Tag: Venezuela

Michael Burry Discloses Long-Held Valero Position Tied to Venezuela

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

When Michael Burry makes a move, investors pay attention. The man who famously predicted the 2008 housing crisis has been quietly holding a position since 2020 that suddenly looks prescient following this weekend’s dramatic events in Venezuela. In a Monday blog post on Substack, Burry revealed he’s owned Valero Energy for five years, describing himself as “more resolved to holding it even longer” after President Trump’s pledge to rebuild Venezuela’s oil sector.

Burry’s thesis is straightforward but powerful. Many Gulf Coast refineries were specifically designed to process Venezuelan heavy crude, meaning they’ve been operating with suboptimal feedstock for years due to sanctions and Venezuela’s production collapse. As Venezuelan oil flows return, these refineries should see improved margins across jet fuel, asphalt, and diesel. Valero shares surged nearly 10% on Monday, vindicating Burry’s patience. The refiner’s capability to efficiently process heavy, high-sulfur crude creates a natural moat that Burry clearly recognized back in 2020, long before this political inflection point.

But Burry isn’t just focused on the obvious large-cap play. He specifically mentioned that smaller refiners like PBF Energy and HF Sinclair could also benefit, even if Venezuelan oil returns only gradually. This acknowledgment of opportunity across the market cap spectrum is noteworthy and particularly relevant for small-cap investors looking beyond the headlines. While any meaningful recovery in Venezuelan exports will likely take years, Burry’s willingness to highlight mid-sized players suggests he sees value throughout the sector.

The investor’s analysis extends beyond refining. Venezuela’s oil infrastructure has suffered from decades of underinvestment, creating substantial demand for oilfield services companies if large-scale rehabilitation begins. Burry disclosed he owns Halliburton and sees potential upside for Schlumberger and Baker Hughes, companies that could be contracted to rebuild deteriorated pipelines and refineries. His comment about potentially buying more Halliburton shares or LEAPs—long-term options contracts—reveals his conviction level and provides a template for how investors might gain leveraged exposure while managing risk.

The timing of Burry’s revelation is significant. He’s held Valero since 2020, a period when Venezuela remained under heavy sanctions and most investors dismissed Venezuelan oil as a dead opportunity. This patience reflects his contrarian nature and willingness to endure extended periods where the market disagrees with his thesis. Wall Street analysts are now rushing to validate what Burry saw years ago, with multiple firms highlighting Valero as a top beneficiary of increased Venezuelan supply.

For small-cap investors, Burry’s framework offers valuable lessons. His mention of PBF Energy and HF Sinclair demonstrates that opportunities exist throughout the market cap structure for companies with the right capabilities. His focus on oilfield services points to second-order effects many investors overlook while fixated on the obvious refining story. And his use of LEAPs shows how options strategies can create leveraged exposure to multi-year themes.

Several key themes emerge from Burry’s playbook. He identified a structural advantage that created long-term value regardless of short-term volatility. He took a multi-year view, holding through uncertainty when the thesis wasn’t working. He’s thinking beyond the obvious, considering services companies and smaller refiners alongside his flagship position. And he’s using options to potentially leverage conviction while managing downside.

The Venezuela oil story is just beginning, and meaningful recovery will take years. But Burry has never been deterred by uncertainty—he’s built his fortune by being right when conventional wisdom said he was wrong. His five-year bet is now in the spotlight, and for those willing to think in multi-year timeframes and look beyond the headlines, his framework offers a roadmap for finding similar asymmetric opportunities.

The Venezuela Oil Story Nobody’s Talking About: Small-Cap Opportunities

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

The weekend capture of Nicolás Maduro and President Trump’s subsequent pledge to rebuild Venezuela’s energy sector sent shockwaves through oil markets on Monday. While headlines focused on the major players—Chevron surging 6.3%, ConocoPhillips and Exxon climbing, and oil-service giants like Halliburton, SLB, and Baker Hughes all jumping over 5%—savvy small-cap investors should be asking a different question: Where are the overlooked opportunities in this historic shift?

Venezuela sits atop the world’s largest crude reserves, yet years of corruption, underinvestment, and sanctions have decimated its infrastructure. Experts estimate a full revival could require upwards of $100 billion and take many years to complete. Trump’s commitment to having major US oil companies “spend billions of dollars” to fix the “badly broken infrastructure” represents one of the largest potential reconstruction efforts in the energy sector’s recent history. But here’s what the major media coverage misses: the oil majors can’t do this alone.

While Chevron, ExxonMobil, and ConocoPhillips will undoubtedly lead the charge—with Chevron already producing roughly 20% of Venezuela’s current output—the sheer scale of reconstruction needed creates a massive opportunity ecosystem that extends far beyond the Fortune 500. The infrastructure damage is comprehensive. Fires, thefts, equipment failures, and decades of neglect have left refineries, pipelines, storage facilities, and drilling operations in tatters. Rebuilding this complex network will require specialized services, equipment manufacturers, logistics providers, and niche technical expertise that major oil companies typically outsource.

While Halliburton and SLB dominate headlines, smaller oilfield services companies with expertise in heavy crude production, well rehabilitation, and aging infrastructure repair could see significant contract opportunities. These nimbler firms often provide specialized services that complement—rather than compete with—the major service providers. The reconstruction will require massive quantities of pumps, valves, drilling equipment, and replacement parts. Small-cap manufacturers and distributors specializing in oil and gas equipment could see order books fill rapidly, particularly those with experience in heavy crude operations or refinery equipment.

Moving equipment, materials, and eventually crude oil will require expanded logistics capabilities. Small-cap shipping companies, port services providers, and specialized transportation firms operating in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean could benefit from increased traffic between US Gulf Coast refineries and Venezuelan facilities. Any major reconstruction effort will also require environmental remediation, safety consulting, and regulatory compliance services. Smaller firms specializing in industrial cleanup, environmental monitoring, and workplace safety for hazardous environments may find significant opportunities.

Venezuela produces heavy crude that’s particularly valuable to Gulf Coast refineries, which are specifically designed to process it. This geographic and operational connection means US-based small-cap companies serving the Gulf Coast refining complex are naturally positioned to extend their services southward. The interrelationship between US refining infrastructure and Venezuelan crude creates a natural expansion pathway for regional players.

Smart investors must acknowledge significant risks. The article notes uncertainty about whether global oil companies will commit substantial capital to a country run by a temporary US-backed government without established legal and fiscal frameworks. ConocoPhillips called speculation about future activities “premature,” and ExxonMobil’s CEO indicated the company would be “cautious” given past asset expropriations. For small-cap companies, these political and regulatory risks are magnified. Smaller firms have less capital cushion to absorb losses and less negotiating power in unstable environments. Any investment thesis predicated on Venezuelan reconstruction must account for potential delays, political volatility, and the possibility that the opportunity never fully materializes.

While Monday’s market action rewarded the obvious beneficiaries, patient small-cap investors should be conducting deeper research into companies positioned along the value chain of Venezuelan oil reconstruction. The opportunity is real—$100 billion doesn’t get spent without creating ripples throughout the entire industry ecosystem—but it will require careful analysis to separate companies with genuine exposure from those merely riding headline momentum. The Venezuelan energy revival may be a major-cap story on the surface, but the small-cap opportunities hiding beneath could prove equally compelling for investors willing to do the work.