Student Loan Payments Resume

After nearly 3 years of reprieve, student loan payments are set to restart on October 1, 2023. However, the landscape looks much different thanks to sweeping changes made by the Biden administration. These alterations have made student debt more manageable and offered routes to accelerated payoff or even forgiveness that didn’t exist before.

The impact could extend beyond individual borrowers to provide a boost to the overall economy. With less income eaten up by student loan payments, borrowers will have more spending power. That additional discretionary income circulating through the economy acts as a stimulus.

Perhaps the most impactful change was the elimination of interest capitalization in most cases. This is the process where unpaid interest gets added to the loan balance, causing it to balloon. Now, interest no longer capitalizes when borrowers exit forbearance, leave income-driven repayment plans, or have other status changes. Only when exiting deferment on unsubsidized loans does interest get added to principal. This prevents balances from spiraling out of control.

Biden has also dramatically expanded access to forgiveness. Over 3 million borrowers have already had loans discharged through revamps of programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness and income-driven repayment. The former saw its complex rules simplified, while the latter had payment counts adjusted and forbearance periods now qualifying for credit. These tweaks pushed many over the line into immediate forgiveness.

Even borrowers who don’t qualify for these programs have an easier time discharging loans through bankruptcy. New guidelines tell government lawyers not to oppose bankruptcy discharge requests that meet certain criteria laid out in a 15-page form. This makes the previously rare “undue hardship” determination more accessible.

The administration also implemented a 1-year “on ramp” where missed payments don’t negatively impact credit or trigger default. This grace period offers struggling borrowers a clean slate before consequences kick in again.

Those able to resume payments may even benefit from today’s high interest rates. Federal student loans have fixed low rates, so borrowers can pay them down faster by investing in treasury notes earning far higher returns. Inflation likewise reduces the real burden of student debt over time.

While these changes have brought tangible individual relief, broadly reducing the student debt burden could also provide a macroeconomic boost. Money freed up in household budgets gets spent elsewhere, circulating through and stimulating the economy.

The Biden administration still wants to enact broad student debt cancellation for this very reason. After the Supreme Court blocked its forgiveness plan, the Department of Education launched “negotiated rulemaking” to find another path. This bureaucratic process involving public committees aims to deliver a new cancellation proposal in late 2024.

Until then, the reshaped student loan landscape gives borrowers breathing room. The structural changes determine whether student debt remains a crushing burden or becomes manageable.

With interest capitalization curbed and expanded opportunities for discharge, balances can actually shrink instead of endlessly growing. The credit safeguards offer wiggle room to get finances in order before consequences hit. And the door to forgiveness has been opened wider than ever before.

Of course, these alterations won’t instantly solve every borrower’s problems. But they provide avenues for relief that didn’t exist previously. And more importantly, they signal a philosophical shift that student debt shouldn’t ruin lives or constrain futures.

There’s still work to be done, like making income-driven repayment more accessible and adding guardrails to limit excessive debt. But the momentum is towards a system that helps borrowers succeed rather than burying them in interest and unpayable balances.

So while student loan repayment is resuming, borrowers can take heart that it’s restarting under a fairer set of rules. The old grind of watching debt balloon while relief remained elusive has thankfully been left behind. With a potential wider economic stimulus, these changes could benefit more than just student borrowers.

August PCE Index Release Suggests Slower Pace of Inflation Growth

Today’s news brings the release of the August data for the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. This report, a crucial indicator of inflation and consumer spending in the United States, has set a positive tone for financial markets as they rally in early trading.

In August, the PCE Index recorded a year-over-year growth rate of 3.5%, showing a modest increase from the previous month’s 3.4%. On a monthly basis, the core PCE, the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation, inched up by 0.1%, slightly lower than the 0.2% increase in July.

The Federal Reserve has long regarded the core PCE as its favored measure of inflation. While the August PCE report has provided insight into inflation trends, it’s important to note that the Fed made a decision to keep interest rates steady earlier this week. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell consistently references the core PCE figures when assessing inflation. Powell has emphasized that inflation remains above the Fed’s 2% target, which has informed the central bank’s recent decision to maintain interest rates within a range of 5.25%-5.50%. This decision underscores the Fed’s cautious approach to managing inflation while fostering economic growth.

Historically, PCE reports have played a significant role in guiding monetary policy and influencing market dynamics. When inflationary pressures rise, the Fed may respond by raising interest rates to curb price increases. Conversely, when PCE growth moderates, the central bank may opt for rate cuts to stimulate economic activity.

While the report suggests a slower pace of inflation growth in August compared to July, inflation remains a pertinent issue. Investors will closely monitor subsequent reports and Federal Reserve actions to gain insight into the trajectory of inflation and its potential impact on financial markets and the broader economy. The early market rally reflects the market’s optimism following the release of the latest PCE data, as it continues to navigate the evolving economic landscape.

Mortgage Rates Hit 23-Year High

Mortgage rates crossed the 7% threshold this past week, as the 30-year fixed rate hit 7.31% according to Freddie Mac data. This marks the highest level for mortgage rates since late 2000.

The implications extend far beyond the housing market alone. The sharp rise in rates stands to impact the stock market, economic growth, and investor sentiment through various channels.

For stock investors, higher mortgage rates pose risks of slower economic growth and falling profits for rate-sensitive sectors. Housing is a major component of GDP, so a pullback in home sales and construction activity would diminish economic output.

Slower home sales also mean less revenue for homebuilders, real estate brokers, mortgage lenders, and home furnishing retailers. With housing accounting for 15-18% of economic activity, associated industries make up a sizable chunk of the stock market.

A housing slowdown would likely hit sectors such as homebuilders, building materials, home improvement retailers, and home furnishing companies the hardest. Financial stocks could also face challenges as mortgage origination and refinancing drop off.

Broader economic weakness resulting from reduced consumer spending power would likely spillover to impact earnings across a wide swath of companies and market sectors. Investors may rotate to more defensive stocks if growth concerns escalate.

Higher rates also signal tightening financial conditions, which historically leads to increased stock market volatility and investor unease. Between inflation cutting into incomes and higher debt servicing costs, consumers have less discretionary income to sustain spending.

Reduced consumer spending has a knock-on effect of slowing economic growth. If rate hikes intended to fight inflation go too far, it raises the specter of an economic contraction or recession down the line.

For bond investors, rising rates eat into prices of existing fixed income securities. Bonds become less attractive compared to newly issued debt paying higher yields. Investors may need to explore options like floating rate bonds and shorter duration to mitigate rate impacts.

Rate-sensitive assets that did well in recent years as rates fell may come under pressure. Real estate, utilities, long-duration bonds, and growth stocks with high valuations are more negatively affected by rising rate environments.

Meanwhile, cash becomes comparatively more attractive as yields on savings accounts and money market funds tick higher. Investors may turn to cash while awaiting clarity on inflation and rates.

The Fed has emphasized its commitment to bringing inflation down even as growth takes a hit. That points to further rate hikes ahead, meaning mortgage rates likely have room to climb higher still.

Whether the Fed can orchestrate a soft landing remains to be seen. But until rate hikes moderate, investors should brace for market volatility and economic uncertainty.

Rising mortgage rates provide yet another reason for investors to ensure their portfolios are properly diversified. Maintaining some allocation to defensive stocks and income plays can help smooth out risk during periods of higher volatility.

While outlooks call for slower growth, staying invested with a long-term perspective is typically better than market timing. Patience and prudent risk management will be virtues for investors in navigating markets in the year ahead.

President Biden Makes History by Joining UAW Picket Line

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023, President Joe Biden made history by joining striking United Auto Workers (UAW) members on the picket line in Wayne County, Michigan. It was the first time a sitting president had ever joined an ongoing strike.

Biden’s visit came as the UAW was in its 12th day of a strike against General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis, demanding better wages, benefits, and job security. The strike had caused significant disruptions to the auto industry and had put thousands of workers out of work.

Despite the risks, Biden was determined to show his support for the UAW and for working families. He arrived at the picket line early in the morning and was greeted by cheers and applause from the strikers.

“It’s an honor to be here with you today,” Biden said to the strikers. “You are fighting for the middle class. You are fighting for the soul of this nation.”

Biden went on to praise the UAW for its long history of fighting for the rights of workers and their families. He also pledged his support for the union and said that he would continue to work to create an economy that works for everyone.

“I want to be clear: I stand with the UAW,” Biden said. “I will always stand with workers who are fighting for a fair deal.”

Biden’s visit to the picket line was a significant show of support for the UAW and for labor unions in general. It came at a time when unions are facing increasing attacks from corporations and anti-union politicians.

Biden’s visit was also a reminder of his commitment to working families. He has repeatedly said that he will fight to create an economy that works for everyone, not just the wealthy few.

Biden’s visit to the picket line could have a number of positive consequences for the UAW and for labor unions in general.

First, it could help to raise public awareness of the strike and the union’s demands. This could put pressure on the auto companies to settle the strike on the union’s terms.

Second, Biden’s visit could help to boost morale among the strikers. It could show them that they have the support of the president and that they are not alone in their fight.

Third, Biden’s visit could help to strengthen the labor movement as a whole. It could show that unions are still a powerful force and that they can win when they stand together.

Biden’s visit to the picket line was also significant for its historical implications. It was the first time a sitting president had ever joined an ongoing strike. This sent a powerful message that the president stands with working families and that he supports the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively.

Biden’s visit to the picket line was a courageous and important act. It showed that he is a president who is not afraid to stand up for working families, even when it is politically difficult.

The UAW strike is a critical test for Biden’s presidency. If the union is able to win a fair contract, it will be a victory for working families and for the labor movement as a whole. It will also be a sign that Biden is delivering on his promise to create an economy that works for everyone.

The strike is also a test for the Biden administration’s commitment to industrial policy. Biden has repeatedly said that he wants to revitalize the American manufacturing sector. The UAW strike is an opportunity for Biden to show that he is serious about this commitment.

The Biden administration can support the UAW strike in a number of ways. First, it can put pressure on the auto companies to settle the strike on the union’s terms. Second, it can provide financial assistance to the strikers and their families. Third, it can use its regulatory authority to make it easier for workers to organize and bargain collectively.

The UAW strike is a critical moment for working families and for the labor movement. The outcome of the strike will have a major impact on the future of the American economy. Biden’s visit to the picket line was a significant show of support for the UAW and for working families. It is now up to the Biden administration to follow through on its promises and to ensure that the UAW strike is a victory for working families.

Looming Government Shutdown Tests McCarthy’s Leadership

Washington braces for its first potential government shutdown under House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s speakership as the fiscal year-end nears on September 30. The high-stakes funding clash represents an early test of McCarthy’s ability to lead a fractious Republican majority.

The face-off caps months of growing friction between McCarthy and the hardline House Freedom Caucus that helped install him as Speaker in January. To gain their votes, McCarthy pledged he would not advance spending bills without “majority of the majority” Republican backing.

That concession has now put McCarthy in a bind as the shutdown deadline approaches without a funding agreement in place. The Freedom Caucus is demanding McCarthy leverage the must-pass spending legislation to cut budgets and advance conservative policies, like defunding the FBI.

However, McCarthy knows Senate Democrats would never accept such ideological provisions. And a prolonged government shutdown could batter the fragile economy while eroding public faith in governance competence.

With only days remaining, McCarthy weighs risky options without easy solutions. Scheduling a vote on a stripped-down continuing resolution to temporarily extend current funding would break his promise to the Freedom Caucus.

Yet refusing to hold a vote risks blame for an unpopular shutdown. McCarthy also considers putting a Senate-passed funding bill to a House floor vote, prompting Freedom Caucus warnings that doing so would incite calls for his ouster.

The Speaker urgently needs to unify Republicans behind a way forward. But McCarthy must balance the Freedom Caucus’ demands against the consequences of failing to avert a shutdown.

Navigating these pressures will test McCarthy’s ability to govern a narrow 222-seat majority. It will also gauge whether he can effectively steer the party into the 2024 elections amid internal divisions.

With only 18% of Americans supporting shutdowns over policy disputes according to polls, McCarthy likely wants to avoid a disruptive funding lapse. A 2013 closure lasting 16 days is estimated to have shaved 0.2-0.6% from economic growth that quarter.

From furloughing 800,000 federal workers to suspending services, even a short shutdown could batter public trust in leadership. The military’s over 1.3 million active duty members would see pay disrupted. National Parks could close, impacting over 297 million annual visitors.

The high-risk brinkmanship highlights the difficulty McCarthy faces satisfying the party’s warring moderate and Freedom Caucus wings. Finding a solution that keeps government open while saving face with hardliners will prove a true test of McCarthy’s political dexterity.

Past shutdowns under divided government have tended to end once public pressure mounted on the blamed party. While Republicans control the House, most fault would land on them for manufacturing a crisis.

Yet McCarthy cannot disregard the Freedom Caucus, whose backing enabled his ascension to power. The days ahead will reveal whether McCarthy has the savvy to extricate the GOP from a crisis partly of its own making.

McCarthy’s handling of the funding impasse will set the tone for his entire speakership. At stake is nothing less than his ability to govern, deliver on promises, and prevent self-inflicted wounds entering 2024.

Russian Export Ban May Push Crude Oil Higher

Oil prices climbed over 1% Friday after Russia banned diesel and gasoil exports. The move aims to increase Russia’s domestic supply but reduces the global oil market.

West Texas Intermediate crude climbed back above $90 per barrel following the news. Brent futures also gained, topping $94. Energy analysts say the Russian ban will likely sustain upward pressure on oil prices near-term.

Russia is a leading diesel producer globally. How much the export halt affects US fuel prices depends on how long it remains in place, says Angie Gildea, KPMG’s head of energy. But any drop in total global oil supply without lower demand will lift prices.

The ban comes as US gas prices retreat from 2022 highs, now averaging $3.86 nationally. Diesel is around $4.58 per gallon. Diesel powers key transport like trucks and ships. The loss of Russian exports could spur further diesel spikes.

However, gas prices may keep easing for most of the US, says Tom Kloza of OPIS. Western states could see increases.

Kloza believes crude may rise $2 to $3 per barrel in the near-term. But gasoline margins are poised to shrink even if oil nears $100 again. The US transition to cheaper winter fuel could also limit price hikes.

Oil has increased steadily since summer as OPEC+ cuts output. Saudi Arabia and Russia also reduced production. More Wall Street analysts now predict $100 oil in 2023.

Goldman Sachs sees Brent potentially hitting $100 per barrel in the next 12 months. Sharper inventory declines are likely as OPEC supply falls but demand rises, says Goldman’s head of oil research.

The White House has criticized OPEC+ for the production cuts. US gasoline demand recently hit a seasonal record high over 9.5 million barrels per day. Jet fuel use is also rebounding towards pre-pandemic levels.

Strong demand, paired with reduced Russian oil exports, leaves the market more exposed to supply disruptions. Hurricane Ian showed how quickly price spikes can occur.

Take a moment to take a look at other energy companies covered by Noble Capital Markets Senior Research Analyst Michael Heim.

The Biden Administration plans to keep tapping the Strategic Petroleum Reserve into 2023 to restrain cost increases. But further export bans or output reductions could overwhelm these efforts.

While tighter global fuel supplies might not directly translate to the US, Russia’s latest move signals volatility will persist. Energy prices remain sensitive to supply and demand shifts.

More export cuts could accelerate oil’s return to triple-digits. But for US drivers, the road ahead on gas costs seems mixed. Falling margins and seasonal shifts could limit prices, but risks linger.

Fed Keeping Rates Higher Despite Pausing Hikes For Now

The Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged on Wednesday but projected keeping them at historically high levels into 2024 and 2025 to ensure inflation continues falling from four-decade highs.

The Fed held its benchmark rate steady in a target range of 5.25-5.5% following four straight 0.75 percentage point hikes earlier this year. But officials forecast rates potentially peaking around 5.6% by year-end before only gradually declining to 5.1% in 2024 and 4.6% in 2025.

This extended timeframe for higher rates contrasts with prior projections for more significant cuts starting next year. The outlook underscores the Fed’s intent to keep monetary policy restrictive until inflation shows clearer and more persistent signs of cooling toward its 2% target.

“We still have some ways to go,” said Fed Chair Jerome Powell in a press conference, explaining why rates must remain elevated amid still-uncertain inflation risks. He noted the Fed has hiked rates to restrictive levels more rapidly than any period in modern history.

The Fed tweaked its economic forecasts slightly higher but remains cautious on additional tightening until more data arrives. The latest projections foresee economic growth slowing to 1.5% next year with unemployment ticking up to 4.1%.

Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, is expected to fall from 4.9% currently to 2.6% by late 2023. But officials emphasized inflation remains “elevated” and “unacceptably high” despite moderating from 40-year highs earlier this year.

Consumer prices rose 8.3% in August on an annual basis, down from the 9.1% peak in June but well above the Fed’s 2% comfort zone. Further cooling is needed before the Fed can declare victory in its battle against inflation.

The central bank is proceeding carefully, pausing rate hikes to assess the cumulative impact of its rapid tightening this year while weighing risks. Additional increases are likely but the Fed emphasized future moves are data-dependent.

“In coming months policy will depend on the incoming data and evolving outlook for the economy,” Powell said. “At some point it will become appropriate to slow the pace of increases” as the Fed approaches peak rates.

For now, the Fed appears poised to hold rates around current levels absent a dramatic deterioration in inflation. Keeping rates higher for longer indicates the Fed’s determination to avoid loosening prematurely before prices are fully under control.

Powell has reiterated the Fed is willing to overtighten to avoid mistakes of the 1970s and see inflation fully tamed. Officials continue weighing risks between high inflation and slower economic growth.

“Restoring price stability while achieving a relatively modest increase in unemployment and a soft landing will be challenging,” Powell conceded. “No one knows whether this process will lead to a recession.”

Nonetheless, the Fed chief expressed optimism that a severe downturn can still be avoided amid resilient household and business spending. The labor market also remains strong with unemployment at 3.7%.

But the housing market continues to soften under the weight of higher rates, a key channel through which Fed tightening slows the economy. And risks remain tilted to the downside until inflation demonstrably falls closer to target.

For markets, clarity that rates will stay elevated through 2024 reduces uncertainty. Stocks bounced around after the Fed’s announcement as investors processed the guidance. The path forward depends on incoming data, but the Fed appears determined to keep rates higher for longer.

The Perfect Storm Brewing in US Housing

A perfect storm is brewing in the US housing market. Mortgage rates have surged above 7% just as millennials, the largest generation, reach peak homebuying age. This collision of rising interest rates and unmet demand is causing substantial disruption, as seen in the sharp decline in home sales, cautious builders and a looming affordability crisis that threatens the broader economy.

Mortgage rates have taken off as the Federal Reserve aggressively raises interest rates to fight inflation. The average 30-year fixed rate recently hit 7.18%, according to Freddie Mac, the highest level since 2001. This has severely hampered housing affordability and demand. Fannie Mae, the mortgage finance giant, forecasts total home sales will drop to 4.8 million this year, the slowest pace since 2011 when the housing market was still recovering from the Great Recession.

Fannie Mae expects sales to struggle through 2024 as rates remain elevated. It predicts the US economy will enter a recession in early 2024, further dragging down the housing market. Home prices are also likely to drop as high rates impede sales. This could hurt consumer confidence and discretionary spending, considering the critical role housing plays in household wealth.

Higher rates have pumped up monthly mortgage payments and made homes less affordable. Take a $500,000 home purchased with a 20% down payment. At a 2.86% mortgage rate two years ago, the monthly payment would have been $1,656. With rates now at 7.18%, that same home has a monthly cost of $3,077, according to calculations by Axios. That 87% payment surge makes purchasing unattainable for many buyers.

These affordability challenges are hitting just as millennials reach peak homebuying age. The largest cohorts of this generation were born in the late 1980s and early 1990s, making them between 32 and 34 years old today. That’s when marriage, childbearing and demand for living space typically accelerate.

However, homebuilders have been reluctant to significantly ramp up construction with rates so high. Housing starts experienced a significant decline of 11.3% in August, according to Census Bureau data, driven by a decline in apartment buildings. Single-family starts dipped 4.3% to an annual pace of 941,000, 16% below the average from mid-2020 to mid-2022. Homebuilder sentiment has also plunged, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

Take a look at Orion Group Holdings Inc., a leading specialty construction company servicing the infrastructure, industrial and building sectors.

This pullback in new construction comes even as there is strong interest from millennials and other buyers. Though mortgage rates moderated the overheated housing market earlier this year, national home prices remain just below their all-time highs, up 13.5% from two years ago, according to the S&P Case-Shiller index.

Some analysts say the only solution is to significantly boost supply. But that seems unlikely with builders cautious and financing costs high. The housing crisis has no quick fix and will continue to be an anchor on the broader economy. Millennials coming of age and mortgage rates spiraling upwards have sparked a perfect storm, broken the housing market, and darkened the country’s economic outlook.

High Gas Prices Return, Complicating Inflation Fight

Pain at the pump has made an unwelcome return, with gas prices rapidly rising across the United States. The national average recently climbed to $3.88 per gallon, while some states now face prices approaching or exceeding $6 per gallon.

In California, gas prices have spiked to $5.79 on average, up 31 cents in just the past week. It’s even worse in metro Los Angeles where prices hit $6.07, a 49 cent weekly jump. Besides California, drivers in 11 states now face average gas prices of $4 or more.

This resurgence complicates the Federal Reserve’s fight against high inflation. Oil prices are the key driver of retail gas costs. With oil climbing back to $90 per barrel, pushed up by supply cuts abroad, gas prices have followed.

West Texas Intermediate crude rose to $93.74 on Tuesday, its highest level in 10 months, before retreating below $91 on Wednesday. The international benchmark Brent crude hit highs above $96 per barrel. Goldman Sachs warned Brent could reach $107 if OPEC+ nations don’t unwind production cuts.

For consumers, higher gas prices add costs and sap purchasing power, especially for lower-income families. Drivers once again face pain filling up their tanks. Households paid an average of $445 a month on gas during the June peak when prices topped $5 a gallon. That figure dropped to $400 in September but is rising again.

Politically, high gas also causes headaches for the Biden administration. Midterm voters tend to blame whoever occupies the White House for pain at the pump, whether justified or not. President Biden has few tools to immediately lower prices set by global markets.

Take a look at other energy companies by taking a look at Noble Capital Markets Research Analyst Michael Heim’s coverage list.

However, economists say oil and gas prices must rise significantly further to seriously jeopardize the U.S. economy. Past recessions only followed massive oil price spikes of at least 100% within a year. Oil would need to double from current levels, to around $140 per barrel, to inevitably tip the economy into recession, according to analysis.

Nonetheless, the energy resurgence does present challenges for the Fed’s inflation fight. While core inflation has cooled lately, headline inflation has rebounded in part due to pricier gas. Consumer prices rose 0.1% in August, defying expectations of a drop, largely because of rising shelter and energy costs.

This complicates the Fed’s mission to cool inflation through interest rate hikes. Some economists believe the energy volatility will lead the Fed to pencil in an additional quarter-point rate hike this year to around 4.5%. However, a dramatic policy response is unlikely with oil still below $100 per barrel.

In fact, some argue the energy spike may even inadvertently help the Fed. By sapping consumer spending power, high gas prices could dampen demand and ease price pressures. If energy costs siphon purchases away from discretionary goods and services, it may allow inflation to fall without more aggressive Fed action.

Morgan Stanley analysis found past energy price shocks had a “small” impact on core inflation but took a “sizable bite out of” consumer spending. While bad for growth, this demand destruction could give the Fed space to cool inflation without triggering serious economic damage.

For now, energy volatility muddies the inflation outlook and complicates the Fed’s delicate task of engineering a soft landing. Gas prices swinging upward once again present both economic and political challenges. But unless oil spikes drastically higher, the energy complex likely won’t force the Fed’s hand. The central bank will keep rates elevated as long as underlying inflation remains stubbornly high.

U.S. National Debt Tops $33 Trillion

The U.S. national debt surpassed $33 trillion for the first time ever this week, hitting $33.04 trillion according to the Treasury Department. This staggering sum exceeds the size of the entire U.S. economy and equals about $100,000 per citizen.

For investors, the ballooning national debt raises concerns about future tax hikes, inflation, and government spending cuts that could impact markets. While the debt level itself may seem abstract, its trajectory has real implications for portfolios.

Over 50% of the current national debt has accumulated since 2019. Massive pandemic stimulus programs, tax cuts, and a steep drop in tax revenues all blew up the deficit during Covid-19. Interest costs on the debt are also piling up.

Some level of deficit spending was needed to combat the economic crisis. But years of expanding deficits have brought total debt to the highest level since World War II as a share of GDP.

With debt now exceeding the size of the economy, there is greater risk of reduced economic output from crowd-out effects. High debt levels historically hamper GDP growth.

Economists worry that high debt will drive up borrowing costs for consumers and businesses as the government competes for limited capital. The Congressional Budget Office projects interest costs will soon become the largest government expenditure as rates rise.

Higher interest rates will consume more tax revenue just to pay interest, leaving less funding available for programs and services. Taxes may have to be raised to cover these costs.

Rising interest costs will also put more pressure on the Federal Reserve to keep rates low and monetize the debt through quantitative easing. This could further feed inflation.

If interest costs spiral, government debt could eventually reach unsustainable levels and require restructuring. But well before that, the debt overhang will influence policy and markets.

As debt concerns mount, investors may rotate to inflation hedges like gold and real estate. The likelihood of higher corporate and individual taxes could hit equity valuations and consumer spending.

But government spending cuts to social programs and defense would also ripple through the economy. Leaner budgets would provide fiscal headwinds reducing growth.

With debt limiting stimulus options, creative monetary policy would be needed in the next recession. More radical measures by the Fed could introduce volatility.

While the debt trajectory is troubling, a crisis is not imminent. Still, prudent investors should account for fiscal risks in their portfolio positioning and outlook. The ballooning national debt will shape policy and markets for years to come.

The Fed’s Tightrope Walk Between Inflation and Growth

The Federal Reserve is stuck between a rock and a hard place as it aims to curb high inflation without inflicting too much damage on economic growth. This precarious balancing act has major implications for both average citizens struggling with rising prices and investors concerned about asset values.

For regular households, the current bout of high inflation straining budgets is public enemy number one. Prices are rising at 8.3% annually, squeezing wages that can’t keep pace. Everything from groceries to rent to healthcare is becoming less affordable. Meanwhile, rapid Fed rate hikes intended to tame inflation could go too far and tip the economy into recession, slowing the job market and risking higher unemployment.

However, new economic research suggests the Fed also needs to be cognizant of rate hikes’ impact on the supply side of the economy. Supply chain bottlenecks and constrained production have been key drivers of this inflationary episode. Aggressive Fed action that suddenly squelches demand could backfire by inhibiting business investment, innovation, and productivity growth necessary to expand supply capacity.

For example, sharply higher interest rates make financing more expensive, deterring business investment in new factories, equipment, and technologies. Tighter financial conditions also restrict lending to startups and venture capital for emerging technologies. All of this could restrict supply, keeping prices stubbornly high even in a weak economy.

This means the Fed has to walk a tightrope, moderating demand enough to curb inflation but not so much that supply takes a hit. The goal is to lower costs without forcing harsh rationing of demand through high unemployment. A delicate balance is required.

For investors, rapidly rising interest rates have already damaged asset prices, bringing an end to the long-running stock market boom. Higher rates make safe assets like bonds more appealing versus risky bets like stocks. And expectations for Fed hikes ahead impact share prices and other securities.

But stock markets could stabilize if the Fed manages to engineering the elusive “soft landing” – bringing down inflation while avoiding recession. The key is whether moderating demand while supporting supply expansion provides stable growth. However, uncertainty remains high on whether the Fed’s policies will thread this narrow needle.

Overall, the Fed’s inflation fight has immense stakes for Americans’ economic security and investors’ asset values. Walking the tightrope between high inflation and very slow growth won’t be easy. Aggressive action risks supply problems and recession, but moving too slowly could allow inflation to become entrenched. It’s a delicate dance with high stakes riding on success.

Consumer Prices Rise at Faster Pace in August

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased 0.6% in August on a seasonally adjusted basis, quickening from the 0.2% rise seen in July, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ latest report. Over the past 12 months through August, headline CPI inflation stands at 3.7% before seasonal adjustment, up from 3.2% for the 12-month period ending in July.

The August monthly gain was primarily driven by a spike of 10.6% in the gasoline index. Gasoline was coming off a tamer 0.2% increase in July. Food prices also contributed to inflationary pressures, with the food at home index edging up 0.2% again last month. The food away from home index rose 0.3%.

Meanwhile, the energy index excluding gasoline picked up as well. Natural gas costs ticked up 0.1%, electricity prices rose 0.2%, and fuel oil prices surged 9.1%.

The core CPI, which removes volatile food and energy categories, rose 0.3% in August after a 0.2% gain in July. The shelter index has been a main driver of core inflation. It covers rental costs and owners’ equivalent rent, both of which have rapidly increased due to imbalances between housing supply and demand.

On an annual basis, the energy index has fallen 3.6%, as gasoline, natural gas and fuel oil costs are down over the past 12 months. However, the food and core indexes are up 4.3% and 4.3% year-over-year, respectively.

Within the core CPI, the main drivers have been shelter costs, up 7.3% over the last 12 months, along with auto insurance (+19.1%), recreation services (+3.5%), personal care (+5.8%) and new vehicles (+2.9%). Medical care services inflation has also accelerated to 6.6% over the past year.

Geographically, inflation varies significantly by region. The Northeast has seen 4.2% CPI inflation over the past year, the Midwest 3.9%, the South 3.7%, and the West just 2.9%. By city size, larger metropolitan areas over 1.5 million people have experienced 3.8% inflation, compared to 3.6% for mid-sized cities and 3.7% in smaller cities.

August’s monthly data shows inflation quickened after signs of cooling in July. While gasoline futures retreated in September, shelter inflation remains stubbornly high with no meaningful relief expected until mortgage rates decline substantially.

With core inflation running well above the Fed’s 2% target, further interest rate hikes are anticipated to combat still-high inflation. But the path to a soft economic landing appears increasingly narrow amid recession risks.

The next CPI update will be released in mid-October, shedding light on whether persistent pricing pressures are continuing to squeeze household budgets. For now, the August report shows inflation picking up steam after the prior month’s encouraging data.

Looking Ahead

Consumers may get temporary relief in the near term at the gas pump, as oil and gasoline futures prices pulled back in September following OPEC’s modest production cut.

Yet the larger concern remains the entrenched inflation in essentials like food, rent and medical care. Shelter inflation in particular has shown little sign of abating, as rental rates and housing prices remain disconnected from incomes.

Mortgage rates have soared above 6% in 2023 after starting the year around 3%. The sharp rise in financing costs continues to shut many homebuyers out of the market. Until mortgage rates meaningfully decline, shelter inflation is likely to persist.

And that will be challenging as long as the Fed keeps interest rates elevated. Monetary policy has lagged in responding to inflation, putting central bankers in catch-up mode. Further rate hikes are expected in the coming months absent a significant cooling in pricing pressures.

But the risks of the Fed overtightening and spurring a recession continue to intensify. The path to a soft landing for the economy is looking increasingly precarious.

For consumers, it means further inflationary pain is likely in store before a sustained moderation emerges. Budgets will remain pressured by pricier essentials, leaving less room for discretionary purchases.

While the monthly data will remain volatile, the overall trend points to stubborn inflation persisting through year-end. The Fed will be closely watching to see if their actions to date have slowed price gains enough. If not, consumers should prepare for more rate hikes and resulting economic uncertainty into 2024.

Jobless Claims Drop to Lowest Since February as Labor Market Holds Up

New applications for U.S. unemployment benefits fell unexpectedly last week to the lowest level since mid-February, signaling the job market remains tight even as broader economic headwinds build.

Initial jobless claims declined by 13,000 to 216,000 in the week ended September 2, the Labor Department reported Thursday. That was below economist forecasts for a rise to 234,000 and marked the fourth straight week of declines.

Continuing claims, which track ongoing unemployment, also dropped to 1.679 million for the week ended August 26. That was the lowest point since mid-July.

The downward trend in both initial and continuing claims points to ongoing resilience in the labor market amid strong employer demand for workers.

There are some emerging signs of softness, however. The unemployment rate ticked higher to 3.8% in August as labor force participation increased. Job growth also moderated in the latest month, though remains healthy.

Worker productivity rebounded at a 3.5% annualized pace in the second quarter, the fastest rise since 2020. Moderating labor cost growth could also help the Federal Reserve combat high inflation.

While jobless claims remain near historic lows, economists will keep a close eye on any notable changes that could indicate potential layoffs, although the Federal Reserve has recently taken a more measured approach to rate hikes aimed at moderating economic demand.

Currently, the most recent data confirms a remarkably robust job market, despite concerns about inflation and slowing growth. This resilience provides hope that any potential economic downturn in the future might be less severe than previously anticipated.