouble, all markets suffer. The “health” measure most associated with securities like treasuries is liquidity or whether money can be raised when needed. Other measures include market spread between the bid and the ask, trading activity levels, and price impact or how a large transaction impacts the price.

A just released report by New York Fed economists Michael Fleming and Claire Nelson discuss the current state of the U.S. Treasury markets from the unique point of view and access to information of the New York Fed.

The report follows:

How Liquid Has the Treasury Market Been in 2022?

Policymakers and market participants are closely watching liquidity conditions in the U.S. Treasury securities market. Such conditions matter because liquidity is crucial to the many important uses of Treasury securities in financial markets. But just how liquid has the market been and how unusual is the liquidity given the higher-than-usual volatility? In this post, we assess the recent evolution of Treasury market liquidity and its relationship with price volatility and find that while the market has been less liquid in 2022, it has not been unusually illiquid after accounting for the high level of volatility.

Why Liquidity Matters

The U.S. Treasury securities market is the largest and most liquid government securities market in the world. Treasury securities are used to finance the U.S. government, to manage interest rate risk, as a risk-free benchmark for pricing other financial instruments, and by the Federal Reserve in implementing monetary policy. Having a liquid market is important for all these purposes and thus of great interest to market participants and policymakers alike.

Measuring Liquidity

Liquidity typically refers to the cost of quickly converting an asset into cash (or vice versa) and is measured in a variety of ways. We consider three commonly used measures, calculated using high-frequency data from the interdealer market: bid-ask spreads, order book depth, and price impact. The measures are for the most recently auctioned

(on-the-run) two-, five-, and ten-year notes (the three most actively traded Treasury securities, as shown in this post) and are calculated for New York trading hours (defined as 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.). Our data source is BrokerTec, which is estimated to account for 80 percent of trading in the electronic interdealer broker market.

The Market Has Been Relatively Illiquid in 2022

The bid-ask spread—the difference between the lowest ask price and the highest bid price for a security—is one of the most popular liquidity measures. As shown in the chart below, bid-ask spreads have widened out in 2022, but have remained well below the levels observed during the COVID-related disruptions of March 2020 (examined in this post). The widening has been somewhat greater for the two-year note relative to its average and relative to its level in March 2020.

Bid-Ask Spreads Have Widened Modestly

Liberty Street Economics chart plots the five-day moving averages of average daily bid-ask spreads for the two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022.

Source: Authors’ calculations, based on data from BrokerTec.

Notes: The chart plots five-day moving averages of average daily bid-ask spreads for the on-the-run two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Spreads are measured in 32nds of a point, where a point equals one percent of par.

The next chart plots order book depth, measured as the average quantity of securities available for sale or purchase at the best bid and offer prices. Depth levels again point to relatively poor liquidity in 2022, but with the differences across securities more striking. Depth in the two-year note has been at levels commensurate with those of March 2020, whereas depth in the five-year note has remained somewhat higher—and depth in the ten-year note appreciably higher—than the levels of March 2020.

Order Book Depth Lowest since March 2020

Liberty Street Economics chart plots five-day moving averages of average daily depth for the two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022.

Source: Authors’ calculations, based on data from BrokerTec.

Notes: The chart plots five-day moving averages of average daily depth for the on-the-run two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Data are for order book depth at the inside tier, averaged across the bid and offer sides. Depth is measured in millions of U.S. dollars par.

Measures of the price impact of trades also suggest a notable deterioration of liquidity. The next chart plots the estimated price impact per $100 million in net order flow (that is, buyer-initiated trading volume less seller-initiated trading volume). A higher price impact suggests reduced liquidity. Price impact has been high this year, and again more notably so for the two-year note relative to the March 2020 episode. That said, price impact looks to have peaked in late June and July, and to have declined most recently (in October).

Price Impact Highest since March 2020

Liberty Street Economics chart plots the estimated price impact per $100 million in net order flow for the two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Source: Authors’ calculations, based on data from BrokerTec.

Notes: The chart plots five-day moving averages of slope coefficients from daily regressions of one-minute price changes on one-minute net order flow (buyer-initiated trading volume less seller-initiated trading volume) for the on-the-run two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Price impact is measured in 32nds of a point per $100 million, where a point equals one percent of par.

Note that we start our analysis of liquidity in this post in 2019 and not earlier. One reason is to highlight the developments in 2022. Another reason is that the minimum price increment for the two-year note was halved in late 2018, creating a break in the note’s bid-ask spread and depth series. Longer time series of bid-ask spreads, order book depth, and price impact are plotted in this post and this paper. The longer history indicates that the price impact in the two-year note is currently at levels comparable to those seen during the 2007-09 global financial crisis, as well as in March 2020.

Volatility Has Also Been High

Pandemic-induced supply disruptions, high inflation, policy uncertainty, and geopolitical conflict have led to a sizable increase in uncertainty about the expected path of interest rates, resulting in high price volatility in 2022, as shown in the next chart. As with liquidity, volatility has been especially high lately for the two-year note relative to its history, likely reflecting the importance of near-term monetary policy uncertainty in explaining the current episode. Volatility has caused market makers to widen their bid-ask spreads and post less depth at any given price (to manage the increased risk of taking on positions), and for the price impact of trades to increase, illustrating the well-known negative relationship between volatility and liquidity.

Price Volatility Highest Since March 2020

Liberty Street Economics chart plots five-day moving averages of price volatility for the two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022.

Source: Authors’ calculations, based on data from BrokerTec.

Notes: The chart plots five-day moving averages of price volatility for the on-the-run two-, five-, and ten-year notes in the interdealer market from January 2, 2019, to October 31, 2022. Price volatility is calculated for each day by summing squared one-minute returns (log changes in midpoint prices) from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m., annualizing by multiplying by 252, and then taking the square root. It is reported in percent.

Liquidity Has Tracked Volatility

To assess whether liquidity has been unusual given the level of volatility, we provide a scatter plot of price impact against volatility for the five-year note in the chart below. The chart shows that the 2022 observations (in blue) fall in line with the historical relationship. That is, the current level of liquidity is consistent with the current level of volatility, as implied by the historical relationship between these two variables. This is true for the ten-year note as well, whereas for the two-year note the evidence points to somewhat higher-than-expected price impact given the volatility in 2022 (as also occurred in fall 2008 and March 2020).

Liquidity and Volatility in Line with Historical Relationship

Liberty Street Economics chart plots price impact against price volatility by week for the five-year note from January 2, 2005, to October 28, 2022. 

Source: Authors’ calculations, based on data from BrokerTec.

Notes: The chart plots price impact against price volatility by week for the on-the-run five-year note from January 2, 2005, to October 28, 2022. The weekly measures for both series are averages of the daily measures plotted in the preceding two charts. Fall 2008 points are for September 21, 2008 – January 3, 2009, March 2020 points are for March 1, 2020 – March 28, 2020, and 2022 points are for January 2, 2022 – October 29, 2022.

The preceding analysis is based on realized price volatility—that is, on how much prices are actually changing. We repeated the analysis with implied (or expected) price volatility, as measured by the ICE BofAML MOVE Index, and found similar results for 2022. That is, liquidity for the five- and ten-year notes is in line with the historical relationship between liquidity and expected volatility, whereas liquidity is somewhat worse for the two-year note.

Note also that while liquidity may not be especially high relative to volatility, one might then ask whether volatility itself is unusually high. Answering this question is beyond our scope here, although we will note that there are good reasons for volatility to be high, as discussed above.

Trading Volume Has Been High

Despite the high volatility and illiquidity, trading volume has held up this year. High trading volume amid high illiquidity is common in the Treasury market, and was also observed during the market disruptions around the near-failure of Long-Term Capital Management (see this paper), during the 2007-09 financial crisis (see this paper), during the October 15, 2014, flash rally (see this post), and during the COVID-19-related disruptions of March 2020 (see this post). Periods of high uncertainty are associated with high volatility and illiquidity but also high trading demand.

Nothing to Be Concerned About?

Not exactly. While Treasury market liquidity has been in line with volatility, there are still reasons to be cautious. The market’s capacity to smoothly handle large flows has been of ongoing concern since March 2020, as discussed in this paper, as Treasury debt outstanding continues to grow. Moreover, lower-than-usual liquidity implies that a liquidity shock will have larger-than-usual effects on prices and perhaps be more likely to precipitate a negative feedback loop between security sales, volatility, and illiquidity. Close monitoring of Treasury market liquidity—and continued efforts to improve the market’s resilience—remain important.

Citation:

 “How Liquid Has the Treasury Market Been in 2022?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, November 15, 2022, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2022/11/how-liquid-has-the-treasury-market-been-in-2022/.

Lifeway Foods (LWAY) – Record Results for the Third Quarter; Raising to Outperform

Posted on by cpereira@noblefcm.com


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Joe Gomes, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Joshua Zoepfel, Research Associate, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

3Q22 Results. Lifeway reported record top line for the third quarter with sales up 29.1% y-o-y to $38.1 million. Price and volume in the core kefir product drove the top line results. Kefir unit volumes increased double digits in the quarter. Net income for the quarter totaled $983,000, or $0.06 per share, compared to $480,000, or $0.03 per share last year. We had forecast revenue of $33.5 million and net income of $215,000, or EPS of $0.01.

New Distribution. Management continues to pick up new accounts. Most recently convincing Food Lion to switch to Lifeway branded kefir from an unbranded product, and adding the 975 store Wawa convenience chain in the mid-Atlantic states and the 106 location Plaid Pantry convenience chain serving the Pacific Northwest. These new accounts should help Lifeway to continue to post top line growth.


Get the Full Report

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

Endeavour Silver (c) – Inventory Provides Sales Flexibility Going Forward

Posted on by cpereira@noblefcm.com


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Endeavour Silver is a mid-tier precious metals mining company that operates two high-grade, underground, silver-gold mines in Mexico. Endeavour is currently advancing the Terronera mine project towards a development decision, pending financing and final permits and exploring its portfolio of exploration and development projects in Mexico, Chile and the United States to facilitate its goal to become a premier senior silver producer. Our philosophy of corporate social integrity creates value for all stakeholders.

Mark Reichman, Senior Research Analyst, Natural Resources, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

Third quarter 2022 results. Endeavour generated a third quarter adjusted net loss of $3.1 million or ($0.02) per share compared to a net loss of $4.5 million or $(0.03) per share during the prior year period. We had projected net income of $2.0 million or $0.01 per share. Financial results were negatively impacted by the company’s decision to withhold sales for inventory, along with higher direct production costs. At quarter end, Endeavour held 1,527,549 ounces of silver and 3,210 ounces of gold in bullion inventory and 2,770 ounces of silver and 143 ounces of gold in concentrate inventory. For the nine months ended September 30, adjusted EBITDA and EPS amounted to $33.1 million and $(0.01), respectively.

Updating estimates. We expect stronger financial performance during the fourth quarter although we have trimmed our 2022 EPS estimate to $0.06 per share from $0.09 to reflect third quarter financial results. We have lowered our 2023 EBITDA and EPS estimates to $52.5 million and $0.09, respectively, from $0.11 and $53.3 million to reflect modestly lower margin on sales.


Get the Full Report

This Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

Coeur Mining (CDE) – Getting the Rochester Expansion Past the Finish Line

Posted on by cpereira@noblefcm.com


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Mark Reichman, Senior Research Analyst, Natural Resources, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

Third quarter 2022 results. Coeur reported a third quarter adjusted net loss of $44.7 million or $(0.16) per share compared to a net loss of $2.9 million or $(0.01) per share during the prior year period. We had forecast a net loss of $3.0 million or $(0.01) per share. Sales were lower and costs applicable to sales were higher than our estimates. Free cash flow was $(115.7) million. For the nine months ended September 30, the company generated adjusted EBITDA in the amount of $103.1 million and free cash flow of $(242.2) million.

Updating estimates. We have lowered our 2022 EBITDA and EPS estimates to $136.3 million and $(0.31), respectively, from $151.8 million and $(0.12). Revisions to our 2022 estimates reflect third quarter results and lower commodity price assumptions in the fourth quarter. Our 2023 estimates remain unchanged.


Get the Full Report

This Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

Cocrystal Pharma (COCP) – 3Q22 Reported – First Influenza Vaccine Data To Be Presented

Posted on by cpereira@noblefcm.com


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company discovering and developing novel antiviral therapeutics that target the replication process of influenza viruses, coronaviruses (including SARS-CoV-2), hepatitis C viruses and noroviruses. Cocrystal employs unique structure-based technologies and Nobel Prize-winning expertise to create first- and best-in-class antiviral drugs. For further information about Cocrystal, please visit www.cocrystalpharma.com.

Robert LeBoyer, Vice President, Research Analyst, Life Sciences , Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

3Q22 Reported With Pipeline Update. Cocrystal reported a 3Q22 loss of $5.7 million or $0.70 per share. The product pipeline continues to make progress, with the first data from its influenza vaccine, CC-42344, scheduled for presentation in December. Two COVID-19 programs continue in preclinical studies, with an IND filing expected in 1Q23. The company ended the quarter with $42.1 million in cash.

Influenza Trial Data To Be Presented. Enrollment has been completed in the Phase 1 study for CC-42344 for seasonal and pandemic influenza. Safety and pharmacokinetic data is scheduled for presentation at the World Antiviral Congress in December 2022. The trial results will be submitted to regulatory authorities in the United Kingdom for a Phase 2a human challenge study to determine efficacy, expected to begin in 2H23.


Get the Full Report

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

Blackboxstocks (BLBX) – Gearing Up for Next Year, Lowering Price Target

Posted on by cpereira@noblefcm.com


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Blackboxstocks, Inc. is a financial technology and social media hybrid platform offering real-time proprietary analytics and news for stock and options traders of all levels. Our web-based software employs “predictive technology” enhanced by artificial intelligence to find volatility and unusual market activity that may result in the rapid change in the price of a stock or option. Blackbox continuously scans the NASDAQ, New York Stock Exchange, CBOE, and all other options markets, analyzing over 10,000 stocks and up to 1,500,000 options contracts multiple times per second. We provide our users with a fully interactive social media platform that is integrated into our dashboard, enabling our users to exchange information and ideas quickly and efficiently through a common network. We recently introduced a live audio/video feature that allows our members to broadcast on their own channels to share trade strategies and market insight within the Blackbox community. Blackbox is a SaaS company with a growing base of users that spans 42 countries; current subscription fees are $99.97 per month or $959.00 annually. For more information, go to: www.blackboxstocks.com .

Joe Gomes, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Joshua Zoepfel, Research Associate, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

3Q Results. Revenue for the quarter was $1.22 million, a decrease from last year’s $1.47 million and in-line with our estimate of $1.21 million. The average users were down as well in the quarter, 5,197 compared to 5,535 a year ago and 6,181 in the second quarter. The Company reported a net loss of $1.31 million, or ($0.10) per share, versus a net loss of $505,976 or ($0.05) last year. We estimated a net loss of $1.29 million or ($0.10).

Tough Environment, but a Silver Lining. Continued poor performance in the stock market, along with high inflation and sluggish GDP, has caused the Company to see decreases in overall performance year-over-year. However, the Company will have a Black Friday/Cyber Monday promotion that we believe will attract new users and bring back past users.


Get the Full Report

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

BioSig Technologies (BSGM) – BioSig reports 3Q 2022; Lots of Activity; Target Price Reduced

Posted on by cpereira@noblefcm.com


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

BioSig Technologies is a medical technology company commercializing a proprietary biomedical signal processing platform designed to improve signal fidelity and uncover the full range of ECG and intra-cardiac signals (www.biosig.com). The Company’s first product, PURE EP(TM) System is a computerized system intended for acquiring, digitizing, amplifying, filtering, measuring and calculating, displaying, recording and storing of electrocardiographic and intracardiac signals for patients undergoing electrophysiology (EP) procedures in an EP laboratory.

Gregory Aurand, Senior Research Analyst, Healthcare Services & Medical Devices, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

BioSig reported 3Q 2022 results.  The Company reported $135,000 of revenues in the quarter that recognized $127,000 in product sales and $8,000 in service revenue.  We were looking for $980,000 in product revenues and $49,000 in service revenue.  The third quarter EPS loss of $0.14 matched our expected loss per share.

Marketing activities are ramping up.  PURE EP technology was featured in a physician presentation at the Kansas City Heart Rhythm Symposium held August 20-21, 2022.  In late September 2022, the Company released its most advanced software, known as PURE EP Software Version 6 with ACCUVIZ Module. The new Version 6 software was introduced at the Cleveland Clinic Global EP Summit held September 23-24, 2022.  In addition, the Company was invited to attend and sponsor the Venice Arrhythmias 2022 Congress that met October 13-15 in Venice Italy.


Get the Full Report

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

Alvopetro Energy (ALVOF) – Rising cash flow allows dividend increase and share repurchase

Posted on by cpereira@noblefcm.com


Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Alvopetro Energy Ltd.’s vision is to become a leading independent upstream and midstream operator in Brazil. Our strategy is to unlock the on-shore natural gas potential in the state of Bahia in Brazil, building off the development of our Caburé natural gas field and our strategic midstream infrastructure.

Michael Heim, CFA, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

Alvopetro reported 2022-3Q results significantly higher than last year and above our expectations. Revenues rose 67% due to a 7% increase in production and a 58% increase in gas prices. Higher sales translated into higher cash flow ($13.8 million versus $7.2 million) and earnings ($8.8 million versus $0.0).

Results were due to operations improvements and are likely to continue. The company expanded its gas processing facilities in July raising capacity to 3,000 boe/d. With quarterly results, management indicated that October total production averaged 2,720 boe/d, a nice rise above 2022-3Q levels of 2,642 boe/d.


Get the Full Report

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

Is This the Best Category of Stocks for Young, Long-Term Investors?

Posted on by aweinsoff@channelchek.com
Image Credit: Michelle Ress (flickr)

Large-Cap and Small-Cap Stock Return Probabilities

According to Ibbotson Associates’ Stocks, Bonds, Bill and Inflation, small Capitalization stocks outperform Large Capitalization stocks over the long term. (Although there is not a set definition for a Small Cap stock,  generally speaking Small Cap stocks are those with a market capitalization below $2 billion today, while Large Cap stocks refer to the S&P 500.) Over the 1926-2018 period, Small Caps produced an average annual return of 11.0% compared to 9.99% for Large Capitalization stocks. (1) But, since 2010, Small Cap stocks have underperformed their Large Cap brethren. From the beginning of 2010 through the end of 2019 the S&P 500 rose 185.2% while the Russell 2000 (a proxy for small cap stocks) was up 145.8%. Over the last decade, the S&P 500 outperformed the Russell 2000 in 6 of the ten years. In 2019, the S&P 500 produced a 28.9% return compared to 23.7% for the Russell 2000. Has the time come for Small Cap stocks to outperform Large Cap stocks?

Positives

Relative Valuation Levels. Valuations for Small Caps are at their most attractive levels since June 2003 relative to Large Caps, according to data from Jefferies Financial Group. Historically, Small Caps have outperformed Large Caps by an average of 6% over the following year when the valuation gaps widens this much. (2)

New Index Highs Are a Historic Positive Sign. This past Thanksgiving, the Russell 2000 hit a new 52-week high after nearly 15 months without breaching it. FactSet and LPL Research data indicate that of the last 11 times the Russell 2000 index hit a new 52-week high, returns for the index were up an average 17% over the next 12 months 10 of those times. (3)

Higher Rate of Earnings Growth. Small Cap stocks produce a higher rate of earnings growth over time than Large Caps. Over the 1987-2017 period, Small Caps average annual recurring earnings growth was 8.15% versus 7.44% for Large Caps. (4)

Positives of Small Caps. As one would expect, most Small Caps are young companies with less international exposure than Large Caps. (5) Small Caps have less research coverage than Large Caps, providing a greater potential of market inefficiencies. (6) Ownership of Small Cap stock is typically concentrated in the hands of founders or management, a group that may be more motivated to increase shareholder value than the highly dispersed ownership of Large Cap shares.

Drawbacks

Higher Returns are due to Higher Risk. According to Alpha Wealth Strategies, Small Caps higher return over time comes with a standard deviation (a measure of risk) of 31.28 compared to just 19.76 for Large Cap stocks. (7) So, yes, an investor is receiving a higher return over time from Small Cap stocks, but the investor is assuming higher risk to achieve those returns.

Greater Volatility. As an example of the greater volatility of Small Caps, the Russell 2000 posted 65 intraday moves of 1% or more in the first 10 months of 2019, double that of the S&P 500. (2)

More Susceptible to Economic Shocks. Given their smaller size, lack of business diversification, and limited access to capital, Small Cap companies have historically been more susceptible to economic shocks. In times of economic uncertainty, many investors flock to Lage Cap stocks that are easier to trade and do not suffer from Small Caps’ business limitations. (8)

Small Caps Risks Relative to Large Caps. Among the greater risks of Small Caps is they tend to be more leveraged than Large Cap stocks with less operational efficiency and pricing power. (3) Small Caps also typically have less liquidity than Large Caps, meaning it may be tougher for investors to either build a position or quickly exit a holding. (6)

The Balanced Case:

While Small Cap stocks make up roughly just 10% of the overall U.S. equity market capitalization, they constitute the vast majority of publicly traded firms. And while Small Cap stocks are more volatile than Large Cap stock, over the last 93 years Small Caps generated positive returns in 68% of the years, compared to 73% of the time for Large Caps. Over the period, Small Caps produced a best one-year return of 142.87% and a 1-year worst return of a negative 58.01%, compared to 53.99% and a negative 43.34% for Large Caps. (7) Given Small Caps superior long-term investment returns compared to Large Caps, Small Caps would appear to be fertile shopping ground for long-term oriented investors.

Channelchek

Sources:

http://www.nylinvestments.com/polos/Investing_Essentials_Growth_of_$11.pdf

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/09/small-caps-are-primed-to-outperform-large-caps-over-the-next-decade.html

https://fortune.com/2019/12/03/as-small-cap-stocks-hit-new-highs-some-see-evidence-that-the-bull-market-has-more-room-to-run/

https://fp.thriventfunds.com/insights/market-updates/whats-behind-the-underperformance-of-small-cap-stocks.html

https://money.usnews.com/investing/portfolio-management/articles/how-to-compare-small-caps-vs-large-caps-for-your-portfolio

https://www.firstwilshire.com/value-investing/

http://www.alphawealthstrategies.com/weekly-update/4428

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/13/small-cap-stocks-are-tanking-while-large-caps-hold-up-a-signal-something-is-wrong-with-economy.html

Artemis Program to Benefit Many Companies

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com
Image Courtesy of Aerojet Rocketdyne

Billions in Artemis Program Budget Could Cause these Companies to Rocket

What companies could gain from the Artemis missions to the moon?

The multibillion-dollar Artemis program has been unfolding over the past several years. The most recent success is the 322-foot-tall Space Launch System (SLS), the most powerful rocket NASA has developed, and the Orion spacecraft. This is all designed to, in time, safely carry astronauts to the moon’s orbit and provide a platform for the U.S. to return to the moon’s surface for the first time since 1972.

The mission of Artemis One is to test a powerful NASA rocket called the Space Launch System, as well as the Orion spacecraft that the rocket will ferry into orbit. After the Florida launch, NASA plans to use the SLS rocket to direct Orion on a route around the moon, after which the vehicle’s crewless capsule will return to Earth and parachute into the Pacific Ocean. Those steps represent another trial geared toward ensuring the Orion crew module can safely bring astronauts back from orbit.

The initial mission will help set the stage for a crewed mission to the moon that NASA hopes to conduct as early as 2025. These efforts will entail higher technology and special equipment designed especially for a unique purpose. With billions being spent, investors may ask what companies may benefit. Obviously, the major contractors, then subcontractors and material suppliers.

The cost of SLS is shown above. Additionally, the cost to assemble, integrate, prepare and launch the SLS and its payloads are funded separately under Exploration Ground Systems, currently at about $600 million per year. (Source:Wikipedia)

Major Contractors

Keeping in mind that an unsuccessful launch could weigh on these companies, as much as they may be propelled by continued success, these are prime contractors. NASA’s prime contractors for the rock launch system is Aerojet Rocketdyne (AJRD), Boeing (NYSE: BA), and Northrop Grumman (NOC). As a note, AJRD showed up as one of 5 portfolio holdings of hedge fund manager Michael Burry.

Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the prime contractor on the Orion spacecraft, while NASA’s prime contractors for the rocket launch system include Redwire’s (RDW) critical sun sensor components and advanced optical imaging technologies, they will be launching on NASA’s Orion spacecraft as a part of the space agency’s Artemis One mission. Aeva Technologies (AEVA) is also involved with a LiDAR-based mobile terrain-mapping and navigation system for lunar and other planet exploration, while KULR Technology Group (KULR) has a battery safety contract with NASA to test its lithium-ion cells going into battery packs designed for the Artemis Program.

Raytheon Technologies'(RTX) was selected to advance spacewalking capabilities in low-Earth orbit and on the Moon. Goodyear Tire & Rubber (GT) has been contracted to develop tires to perform on the lunar surface.

Rocket Lab (RKLB) has been called upon to test new orbits around the moon. For communications, Lockheed Martin (LMT), Amazon (AMZN), and Cisco (CSCO) are working in conjunction to develop a new voice, AI, and tablet-based video technologies for use around the moon.

The companies being called upon is expected to grow rapidly after scientific experiments begin on the moon’s surface.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System#:~:text=The%20Space%20Launch%20System%20(abbreviated,2022%20from%20Kennedy%20Space%20Center.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/artemis-i-launch-moon-mission-nasa-11668529576?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3877127-nasa-is-going-to-the-moon-will-these-stocks-benefit

Release – Alvopetro Announces a 50% Increase to our Quarterly Dividend, an Intention to Launch a Share Buyback Program, and Record Q3 2022 Results

Posted on by cpatches

Research, News and Market Data on ALVOF

CALGARY, AB, Nov. 15, 2022 /CNW/ – Alvopetro Energy Ltd. (TSXV:ALV); (OTCQX: ALVOF) is pleased to announce a 50% increase in our quarterly dividend, to US$0.12 per common share, an intention to launch a share buyback program under a normal course issuer bid (“NCIB”) and operating and financial results for the third quarter of 2022 including another record quarter of funds flow from operations of $13.3 million. We will host a live webcast to discuss Q3 2022 results on Wednesday November 16, 2022, beginning at 9:00 am Mountain time.

President & CEO, Corey C. Ruttan commented:

“With continued strong operating and financial results, and with our debt now fully repaid, we are pleased to announce a 50% increase in our quarterly dividend following on the 33% increase earlier this year. Our dividend program and the proposed NCIB will provide us with maximum flexibility to meet our strategy to maintain a balanced organic growth and stakeholder return model.”

All references herein to $ refer to United States dollars, unless otherwise stated and all tabular amounts are in thousands of United States dollars, except as otherwise noted.

Quarterly Dividend Increased 50% to $0.12 per Share

Alvopetro is pleased to announce that our Board of Directors has approved a 50% increase in our quarterly dividend, to $0.12 per common share, payable in cash on January 13, 2023, to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 30, 2022. This dividend is designated as an “eligible dividend” for Canadian income tax purposes. 

Dividend payments to non-residents of Canada will be subject to withholding taxes at the Canadian statutory rate of 25%.  Shareholders may be entitled to a reduced withholding tax rate under a tax treaty between their country of residence and Canada.  For further information, see Alvopetro’s website at  https://alvopetro.com/Dividends-Non-resident-Shareholders.

Normal Course Issuer Bid

In connection with our long-standing balanced and disciplined stakeholder return and organic growth model, our Board has provided approval to submit an application to launch a share buyback program under a NCIB, subject to securities law and customary approvals. Once approved, the NCIB, combined with our quarterly dividends, will provide us with flexibility in managing our returns to stakeholders.

Financial and Operating Highlights – Third Quarter of 2022

  • Daily sales averaged 2,642 boepd in Q3 2022, a 7% increase from the Q3 2021 average of 2,459 boepd and a 12% increase from the Q2 2022 average of 2,359 boepd. The expansion of our gas processing facility was completed at the end of July and available processing capacity has now increased to 500,000 m3/d (18 MMcfpd) contributing to higher volumes in the quarter.
  • As of August 1, 2022, Alvopetro’s natural gas price has been reset to the new ceiling price of $10.22/MMBtu. Due to the appreciation of the BRL in the first half of 2022 compared to second half of 2021, the BRL contracted price remained consistent at BRL1.94/m3. With all natural gas sales in Q3 2022 at the ceiling price, our average realized natural gas price increased to $11.18/Mcf compared to the Q3 2021 average price of $7.07/Mcf. Higher commodity prices and higher daily sales volumes resulted in a 67% increase in our natural gas, condensate and oil revenue compared to Q3 2021.
  • Our operating netback was $59.83 per boe in Q3 2022, an improvement of $23.45 per boe from Q3 2021 (+64%). Despite consistent BRL denominated natural gas pricing, our operating netback decreased $4.13 per boe from Q2 2022 (-6%) due to the devaluation of the BRL relative to the USD and lower Brent pricing on condensate.
  • We generated cash flows from operating activities of $13.8 million ($0.40 per basic share and $0.37 per diluted share) and funds flows from operations of $13.3 million ($0.39 per basic share and $0.36 per diluted share), increases of $6.6 million and $5.4 million, respectively compared to Q3 2021.
  • We reported net income of $8.8 million in Q3 2022 compared to a loss of $0.02 million in Q3 2021.
  • Capital expenditures totaled $8.7 million, and included drilling costs for our 183-B1, 182-C2 and Unit-C wells, testing costs on our 182-C1 well, long lead purchases and development costs on our Murucututu project.
  • All outstanding warrants were exercised in the quarter, with 1,342,978 warrants exercised by way of cashless exercise and 1,342,978 warrants exercised at a strike price of $1.80 per share. Alvopetro received cash proceeds of $2.4 million and issued a total of 2,081,616 common shares on the exercise.
  • We repaid the final $2.5 million outstanding on the credit facility and the facility has now been cancelled. As at September 30, 2022, we had a net working capital surplus of $12.2 million, including $17.4 million in cash and cash equivalents.
  • Our October 2022 sales volumes averaged 2,720 boepd based on field estimates, with natural gas sales of 15.6MMcfpd and natural gas liquids from condensate of 124 bopd.

The following table provides a summary of Alvopetro’s financial and operating results for three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2021. The consolidated financial statements with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A) are available on our website at www.alvopetro.com and will be available on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) website at www.sedar.com.


Notes:
The 2021 comparative periods in the table above have been restated. See “Restatement of the 2021 Comparative Period” section within the MD&A and Note 14 of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 for further details.
Per share amounts are based on weighted average shares outstanding other than dividends per share, which is based on the number of common shares outstanding at each dividend record date. The weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding in the computation of funds flow from operations and cash flows from operating activities per share is the same as for net income per share.
 See “Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures” section within this news release.

Third Quarter 2022 Results Webcast

Alvopetro will host a live webcast to discuss Q3 2022 financial results at 9:00 am Mountain time on November 16, 2022. Details for joining the event are as follows:

Date: November 16, 2022
Time: 9:00 a.m. Mountain/11:00  a.m. Eastern
Link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83084021752
Dial-in Numbers: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kgefFrJiJ
Webinar ID: 830 8402 1752

The webcast will include a question-and-answer period. Online participants will be able to ask questions through the Zoom portal. Dial-in participants can email questions directly to socialmedia@alvopetro.com.

Long-term Incentive Compensation Grants

In connection with our long-term incentive compensation program, Alvopetro’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has approved the annual rolling grants to officers, directors and certain employees under Alvopetro’s Omnibus Incentive Plan. A total of 536,000 stock options, 122,000 restricted share units (“RSUs”) and 40,000 deferred share units (“DSUs”) were approved by the Board and are expected to be granted on November 24, 2022. Of the total grants, 248,000 stock options, 101,000 RSUs and 40,000 DSUs were granted to directors and officers. Each stock option, RSU and DSU entitles the holder to purchase one common share. Each stock option granted will have an exercise price based on the volume weighted average trading price of Alvopetro’s shares on the TSX Venture Exchange for the five (5) consecutive trading days up to and including November 24, 2022. All stock options, RSUs and DSUs granted expire five (5) years from the date of the grant.

Corporate Presentation

Alvopetro’s updated corporate presentation is available on our website at:
http://www.alvopetro.com/corporate-presentation. 

Social Media

Follow Alvopetro on our social media channels at the following links:

Twitter – https://twitter.com/AlvopetroEnergy
Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/alvopetro/ 
LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/company/alvopetro-energy-ltd

Alvopetro Energy Ltd.’s vision is to become a leading independent upstream and midstream operator in Brazil. Our strategy is to unlock the on-shore natural gas potential in the state of Bahia in Brazil, building off the development of our Caburé natural gas field and our strategic midstream infrastructure.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release.

Abbreviations:

bbls=barrels
boepd=barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”) per day
bopd=barrels of oil and/or natural gas liquids (condensate) per day
BRL=Brazilian Real
m3=cubic metre
Mcf=thousand cubic feet
Mcfpd=thousand cubic feet per day
MMcf=million cubic feet
MMcfpd=million cubic feet per day
NGLs=  natural gas liquids
Q2 2022  =three months ended June 30, 2022
Q3 2021=three months ended September 30, 2021
Q3 2022=three months ended September 30, 2022

Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures

This news release contains references to various non-GAAP financial measures, non-GAAP ratios, capital management measures and supplementary financial measures as such terms are defined in National Instrument 52-112 Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures Disclosure. Such measures are not recognized measures under GAAP and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and might not be comparable to similar financial measures disclosed by other issuers. While these measures may be common in the oil and gas industry, the Company’s use of these terms may not be comparable to similarly defined measures presented by other companies. The non-GAAP and other financial measures referred to in this report should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than measures prescribed by IFRS and they are not meant to enhance the Company’s reported financial performance or position. These are complementary measures that are used by management in assessing the Company’s financial performance, efficiency and liquidity and they may be used by investors or other users of this document for the same purpose. Below is a description of the non-GAAP financial measures, non-GAAP ratios, capital management measures and supplementary financial measures used in this news release. For more information with respect to financial measures which have not been defined by GAAP, including reconciliations to the closest comparable GAAP measure, see the “Non-GAAP Measures and Other Financial Measures” section of the Company’s MD&A which may be accessed through the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Operating netback

Operating netback is calculated as natural gas, oil and condensate revenues less royalties and production expenses. This calculation is provided in the “Operating Netback” section of the Company’s MD&A using our IFRS measures. The Company’s MD&A may be accessed through the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. Operating netback is a common metric used in the oil and gas industry used to demonstrate profitability from operations.

Non-GAAP Financial Ratios

Operating netback per boe

Operating netback is calculated on a per unit basis, which is per barrel of oil equivalent (“boe”). It is a common non-GAAP measure used in the oil and gas industry and management believes this measurement assists in evaluating the operating performance of the Company. It is a measure of the economic quality of the Company’s producing assets and is useful for evaluating variable costs as it provides a reliable measure regardless of fluctuations in production. Alvopetro calculated operating netback per boe as operating netback divided by total sales volumes (barrels of oil equivalent). This calculation is provided in the “Operating Netback” section of the Company’s MD&A using our IFRS measures. The Company’s MD&A may be accessed through the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. Operating netback is a common metric used in the oil and gas industry used to demonstrate profitability from operations on a per unit basis (boe).

Operating netback margin

Operating netback margin is calculated as operating netback per boe divided by the realized sales price per boe. Operating netback margin is a measure of the profitability per boe relative to natural gas, oil and condensate sales revenues per boe and is calculated as follows:

Funds Flow from Operations Per Share

Funds flow from operations per share is a non-GAAP ratio that includes all cash generated from operating activities and is calculated before changes in non-cash working capital, divided by the weighted the weighted average shares outstanding for the respective period. For the periods reported in this news release the cash flows from operating activities per share and funds flow from operations per share is as follows:

Capital Management Measures

Funds Flow from Operations 

Funds flow from operations is a non-GAAP capital management measure that includes all cash generated from operating activities and is calculated before changes in non-cash working capital. The most comparable GAAP measure to funds flow from operations is cash flows from operating activities. Management considers funds flow from operations important as it helps evaluate financial performance and demonstrates the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash to fund future growth opportunities. Funds flow from operations should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, cash flows from operating activities however management finds that the impact of working capital items on the cash flows reduces the comparability of the metric from period to period. A reconciliation of funds flow from operations to cash flows from operating activities is as follows:

Net Working Capital

Net working capital is computed as current assets less current liabilities. Net working capital is a measure of liquidity, is used to evaluate financial resources, and is calculated as follows: 

Working Capital Net of Debt

Working capital net of debt is computed as net working capital surplus decreased by the carrying amount of the Credit Facility. Working capital net of debt is used by management to assess the Company’s overall financial position.

Supplementary Financial Measures

“Average realized natural gas price – $/Mcf” is comprised of natural gas sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company’s natural gas sales volumes.

“Average realized NGL – condensate price – $/bbl” is comprised of condensate sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company’s NGL sales volumes from condensate.

“Average realized oil price – $/bbl” is comprised of oil sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company’s oil sales volumes.

“Average realized price – $/boe” is comprised of natural gas, condensate and oil sales as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the Company’s total natural gas, condensate and oil sales volumes (barrels of oil equivalent).

“Royalties per boe” is comprised of royalties, as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the total natural gas, condensate and oil sales volumes (barrels of oil equivalent).

“Production expenses per boe” is comprised of production expenses, as determined in accordance with IFRS, divided by the total natural gas, condensate and oil sales volumes (barrels of oil equivalent).

BOE Disclosure

The term barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”) may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six thousand cubic feet per barrel (6 Mcf/bbl) of natural gas to barrels of oil equivalence is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. All boe conversions in this MD&A are derived from converting gas to oil in the ratio mix of six thousand cubic feet of gas to one barrel of oil.

Forward-Looking Statements and Cautionary Language

This news release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The use of any of the words “will”, “expect”, “intend” and other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking information. Forward‐looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether or not such results will be achieved. A number of factors could cause actual results to vary significantly from the expectations discussed in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect current assumptions and expectations regarding future events. Accordingly, when relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions, Alvopetro cautions readers not to place undue reliance on these statements, as forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties. More particularly and without limitation, this news release contains forward-looking information concerning the Company’s dividend policy, plans for dividends in the future, and the timing and taxation of such dividends, the Company’s intention to proceed with an NCIB, plans relating to the Company’s operational activities, the expected natural gas price, gas sales and gas deliveries under Alvopetro’s long-term gas sales agreement, exploration and development prospects of Alvopetro, the expected timing of certain of Alvopetro’s testing and operational activities, future results from operations, and the Company’s plans for dividends in the future. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon assumptions and judgments with respect to the future including, but not limited to, expected approvals and timing thereof with respect to an NCIB, equipment availability, the timing and results of testing the 183-B1 well, the 182-C2 well and the Unit C well, the success of future drilling, completion, recompletion and development activities, foreign exchange rates, expectations regarding Alvopetro’s working interest and the outcome of any redeterminations, the outlook for commodity markets and ability to access capital markets, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the performance of producing wells and reservoirs, well development and operating performance, the timing of regulatory licenses and approvals,  general economic and business conditions, forecasted demand for oil and natural gas, weather and access to drilling locations, the availability and cost of labour and services, environmental regulation, including regulation relating to hydraulic fracturing and stimulation, the ability to monetize hydrocarbons discovered, the regulatory and legal environment and other risks associated with oil and gas operations. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect. Actual results achieved during the forecast period will vary from the information provided herein as a result of numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors. In addition, the declaration, timing, amount and payment of future dividends remain at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Although Alvopetro believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward-looking information is based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking information because Alvopetro can give no assurance that it will prove to be correct. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Additional information on factors that could affect the operations or financial results of Alvopetro are included in our restated annual information form which may be accessed on Alvopetro’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com. The forward-looking information contained in this news release is made as of the date hereof and Alvopetro undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws.

SOURCE Alvopetro Energy Ltd.

For further information: Corey C. Ruttan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, or Alison Howard, Chief Financial Officer, Phone: 587.794.4224, Email: info@alvopetro.com, www.alvopetro.com, TSX-V: ALV, OTCQX: ALVOF

Release – Sierra Metals Announces Follow Up Shareholder Conference Call to Be Held on Wednesday November 16th, 2022

Posted on by cpatches

Research News and Market Data on SMTS

TORONTO–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Sierra Metals Inc. (TSX: SMT) (BVL or Bolsa de Valores de Lima: SMT) (“Sierra Metals” or the “Company”) will host a conference call on Wednesday November 16th, 2022, at 8:00am EST to provide attendees the opportunity to ask questions with respect to the Company’s financial results for Q3 2022. The Company held its Q3 2022 earnings call earlier today, but due to technical issues attendees were not able to ask questions. Details of the November 16th, 2022 conference call are as follows:

Via phone:

To ensure your participation, please call approximately five minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the call.

Canada dial-in number (Toll Free): 1 833 950 0062
Canada dial-in number (Local): 1 226 828 7575
US dial-in number (Toll Free): 1 844 200 6205
US dial-in number (Local): 1 646 904 5544
All other locations: +1 929 526 1599

Access code: 272699

Press *1 to ask a question, *2 to withdraw your question, or *0 for operator assistance

About Sierra Metals

Sierra Metals Inc. is a diversified Canadian mining company with Green Metal exposure including copper production and base metal production with precious metals byproduct credits, focused on the production and development of its Yauricocha Mine in Peru, and Bolivar and Cusi Mines in Mexico. The Company is focused on increasing production volume and growing mineral resources. The Company has large land packages at all three mines with several prospective regional targets providing longer-term exploration upside and mineral resource growth potential.

The Company’s Common Shares trade on the Bolsa de Valores de Lima and on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “SMT”.

For further information regarding Sierra Metals, please visit www.sierrametals.com.

Continue to Follow, Like and Watch our progress:

Web: www.sierrametals.com | Twitter: sierrametals | Facebook: SierraMetalsInc |
LinkedIn: Sierra Metals Inc | Instagram: sierrametals

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian and United States securities legislation, including with respect to timing of the conference call. Forward-looking information relates to future events or the anticipated performance of Sierra and reflect management’s expectations or beliefs regarding such future events and anticipated performance based on an assumed set of economic conditions and courses of action. In certain cases, statements that contain forward-looking information can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative of these words or comparable terminology. By its very nature forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual performance of Sierra to be materially different from any anticipated performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking information.

Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking information, including, without limitation, the risks described under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s annual information form dated March 16, 2022 for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and other risks identified in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, which filings are available at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov, respectively.

The risk factors referred to above are not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of the Company’s forward-looking information. Forward-looking information includes statements about the future and is inherently uncertain, and the Company’s actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. The Company’s statements containing forward-looking information are based on the beliefs, expectations, and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and the Company does not assume any obligation to update such forward-looking information if circumstances or management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, one should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Investor Relations
Sierra Metals Inc.
Tel: +1 (416) 366-7777
Email: info@sierrametals.com

Luis Marchese
CEO
Sierra Metals Inc.
Tel: +1 (416) 366-7777

Source: Sierra Metals Inc.

Release – Motorsport Games to Report Third Quarter 2022 Financial Results

Posted on by aweinsoff@channelchek.com

Research, News, and Market Data on MSGM

NOVEMBER 15, 2022

Motorsport Games to Report Third Quarter 2022 Financial
Results

MIAMI, Nov. 15, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Motorsport Games Inc. (NASDAQ: MSGM) (“Motorsport Games”), a leading racing game developer, publisher and esports ecosystem provider of official motorsport racing series throughout the world will report financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2022 on Friday, November 18, 2022, after market close. Management will host a conference call and webcast on the same day at 5:00 p.m. ET to discuss the results.

Participants may access the live webcast on the Company’s investor relations website at https://ir.motorsportgames.com under “Events.” The call may also be accessed by dialing 1 (877) 407-0784 from the U.S., or by dialing 1 (201) 689-8560 internationally.

About Motorsport Games:
Motorsport Games, a Motorsport Network company, is a leading racing game developer, publisher and esports ecosystem provider of official motorsport racing series throughout the world. Combining innovative and engaging video games with exciting esports competitions and content for racing fans and gamers, Motorsport Games strives to make the joy of racing accessible to everyone. The Company is the officially licensed video game developer and publisher for iconic motorsport racing series across PC, PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo Switch and mobile, including NASCAR, INDYCAR, 24 Hours of Le Mans and the British Touring Car Championship (“BTCC”), as well as the industry leading rFactor 2 and KartKraft simulations. rFactor 2 also serves as the official sim racing platform of Formula E, while also powering F1 Arcade through a partnership with Kindred Concepts. Motorsport Games is an award-winning esports partner of choice for 24 Hours of Le Mans, Formula E, BTCC, the FIA World Rallycross Championship and the eNASCAR Heat Pro League, among others. Motorsport Games is building a virtual racing ecosystem where each product drives excitement, every esports event is an adventure and every story inspires.

Contacts:
Investors:
investors@motorsportgames.com

A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/90cf8d59-ce48-4ab2-ac0c-fbca9a4cabdd