Tech Stocks Stumble Despite Strong Earnings from Alphabet and Meta

Tech stocks have taken it on the chin over the past two days, with the Nasdaq tumbling nearly 3.5%, despite stellar earnings reports from two giants in the space. Alphabet and Meta both exceeded expectations with their latest quarterly results, yet saw their shares plunge amid broader concerns about economic conditions weighing on future growth.

Alphabet posted robust advertising revenues, with Google Search and YouTube continuing to hum along as profit drivers. However, its Google Cloud division came up shy of estimates, expanding at a slower pace as clients apparently pulled back on spending. This reignited worries about Alphabet’s ability to gain ground on the cloud leaders Amazon and Microsoft.

Meanwhile, Meta also topped analyst forecasts, led by better ad revenues at Facebook and Instagram. But in the earnings call, Meta CFO Susan Li warned that the conflict in the Middle East could impact advertising demand in the fourth quarter. This injected uncertainty into Meta’s outlook, leading the stock lower.

The sell-off in these tech titans reflects overall investor angst regarding the challenging macroeconomic environment. While both companies beat expectations for the just-completed quarter, lingering headwinds such as high inflation, rising interest rates, and global conflicts have markets on edge.

Details

This skittishness has erased the gains tech stocks had made earlier in the year after a dismal 2022. Meta and Alphabet remain in positive territory year-to-date, but have given back chunks of their rallies from earlier this year. Other tech firms like Amazon and Apple are also dealing with the fallout ahead of their upcoming earnings reports.

The market is taking a “sell first, ask questions later” approach with these stocks right now. Even as fundamentals remain relatively sound, any whiff of weakness or caution from management is being seized upon as a reason to sell. The slightest negative data point is exaggerated amid the unsettled backdrop.

Both Alphabet and Meta have been aggressively cutting costs after overindulging during the pandemic boom years. But investors are now laser-focused on the revenue outlook, rather than celebrating the expense discipline. If top-line growth decelerates materially, the bottom-line gains from cost reductions will be moot.

For now, the Nasdaq remains in a confirmed uptrend, so this could prove to be just a brief pullback before tech stocks regain their footing. Many firms in the sector remain highly profitable with solid balance sheets. But the risk is that slowing economic activity and consumer jitters will weigh on future earnings potential.

Tech investors may need to buckle up for more volatility ahead. The days of easy gains propelled by boundless growth and ultra-low interest rates appear to be over. Now tech companies face much more skeptical scrutiny of their business fundamentals. In an environment where growth is harder to come by, even stellar quarterly results may not be enough to pacify traders worried about what lies ahead.

Nvidia and Chip Stocks Tumble Amid Escalating China-U.S. AI Chip Export Tensions

Shares of Nvidia and other semiconductor firms tumbled Tuesday morning after the U.S. announced stringent new curbs on exports of artificial intelligence chips to China. The restrictions spooked investors already on edge about the economic fallout from deteriorating U.S.-China relations.

Advanced AI chips like Nvidia’s flagship A100 and H100 models are now barred from shipment to China, even in downgraded versions permitted under prior rules. Nvidia stock plunged nearly 7% on the news, while chip stocks like Marvell, AMD and Intel sank 3-4%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index lost over 5%.

The export crackdown aims to hamper China’s progress in developing cutting-edge AI, which relies on massive computing power from state-of-the-art chips. U.S. officials warned China could use next-generation AI to threaten national security.

“We have specific concern with respect to how China could use semiconductor technologies to further its military modernization efforts,” said Alan Estevez, an under secretary at the Commerce Department.

But hampering China’s AI industry could substantially dent revenues for Nvidia, the dominant player in advanced AI chips. China is estimated to account for billions in annual sales.

While Nvidia said the financial impact is not immediate, it warned of reduced revenues over the long-term from tighter China controls. Investors are concerned these export curbs could be just the beginning if tensions continue to escalate between the global superpowers.

The escalating trade barriers also threaten to disrupt global semiconductor supply chains. Many chips contain components sourced from the U.S., Japan, Taiwan and other countries before final manufacturing and assembly occurs in China. The complex web of cross-border production could quickly seize up if trade restrictions proliferate.

Nvidia and its peers sank Tuesday amid fears of being caught in the crossfire of a technology cold war between the U.S. and China. Investors dumped chip stocks on worries that shrinking access to the massive Chinese market will severely depress earnings.

AI chips are essential to powering everything from data centers, autonomous vehicles, and smart devices to facial recognition, language processing, and machine learning. As AI spreads across the economy, demand for specialized semiconductors is surging.

But rivalries between the U.S. and China now threaten to put a ceiling on that growth. Both nations are aggressively competing to dominate AI research and set the global standards for integrating these transformative technologies. Access to the most powerful AI chips is crucial to these efforts.

By curbing China’s chip supply, the U.S. administration aims to safeguard America’s edge in AI development. But tech companies may pay the price through lost revenues if China restricts access to its own market in retaliation.

For the broader stock market already on edge about resurgent inflation, wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, and rising interest rates, the intensifying technology cold war represents yet another worrying threat to global economic growth. While a severe downturn may ultimately be avoided, the rising risk level underscores why investors are growing more anxious.

DoorDash Ditches NYSE for Nasdaq in Major Stock Exchange Switch

Food delivery app DoorDash announced it will transfer its stock exchange listing from the New York Stock Exchange to the Nasdaq. The company will begin trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker ‘DASH’ starting September 27, 2023.

This represents a high-profile switch that exemplifies the fierce competition between the NYSE and Nasdaq to attract Silicon Valley tech listings. It also reflects shifting sentiments around brand associations and target investor bases.

DoorDash first went public on the NYSE in December 2020 at a valuation of nearly $60 billion. At the time, the NYSE provided the prestige and validation desired by the promising young startup.

However, DoorDash has since grown into an industry titan boasting a market cap of over $30 billion. As a maturing technology company, Nasdaq’s brand image and investor mix provide better positioning.

Tony Xu, co-founder and CEO of DoorDash, emphasized the benefits of the Nasdaq in the company’s announcement. “We believe DoorDash will benefit from Nasdaq’s track record of being at the forefront of technology and progress,” he said.

Nasdaq has built a reputation as the go-to exchange for Silicon Valley tech firms and growth stocks. Big name residents include Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, Alphabet, and Facebook parent company Meta.

The exchange is also home to leading next-gen companies like Zoom, DocuSign, Crowdstrike, Datadog, and Snowflake. This creates an environment tailor-made for high-growth tech outfits.

Meanwhile, the NYSE leans toward stalwart blue chip companies including Coca Cola, Walmart, Visa, Walt Disney, McDonald’s, and JPMorgan Chase. The historic exchange tends to attract mature businesses and financial institutions.

Another factor likely influencing DoorDash is the investor makeup across the competing exchanges. Nasdaq generally appeals more to growth-oriented funds and active traders. The NYSE caters slightly more to institutional investors like pension funds, endowments, and passive index funds.

DoorDash’s switch follows ride sharing pioneer Lyft’s jump from Nasdaq to the NYSE exactly one year ago. Like DoorDash, Lyft desired a brand halo as it evolved past its early startup days.

“It’s a signal of us being mature, of us continuing to build a lasting company,” said Lyft co-founder John Zimmer at the time of the company’s NYSE listing.

Jared Carmel, managing partner at Manhattan Venture Partners, believes these exchange transfers reflect the “changing identities of the companies.”

As startups develop into multi-billion dollar giants, they evaluate whether their founding exchange still aligns with their needs and desired perceptions. Brand association and shareholder registration are becoming as important as operational capabilities for listings.

High-flying growth stocks like DoorDash also consider indexes, as the Nasdaq 100 often provides greater visibility and buying power from passive funds tracking the benchmark. Prominent inclusion in those indexes requires trading on Nasdaq.

Whether mature blue chips or emerging Silicon Valley darlings, the rivalry between Nasdaq and NYSE will continue heating up as each exchange vies to attract and retain brand name public companies. With lucrative listing fees on the line, exchanges will evolve branding, services, and capabilities to better cater to their target customers.

The DoorDash switcheroo exemplifies the changing perspectives and motivations influencing exchange selection. As companies lifecycles and personas transform, they reevaluate decisions made during those frenetic early IPO days.

U.S. Justice Department Takes On Google Search Monopoly in Landmark Trial

The U.S. government is launching a monumental legal challenge against Google in a bid to curb the technology giant’s dominance in internet search. A federal antitrust trial begins Tuesday in Washington D.C. where the Justice Department and a coalition of state attorneys general will argue that Google improperly wields monopoly power.

At the heart of the case are allegations that Google unlawfully maintains its position in the search market through exclusionary distribution agreements and other anticompetitive practices. Google pays billions annually to companies like Apple and Samsung to preset Google as the default search engine on smartphones and other devices. This boxes out rivals, according to prosecutors.

The government contends that Google’s actions have suffocated competition in the critical gateway to the internet, enabling the company to extend its grasp with impunity. Google counters that its search supremacy is earned by offering a superior product that consumers freely choose, not due to illegal activity.

But smaller search upstarts like DuckDuckGo allege that Google abuses its might to hinder their ability to gain users. At stake in the trial is nothing less than how the power of dominant tech platforms is regulated and how competition – or lack of it – shapes the internet as we know it.

The verdict could lead to sweeping changes for Google if found guilty of violating antitrust law. Potential sanctions range from imposed restrictions on its business conduct to structural reorganization of the company. Fines could also be on the table.

Google’s practices echo the behavior that got Microsoft into hot water in the 1990s. That landmark case saw the government successfully prove Microsoft leveraged its Windows monopoly to quash competition. Google is accused of similar monopolistic plays via its search engine dominance.

The Google antitrust trial is slated to last around three months. Testimony from Google CEO Sundar Pichai and executives of tech firms like Apple is anticipated. The federal judge overseeing the case will determine if Google’s undisputed leadership in search equates to unlawful monopoly status.

The verdict stands to fundamentally shape Google’s role in internet search and potentially alter business practices of other dominant technology companies. It represents the most significant legal challenge to Silicon Valley power in the 21st century.

Take a look at Information Services Group, a leading global technology research and advisory firm.