Is the Fed Really Trying to Lower Employment?

The Reasons High Employment Concerns the Market

Maximum employment is one of the top mandates of the Federal Reserve, so why is it trying to reduce the number of jobs available? On the surface this would seem backwards. But in economics, everything is related, intentionally slowing growth to the point where resources aren’t stressed, can provide a better balance across the Feds other mandates. These Congressional mandates are stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.  

Current Employment Situation

The most recent U.S. Employment Report was released on July 7th. It showed that payroll employment was still climbing during June, and 209,000 new employees were added to company payrolls. The same report showed that the unemployment rate dropped to a historically low 3.6%, and workers earned 4.4% more than a year earlier (In May, it was 4.3% more).

The markets immediately viewed these strong job gains, coupled with an acceleration of wage increases and the drop in unemployment, as foreshadowing a Fed hike in late July. And also viewed is as increasing the probability of additional tightening before year-end. Employment is high, and the labor market is so tight that employers are increasing what they have paid workers in order to attract suitable personnel.

A day earlier, the payroll company ADP released its National Employment Report, which is produced in collaboration with the Stanford Digital Economy Lab. This report also showed a strong labor market. The private sector (non-government) jobs increased by 497,000 in June. This was approximately double the strong number of new hires from the previous month.

Civilian Unemployment Rate

Source: BLS.gov

How More Jobs Translate to Stock Market Concerns

The U.S. Unemployment Rate continues to remain very low despite the Fed’s aggressive efforts to slow the economy and only a modest 2% GDP growth rate. In fact, in April unemployment hit a 50 year low at 3.4% which is just below the June level.

Employment levels in the U.S. are now a key focus of the Federal Reserve (the Fed) in its effort to slow U.S. economic growth to combat persistent inflation well above the Fed’s target. Fed officials have repeated what most market participants know, that achieving lower inflation would be difficult without addressing the increasing prices that employees are receiving for their labor. A strong jobs market pushes wages higher, which filters into higher consumer inflation.

The job market’s continued strength has been somewhat surprising in what appears to be a slowing economy, with consistently low unemployment and solid job growth. This likely reflects unusual dynamics that stem from the novel economy during the pandemic. The economy hasn’t yet balanced out after massive government stimulus, low production, and a changed sense of work among many that are still of working age.

The employment numbers this year show there are still 1.6 job openings for each person that is looking for work. Considering those looking for work and the positions open are largely mismatched, this leaves employers either bidding up what they are willing to pay to attract the right person or producing less than is demanded by the market for their goods or services. Both situations are inflationary.

There are two sides to every problem; while potential employees willing to work represent far fewer workers than there are jobs, there are fewer, of age, adults willing to participate in the labor force. The labor force participation rate now stands at 62.6%, unchanged from the previous four months. Improving labor participation would be a preferred way to address the tightness in the labor market that’s leading to wage inflation, but the Fed doesn’t have the tools to incentivize this. So it is back to raising rates, draining money from the system, and otherwise taking the punchbowl away to end the party.

Good News is Bad News

This is why the Fed is not excited about job growth and low unemployment. And if the Fed isn’t happy, the markets aren’t happy. The bond market selling off in expectation that the Fed is going to raise interest rates lowers bond prices, and the stock market is concerned on many fronts, as high rates increase costs for companies, slow purchases that are typically financed, and with each tick up in rates, bonds and C.D.s become more attractive as an alternative to stocks.

So the good news which is that almost anyone who wants a job can have one, as it turns out, leads to a chain of events that causes concern among those invested in stocks.

But while unfortunate, the Fed actions are long-term good. Inflation quietly erodes the purchasing power of financial assets. So the Fed is focused on what is driving inflation, wage inflation being chief among them.

Take Away

The job market’s continued strength and the wage growth that comes with it creates a perplexing situation for all involved. The Fed has to work to reduce employment pressures, and stock and bond market participants are cheering on bad economic news – this is perplexing for investors of all levels.  

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/06/economy/june-jobs-report-preview/index.html

Five Ways Higher Interest Rates Impact Stocks

Interest Rate Increases are Less Frightening When the Impact is Understood

The fixed income market, and the interest rates market in general have a pronounced role in shaping stock market dynamics and equity investor sentiment. At a minimum, higher rates, the cost of money, when increasing, will most directly impact businesses that borrow as part of their normal activity. Other industries find that growing profits is more difficult in a less direct way. And then there are actually sectors that can benefit from an upward-sloping yield curve. Below we cover five different ways that higher interest rates impact stocks, and mention sectors that may be especially hurt, and some that could even thrive if the rates continue to climb higher.

Background

The U.S. central bank, The Federal Reserve has raised overnight interest rates from nearly 0.00% to near 5.25%. Longer-term rates have not followed in lock-step as other dynamics such as future economic expectations, flight to quality, and Fed yield-curve-control have caused longer rates to continue to lag below short-term interest rates.

In recent days there has been some selling in bonds which has driven longer interest rates up. The overall reason is the rekindled belief that the Fed is not finished tightening after the FOMC minutes from June indicated such. But other factors such as investors doing break-even analysis on longer term bonds and then raealizing they may not be getting paid enough interest to offset inflation, or to benefit them more than rolling shorter maturities that may be paying 200bp higher.

The sudden increase in rates, especially the ten-year US Treasury Note which is a benchmark for many lending rates, including mortgages, has caused stock market participants to feel unsettled. Some of their fears may be justified, some may not be.

Five Ways Higher Interest Rates Impact Equities

#1 Higher Rates Impact on Equity Valuations

One of the primary concerns for stock market investors, when interest rates rise, is the potential impact on equity valuations. As interest rates increase, the discount rate used to value future cash flows is then higher. This can put downward pressure on equity valuations, particularly for stocks with high price-to-earnings ratios. Investors become concerned about the potential decline in stock prices and the overall effect on the market’s valuation levels.

#2 Profitability of Interest Rate-Sensitive Sectors

Some sectors are particularly interest rate sensitive. Utilities for example, might have a couple of things working against them. First off, they are notorious for carrying a high level of debt. As this debt needs to be refinanced (as bonds mature), the new bonds need to be issued at higher rates, increasing the utility’s cost of doing business.

Utilities also are popular investments among dividend investors. As yields on bonds increase, there is more competition for income investors to choose from, at times with lower risk, which makes utility stocks less attractive.

As one might imagine REITs, by definition, all have real estate as underlying assets. Rising interest rates can increase borrowing costs for REITs involved in property acquisitions and development. This can potentially affect their profitability and underlying property valuations.

As with utilities, the REIT sector attracts income investors; if bonds become a more attractive alternative, this creates lower demand for REIT investing.

Financial institutions are certainly impacted, however, depending on the segment within financials, some may benefit from increased profit margins, while others are weighed down by increased costs. Basic banking is borrowing short and lending out longer, then managing the risk of maturity mismatch. As longer-term rates rise relative to shorter rates, these institutions find their earnings spread increases.

In recent years the trend has been, especially for larger banks, to create loans and then sell them. They profit on the servicing side, or administrative fees to create the loan. In this way they are shielded from interest rate mismatch risk, and they can make more loans on the same deposit base (selling the loans replenished the funds they can loan from). So the benefit of rising rates on benchmark securities relative to the banks deposit rates could have much less positive impact than it might have if they held the loans. What may actually happen within these institutions is that they experience fewer loans as consumers and business borrow take fewer loans, thus earning less fee income.

#3 Investors Lean Toward Bond Investments

The return on anything is the present value, versus future value, over time held. Higher interest rates can make fixed-income investments more attractive than low rates compared to stocks. When interest rates rise, more investors prefer a known return in terms of interest payments than an unknown move in stocks valuations. This shift in investor preferences can lead to reduced demand for equities and potentially impact stock market performance.

Investors buying bonds as rates are rising will experience a decrease in the value of their fixed income securities. So, they may be surprised to learn that they avoided stocks because stocks may go down in value, and instead invested in fixed income which mathematically will go down in value when rates rise.

#4 Borrowing Costs for Companies

As mentioned earlier, rising interest rates increase the borrowing costs for companies. This can impact corporate profitability and investment decisions, which in turn can affect stock prices. Companies that rely heavily on debt financing may experience higher interest expenses, potentially squeezing profit margins. Investors become concerned about the potential impact on corporate earnings and the overall financial health of companies in a higher interest rate environment.

Analyzing a company’s capital structure, and looking for signs of low debt levels, or long-term debt that is locked in at the low interest rates of the early 2020’s, may be a good way to filter companies that have a profit advantage over their competitors

#5 Consumer Spending and Business Investment

Consumer spending levels are a direct driver in consumer stocks. When borrowing becomes more expensive, consumers may reduce their discretionary spending. This can impact businesses that rely on consumer demand, potentially leading to lower revenues and profitability. The stocks that tend to hold up more when spending levels decrease are those that produce necessities.

Business investment during periods of rising interest rates can influence investment decisions for businesses. As borrowing costs increase, companies may reduce or delay capital investments, expansions, or acquisitions. This cautious approach can impact economic growth and overall industry development, which can in turn affect its performance, for much longer than a quarter or two.

Take Away

Stock market investors have legitimate concerns about the impact of higher interest rates on their investments. The potential effects on equity valuations, profitability of interest rate-sensitive sectors, investor preferences for fixed-income investments, borrowing costs for companies, and consumer spending/business investment are key factors that contribute to investor apprehension. It is as important for investors to monitor interest rate trends and understand the impacts as it is for them to monitor.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Investment Articles from the First Half, That are Still Well-Worth Understanding

The Markets During the First Half of 2023 Were Reflective of the People that Trade Them

Financial markets reflect the collective actions and expectations of market participants. This includes rational analysis, irrational emotions, and at times less than rational analysis. The emotions and number crunching get their cue from a daily barrage of information including: profits, policy, panic, prices, politics, purchasing power, the president …and that’s just the Ps. So each day, as Channelchek prepares to deliver research, articles, and pertinent video content to subscriber’s inboxes, we plow through an abundance of information and hope to share what is either not being addressed or covered, or present front page news from the point of view of seasoned investors, not less experienced news writers.

Below are six articles, one from each month this year. Although I have favorites not included here, and these may not have been the most read or shared, they told a slightly expanded story than found on the mainstream take on the subject and are still relevant to some investors.  

As a content provider to this popular investment research platform, my job is not to call the market; it is to present thoughts and knowledge to help investors make decisions on small and microcap stocks along with the overall universe of investment opportunities. The insights below from earlier this year are still quite current, and worth digesting.  

January 2023

Will Three Bank Regulators Kill Cryptocurrency in 2023?

On the very first business day of 2023, three regulators announced concerns over businesses involved in cryptocurrency citing the lack of oversight, lack of standards, and unknown risk. As the year progressed, the three federal agencies, which do not include work on oversight being done by the SEC or CFTC, are now working hard to regulate what banks can do involving crypto. The SEC for its part has been creating headaches for some of the larger crypto exchanges. Banks are having a particularly difficult time incorporating the asset in their business.

February 2023

Michael Burry Warns Against the Market Hoping for Economic Weakness

Investment content providers love Michael Burry. The reason is that readership goes through the roof whenever his name is mentioned. Still, if there is nothing to write about the subject, or if it is old news, the writer, blogger, or vlogger is doing investors a disservice.

We’re choosy about when to take one of Burry’s rare tweets and decipher them for readers. But, we always try to be among the first when his fund’s public holdings are reported each quarter on SEC form 13-F. But there are only few times during the year when there is actually worthwhile news. This is because Burry is usually tightlipped. Unless required by a regulator, the successful hedge fund manager is out of the public spotlight, presumably crunching numbers and rebuilding old guitars.

This article is good advice that can be used any time the Fed is trying to reel in inflation.

March 2023

The CFA Institute Makes First Major Change to Program Since Inception

It was 1963 the last time the CFA Institute (Chartered Financial Analyst) made any changes to their prestigious designation. However, the investment world is changing, and the CFA Institute is responding in order to better serve those that benefit from the services of skilled analysts. In 2023 CFA candidates will have more choices, more study material available, and the ability to take credit for their rigorous studies beginning after passing Level I.

Some thoughts on why, eligibility, and the new focus are presented here along with how it should help keep the credential fresh and more useful.  

April 2023

U.S. Money Supply, Here’s Why it’s Critical for Inflation Forecasts

It wasn’t too long ago that the Federal Reserve did not announce its intentions. If a Fed-watcher or market participant wanted to know for certain if the FOMC adjusted monetary policy, the best they could do is see if measures of money supply increased or decreased. Weeks later the FOMC Minutes would be released, and the markets would know for sure what the Fed did at the previous meeting.

When the Fed became more transparent, the market focus on money-supply disappeared. This has now reversed as the stimulative money that had been injected into the economy to prevent undue weakness during the pandemic is now being methodically removed via quantitative tightening (Q.T.). The renewed focus on M2 is to make sure the Fed sticks with its plan. Signs that it may not be impact the amount of money available to chase goods and services, this impacts inflation.

The Fed’s battle to drain the cash put into the system, and do it in a way that doesn’t crash banks, or the overall economy is perilous, is continuing and well worth understanding.

May 2023

Solid Evidence a Recession is Unlikely this Year

Economists and news writers have been negative about the economic outlook, scaring people with the word recession since before the year even began. And while there are some weaknesses, the stimulative money supply is still exceedingly high, jobs are more abundant than workers, and home sales have not reacted as expected when mortgage rates rise from 3% to 7%.

The often-repeated line that the downward slope of the yield curve is a time-tested indicator of an impending recession was the echo chamber talking point that probably didn’t apply to this economy because of a novel Fed policy.

From a textbook position, those saying a negative yield curve indicates a recession got the answer right if they were taking a college quiz. However, those that were saying this inverted yield curve indicates a recession may have flunked. And if you copied off the economist next to you, and they somehow missed that the Fed owned 33% of all U.S. Treasuries outstanding, and because of their policy of yield-curve-control, the yield curve was not market-driven, and therefore not a reliable indicator of anything. What we know is that when the Fed buys one out of every three bonds, it leaves a mark on the area of the curve that they are active.

With higher than expected GDP released last week, most have stopped talking about a recession in 2023. We put out several articles beginning in 2022 explaining why others may have this yield curve indicator wrong, this is addition is most recent.

I highly recommend reviewing this article if your summer backyard barbecues include conversations about economic strength (or weakness).

June 2023

Why Small Cap Stocks Started to Attract Mega Cap Investors

Small Cap stocks had been lagging behind larger companies. Historically they are more volatile, but investors expect to be compensated over time for the additional risk they take. Yet, over a longer than normal period, they still lagged. This seemed to have changed; during the first week in June there were some days that small company returns had a little more giddy-up than they had in recent months or years. On June 6th we published the above article.

Small cap stocks finished the month well ahead of the large caps and even mega-cap companies. This momentum has carried into the second half.

Let’s Start the Second Half of 2023 Together

If you are one of our free subscribers, thank you for trusting us as one of your news and research resources.

If you have not yet signed up, now is a great time to make sure you don’t miss any research, videos, special events, and market insights. Sign up here.

I hope you found these six articles compelling, and if you have not registered for no-cost insights to your inbox each day, here’s your chance to start the second half with a slightly different investment angle.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

What Investors Learned in June That They Can Use in July

Looking Back at the Markets in June and Forward to July

Enthusiasm in the overall stock market was strong in June, the major indices were all up, and every S&P sector closed in positive territory. In fact, there was spectacular performance across market caps as Apple (AAPL) became the first company to reach a $3 trillion market cap, and noteworthy among small caps, Bitcoin mining company Bit Digital (BTBT) was up another 20% and a staggering 685% on the year during the last week in June. The across-the-board positive sentiment came during a month when the market was disappointed by the Federal Reserve’s continued hawkish bias.

Two dark clouds that the markets had hanging over them as they entered June were a possible U.S. default on debt and talk of a recession later this year. A higher debt ceiling law was signed on June 5, and a strong jobs report and higher-than-expected first-quarter GDP have for most, pushed most recession forecasts into 2024 or later. June’s performance may reflect a celebration and feelings of relief from both concerns.

Consumer confidence improved in June to its highest level since January 2022, reflecting a big jump in outlook and expectations. This surprise positive mood is reflected in stock market rotations experienced during June in both market-cap and market sectors.

Image Credit: Koyfin

Look Back

Four broad stock market indices were positive in June. In order, the Russell 2000 Small Caps, Nasdaq 100 Large Caps, the S&P 500 Large Caps, and the Dow Jones Industrials. Small cap stocks are the big winner in June as investors went looking for value. The Russell 2000 rose 8.07%. The smaller stocks may now have more positive impetus that could carry over into July as a report released last week by Goldman Sachs estimates that based on their models, small cap stocks could rise 14% over the next 12 months.  

While small cap stocks had their stars, the Nasdaq maintained a startling pace as big tech retained its appeal despite individual company market caps that have exceeded those of developed countries. The Nasdaq 100 was up 6.49% in June. The S&P 500 nearly matched Nasdaq with a 6.47% return. The Dow 30 Industrials, which have had a difficult few months, returned 4.56% to investors.

Source: Koyfin

Market Sector Lookback

Of the 11 S&P market sectors (SPDRs), even the lowest performer had an impressive one-month return. The chart above reflects the three best-performing sectors and the three worst. The performance indicates that there was a sector rotation away from defensive stocks during June.

Consumer Discretionary had the best return at 11.96%. By definition, these are companies selling products that consumers can cut back on or more easily avoid. The top ten holdings include Starbucks (SBUX), Bookings Holdings (BKNG), and Tesla (TSLA).

What S&P calls the Industrial Select sector finally came to life in June. Its 9.57% return represents almost all of this sector’s performance for the first six months of 2023 (9.73% YTD). Examples of top stocks contained in this index are John Deere (D.E.), General Electric (G.E.), and Union Pacific (UNP).

The third was Materials Select which was negative on the year heading into June. The 9.23% return on the month more than erased the negative 7.67% performance heading into the month.

Each of the top three performers is typically sectors that investors delve into when their economic outlook is more positive.

The three worst-performing sectors also indicate the month was very positive. The Health Care sector was the best of the bottom three at 4.51%. While this did not bring the sector positive on the year, companies like Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Abbott Labs (ABT), and United Health (UNH), had experienced strong years this decade with growth drivers that have since weakened some.

The second to weakest performer is Utilities Select. Utilities are still negative on the year despite a 2.13% increase in June. Companies like American Electric Power (AEP), Dominion Energy (D), and Consolidated Edison (E.D.) are surrounded by a lot of uncertainty as their costs are driven more than other industries by fuel prices. Additionally, investors in utilities tend to be dividend stock investors. Dividend stocks tend to underperform in a rising interest rate environment as they compete less favorably with bonds.

The worst-performing sector provides further evidence of a rotation during June. Consumer Staples was the second-worst-performing sector at the close of May. While it returned 1.72% in June, the sector, which includes Colgate Palmolive (CL), Walmart (WMT), and Philip Morris (PM), usually gains in popularity when consumer confidence is low, it loses popularity as consumer confidence is high, that’s when, as we saw in June, consumer discretionary stocks get attention.

Looking Forward

The job market is strong, inflation is tapering,  and consumers are more confident. There are even signs that companies that have been waiting for an improved market to go public are considering now a good time for an IPO.

Bitcoin mining stocks and artificial intelligence are still be on fire. The crypto-mining stocks interest is tied to the price of Bitcoin – many of the stocks have actually outperformed the cryptocurrency. Artificial intelligence, as its potential becomes better understood, has inspired many to place bets that this will grow into a technology that is indispensable to many industries. Is the next Apple in this tech segment?

The rotation to small caps and sectors that perform better when the economy improves has a lot of momentum heading into July.

The next FOMC meeting is July 25-26; while market participants already expect further tightening, it has not deterred their positive view on the “risk-on” trade.

Take-Away

The market was jubilant in June. The signing into law of an increased debt ceiling helped kick off a change from the uncertain mood in May.  It unleashed buyers that continued even after it was clear the Federal Reserve was not finished hiking interest rates.

The year 2023 now sits at the halfway point. And within a few months, we will be in a presidential election year. Stocks tend to do well in election years. While the Russia/Ukraine situation is still uncertain, especially in the energy sector, the markets seem to have already priced in negative scenarios and are marching upward confidently.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Signs We May Be Witnessing the End to the Indexed-Fund Stranglehold

Dominance of Indexed Funds May Be Giving Way to a Preference for Diversification

Not many years ago, the most widely followed stock market index was the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or Dow 30 (DJIA). This practice slowly changed and a broader benchmark, the S&P 500, became the new gauge of market moves. Both have the same purpose, to provide a big-picture view of whether stock prices generally are moving up, down, or sideways over a period – and by how much. The DJIA has fallen out of favor as investors grew more sophisticated and came to realize the Dow only tracks 30 stocks. So it was considered not representative of the entire stock market – which includes thousands of different companies. With only 30 stocks impacting its price, it was not disperse enough to be the preferred stock market index. After all, the DJIA’s performance can be significantly influenced by the performance of the 30 stocks, which at times can veer far from indicative of the broad market.

The S&P 500, which is weighted by market capitalization, is beginning to feel the impact of its own loss of diversity. As of June 2023, the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 account for over 25% of the index’s total market capitalization. That is, the weight of 25% of market moves impacting the index comes from just 10 stocks and these can all be considered technology stocks. For portfolios it means that investors who believe the S&P 500 reflects the market, might actually be more accurate if they went back to the index with 30 stocks in a wider array of industries.

I’m not suggesting that we should all start following the Dow. Instead, I am suggesting that there is risk to index investors that are looking to participate in the overall market and are using the S&P 500. Portfolio managers looking to spread risk may want to purposefully add diversity to their holdings.

In contrast to the upper 25%, the lower 25% of the S&P 500 is a diverse group of industries, with no single industry accounting for more than 20% of the weight. This means that the performance of the lower 25% of the S&P 500 is not as dependent on the performance of any single industry. From “stock market 101,” we know that the risk (not necessarily return) is greater in the top 25%. Focusing on risk-adjusted return is how most managing their portfolio do well over time.

Over the past several years, including last year’s down draft, tech has, on average, been the leader. Carrying companies that make up the top 25% in large cap indexes, MSFT, AAPL, META, GOOGL, etc. have been additive to performance. This has helped, as not only has it lifted large-cap indexed funds returns, but it sent more money into these indexed funds, which served to further increase the perfomranc of the funds including ETFs.

Ongoing, above-average growth in one sector, even tech, or a market cap segment (megacap), is as unsustainable as a Ponzi scheme. So while activity is sustaining movement into these stocks, performance is satisfying. But investor money is finite and investor behavior is fickle. So the above average performance must at some point should give way to these stocks being a drag on performance.

Apple’s market capitalization exceeds that of all the publicly traded companies on these stock markets; where would growth in share price come from?

Are We Seeing the End?

According to data from Morningstar Direct through June 20, actively managed stock mutual funds and exchange-traded funds beat their passive peers across categories, except in the large blend category, which is less heavily weighted to one sector. The report data shows that as we reach mid-year 2023, small- and large-cap stock pickers had a strong first half of 2023. As reported by Barron’s, “The next six months may prove favorable for active managers if dispersion—the spread of returns in an index—or market breadth—which reflects how many stocks participate in a rally—increase, allowing other sectors and stocks to catch up to the mega-caps.” Stockpickers are beginning to win, as a wider dispersion of selected investments, on average, beat the “just buy the index” investment style.

Active managers’ improving performance versus index funds is building on 2022, which was the best year for active U.S. equity fund managers since 2009. Anu Ganti, senior director of index investment strategy at S&P Dow Jones Indices, said while S&P doesn’t yet have midyear performance data, one potential tailwind for active managers this year was high dispersion. “If you’re a stockpicker, and if you have skill, and if you make the call right, there’s greater potential to add value from stock selection when dispersion is higher,” she said. “What we saw in May is that the S&P 500 stock level dispersion rose to its highest level since March 2020.” 

The Investment Advisors Association (IAA) Active Managers Council advocates for a more balanced narrative on passive versus active portfolio management among advisors. “Active and passive management are critical and play different roles in a broader portfolio,” said Apurva Schwartz, a member of the Active Managers Council’s research task force and a portfolio specialist at Harding Loevner. “Active management allows investors to navigate complexity, customize portfolios, manage risks, capitalize on specific skills, or try to profit from market inefficiencies. Passive management can help reduce costs and that’s important, especially in efficient market segments.” Over the years, there has been an overriding emphasis on passive funds among advisors, the Council seeks, through statistics and education, to provide a more balanced view.

Take Away

Over any period of time one sector or another may outperform. The one style of management that has provided solid performance is a diversified portfolio with an eye on risk-adjusted return. This style has faded as investors placed money in a large-cap indexed fund, believing the underlying assets were well diversified and had a positive risk/reward potential.

So far in 2023, large-cap indexed funds are underperforming managed funds. This outcome follows on top of late last year when managed money’s comparative performance improved. The underperformance is even highere when one nets out the higher fees associated with managed money.

Obviously there is no way to track non-professional, self-directed stock picker’s performance the way Morningstar ranks funds by category. But it is not a stretch to expect that a carefully selected portfolio with the help of  high-quality research and basic diversification across market-cap and industry characteristics, could do even better than just paying fees and parking assets in a fund.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Source

https://www.barrons.com/articles/active-managers-outperform-passive-index-funds-23723641?mod=hp_LEAD_1

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/10/apple-vs-the-world-apples-bigger-than-entire-overseas-stock-markets-.html

https://investmentadviser.org/active-managers-council/

Goldman’s Model Shows 14% Growth In Small-Caps Coming

On the One Hand, the Russell 2000 Should Outperform, on the Other Hand…

A Goldman Sachs report released Wednesday, June 28 projects that the Russell 2000 should gain 14% over the next 12 months and could outperform the S&P 500 in the coming year. The economic headwinds that companies represented in the index would have to overcome were discussed in the report. Each should come as no surprise. The forecast is based on Goldman’s research using expected economic growth and current valuations.

Based on US economic growth and a model built on initial valuations, the small-cap index should gain 14% over the next 12 months, according to Goldman. This looks even more favorable compared to the reports projection that  the S&P 500 is expected to climb 9% over the same period.

The research note said this would mark a position change as the S&P 500 has been outperforming the Russell 2000 Small Cap index.

Goldman outlined three near-term macro headwinds facing the Russell 2000 Index:

Rising Interest Rates

The index is more sensitive to monetary tightening because listed companies tend to have a higher debt burden than the S&P 500. As interest rates continue to rise, the cost of servicing debt could gradually put pressure on small caps, as about one-third of Russell 2000’s debt is floating rate.

This could become a complication through the remainder of the year, as the Federal Reserve has signaled the possibility of two more hikes. For its part, Goldman expects another hike in July, and predicts a cut for 2024.

Economic Development

Compared to the S&P 500, the Russell 2000 is more sensitive to US economic performance, wrote Goldman. Even if a recession has been avoided, small-cap stocks struggle to outperform in the later stages of the business cycle as investors turn to companies with larger balance sheets.

The note recognized another possible bump in the road suggesting it appears that the market has already priced in the GDP forecasts, and growth looks unlikely to pick up any further as long as the Fed continues to tighten to tame inflation.

Sector Composition

Goldman said the Russell 2000’s high exposure to cyclical stocks, regional banks, real estate and biotech makes it more vulnerable to slowing growth, rising rates and the re-emergence of financial stability fears.

This means there could be further cuts in earnings forecasts. The note recognized that while earnings revisions among S&P 500 companies have mostly been flat, Russell 2000 revisions are continuing.

Take Away

Goldman’s basic analysis shows the propensity for the small cap sector to begin to outperform in a big way. As is the case with market forecasters, the story starts out “on the one hand this could happen,” and then transitions with, “but on the other hand…”. It is standard to look out into the future and see where a sector could be headed, but also recognize where there may be trouble along the way.

The report did not lay out a scenario where the report may have underestimated where the Russell Small Cap index may be in 12 months, but with all the less-than-knowns surrounding this year, and an election year, it is safe to presume that the analyst could also have undershot where actual performance will be 12 months into the future.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Source

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/28/goldman-sees-small-cap-stocks-up-14percent-in-year-ahead-etfs-to-capture-that-return.html

The Week Ahead –  Powell is Back, PCE Report, and Summer Trading Activity

This Week’s Economic Focus Will be on PCE Inflation

It’s the last trading week of the month, quarter, and first half of 2023. The Fed Chair is scheduled to speak on Wednesday at the ECB Forum on Central Bank Policy, and the Fed’s favored inflation gauge will be released on Friday. As we approach the 2023 halfway point, the S&P 500 is up 13.25% YTD. Historically, whenever the S&P 500 is up at least 10% YTD at the end of June, the index ends the year up on the year 82% of the time. However, it gained 7.7% on average for those years, which suggests some gains were given back in the average year.

Monday 6/26

•             The ECB Forum on Central Banking 2023 is a three day event beginning Monday. The US Federal Reserve Chairman will take part in a panel discussion Wednesday.

Tuesday 6/27

•             8:30 PM ET, Durable Goods orders are forecasted to have fallen 1.0 percent in May after April’s 1.1 percent rise. Ex-transportation orders are seen unchanged with core capital goods orders, after jumping 1.3 percent in April, rising a further 0.6 percent.

•             10:00 AM ET, Consumer Confidence is expected to rebound slightly in June to 103.7 versus May’s 102.3 which was better than expected but still down 1.4 points from April. The index has sat at depressed levels for the past year.

•             1:00 PM  ET, Money Supply, including the closely watched M2 will be released. M2 had stood at $20,673.1 Billion as of the last reporting. The act of the Fed tightening credit conditions, is typically orchestrated by reducing money in the system which can be expected to reduce money supply by its two most watched measures, M1 and M2.

Wednesday 6/28

•             9:30 AM ET, at 2:30 PM in Portugal a panel discussion on policy will be modersated by CNBCs Sara Eisen. The four member panel will include J. Powell, US Federal Reserve, A. Bailey, Bank of England, C. Lagarde, ECB, and K. Ueda, Bank of Japan.

•             10:30 AM ET, The Energy Information Administration (EIA) provides weekly information on petroleum inventories in the U.S., whether produced here or abroad. The level of inventories helps determine prices for petroleum products.

Thursday 6/29

•             8:30 AM ET, First quarter GDP third estimate is expected to show 1.4% growth. While this is not e a strong pace, it indicates the US is not currently in a recession.

•             8:30 AM ET, Jobless Claims for the week ending  June 24 are expected to be 270,000 versus a second straight and elevated 264,000 in the two prior weeks and 262,000 the week before.

•             4:30 PM ET, Factors Affecting Reserve Balances, otherwise known as The Fed’s Balance Sheet or the H.4.1 report is a weekly report of a consolidated balance sheet for all 12 Reserve Banks that lists factors supplying reserves into the banking system and factors absorbing reserves from the system. The report is officially named Factors Affecting Reserve Balances, otherwise known as the “H.4.1” report.

Friday 6/30

•             8:30 AM ET, Personal Income and Outlays, including PCE Inflation, will be released as part of a data set. Income is expected to rise 0.4 percent in May, with consumption expenditures expected to increase by 0.2 percent. These would compare with April’s 0.4 percent gain for income and 0.8 percent jump for consumption. PCE Inflation readings for May are expected at monthly increases of 0.1 percent overall and 0.4 percent for the core (versus April’s respective increases of 0.4 percent for both) for annual rates of 3.8 and 4.7 percent (versus April’s 4.4 and 4.7 percent).

•             10:00 AM ET, Consumer Sentiment is expected to end the first half of 2023 at 63.9 for June, this would be up nearly 4 points from May.

What Else

The summer doldrums is a Wall Street term for reduced trading activity between Memorial Day and Labor Day. Many professional investors take time off from work during the summer; this means portfolios are in the hands of the second-string portfolio managers that are there to monitor and maintain but not take big positions or make big decisions. Volume is often reduced, which could cause exaggerated swings in prices.

Lifeway Foods, Inc. (LWAY), which has been recognized as one of Forbes’ Best Small Companies, is America’s leading supplier of the probiotic fermented beverages. Wherever you are on Monday, you can attend the virtual roadshow and better understand directly from management the many intricacies of the probiotic food business as it relates to Lifeway. Should you have a question for management, there will be an ample Q&A period for participants to get their questions answered.  

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Capitalizing on Less Certainty

The Market Averages Suggest this Move

Different investment timelines call for different investments.

Have you ever looked at a chart of a company you were interested in, let’s say year-to-date, and thought, wow, this company has just dipped to where it could be expected to start to bring in buyers and go up? Then you look at a five-year chart, and the same stock has been trending down for years, and is actually close to where, from a longer-term perspective, a technical analyst would view it as more likely to weaken. Based on time perspective, both expectations can coincide with each other. This is why it is important to understand your own investment time frame before pulling the trigger on a stock.

The big question that needs to be answered first is, are you expecting the trade to work out in minutes, weeks, or years? Often this is based on any future needs of your invested capital.

If a trader is trying to make incremental income, they may use a five-minute chart. An investor looking to gain by holding weeks or months may use a one or three-year chart. Longer-term investors, those that are looking to put to bed what they hope will be the next Apple or Tesla in terms of performance, may look at charts using 20 years, or the “Max” time period.

Those that are longer-term investors can be less cautious about the exact timing on most investments, or less concerned about deciding if this is the ideal timing. This is especially relevant today in light of recession talk, rate increases, global risk, and other possible disruptions.

In fact, last year’s downward market direction was a wake up call for a lot of less seasoned investors, coming off so many so many positive years before. And this years retracement back up, is a good reminder that over time, markets have always broken new highs.

As mentioned above, when times are less certain, the investor that is looking to hold for an extended period, is the investor less likely to question their decision; many actually average into a position based on calendar buys, not price targets.

Having the long view, or deciding uncertain markets has dictated a longer view, would likely steer the investor to include smaller companies. Smaller companies have had the best long-term performance. It’s a category that may be more volatile but over time, has served investors better.

Over the past few years, small cap stocks have participated far less in the upward trend. That is less than larger companies (on average) and far less than they have versus their own historical average relative to large caps.

Source: Koyfin

The chart above compares performance since the beginning of the decade of the Russell 2000 Large Cap performance (blue) to the Russell 2000 Small Cap index (gold). One thing that is evident immediately is the small cap stocks outperformed large caps long term by a large margin over time. The second is the trend is up. If you’d like, add a third which is there has been a significant dip in value (last year’s bear market).

“From our perspective, the uncertain present offers a highly opportune time to invest in small caps for the long run.” —Francis Gannon, Co-CIO Gannon Investment Partners (June 13. 2023)

Long term investors looking at this scenario could easily make a case for getting involved knowing that small caps historically overperform large caps. So if an investor is looking to maximize return, large caps may not have the highest probabilities. The above graph makes both points clear.

Source: Koyfin  

This second chart begins only five year ago. If one was to look at it by itself, the trendline over the years is upward, with gains in both large cap and small cap . But the large caps have a steeper upward pace. On the other hand, small caps are noticeably flat since the beginning of 2022.

Source: Koyfin  

The last chart is just since the beginning of this month. Small cap stocks seem to finally have caught their tailwind, going up by more on most up days, and coming down by less on down days. Time will tell if this is a trend that will continue.

The small cap stock index won’t catch the large caps over night. If it happens, it will be months or years before investors that have been in small caps catch and pass those that have been in large cap stocks. Those investing now will outperform those that got in earlier. Of course, long-term investors are cautioned to also be diversified across many industries and of even market cap sectors.

Perhaps rebalancing the allocation after so many periods of small cap underperformance is a strategy that fits all the basic tenets that have been true of long-term investing.

They are:

Over time the stock market goes up and breaks new records.

Diversified portfolios spread risk and are less volatile.

Rebalance so allocations in sectors that have done well are not now undermining your asset mix.

Take Away

One can look at the same stock, over different time periods and see completely different trends. Those investing longer term, providing the company or industry isn’t in a decades long tailspin, reduce the risk of loss by letting time iron out the ups and downs.

Small cap stocks over time have outperformed larger companies. Assuming this hasn’t changed, when the volatility is “ironed out” small caps have a lot of catching up to do before they pass. This argues that they will return even greater comparative performance than if they were already ahead in recent years.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

Why the Time Looks Right for Small Caps —Royce (royceinvest.com)

The Week Ahead –  Fed Chairman Jerome Powell Will Again be the Focus

This Week We’ll See if the Small-Cap Rally Continues, and Which Individual Stocks Move from the Russell Reconstitution

The FOMC interest rate pause at 5.00-5.25% last week created investor uncertainty as there was little forward guidance as the policymakers insist they remain data dependent. Chair Jerome Powell was emphatic in his comments to the press on Wednesday that getting inflation down to the 2 percent average inflation target is the FOMC’s unanimous goal – although there may be differences on the speed or level at which rates need to be adjusted.

Powell will have the spotlight again this week as he gives two testimony’s, the first on Wednesday before the House Financial Services Panel, and then on Thursday before the Senate Banking Committee.

While the mood of markets is still apprehensive, this did not stop the S&P 500 from rallying and reaching the highest weekly close since April 2022.

Monday 6/19

•             US Markets closed in celebration of the Juneteenth holiday.

Tuesday 6/20

•             8:30 PM ET, May Housing starts are expected to hold steady after experiencing a bounce in April. Exonomists expect May’s starts to have been 1.433 million, they were 1.416 million in April.

Wednesday 6/21

•             10:00 AM ET, Federal Reserve Chairman Powell will appear before House Financial Services Panel.

•             10:00 AM – 4:00 PM ET, While Fed Chair Powell will be getting the attention as he reads prepared remarks and answers question, the day will be filled with other FOMC members speaking and sharing their view and outlook for the first time since the June FOMC meeting concluded. This includes Lisa Cook at 10:00 AM ET, Philip Jefferson also at 10:00 AM ET, Austan Goolsbee at 12:25 PM ET, and Loretta Mester at 4:00 PM ET.

Thursday 6/22

•             8:30 AM ET, Jobless Claims for the June 17 week, is expected to remain near the previous weeks level. The consensus is 261,000 versus 262,000 last week.  

•             10:00 AM ET, Existing Home sales for May are expected to slip slightly to a 4.25 million rate. The National Association of Realtors described sales as “bouncing back and forth” but remaining “above recent cyclical lows.”

•             10:00 AM ET, Federal Reserve Chairman Powell will again be the focus as he appears before the Senate Banking Panel.

•             10:00 AM ET, The Index of Leading Indicators was down by 0.6 percent in April, for May it is expected to post a 14th straight decline, the consensus is down 0.7 percent. This index has been in sharp decline and has long been a trendline toward slow or no economic growth. signaling a pending recession.

•             4:30 PM ET, Factors Affecting Reserve Balances, otherwise known as The Fed’s Balance Sheet or the H.4.1 report is a weekly report of a consolidated balance sheet for all 12 Reserve Banks that lists factors supplying reserves into the banking system and factors absorbing reserves from the system. The report is officially named Factors Affecting Reserve Balances, otherwise known as the “H.4.1” report.

Friday 6/23

•             9:45 AM ET, The Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) is not expected to show significant change in June compared to May; manufacturing underperformed at 48.5 and services even though services were strong at 53.5.

What Else

On Friday the Russell Indexes will have new components beginning the moment the market closes. The following Monday morning the indexes will reflect these changes, and index funds that are designed to match the performance of the funds will hopefully have gotten their trades off in time. Expect some interesting moves of a few stocks on Friday as a result.  

Small-cap stocks have joined the stock market rally in June and, according to an article in Morningstar, “trouncing the larger indexes.”

Noble Capital Markets has been hosting road shows of interesting small-cap companies in various cities and towns throughout the US. This week features a very busy week with company’s speaking to potential investors in St. Louis and Florida. Also there will be two virtual events, so that no one is excluded by geography. Become informed here.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.bing.com/search?q=small+cap+stocks+on+a+rolll&filters=ex1%3a%22ez2%22&pglt=41&cvid=480e1d5e96354e0f85be232f12f9721e&aqs=edge..69i57j0l8.5031j0j1&FORM=000017&PC=LCTS&qpvt=small+cap+stocks+on+a+rolll

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/key-events-week-no-data-releases-fed-speakers-galore-including-powell-twice

https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.aspx?fid=562858&cust=us&year=2023&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top

This Year’s Russell Rebalance May Accelerate Market-Cap Sector Rotation

Investors Already Wary of Big Tech’s Dizzying Heights May Deviate Away From Swelling Large Cap Weightings

What’s different about this year’s Russell Index Reconstitution?

When the market closes on Friday, June 23rd , the overall FTSE Russell 3000 index and the other indexes that it impacts, including the Russell 1000 Large-cap and Russell 2000 Small-cap index, will be rebalanced to reflect current market-cap size. When the bell rings on Monday June 26th, the indexes will have different members and adjusted weighting of those constituents. Some market watchers and analysts expect this year to be a “headache” for active portfolio managers. Here’s why.

The new FTSE Russell makeup is already known. There is only a small chance a change in that might occur between now and Friday, it is largely assured that the reconstitution will increase the concentration of the top ten biggest companies in the large-cap Russell 1000 Index to a historical high of 29%. Active managers that are already underweighted mega-caps and big tech represented in the large-cap indexes will have to decide if they are going to increase holdings or be even more underweighted in comparison to an index that investors are likely to compare them to.

Additionally, while active fund managers are freer to weight their portfolios (within the boundaries of the fund’s prospectus), investors tend to compare the returns of index funds to the performance of managed funds when investing. This would increase the size of the bet in terms of fund percentage for managed funds, some already underweighted in tech. They’ll have a decision to make.

Further confusing things on the large-cap side is that the wisdom of diversification is being tested. If ten of the largest company’s make up 29% of an index, one that financial advisors and mom-and-pop investors are comparing them to, then roughly mimicking its concentrations would reduce diversification. Investing in a fund with a more even balance of stocks had once been the primary driver of mutual funds’ growth in popularity.

The rebalancing will heap a higher weighting to mega-cap names, including those referred to as FAANG stocks. This group of companies have already had tremendous gains this year, a pace that history would indicate is not sustainable.

Just look at the numbers, as we near the mid-year mark in 2023.

To date the top 100 stocks in the Nasdaq, heavily weighted with mega-caps and large-cap tech, has increased 38.87%. Using historical returns, most would forecast that these topstocks have much more downside for the next six months than upside. Yet, to stay on the same playing field with index funds, managed money would have to bet against stock market history.

The largest of stocks, as demonstrated below, are pulling a lot of weight. Nvidia (NVDA) is up nearly 200%, Meta (META) returned 137%, Tesla (TSLA) is also up over 100%. A fund manager with flexibility could be torn; on the one hand, afraid to bet against such momentum, on the other, historical probabilities suggest they should.

Source: Koyfin

There’s recent evidence that portfolio managers are looking for value away from the mega-cap stocks that have had the kind of run that in some cases made them twice as expensive. The Russell Small-cap Index, which is part of the June rebalancing is made up of the lowest 2,000 companies in terms of market cap of the broader Russell 3000. June has been a great month for the index so far. The index month-to-date is up 7.75% compared to the Nasdaq 100’s 6.56%. This beats June’s returns for Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), and Amazon, among others. The performance, which includes an increase of 3.6% and a 2.8% jump on June 6th indicates investors are rotating away from large-cap stocks that have become historically expensive and into smaller companies that are cheap by historical standards.

The reconstitution also provides investors in the weeks and hours leading up to the rebalance to speculate on how the rebalance will impact individual stocks. Since the preliminary list of changes was announced last month, companies expected to be added to the Russell 1000 Index have gained 4.9%, while the those that moved to a smaller-cap index have grown 11.3%, according to data compiled by Wells Fargo (6/14/23).

Take Away

The Russell Reconstitution elevates the percentage weighting of mega-cap tech stocks that usually trade in rough tandem. Mutual fund managers, and other managed money will have to rethink their weighting of a sector that has already skyrocketed on speculation of future growth.

There has already been signs of a slowdown of interest in mega-tech, compared to a significant increase in attention to small-caps that are cheap by most measures. If the rotation continues, money managers that adhere to tried and true wisdom related to diversification, and metrics like P/E ratios, may wind up the year outperforming the indexed funds they tend to be compared to.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.ft.com/content/01ad3636-f15c-42c2-ab2c-81418f8160be

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jjkinahan/2023/06/16/stocks-looking-to-keep-the-party-going/?sh=4e85e4c86067

Equity Investors Shouldn’t Fear Quadruple Witching if They Understand It

June Quad-Witching is the Friday Before a Three-Day Weekend

Double, triple, and quadruple witching hours are often characterized by increased stock market activity as traders manage expiring positions in the last hours of trading. Friday, June 16th is a quadruple witching which may demonstrate increased activity as it leads into a weekend where markets are closed on Monday.

The term “quadruple witching hour” is used to describe the simultaneous expiration of stock options, stock index futures, and stock index options and single stock futures contracts on the same day. This happens only four times a year on the third Friday just before a quarter end. The same expiration date of all three types of stock derivatives can cause unusual swings as expiring derivative positions can cause increased trading volume and unusual price action in the underlying assets as traders close, roll, or offset expiring derivative positions, particularly in the final hour of trading.

Options Expirations and Futures Contracts

Stock index options, and stock options, are financial instruments that grant the holder the contractual right, but not the obligation, to buy (call option), or sell (put option) a specific quantity of an underlying security or value of an underlying index at a predetermined price (strike price) within a specified period. The final day of the period is known as the option’s expiration date.

Stock index options are options based on the broad market indexes, such as the S&P 500 or the NASDAQ-100. These options give investors exposure to the overall market’s performance rather than individual stocks.

Stock options work similarly, but are based not on index values, but on stock price.

Stock index futures and single stock index futures are contracts that obligate (not optional) traders to buy or sell an index at a specific price or a single stocks at a specific price on a future date.

Expiration Fridays often witness heightened trading activity, as investors attempt to rebalance portfolios and positions. This can cause increased volume and produce significant price fluctuations in the underlying, impacting both individual stocks and the overall market.

Arbitrage Opportunities

Though much of the trading in closing, opening, and offsetting futures and options contracts during witching days is related to the squaring of positions, this increased, and at times, frantic activity can create price inefficiencies, this may provide short-term arbitrage opportunities for those skilled and quick enough.

The arbatrageurs would generate even more volume into the close on quadruple witching days as traders attempt to profit on small price imbalances with large trades that may execute a buy and sell in seconds.

Additional Reasons To Care About Triple Witching

As four types of derivatives, with related underlying indexes and securities expire, traders, especially before a long weekend, will often seek to close out all of their open positions well in advance of the close. This can lead to increased trading volume and intraday swings. Traders with large short positions are particularly exposed to price movements that could be more difficult to manage leading up to expiration. Arbitrageurs try to take advantage of abnormal price action, this actually serves to keep prices more in synch.

The higher trading volumes can be one-sided and potentially result in wider bid-ask spreads and greater slippage. Investors mindful of the potential one-sided liquidity challenges may decide to wait for the smoke to clear the following week, or see if they can benefit by feeding into demand if they can.  

Traders who are skilled at interpreting trends, and have great execution, may find quick opportunities to make money during these multiple expiration dates.

Take Away

Quadruple expiration dates, which happen four times a year, can have significant implications for traders and investors. It is best to, at a minimum, know the dates to understand unusual price moves. Understanding the intricacies of option expiration, and multiple witching hours helps investors navigate markets. Advanced traders may even find ways to capitalize on the moves intraday.

June 2023 is unusual in that the quadruple witching hour comes before a three-day weekend; this could push more volatility to earlier periods during the afternoon.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Pause, Pivot, or Push Higher – What to Review After the FOMC Announcement

The FOMC Member’s Change in Sentiment is a Big Focus

Whether the Fed moves rates up after the June FOMC or not could mean little to whether there is additional drag on the economy. The short end of the yield curve, where savers benefit, has risen each time the Fed has raised rates. Out further, the 10-year T-Note, which is the benchmark for 30-year mortgages and from which corporate 10-year notes are spread, has been remarkably steady. Nine months ago, when Fed Funds were 3.00%- 3.25%, the 10-Year Treasury yielded 3.76%. Today the Fed Funds target rate is 5.00-5.25%, the 10-Year is still at 3.76%. This may be why the Fed has had a difficult time reeling in inflation, longer interest rates, where they impact the economy most, had reached 4.25% last October, the Fed has since tightened 200bp, and 10-year rates have traded around 50 bp lower     since the October high, despite the tightening. And for the same reason, mortgage rates are lower now than they were last October.

Summary Of Economic Projections

More meaningful for market participants might be the Summary of Economiuc Projections (SEP). Outside of a normal knee-jerk reaction after Wednesday’s policy announcement, or a quick trade that can be had off Powell’s press conference remarks, what the Fed members now expect by year-end is a better indication of any new mindset on monetary policy.  

The Summary of Economic Projections includes estimates from the FOMC members showing where they see rates at the end of 2023 (and beyond). At the March meeting (see below), most of the Fed policymakers saw rates staying at current levels, with a few signaling additional hikes may be coming. While Powell will answer questions at the press conference that may be indicative of what they are thinking, the change in the SEP numbers (released in the statement after the meeting) is a better indicator of whether the Fed is now more hawkish or dovish.

A big shift toward expectations of higher rates would indicate a more hawkish stance. It will be useful to note how projections have evolved compared to March – Chair Powell will, of course, provide further color through his press conference.

Pause, Pivot, or Push Higher

Has the view changed with recent economic data? Was the view in March skewed by what could have turned into a banking crisis? We’ll see in hard numbers, without reading between any lines. We can see in black and white what the aggregate thinking is of the members when behind closed doors, where the important discussions happen – inside the FOMC meeting room.

After the announcement, Channelchek subscribers will receive a summary in their email of the announcement, changes in language from previous meetings, and the new SEP to compare any change in sentiment (subscribe at no cost).

While the actual impact on the overall economy of a 25bp move compared to a Fed pause may have little impact on the economy, company earnings, or even Treasury Bonds, each time the Fed raises overnight rates, there are investors that are more comfortable with a larger allocation of cash. Depending on where “uninvested” assets are held, they may be earning near 5%. This is a risk to stock prices as some investors may find be comfortable with money market returns for a larger portion of their portfolios. Fewer assets in the stock market have a depressing effect on prices.

Take Away

While pre and post-Fed meeting investor conversations tend to swirl around words like, “pause”, “pivot”, and “tighten”, the Fed’s overall change in rate expectations, which they have the most control over, is more telling than any polished statement or press briefing. These numbers are on the SEP report.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://ycharts.com/indicators/10_year_treasury_rate

The Week Ahead –  FOMC Meet, Quadruple Witching Hour, Consumer Inflation

This Week’s Events are Sure to Keep Investors on Their Toes

I wouldn’t want to be Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week. The June 13-14 FOMC meeting may be the first meeting of the Committee that sets monetary policy, since January 2022, when a tightening of monetary targets doesn’t occur. The decision will come down to the wire as very important inflation data won’t be released until the first day of the meeting on Tuesday. While most on the Committee have expressed seeing current inflation data as problematic, there usually is a delay between when the Fed first alters policy, and the impact it creates.


Whether the Fed again acts to slow the economy, or takes a breather, announced at 2:00 on Wednesday, Powell will face reporters having to explain the Fed’s action or inaction. With likely less personal conviction than at previous press briefings, his responses may be more general than usual.

Monday 6/12


• 2:00 PM ET, The Treasury Statement is the U.S. Treasury’s release of a monthly accounting of the surplus or deficit of the government. Changes in the budget balance reflect Federal policy on spending and taxation. Forecasters see a $205.0 billion deficit in May that would compare with a $66.2 billion deficit in May one year ago, and a surplus of $176.2 billion in April this year.

Tuesday 6/13


• The June FOMC Meeting begins day one of two.


• 6:00 AM ET, NFIB Small Business Optimism Index has been below the historical average of 98 for the past 16 months in a row. May’s consensus is for a decline to 88.4 versus 89.0 in April.


• 8:30 AM ET, The Consumer Price Index this month could move markets significantly if there is a significant change in the data from the previous month. Core price increases in May are not expected to have slowed. They are expected to keep their pace of April’s 0.4 percent monthly increase. The core’s year-over-year rate is seen easing to 5.3 from 5.5 percent. Overall price increases are expected to halve to 0.2 percent on the month from 0.4 percent and 4.1 percent on the year from 4.9 percent.

Wednesday 6/14

• 8:30 PM ET, The Producer Price Index – Final Demand number is another important inflation index that the FOMC members may want to peak at before voting Wednesday on any policy shift. After rising 0.2 percent in April, producer prices in May are expected to fall 0.1 percent. The annual rate in May is seen at 1.6 percent versus April’s plus 2.3 percent. May’s ex-food ex-energy rate is seen up 0.2 percent on the month and up 2.9 percent on the year, matching April’s 0.2 percent monthly rise and just below the month’s 3.2 percent yearly rate.


• 10:30 AM ET, The Energy Information Administration (EIA) will be providing its scheduled weekly information on petroleum inventories, whether produced in the US or abroad. The level of inventories helps determine prices for petroleum products.


• 2:00 PM ET, The FOMC Announcement is when the world gets to learn what the Fed decision is on interest rates, and why.


• 2:30 PM ET, The FOMC Chair press briefing provides additional context to the just announced direction of the FOMC’s policy decision. The questions and answers with the media can shed far more light of the intentions of the Committee than the carefully worded statement released at 2PM.

Thursday 6/15


• 8:30 AM ET, Jobless Claims for the June 10 week are expected to ease back to 250,000 versus the prior week’s large 28,000 jobs jump to 261,000. This has been a very closely watched report. If as expected, it would indicate the Fed has room to tighten further if other data remain strong.


• 8:30 AM ET, May Retail Sales are expected to be unchanged, matching April’s 0.4 percent rise.


• 8:30 PM ET, The Philadelphia Fed (Philly Fed) manufacturing index has been in contraction for the last ten reports. At minus 10.4 in May, with June’s consensus is at minus 13.2.


• 9:15 PM ET, Industrial Production is expected to push 0.1 percent higher in May after April’s 0.5 percent increase that was boosted by manufacturing output which jumped a surprising 1.0 percent. Manufacturing in May is seen up 0.2 percent.


• 4:30 PM ET, The Fed’s Balance Sheet is a weekly report presenting a consolidated balance sheet for all 12 Reserve Banks that lists factors supplying reserves into the banking system and factors absorbing reserves from the system. This has ben getting more attention as it indicates if the fed is on track with its announced quantitative tightening and if any bank borrowing has dramatically increased.

Friday 6/16


• 10:00 AM ET, Consumer Sentiment will be the first indication for June. It fell by 4.3 points to 59.2 last month, it is expected to inch up and report 60.5.


• Quadruple Witching is a phrase used to refer to the expiration of four different derivative contracts: Stock index futures, Stock index options, Single-stock options, Single-stock futures. Quadruple witching happens four times a year, on the third Friday of March, June, September, and December. It is a time of heightened volatility in the markets, as traders adjust their positions in anticipation of the expiration of these contracts.

What Else


The key factors that the Fed will consider when making its decision are the pace and trend of economic growth, the level of inflation, the strength of the labor market, and the risk of recession.
Additionally, the FOMC will have to determine if the moves to date will have a more substantial impact if allowed to have more time to have an impact.


While OPEC is cutting output and it seems like we are on a path of oil and natural gas prices again inching up, Alvopetro Energy (ALVOF), an enviable gas company, headquartered in Canada, operating in Brazil, will be conducting roadshows in New York and St. Louis. Learn more about attending here.
Paul Hoffman
Managing Editor, Channelchek