What Investments Rally During a Debt Ceiling Standoff?

Image Credit: Downing Street (Flickr)

The Debate Over the U.S. Spending Limit Opens Investment Opportunities

The U.S. debt-ceiling crisis, as Summer 2023 approaches, can go one of two ways. First, all parties in Congress could quickly meet and vote on fixing it, thus averting a catastrophe; alternatively, the debate could heat up as we approach the day when the U.S. Treasury can’t borrow to pay the country’s bills. At the risk of sounding negative, the timing of Washington finally ironing out a solution is likely to be hours before the moment the country would have been unable to fund maturing debt, minutes before it would have to send workers home and halted other spending.

Okay, so that was a bit pessimistic. But, as investors, we rely on past performance, even though we know it is no guarantee of future results. And past performance by Congress has been that it waits until the 11th hour after all hope seems to be lost.

This has happened many times in the past. The last time it became truly scary was in 2011. For equity investors, stocks became volatile but overall averaged flat in the period. But, there were two investment sectors that attracted positive activity.

What’s Rallied in the Past?

The winning sector was U.S. Treasury bonds out along the yield curve with maturity dates not expected to be impacted by a possible non-payment at maturity. Today, bonds are rallying (rates down) even after the PCE inflation gauge showed little headway over the past two months, so this is an indication that government debt may still be considered an investor safe haven. But, investing in an entity headed toward insolvency is questionable practice, even when the entity speeding toward bankruptcy is the United States of America.

The second is precious metals (PM), a currency alternative – the longest-running safe haven of all. By precious metals, I’m speaking specifically of gold, silver, and the stock of companies whose main business it is to mine these metals.

The most recent nail-biting standoff was in 2011. It was a politically contentious time in Washington, arguably, today’s climate is even less agreeable. At the time, the U.S. government had reached its borrowing limit of $14.3 trillion and needed to raise the debt ceiling in order to continue paying its bills and avoid default. Congress, and the White House eventually agreed to a last-minute compromise, which included some spending cuts but avoided a U.S. default.

Between July 1 and September 8, 2011, PM investments trounced the S&P 500 (Koyfin)

During this time, the financial markets whipsawed investors. However, gold-related investments, along with silver related, turned dramatically upward until a deal was struck the second week of September. Gold rose to an all-time high of around $1,900 per ounce in September 2011. Investors used gold as a hedge against the same concerns we are experiencing in 2023, namely inflation and currency debasement.

Silver also saw its price rise, although not to the same extent as gold. The price of silver reached a high of around $48 per ounce in April 2011, before retreating to around $30 per ounce by the end of the year.

Mining stocks also benefited from the uncertainty in the financial markets (see above graph). Shares of companies like Barrick Gold, Newmont Mining, and Goldcorp all saw significant gains while other industries were getting whipsawed. Junior miner Coeur mining (CDE) rose 25.7% during the period between July 1 and September 8, 2011. Endeavour Silver (EXK) rose a full 30% in the same period.

Mark Reichman the Senior Research Analyst covering Natural Resources at Noble Capital Markets pointed to additional macroeconomic events shaping precious metals investment, “We remain constructive on precious metals. Year-to-date, gold prices have risen more than silver, and the gold-to-silver ratio has widened since the beginning of the year. Mr. Reichman suggests, “Two things to track are changes in monetary policy and the strength of the U.S. dollar.”  Outside of the U.S., Reichman informed,  “Global demand for precious metals, particularly in Asia, is very strong, and is driven in part by global uncertainty.”

Take Away

Historically, investors asking, “what happened last time?” can be helpful when choosing a direction. The U.S. may avert a showdown on the debt ceiling/spending limit issue. But the month of June, when analysts expect the U.S. to run out of money, is fast approaching. There doesn’t seem to be any headway at this point.

Every challenge brings opportunities to investors. Market participants interested in precious metals mining companies can get detailed information on many companies here on Channelchek by clicking here.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_debt_ceiling

Will the Fed Tighten in May and Walk Away?

Image Credit: Focal Foto

A Bull Market Across Sectors May Come Out of the Next FOMC Meeting?

As U.S. GDP for the first quarter of 2023 showed a significant slowdown, expectations that the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is near the end of the tightening cycle have increased among investors. The Fed announcement after the May 2-3 meeting could change the mindset of the stock, bond, and real estate markets. While a strong consumer is still fueling economic growth, as indicated by the most recent Consumer Spending numbers, government spending is also high and less related to economic momentum, yet it helped support the declining Gross Domestic Product figure.

The U.S. economy slowed at the start of 2023, which implies that the bold Fed moves have worked to cool business activity. During this same period, stock market values have risen after a dismal 2022, bonds have become stronger, and housing prices have shown signs of life.

Background

U.S. Gross Domestic Product grew by a 1.1% annualized rate during the first three months of the year. This is less than half the pace of the 2.6% growth reported for the previous quarter – which was slower than the previous quarter. The slowing trend is certainly expected and undoubtedly being monitored by FOMC members.

The slowdown from the previous quarter was largely the result of a decline in business investment and residential fixed investment, which includes money spent on home buying and construction, according to the data set. While layoffs made headlines, the job market remained strong during the first quarter.

The banking system showed weakness as asset values plummeted and deposit levels decreased. Also impacting banks is commercial real estate. The risk of default in the commercial real estate market has grown as office and retail property valuations are seen as headed lower by as much as 40%, with nearly $1.5 trillion in debt due for repayment by the end of 2025.

Could a Full-Fledged Bull Market Follow?

While there is a Wall Street adage that says, “sell in May and walk away.” A post-meeting announcement that suggests the Fed is finished taking shots at the economy could cause a relief rally as worry about increasingly expensive capital abates. Unless this worry is replaced by a new one, a broad-based upward trend may develop.

The trend in economic growth is slowing, perhaps even headed for a recession, but markets are no longer expecting a hard landing. Ashard-landing expectations work their way even further out of the market psyche, more willingness to buy should lead to higher stock prices.

Bond markets and real estate have also been positive recently. The direction in interest rates, when the Fed does indicate it is done hiking Fed Funds levels, would either fall because of knowledge that the Fed is done, or generate inflation fears which cause concern that would be reflected as higher rates along the curve. Real Estate values are tightly linked to interest rates and could take its direction from the bond market direction.  

Take Away

We’re in the part of the economic cycle where bad news (lower GDP) is seen as good news. The economy has been slumping for a few quarters, and the markets are continually forward-looking. This slump may be cause for the Fed to suggest an end to its relentless tightening phase. Equity markets could rid themselves of a year-long worry.

Nothing is certain; however, the markets that have already been rising this year in anticipation of an end to the Fed moves could make an even more decisive move upward.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCNS

https://ycharts.com/indicators/10_year_treasury_rate_h15

https://www.google.com/search?q=are+commercial+real+estate+defaults+rising&rlz=1C1CHZN_enUS934US934&oq=are+commercial+real+estate+defaults+rising&aqs=chrome..69i57j33i160l2.10358j1j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Bed Bath and Beyond, Why Companies Delist, and Investor Impact  

Do Investors Take a Bath When Stocks Delist?

One popular meme stock, Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) is being delisted from the Nasdaq exchange, according to a company announcement. There are a number of reasons a public company can delist from an exchange. In BBBY’s case it is related to their recent bankruptcy filing, according to management. Below are examples of the many reasons a company would delist, what happened in BBBY’s case, and what delisting means for investors.

Many Reasons to Delist

Delisting from the stock exchange refers to the removal of a company’s shares from public trading on a particular exchange. It occurs by management choice or at the exchange’s request. The process can happen for various reasons, such as regulatory violations, bankruptcy, or a company’s decision to go private. Delisting can have significant consequences for the corporation and its investors, including decreased liquidity and visibility in the market.

A common reason for delisting is regulatory violations. For example, if a company fails to comply with the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), it may face delisting from the stock exchange. This was the case with Chinese tech giant Alibaba, which was delisted from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 2020 because of regulatory violations.

Sometimes, companies have a reason to take themselves private and delist as part of that process. Going private means that a corporation’s shares are no longer traded on public stock exchanges. In 2013, computer maker Dell was taken private in a deal worth $24.9 billion. The company’s delisted its shares from the NASDAQ exchange. Twitter was recently purchased and taken private.

As is the case with Bed Bath and Beyond, bankruptcy often causes shares not to meet the exchange’s criteria, forcing a delisting. Another retailing example is Toys R Us in 2018. It filed for bankruptcy and was subsequently delisted from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).

Delisting can have significant implications for a company and its shareholders. One of the main consequences is a decrease in liquidity. When a company is delisted, its shares are no longer traded on public stock exchanges, which means that investors may have a harder time finding buyers or sellers for their shares.

Additionally, delisting can impact a company’s visibility in the market. Without a public listing, a company may find it more difficult to attract investors and raise capital. This can be particularly challenging for small and mid-sized companies that rely on the stock market to raise funds.

Bed Bath and Beyond’s Delisting

Trading in BBBY common stock will cease at the opening of the trading day on May 3 – according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

In its bankruptcy announcement, the company said trading of shares would halt on the Nasdaq exchange. Nasdaq and the NYSE have standards companies need to meet for their stocks to be listed and stay listed. This includes minimum levels of liquidity, market value, or price level.

Back in January, Nasdaq warned the company its shares would be delisted after it failed to report quarterly results in a timely manner. The company eventually filed the report and returned to compliance. This time Bed Bath and Beyond said it doesn’t intend to appeal.

Shareholders will still own the stock and fractional shares of the company after May 3. However, without the help of a major exchange, trading between stockholders and speculators is usually much more difficult. Some bankrupt companies’ stocks continues to trade in over-the-counter markets (OTC). They typically have the letter “Q” at the end of their stock symbol. It isn’t yet clear if BBBY will trade as BBBYQ.

After a company files for Chapter 11, unsecured creditors—including suppliers and leaseholders—line up in an attempt to get repaid. How much creditors get paid back depends on how much money Bed Bath and Beyond can raise from the sale of either parts of its business or the chain itself.

Take Away

Delisting from major stock exchanges can happen for various reasons and can have significant consequences for investors. While regulatory violations and bankruptcy can lead to forced delisting, companies may choose to delist voluntarily to go private or for other strategic reasons. Regardless of the reason, delisting can impact a company’s liquidity and visibility in the market, making it important for investors to carefully consider the implications before investing in delisted companies or those facing delisting.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=0000886158

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/10/stock-holder-lose-equity-chapter-11.asp

https://bedbathandbeyond.gcs-web.com/news-releases/news-release-details/bed-bath-beyond-inc-receives-nasdaq-delisting-notice

https://bedbathandbeyond.gcs-web.com/news-releases/news-release-details/bed-bath-beyond-inc-files-voluntary-chapter-11-petitions

If Bad Expectations are Fully Priced Into Stocks, Which Ones Could Outperform This Year 

Image Credit:Maarten Takens (Flickr)

Highly Regarded Analyst Tells Investors How to Position for the Upturn   

Are recession worries fully baked into stock prices? At least one Wall Street analyst has publicly made her case this may be accurate. And she offers tips on what sectors may have more upside and on those that have factors working against them. While a recession still may occur before year-end, forward-looking stock investors may have fully priced that risk in – forward-looking investors may also be the reason the overall market is up on the year despite greater expectations of a recession. They are looking past any slowdown.

Stock market participants, many still down on last year’s price moves, have been extremely cautious in front of a Fed that is playing catch up in a fight against inflation. The rapid Fed Funds rate increases that began in March 2022, coupled with quantitative tightening, sank stocks, bonds, and even cryptocurrency holdings. While the economy did shrink for two consecutive quarters last year, there are many that expect a mild recession will begin at some point this year.

Those that do expect a bumpy economic ride and a rough landing point to high-interest rates, a weakening dollar, tech industry layoffs, and a Federal Reserve that is resolved to get inflation down as soon as possible.

Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America Securities, proposed to investors in a research note published on April 24, that these fears and recession worries have been in place for a while and may be largely baked into the market. She says, barring a sudden shock to the economy, it makes sense for investors to reintroduce riskier assets into their portfolios.

Her guidance on finding value is well thought out. Subramanian, proposes investors own stocks over bonds and cyclical stocks over defensive names. The reason given is that hedge funds and long-only funds are near maximum exposure in defensive industries such as health care, utilities, and consumer staples. The suggestion here is that the probabilities would lean toward a better risk-reward payoff for cyclical names.

Ms. Subramanian does not say an economic slowdown won’t occur; instead, her thinking seems to be that after raising the Federal Funds rate from near-zero to a range of 4.75% to 5%, there is more control should a downturn need to be dealt with by easing. When rates are at or near zero percent, there is less the Fed can do to stimulate growth. So far, we’ve made it through the first quarter, and now April with only a few disruptions in the banking sector.

“Even if a recession is imminent, the Fed has latitude to soften the impact after pushing rates up by 5%. And after the fastest hiking cycle ever, the only thing to ‘break’ so far is SVB,” Subramanian wrote.

In an article published in Barron’s this week the investment news publication wrote, “Some corners of Wall Street are feeling confident that there will be no recession and that the very things that make a recession appear likely–the inverted yield curve, inflation, and the recent banking crisis–actually guarantee that one won’t happen.”

This could be good news for investors that have been nervous about having money in a market that has been given much to be concerned about, and ver little to be jubilant about.

On Thursday, GDP (Gross Domestic Product) for the first quarter will be released. No one expects this to indicate a recession began then. Forecasters expect that the economy will show 2% growth, following growth of 3.2% and 2.6% in the third and fourth quarters of 2022. This is one of the cases where if the number surprises much higher, the market may expect the Fed to make bigger rate moves. If it surprises on the low side, markets may see it as a sign of an approaching recession.

Take Away

A highly regarded analyst joins others with thoughts that the market could be priced for a recession; this could be good for stocks. If true, investors may want to start looking past a recession. Those she is most positive on are riskier names. While funds and other investors are near maxed out in lower-risk holdings, there is far less upside for them. The bigger upswings can occur in the industries, market-cap sectors, and companies that have been given less attention due to recession fears.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

U.S. Money Supply, Here’s Why it’s Critical for Inflation Forecasts

Image Credit: Pictures of Money (Flickr)

M2 is Fuel for Inflation, How Much Money Must the Fed Drain to Achieve 2 Percent?

U.S. Money Supply, measured as M2, is an important consideration when forecasting inflation. A decline in immediately available cash in the economy has a downward effect on price levels. At the same time, less cash available to consumers also cools economic growth. With the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) interest rate decision coming the first week in May, the updated report this week (for March) will give investors a look see at how successful the Fed has been draining funds from the system while trying to maintain some growth.

M2 Shrinking

The Federal Reserve will update stock and bond markets Tuesday afternoon on the total amount of currency, coins, bank savings deposits, and money-market funds held in March. This broader measure, officially M2SL, referred to as M2, gained renewed focus after contracting for the first time ever in December 2022, then contracting even further in January and February. January’s 1.75% decline and February’s 2.4% drop to $21.1 trillion, are the steepest drops so far in M2.  

Image: M2 levels ramped up starting in 2020 in response to pandemic economic efforts

A fourth consecutive decline in M2 would provide more evidence that inflation can be expected to continue to come down and weigh into the FOMC decision when the Fed meets to adjust monetary policy at its May 2-3 meeting. While the chart above shows the recent declines are significant, it is still far higher than the trend line that was established decades ago. So while a decline of similar magnitude as the first two months would be welcome by inflation hawks, there is still a great deal more cash in the system than there was pre-pandemic. But it would be a huge positive and may cause the Fed to pause or slow draining money from the system.

Inflation

Consumer price inflation is well off its 8.6% average for all of 2022. Inflation since rose 5% in March 2023 (annual basis), decelerating from February’s 6% pace. While this slowdown in price increases is substantial, the Fed doesn’t want to declare “mission accomplished” until it is ranging near 2%. Its work is not yet finished.

How close is the Fed from finished is what investors will try to discern from M2. Highly regarded analysts and Fed watchers anticipate that there is a lag of about a year when the money supply shrinks. However, as indicated above, it has never come down on an annualized basis, and January and February were the largest declines to date. So even the best analysts have little history to point to.

Financial Sector

The data is for March, so it is the first look at M2 since the banking sector showed trouble early that month. A part of the difficulty banks are currently experiencing is that the reduction in cash has caused a need for them to liquidate U.S. Treasuries and other bonds to fund withdrawals. A further huge reduction in M2 could be shown to be challenging more banks as bonds and other interest rate-sensitive assets had lost considerable value as rates rose dramatically over the past year.

Using the most recent data, the Federal Reserve reported bank deposits were down 6% for the week ending April 12 versus a year ago. Deposits have been falling year-over-year since November, off slightly at $17.2 trillion compared to the highest-ever $18.2 trillion level seen in April last year.

Further declines in deposits should lead to fewer loans written, fewer loans slows economic growth. This in part, accounts for why there is a lag between when the Fed drains and when it has an impact on inflationary pressures.

Take Away

M2 is an important gauge of future inflation. Because of this, the release of data may cause economists to change their May FOMC meeting forecast. A large decline may cause the Fed to pause, if M2 resumed its path upward the Fed may become more hawkish. Efforts to help the banking system last month, may have reinflated money supply, this will be a very interesting report.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20230322.pdf

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2SL#

https://rationalreasoning.substack.com/p/on-the-feds-discontinuation-of-the

https://www.barrons.com/articles/fundamental-reason-interest-rates-will-come-down-444ab9c

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/m2.asp#:~:text=M2%20is%20seen%20as%20a,even%20better%20predictor%20of%20inflation.

Why the IPO Market is Picking Up

Image Credit: Steve Jurvetson (Flickr)

IPO Market Accelerating – Especially Overseas

The amount of investment in initial public offerings (IPOs) during March-April has jumped from January-February levels. Globally, the pick-up in IPOs is linked to the uptick in stock prices, which has allowed companies to tap into investor appetite for newer listings. A sizeable percentage of the offerings are in Asia, but Europe and the U.S. have experienced a surge as well. Activity during the first two months of 2023 had ground to a halt; new data compiled by Bloomberg demonstrates a much faster trend.

To date, there has been $25 billion worth of IPOs worldwide in March and April; this is nearly twice the amount transacted during the prior two months of the year. Companies headquartered from Hong Kong to Milan have put up their “Going Public”  signs up as market volatility declined. The uptick in IPOs in Asia substantially moved the needle as non-U.S. exchanges accounted for nearly 80% of new share sales during April.

The uptick in Europe can’t be ignored either; European listings are higher by a wide margin compared to earlier in the year. The activity in the U.S. is not as robust but also noteworthy, as concern about a recession had been creating caution among potential U.S. issuers.

In a quote published by Bloomberg News, Jason Manketo global co-head of the law firm Linklaters’ equities practice said, “We are beginning to see green shoots of activity with companies restarting processes that were on hold, but there is still a fair degree of uncertainty in the market.” Mankel added, “The buy side is keen to see results for a couple of quarters before committing to an IPO. This means the potential pipeline of some 2023 deals has been moved out to 2024.”

Leaders

Statistically, Asia is where a great deal of the action is in the world today. But the activity is different, perhaps more appealing, than last year. In 2022 the vast majority of large deals were concentrated in mainland China; over the past two months, issuance is coming from a broader representation of Asia.

“The IPO market is coming back gradually and slowly. It is not 100% back yet, but there are signs of life and renewed vigor,” said James Wang, co-head of equity capital markets at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in Asia ex-Japan.

A couple of nickel producers from Indonesia surged as they went public. And in Japan, as part of the country’s largest IPO since 2018,  Rakuten Bank Ltd. soared after it raised 83.3 billion yen ($623 million). And KKR & Co.-backed Chinese liquor company ZJLD Group Inc. as recently as April 20th, priced Hong Kong’s largest offering in 2023.

Europe Wakes Up

Europe’s IPO market had been dragging, with activity in 2023 down about 12% from the same period last year as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine brought new listings to a screeching halt.

Also weighing on the market, poor IPO returns have been a deterrent for investors. Portfolio managers had been in the drivers seat insisting on bargains for less proven companies. In  March the sudden meltdown of financial firm Credit Suisse, ignited a global market rout, this added to investor worries about interest rates and inflation; the event also made it less attractive for companies to try and attract a favorable price.

But there are growing signs of fear lifting. Most notably, Lottomatica SpA, the Italian gambling company backed by Apollo Global Management Inc., opened the books last week for a €600 million ($657 million) IPO, becoming the third large firm to tap European exchanges this year. Additionally, German web-hosting company Ionos SE and electric motor component maker EuroGroup Laminations SpA have managed to raise more than $400 million in the region, though both stocks have struggled after debuting.

U.S. Uptick

While IPO activity in the U.S. is not as robust, there has been a huge uptick as well. The IPO calendar for U.S. exchanges shows 20 priced deals totalling $751.5 billion, and 29 new filings. This is an acceleration after only $4.1 billion had been raised for companies listing on U.S. exchanges during the first two months of 2023.

Take Away

Globally companies are finding it more worthwhile to tap capital from the equity markets via IPO. While the most growth is greater Asia, Europe and the U.S. see a significant uptick as well. Whether this trend continues and represents, a buying opportunity seems to hinge on recession concerns. Many forecasters are now calling for a much more mild recession than previously expected.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-23/ipo-market-shows-signs-of-life-even-as-recession-fears-persist?srnd=markets-vp&sref=8GWybyo5&leadSource=uverify%20wall

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/ipos

https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/LTT:IM

Russell Reconstitution 2023, What Investors Should Know

Image Credit: SL (Noble Capital Mkts)

 The Annual Russell Index Revision and Dates to Watch (2023)

The yearly process of recasting the Russell Indexes begins on Friday April 28 and will be complete by market opening on June 26. During the period in between, FTSE Russell will rank stocks for additions, for deletions and evaluate the companies to make sure they conform overall. The methodology for inserting and removing tickers in the Russell 3000, Russell 2000, and Russell 1000 is intentionally transparent to help eliminate price shocks. Price movements do of course occur along the way, and investors try to foresee and capitalize on them. Channelchek will be providing updates that may uncover opportunities, or at least provide an understanding of stock price swings during this period.

Background

Russell index products are widely used by institutional and retail investors throughout the world. There is more than $20.1 trillion currently benchmarked to a Russell index. This includes approximately $12.1 trillion benchmarked to the Russell US Equity indexes. The trading volume of some companies moving into an index will heighten around the last Friday in June as fund managers seek to maintain level tracking with their benchmark target.

Opportunity

For non-passive investing, determining which stocks may benefit from moving up to a large-cap index, down to a smaller one, or into or out of the measurements is an annual event causing volatility around stocks. There has, of course, the potential for very profitable long and short trades. And the potential for an unwitting investor to be holding a company moving out of an index, which could cause less interest in the stock, and perhaps unfortunate performance.

Active investors should make themselves aware of the forces at play so they may either get out of the way or determine if they should become involved by taking positions with those being added or those at the end of their reign within one of the Russell measurements.

Dramatic Valuation Shifts

The leading industries and altered market-cap of companies of a year ago have changed dramatically from last year’s reconstitution. This will be reflected in the 2023 rebalancing and is going to impact a much larger number of companies than most years. That is to say, a higher percentage of companies than normal will move in, out, or to another index, and may be subject to amplified price movement.

The 2023 Russell Reconstitution Schedule:

• Friday, April 28 – “Rank Day” – Index membership eligibility for 2023 Russell Reconstitution determined from constituent market capitalization at market close.

• Friday, May 19 – Preliminary index additions & deletions membership lists posted to the FTSE Russell website after 6 PM US eastern time.

•   Friday, May 26th, June 2nd, 9th and 16th – Preliminary membership lists (reflecting any updates) posted to the FTSE Russell website after 6 PM US eastern time.

• Monday, June 5th – “Lock-down” period begins with the updates to reconstitution membership considered to be final.

• Friday, June 24 – Russell Reconstitution is final after the close of the US equity markets.

• Monday, June 27 – Equity markets open with the newly reconstituted Russell US Indexes.

Take-Away

The annual reconstitution is a significant driver of dramatic shifts in some stock prices as portfolio managers have their holding needs shifted within a very short period of time. Longer-term demand for certain equities is altered as well. Sizable price movements and volatility are expected, especially around the last week in June. In fact, the opening day of the reconstitution is typically one of the highest trading-volume days of the year in the US equity markets.

The market event impacts more than $9 trillion of investor assets benchmarked to or invested in products based on the Russell US Indexes. Portfolio managers that are required to track one of these indexes will work to have minimal portfolio slippage away from their benchmark.  The days and weeks from April 28 through the last Monday in June can create opportunities for investors seeking to benefit from price moves, Channelchek will be covering the event as stocks to be added to, or removed from this year’s Russell Reconstitution and other information plays out.

Be sure to register to receive Channelchek updates and information.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Yellen is About to Know the Debt Ceiling Do or Die Date

Image Credit: Federal Reserve (Flickr)

Tax Date Will Provide Timing on Critical Debt Ceiling Breach

While both stock and bond investors are focused on the Federal Reserve and how it will orchestrate lower inflation without crashing the economy, the debt limit time bomb hasn’t gotten much attention yet, this could quickly change. The U.S. mathematically hit its allowed debt ceiling on January 18, 2023. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has since been taking measures to avoid a U.S. default on the national debt. But she can only do this dance for so long. How long will become much clearer quite soon. April 18, 2023 is tax date; the U.S. Treasury will then have more precise revenue numbers. This will give the department a much better understanding of when the U.S. would default on its debt if Congress doesn’t allow a higher borrowing limit.

Congress tends to let these issues come down to the eleventh hour before acting. All parties involved know a default would be catastrophic, so the down-to-the-wire drama frustrates markets but tends to allow Congressional representatives to carve out deals on what is important to them. Some expect the actual deadline will be as early as mid-June, others forecast it to be just after summer. The answer will come into clearer focus as tax receipts are taken in over the coming week. Once the time-frame is more certain, the markets are likely to begin to then react as concern amps up.

The Treasury’s $31.4 trillion borrowing cap plus tax receipts will give a clearer idea of how much cash it will have available, which it can weigh against its spending rate. In a note to clients, Bank of America’s analysts, Mark Cabana and Katie Craig wrote “we maintain our current base case for a mid-August X-date but see risks skewed toward earlier.” This four-month or earlier period would end near the scheduled recess for both the House and Senate.

In the analysts view, an influx from taxes of more than $200 billion following tax day would be a relief, while a figure of less than $150 billion would be concerning. Meanwhile, U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is preparing to roll out his proposal this week for a one-year debt ceiling suspension, according to sources reported by Bloomberg. Republicans have long sought to make any deal contingent on spending cuts, while President Biden has insisted that budgetary needs and debt ceiling should be viewed separately. 

Over the coming months markets and US Treasury officials culd encounter:

T-Bill Yield Increases

Investors could expect higher yields on securities maturing in the very short end of the curve. The fear driving the rate increases is the knowledge that should the U.S. runs out of borrowing capacity, it may not be able to borrow to pay the maturing debt.

This could begin to create an unusual one-year and shorter yield curve as investors either want maturities well ahead of any possible default or well after to give the Congress time to act.

Insuring Against Default

A key market to watch is what happens in credit default swaps for U.S.-issued debt. There has been an increase in activity in recent months as pricing has moved past levels seen in previous debt-cap crunches; this is viewed as the market’s increased expectation of a higher probability of default.

Treasury Cash On-Hand

The measures Treasury Secretary Yellen deployed in late January to address the debt limit issue involve in part, spending cash it doesn’t need to borrow. Last week this cash dropped to $87 billion. This is the lowest level since December 2021 during the debt ceiling battle. However, with the tax payment infusion and other tax revenue, this amount is viewed as a safe cushion for the time being.

The amount of revenue received in taxes this week is critical in that market participants can gauge how far off the debt ceiling debate will be. The concern that the negotiations can cause short-term shifts in interest rates and impact the U.S. dollar and other markets generally has investors on edge.

The situation is not likely to be resolved until the eleventh hour with the current split Congress – when the peak period of drama occurs will be better known very soon.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.nab.org/documents/advocacy/2023CongressionalCalendar.pdf

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-17/tax-day-cash-will-indicate-just-how-close-the-us-is-to-default?srnd=premium#xj4y7vzkg

Where Investors Might Hide in a Storm

Image Credit: DonkeyHotey (Flickr)

Doomsday Investor Sees Ongoing Moves by Policymakers as Destructive

We’d all like to think that global decision-makers responsible for economic conditions have the best interest of the world’s citizenry in mind when making decisions – but doubts and concerns are growing. Among the most concerned are economic stakeholders that don’t believe “bad” things should always be prevented. One very credible voice highlighting this idea is hedge fund manager Paul Singer. He’s the CEO of Elliot Investment Management and recently moved his firm’s offices out of NY, NY, to the more business-friendly West Palm Beach, FL. Singer says a credit collapse and deep recession may be needed to restore financial markets.

Paul Singer is the founder and CEO of Elliott Investment Management. Its year-end 13F reportable AUM was $12.25 billion. The firms opportunity-based investment style allows Singer and Company, known for their corporate activism, to move to wherever profit may lie.  

The current thinking of Singer, a registered Republican, has been making headlines. This includes a widely circulated opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal last week. In it, he discusses more than a decade of what he believes are damaging easy-money policies and how a deep recession and even credit collapse will be necessary to purge financial markets of excesses.  

“I think that this is an extraordinarily dangerous and confusing period,” Singer told The Journal, in his interview, he warns that trouble in markets may only be getting started now that a full year has passed from the start of tighter monetary policy.

One of the more chilling quotes from Singer is, “Credit collapse, although terrible, is not as terrible as hyperinflation in terms of destruction wrought upon societies.”

The idea that we are headed down either one path or the other, he doesn’t mention a third option, may be why the New Yorker magazine calls him “Doomsday Investor.” He explains,  “Capitalism, which is economic freedom, can survive a credit crisis. We don’t think it can survive hyperinflation.”

The Doomsday Investor has been outspoken against government safety nets for a while, including the sweeping banking regulations from the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. This act created the Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and established the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). Singer strongly opposed prolonged market interventions by global central banks following the 2008 global financial crisis. Interventions that still haven’t been drained from the U.S. monetary system.

Singer, who is 78 called crypto, “completely lacking in any value,” in his WSJ interview. He also said: “There are thousands of cryptocurrencies. That’s why they’re worth zero. Anybody can make one. All they are is nothing with a marketing pitch—literally nothing.”

While his funds performance have placed him near the top of hedge fund manager performance, Singer personally worries the Fed and other central banks will respond to the next downturn by referring to the failed playbook of slashing interest rates and potentially resuming large-scale asset purchases. The point was shown to be current, as Singer called the regulatory response to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, including the guaranteeing of all deposits from the two lenders akin to “wrapping all market movements in security blankets.”

He complained, “…all concepts of risk management are based around the possibilities of loss.” He encouraged decision makers to, “Take it away, it’s going to have consequences.”

Where Can Investors Hide

Paul Singer said in his interview there may be a few places for investors to ride out what he sees as a coming storm. One place comes as no surprise, “At such times, some consider the safest bet to be relatively short-term U.S. government debt,” he said, adding that “such debt pays a decent return with virtually no chance of a negative outcome.” He is likely speaking of U.S. Treasuries two years and shorter as the longer duration bonds would be more volatile as rates shift, and other government debt like GNMAs are fraught with extension risk.

Singer also believes some gold in portfolios may make sense.

Take Away

Without some rain, nothing could flourish. Without an occasional brush fire, the risk of massive forest fire greatly increases. Paul Singer, in his interview with the WSJ, indicates he believes the economic brushfires that decision-makers have been preventing should have been allowed to run their course. Preventing them is a big mistake and a collapse may not be far off.

This collapse in easy credit and crypto, among other bubble-type excesses Singer believes could be destructive but preferred by society over continuing to move toward hyperinflation.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-man-who-saw-the-economic-crises-coming-paul-singer-banking-signature-svb-financial-downturn-asset-hyperinflation-recession-debt-federal-reserve-cd2638fe

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/08/27/paul-singer-doomsday-investor

https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_fl/B21000000006

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/hedge-fund-billionaire-paul-singer-still-sees-dangerous-bubble-securities-bubble-asset-classes-in-markets-4cd81a76?mod=search_headline

The Key Consideration to Any Investing Strategy

Image Credit: Jordan Benton (Pexels)

Short Changing Investment Returns By Ignoring Time Horizon

Time horizon is part of every investor’s buy decision, or at least it ought to be. For example, in 2022 the 60/40 investment portfolio had its worst performance since 2008. This is despite a 5.3% increase in value during the fourth quarter of that year. Many headlines had read that the classic 60% stocks and 40% bonds portfolio is “broken.” After it’s stellar performance during Q4 2022, the first quarter of 2023 brought even higher performance – again compounding by an additional 5.9%. This example can highlight that time horizon is dependent on the investment goals proving 60/40 probably is not dead after all. The 60/40 diversification is considered conservative, it’s often implemented for retirement portfolios, typically portfolios with a lot of lead time to achieve its goal of historical returns. Goals should dictate investment strategy and they should include a realistic time horizon.

To Be Patient or Not to Be Patient

Entering the second quarter of 2023, economic trends, including commodity prices, interest rates, political power, inflation, and even peace between nations, all seem to be sending off mixed signals on future trends. A clear market read is far more difficult today than most years. This leaves a lot of questions on what to do with one’s money. If you leave it in the bank, inflation is likely to erode your purchasing power. If you move it to the U.S. government-backed treasury market, a rise in rates (as promised by the Fed) can leave you hurting like a few banks that saw their assets value plummet. Should stocks take a leading role – even if holdings wind up moving sideways or even down for the rest of this year?

As mentioned, this depends on your goal. If you can be patient and have a time horizon to achieve performance of more than a year, the tendency for reversion to mean suggests the answer is probably yes. However, if during the next six to 12 months, this money may need to be deployed for a purchase, it may be best to continually roll treasuries maturing in under a year.

For investments expected to be held longer than a year, there is the lazy way and a more hands-on approach that takes a little more digging. The lazy way says you plop a large percentage of your portfolio in an index fund and earn market returns. A more involved management approach of one’s portfolio would suggest that you’d prefer to avoid stocks considered overvalued or in a weakening industry. If, instead, one can achieve adequate diversity by owning many companies in different industries, and do enough evaluation (i.e., exploring trusted research) to have a sense of whether holding them would suit your needed time horizon, then the stocks selected as your holdings may avoid expected dogs weighing it down. It would make sense that this argues for patience, with expectations that not only will stocks follow history and go up over time, but your holdings have a reasonable expectation to outperform the market.

Time Horizon

Time horizon is a critical factor in investing. It refers to the length of time an investor is willing to hold onto their investments. The time horizon can range from a few months to several decades, depending on an investor’s goals, risk tolerance, and investment strategy. Most benchmarks are viewed daily, quarterly, and monthly. If your time horizon is five years, the quarterly or even annual returns should be a low consideration. Cathie Wood, CEO and founder of Ark Invest, says she invests on a five-year time horizon, considering the speculative growth names her funds have invested in, such as Tesla (TSLA), Roku (ROKU), Zoom Video Communications (ZM), Exact Sciences (EXAS), etc. she could not manage her funds properly if she looked shorter in term.

At least each quarter Portfolio Manager Chuck Royce and Co-CIO Francis Gannon of Royce Funds publish text of a “conversation” between the two. The subject is usually past market performance, expectations of the future, and even stocks that they believe, with the appropriate time horizon, will pay off.  

In the discussion between the two, Francis Gannon covered the case for more extended time horizon investors to explore the small-cap sector. His expectation is that various sectors (viewed by market cap) will fall in line with historical performance averages. “The stocks that performed best under the previous decade’s regime of zero interest rates, low inflation, and low nominal growth—which were mega-caps and small-cap growth—are unlikely to lead going forward, regardless of what direction the U.S. economy ultimately takes. Conversely, those areas of the equity market that lagged during this long period are likely, in our view, to capture long-term leadership,” said Gannon. This is when Chuck Ross very clearly explained the importance of knowing one’s time horizon for maximum potential gain.

“We think small cap is ready to roll and expect the next three to five years to be strong on both an absolute and relative basis.” Said Mr. Royce. He explained that rising rates could help companies that can that don’t need to borrow from the outside.   “Equally important, the Russell 2000’s valuation remained near its lowest rate in 20 years compared to the Russell 1000’s, based on our preferred valuation metric of the median last 12 months’ enterprise value to earnings before taxes (LTM EV/EBIT).” Royce explained.

Source: Royce Invest

The chart above shows that the 20-year performance of small-cap stocks averages 102.9% above that of large-cap equities. The underperformance began five years ago, and the current 20-year low in relative performance in small-caps could play out to be a long lag. With a long enough time horizon, one might expect that small-cap investors get rewarded for the additional risk and reduced liquidity in the sector.

Investment Strategy

While not everyone has five years or more to wait for performance to improve, intentional stock selection among small-caps could help those who do. A recent Barron’s article argued that “Small-Cap Stocks Look Ready to Rally,” the investment publication also believed that stock selection within the sector could pay off. The author wrote that as of March 31, “the Russell 2000 was at 44% of the S&P 500’s level, a ratio the index touched in early 2020 when the advent of Covid-19 had left the economy in perilous waters.”  The publication then reported that the level is a technical low point, a support that wasn’t even breached with pandemic concerns and skyrocketing large-cap tech stocks. Expressed in the within the April 3 article was to a methodology of filtering stocks by reviewing companies with market caps of at least $200 million and free cash flow minimum of 4.5% of the share price. This would put them in line with the overall Russell 2000.

Then look at the consensus earnings forecasts among analyst, have they risen? A high short interest in the stock could also be part of the screening process for possible buys.

Take Away

The importance of time horizon in investing lies in the fact that different investment opportunities have different risk and return profiles over different time periods. Short-term investments tend to have lower risk but lower returns, while long-term investments tend to have higher risk but potentially higher returns. By understanding your time horizon, you can choose investments that align with your investment goals and risk tolerance.

For investors that can span many years holding and waiting for scenarios to play out, but don’t, perhaps are leaving long-term return on the table by investing as though their time horizon is short. Investible cash sitting in a bank will be eroded by inflation, the Fed with its deep pockets has said it is resolved to instigate a further bear market in bonds.  Longer term, stocks outperform, what’s more, well-selected companies can outperform stock indixes that only promise to match the average of good and bad companies.

If you aren’t receiving equity research in your daily email, sign up here now.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.barrons.com/articles/small-cap-stocks-rally-cheap-russell-2000-5b35f854

https://www.royceinvest.com/insights/small-cap-interview?utm_source=royce-mktg&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=insights-interview&utm_content=button-1

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-60-40-investment-strategy-is-back-after-tanking-last-year-b4892aac?mod=hp_lead_pos5

The Week Ahead –  Inflation, FOMC Minutes, and Consumer Sentiment

Will the CPI Number or Fed Minutes Change the Market Direction this Week?

Market-moving economic reports are likely this week. Those with the highest chance to move markets are March CPI data on Wednesday, then FOMC minutes from the meeting just after last month’s bank failures, and the Producer Price Index on Thursday.

The minutes of the March 21-22 FOMC meeting will be released at 2:00 PM Wednesday, this highly watched information coincides with the half-fiscal year Budget Report from the U.S. Treasury. The FOMC minutes will get a lot of attention, but the U.S. Budget Deficit is likely to receive renewed focus as we approach summer and begin to bump up against the Treasury’s borrowing ceiling.  

Monday 4/10

  • 10:00 AM ET, Wholesale Inventories’ second estimate for February is expected to show a 0.2 percent build up; this would be unchanged from the first estimate.

Tuesday 4/11

  • 6:00 AM ET, Small Business Optimism Index has been below the historical average of 98 for 14 months in a row. March’s consensus is 89.0 versus 90.9 in February. The direction of the health of small businesses can foreshadow changes in the stock market.
  • 1:30 PM ET, Austan Goolsbee, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago will be speaking at a luncheon at the Economic Club of Chicago.

Wednesday 4/12

  • 8:30 AM ET, The Consumer Price Index (CPI) core prices for March are expected to have risen by 0.4 percent versus February’s sharp and higher-than-expected increase of 0.5 percent. Overall, headline inflation prices are expected to have increased 0.3 percent after February’s 0.4 percent rise. Annual rates, which in February were 6.0 percent overall and 5.5 percent for the core, are expected to show 5.2 and 5.6 percent.
  • 9:10 AM ET, Thomas Barkin, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond will be speaking. He spoke on April 3, indicating his expectations are that low unemployment rates will continue to support the belief that the economy is not at risk of a recession. Inflation, however, is not going away anytime soon, according to Barkin.
  • 10:30 AM ET, The Energy Information Administration (EIA) will provide its weekly information on petroleum inventories in the U.S., whether produced here or abroad. The level of inventories helps determine prices for petroleum products. Markets will be paying close attention after OPEC+ cut production one week ago.
  • 2:00 PM ET, FOMC minutes from the March 21-22 meeting will be released. This report will have two areas that investors will focus on. These are conversations surrounding U.S. bank health, and those discussions related to inflation and interest rates.
  • 2:00 PM ET, the Treasury Statement related to the budget deficit are expected to report a $253.0 billion deficit in March. This would compare with a $192.7 billion deficit in March a year-ago and a deficit in February this year of $262.4 billion. March is the halfway point into the U.S  government’s fiscal year.

Thursday 4/13

  • 8:30 AM ET, Producer Price Index (PPI), After dropping 0.1 percent lower on the month in February, this inflation index on the producer level in March is expected to be unchanged. March’s ex-food ex-energy rate is seen up 0.3 percent versus February’s no change.
  • 4:30 PM ET, the Federal Reserve’s Balance Sheet has been receiving heightened attention. After the Silicon Valley Bank collapse the Fed institutes a new method for banks to get assistance, markets will watch to see if this has grown. Also, as interest rates have risen, the fixed income securities held by the Fed have repriced billions lower, Fed watchers are beginning to comment on how dramatic this drop in value has been. The last line investors will focus on is quantitative easing. Specifically, investors will look to see if the Fed is on track with its letting securities mature off its books without reinvestment – this reduces U.S. dollars in circulation.

Friday 4/14

  • 8:30 PM ET, March Retail Sales are expected to have fallen 0.4 percent for a second month in a row. Excluding autos, a 0.4 percent decline is also expected.
  • 9:15 AM ET, Industrial Production is expected to rise 0.3 percent in March after being unchanged in February.
  • 10:00 AM ET, Business Inventories for February are expected to have risen 0.3 percent following a 0.1 percent draw in January.
  • 10:00 AM ET, Consumer Sentiment, which sank five full points in March to 62.0, is expected to improve to 62.7 in the first reading for April.

What Else

Taxes are due April 18 this year. This typically creates a wave of new IRA deposits. On April 13, in NYC there will be a luncheon roadshow with PDS Biotechnology. Noble Capital Markets organize the event, more details are available on Channelchek by clicking here.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://us.econoday.com/

https://www.guilford.edu/news/2023/04/fed-leader-inflation-remain-persistent

Should You Buy at the Closing Bell and Sell at the Open?

Image Credit: Florin Cee (Flickr)

Much of Market Performance, in Some Cases All, Occur When the Market is Closed

All traders and most investors have experienced this. From one market close to the next, indexes or stocks rise by 1.5% – 3%, and yet there was never a clear opportunity to make a dime after the market open. The frustration is because the market opened with much or all of the day’s gain baked in. It has been proven to be accurate that the most significant revaluation of stocks occurs during the 17 hours when the market is closed, not the 7-hours when it’s open. And any long-term chart will show that the direction of revaluation over time has been upward. Details, along with other phenomena related to night moves, are discussed below.

Background

 Historically, stock markets have had a positive return, and most of this change occurs while the exchanges are closed or not during regular trading hours. Historically the tendency is to make most of its daily move between the closing and opening bell.

This has been shown in research papers through the years, and there are even ETFs which purport to take advantage of this statistical phenomenon. Of course this is not an everyday occurrence, in fact today (4/6/23), the S&P 500 opened lower than its previous close but began moving higher than the open around noon.

A well-researched scholarly paper had been published demonstrating these price movements and offered the explanation that stock prices behave very differently with respect to their sensitivity to beta when markets are open for trading versus when they are closed. The paper titled,  Asset Pricing: A Tale of Night and Day, by Henderschott, Livdan, and Rösch explained, “stock returns are positively related to beta overnight whereas returns are negatively related to beta during the trading day.”

Image Source: Asset Pricing aTale of Day and Night

 One goal of the research was to test the hypothesis that a securities performance relative to beta is only positive during certain periods. In the paper the researchers tested specific days or months by examining the CAPM validity during different time periods within each day, including all times and all days during the week. The authors wrote, “when the stock market is closed, beta is positively related to the cross section of returns. In contrast, beta is negatively related to returns when the market is open.”

The overall thrust of the findings in the 47-page paper are encapsulated in the chart above which plots the performance during opened and closed periods against different beta groupings of stocks over 25 years.

Can Investors Use this Information?

Most retail trading today is commission free, but there is still a bid offer spread and other slippage. For those that would prefer to not have to be active each day, twice a day, Nightshares ETFs were formed to exploit this phenomenon, with a set it and forget it approach. On the surface it would seem to make sense for long term investors. You could own the S&P 500 index ETF, or increase beta exposure for a potentially better performance with a small-cap index ETF.

The founder of Night Shares, Bruce Lavine, pointed out in an interview that over the 20 years through the end of 2022, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF SPY, 0.31% produced a buy-and-hold return of 9.7% annualized. Three-quarters of that return — 7.5% — was produced while the NYSE was closed.

The numbers are even more pronounced in the case of the small-cap Russell 2000 Index, according to Lavine. Over the same 20-year period, all of the index’s net return was produced overnight; during the day session, it actually lost ground on balance. In other words, small-cap portfolios that out-returned large-cap would have been better off if they were not exposed during the day.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/draft20130612pp-full.pdf

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/youll-make-the-most-money-in-the-stock-market-during-these-specific-and-suprising-hours-bdd55215?mod=home-page

https://www.ftserussell.com/

Will the Market Continue to Move Higher in April?

Image Credit: U.S. Pacific Fleet (Flickr)

Looking Back on March Markets and Forward to the Second Quarter

Looking in the rearview mirror at March, the month distinguished itself in two ways. First, attention was drawn to the unexpected banking sector as problems with Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse shook investor confidence. The fear of any additional financial sector bank problems bubbling up are at rest for now. Second, after the FOMC meeting concluded with a 25bp tightening on March 22, all major indices breathed a sigh of relief and trended upward in the final week of March. Looking forward into the month of April, the Nasdaq 100 just broke 20% above its October low. This has investors cautiously optimistic that large-cap tech has entered a new bull market, with hopes that the other indices will also continue to climb higher.

Image Credit: Koyfin

Looking Back

Of the 11 S&P market sectors (SPDRs), seven finished March in positive territory, energy was break-even on the month, and three sectors were negative. The best performing three were led by Technology (XLK), up 10.86%, followed by Consumer Discretionary (XLC), which increased 8.65%, and Utilities (XLU), rose 4.91% during March, reacting to lower fuel costs and lower yields.

Energy, which closed out the month essentially where it began, now indicates that April will kick-off with a strong tailwind as OPEC+ decided to cut production, driving oil futures higher.

Of the worst-performing sectors, Financials (XLF) which includes banks, was down 9.55%. Real Estate (XLRE) was lower by 1.48%, and Basic Materials (XLB), reacting to the increased threat of recession as the bank crisis unfolded, was down 1%.

All sectors began moving higher after the March 22nd interest rate decision by the Federal Reserve.

Source: Koyfin

Looking Forward

Moving past the March banking crisis, three key factors are likely to continue to be front and center in April. These are inflation and interest rates. Fuel prices, to a lesser degree, may also become impactful as rising fuel prices could serve to push headline inflation higher.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) gained 6% year-over year in February (reported in March). The inflation gauge is still coming off a peak of 9.1% in June last year, but still well above the Federal Reserve’s 2% long-term target.

12-Month Percent Change in CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), Not Seasonally Adjusted, Feb. 2022 – Feb. 2023

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

At the Fed meeting, the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) voted to raise interest rates by one-quarter of a percentage point. This followed a quarter-point move at the prior meeting, following more aggressive hikes going back to March 2022.

Federal Reserve Chairman Powell noted that “financial conditions seem to have tightened” since the banking crisis began. The Fed released fresh long-term economic projections at the meeting, including an outlook that foresees just one more rate hike before the FOMC is seen as pausing any moves on overnight lending rates.

The availability of jobs and very low unemployment rate in the face of massive rate hikes from March 2022-March 2023, makes this tightening cycle unique,and perhaps more difficult for the Fed to manage. That said, recession risks remain elevated as the Fed moves work through the economy over time.

Traders now forecast near a 49% chance that the Fed will raise rates by an additional quarter point at the meeting ended May 3 —and a 51% chance it could do nothing.

Recession Watch

The Fed is reaching a critical point in its battle against inflation, the next couple of months will determine whether or not it can navigate a soft landing for the U.S. economy without tipping it into a recession.

In recent months, the U.S. housing market has softened significantly, and manufacturing activity has dropped. In addition, the U.S. Treasury yield curve has been inverted since mid-2022, something that’s historically been seen as a strong recession indicator.

In fact, the New York Fed’s recession model predicts a 54.5% chance of a U.S. recession sometime in the next 12 months.

So far, the most convincing argument a soft landing may still be possible has been the resilience of the U.S. labor market. The Labor Department reported the U.S. economy added 311,000 jobs in February, widely exceeding economists’ expectations. The unemployment rate rose a bit to 3.6%, but that’s still down from 3.8% a year ago.

Take-Away

The market became fearful early in March as participants reevaluated to determine if the bank failures were isolated cases or part of a broader problem. Once confidence set back in with the feeling the problem was isolated, there were relief rallies that pushed all indices and sectors northward the last third of the month.  

With the Nasdaq 100 having risen 20% from its low last October, there is an expectation that it is in a bull market and hope that it will lead the other market cap sectors to break into bull territory as well.

The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for May 2-3.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf

https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/

https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/capital_markets/ycfaq#/