Fairness Opinions, Understanding a Transaction’s Full Value

Image Credit: Jernej Furman (Flickr)

Why Companies Get a Fairness Opinion Before Entering a Financial Transaction

How important is a fairness opinion (FO) when a company is evaluating a merger, acquisition, spin-off, buyback, carve-out, or other corporate change of ownership? Part of the due diligence of a large financial transaction is to engage for a fee, an experienced expert to create a fairness opinion that, among other things, advises on the valuation of the proposed transaction. And possibly recommends adjusting some terms to align the transaction with what the expert sees as fair. 

Understanding Fairness Opinions

When companies are considering impactful transactions, they may be required to get an objective opinion on whether the terms of the deal are fair. If it isn’t required, it is still a good idea to help reduce risks inherent in large transactions.

A fairness opinion is a professional assessment of the fairness of a proposed transaction. An independent third-party advisor, such as an investment bank, usually provides it. The goal of a fairness opinion is to provide an impartial evaluation of whether the transaction is fair to all parties involved based on various financial and strategic factors. The analysis involves evaluations of the impact of synergies, overall asset value, current market worth, dilutive effects, structure, and other attributes that a non-experienced executive may easily overlook.

Who Provides Fairness Opinions

Investment banks are the most common providers of fairness opinions. Choosing an institution that has extensive industry-specific experience and knowledge in valuing a transaction or strategic opportunity could save the client many times the cost of the service.

For example, Noble Capital Markets, an investment banking firm with 39 years of experience serving clients in a variety of industries, provides as one of its opinion services, FOs to companies considering a transaction. Francisco Penafiel, Managing Director and part of Noble’s investment banking & valuation practice, explained why getting an opinion from a reputable investment bank can avoid expensive problems.  Mr. Penafiel said, “FO’s should be provided by independent third parties, but it’s highly recommended for companies to have the assistance of advisors with a sound reputation, credibility, and significant industry experience.”

Why should the advisor have an intimate understanding of the industry? Penafiel explained, “it’s also important for the advisors to have knowledge of the regulatory compliance factors that affect the process as well as to be fully independent to avoid any conflict of interests.” He believes most often, investment banking firms, with platforms that include many years of experience, are best suited to run analysis that is deep and thorough, and are necessary when rendering these opinions

“Noble has helped clients over the years with their valuations needs, we’re now witnessing an increased demand for FOs because of the benefits they bring to the companies involved in a transaction. It also goes a long way to demonstrate that management and boards fulfilled their fiduciary duties, reducing risks of litigation,” said Penafiel.

The SEC has shown that they approve of and, in some cases, could require an FO. Recent regulations applying to de-SPAC transactions make fairness opinions the standard as de-SPAC transactions have an inherent conflict of interest between a SPAC’s sponsor and the stockholders. The third-party FO provider allows for impartiality and transparency to benefit all parties, especially investors.

Steps in Creating an FO

To provide a fairness opinion, an investment bank will typically conduct a thorough analysis of the deal’s financial and strategic aspects. This analysis may involve evaluating the company’s financial statements, projecting future earnings, analyzing the transaction structure, and reviewing comparable transactions in the industry. The investment bank will also consider the prevailing market conditions, economic climate and the impact on interest rates and the effects of any regulatory or legal issues on the transaction.

After completing its analysis, the investment bank will issue a formal report summarizing its findings and conclusions. The report will typically contain a detailed explanation of the fairness opinion, including the methodology used, the assumptions made, and the supporting evidence. It will also provide a valuation of the company, which may be used as a reference point for negotiating the deal’s terms.

It’s worth noting that a fairness opinion is not a guarantee that the proposed transaction is fair. Rather, it’s a professional opinion based on the information available at the time of the analysis. The ultimate decision about whether to proceed with the transaction lies with the parties involved, who must consider various factors beyond the scope of the fairness opinion.

Take Away

 Obtaining a fairness opinion is a critical step for companies considering major transactions. It provides an objective evaluation of the transaction’s fairness, which can help the parties involved make informed decisions. Investment banks are well-positioned to provide fairness opinions, given their extensive experience and expertise in financial analysis and valuation. By engaging an investment bank to provide a fairness opinion, companies can gain a valuable perspective on the proposed transaction, which can help them negotiate more effectively and ultimately achieve a better outcome.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://noblecapitalmarkets.com/opinion-practice

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/160249385.pdf

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fairness-opinion.asp

http://edgar.secdatabase.com/1680/121390023011399/fs42023ex23-4_heritage.htm

Why the IPO Market is Picking Up

Image Credit: Steve Jurvetson (Flickr)

IPO Market Accelerating – Especially Overseas

The amount of investment in initial public offerings (IPOs) during March-April has jumped from January-February levels. Globally, the pick-up in IPOs is linked to the uptick in stock prices, which has allowed companies to tap into investor appetite for newer listings. A sizeable percentage of the offerings are in Asia, but Europe and the U.S. have experienced a surge as well. Activity during the first two months of 2023 had ground to a halt; new data compiled by Bloomberg demonstrates a much faster trend.

To date, there has been $25 billion worth of IPOs worldwide in March and April; this is nearly twice the amount transacted during the prior two months of the year. Companies headquartered from Hong Kong to Milan have put up their “Going Public”  signs up as market volatility declined. The uptick in IPOs in Asia substantially moved the needle as non-U.S. exchanges accounted for nearly 80% of new share sales during April.

The uptick in Europe can’t be ignored either; European listings are higher by a wide margin compared to earlier in the year. The activity in the U.S. is not as robust but also noteworthy, as concern about a recession had been creating caution among potential U.S. issuers.

In a quote published by Bloomberg News, Jason Manketo global co-head of the law firm Linklaters’ equities practice said, “We are beginning to see green shoots of activity with companies restarting processes that were on hold, but there is still a fair degree of uncertainty in the market.” Mankel added, “The buy side is keen to see results for a couple of quarters before committing to an IPO. This means the potential pipeline of some 2023 deals has been moved out to 2024.”

Leaders

Statistically, Asia is where a great deal of the action is in the world today. But the activity is different, perhaps more appealing, than last year. In 2022 the vast majority of large deals were concentrated in mainland China; over the past two months, issuance is coming from a broader representation of Asia.

“The IPO market is coming back gradually and slowly. It is not 100% back yet, but there are signs of life and renewed vigor,” said James Wang, co-head of equity capital markets at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in Asia ex-Japan.

A couple of nickel producers from Indonesia surged as they went public. And in Japan, as part of the country’s largest IPO since 2018,  Rakuten Bank Ltd. soared after it raised 83.3 billion yen ($623 million). And KKR & Co.-backed Chinese liquor company ZJLD Group Inc. as recently as April 20th, priced Hong Kong’s largest offering in 2023.

Europe Wakes Up

Europe’s IPO market had been dragging, with activity in 2023 down about 12% from the same period last year as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine brought new listings to a screeching halt.

Also weighing on the market, poor IPO returns have been a deterrent for investors. Portfolio managers had been in the drivers seat insisting on bargains for less proven companies. In  March the sudden meltdown of financial firm Credit Suisse, ignited a global market rout, this added to investor worries about interest rates and inflation; the event also made it less attractive for companies to try and attract a favorable price.

But there are growing signs of fear lifting. Most notably, Lottomatica SpA, the Italian gambling company backed by Apollo Global Management Inc., opened the books last week for a €600 million ($657 million) IPO, becoming the third large firm to tap European exchanges this year. Additionally, German web-hosting company Ionos SE and electric motor component maker EuroGroup Laminations SpA have managed to raise more than $400 million in the region, though both stocks have struggled after debuting.

U.S. Uptick

While IPO activity in the U.S. is not as robust, there has been a huge uptick as well. The IPO calendar for U.S. exchanges shows 20 priced deals totalling $751.5 billion, and 29 new filings. This is an acceleration after only $4.1 billion had been raised for companies listing on U.S. exchanges during the first two months of 2023.

Take Away

Globally companies are finding it more worthwhile to tap capital from the equity markets via IPO. While the most growth is greater Asia, Europe and the U.S. see a significant uptick as well. Whether this trend continues and represents, a buying opportunity seems to hinge on recession concerns. Many forecasters are now calling for a much more mild recession than previously expected.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-04-23/ipo-market-shows-signs-of-life-even-as-recession-fears-persist?srnd=markets-vp&sref=8GWybyo5&leadSource=uverify%20wall

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/ipos

https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/LTT:IM