Statistically, 2023 Should Finally Be the Year for Small Caps
It has been six months since I shared the hard data and a graphic from Royce Investment Partners. In the firms most recent letter to investors, the firm reiterated the reality that after any consecutive five-year period where small-cap stocks had returned less than five percent, the following year, returns averaged 14.9%. Senior management of Royce again stated in its July newsletter, that a five-year low-performing period occurred 81 times in history, 81 times small caps had a sixth year with very good returns.
Are Small Cap Stocks on Track to Make it 82 Times in a Row?
The five-year period 12/31/83 through 6/30/23, was below 5% for each year. January kicked off the sixth year return was up over 5%. Since the strong January, we have had a strong June, and so far July. Year-to-date, the Russell 2000 index is up 9.4%, which is a strong six months – with six months to go. If it stays on course, small caps will keep the “100% of the time history.”
What is even more exciting is that in the month of June alone, the small cap index was up 6.9% and so far in July is up on the month and outperforming large cap indexes, which are all down on the month.
While a 100% of the time track record is comforting, the idea that so far only months that start with the letter “J” have been up, and after this month, we run out of “J” months, is concerning. The Royce newsletter dated July 7th has pointed out another positive statistic for where we are now.
Co-CIO Francis Gannon recognized, “It’s true that January and June were the only months so far in 2023 when the Russel 2000 had positive returns. There were four straight down months in between.” Gannon explained that this is also a rare occurrence that has occurred only nine times since the start of the Russell 2000 on the last day of 1978. The Co-CIO said, “For the eight periods for which we have data, subsequent one-year returns averaged 24.7%; subsequent three-year returns averaged 21.0%; and subsequent five-year returns averaged 16.8%.”
These numbers work on a simple, buy-the-dip phenomenom, but quantify it in a way that gives investors confidence that at a minimum there is a rationale behind expanding holdings in small cap stocks.
Take Away
Investing, at it’s core, is putting statistics on your side, expecting that it is not different this time, then letting historical probabilities play out. Large cap stocks are expensive compared to small caps. This may not be the only reason the two scenarios discussed in newsletters from Royce Capital Partners have played out. But other factors, including a rebalancing of the Nasdaq 100 Index this summer, strongly favor a more competitive performance of small cap stocks in 2023 than we have experienced in five years.
The Growing Case for Small-Cap Stocks: Is it Time to Make the Shift?
The more time that passes with small cap stocks lagging the large and mega caps, the louder very respected market voices are urging investors to move more assets to these smaller companies. The pro small cap stock outlook was reflected again in a recent Barron’s article. The piece highlighted what others continue to point out, that the large cap, S&P 500, is up nearly 8% on the year, but the gains have only been because of the performance of a few big tech stocks and the math used to measure the equity index.
A very eye-opening line in Barron’s points out that, “Apple (ticker: AAPL), Amazon.com (AMZN), Meta Platforms (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), and Tesla (TSLA) are up between 29% and 99% for the year.” These stocks make up a significant weighting of the large cap index, which means that much of the other large cap stocks have been negative in order to only provide an 8% return. To demonstrate how the weighting of the larger companies distorts return, just look at the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). This ETF weighs each stock in the S&P 500 equally. This has the effect of avoiding overweighting and one stock. This ETF is flat year-to-date. In contrast, The few tech names listed above total just under a third of the entire index.
The article also pointed out the truth that smaller names, those not in the S&P 500, have struggled. What does this mean for investors? Barron’s wrote, “They also look cheap—-and it may be time to take a nibble.” The case that others are also making is based on a number of current market setups. These include value, market history, and even macroeconomic trends that now may favor smaller companies over larger ones.
Big Tech companies like those mentioned above borrow massive amounts of money, they have been the beneficiaries of lower bond rates out on the yield curve. In addition to borrowing costs still below normal, valuing these stocks based on future earnings and comparing the expected earnings to available interest rates have caused investors to be less inclined to tie up money for ten years or more, (at 3.50%). Also, better than expected first-quarter earnings of big tech-inspired investors – product enhancements using artificial intelligence was credited with much of this.
Royce Funds’ Premier Quality Fund invests in “small cap quality.” In a recent article to investors co-lead portfolio managers Lauren Romeo and Steven McBoyle explained why, “small-cap quality looks so compelling in today’s uncertain investment environment.” The portfolio managers wrote, “Secular changes in economic trends, interest rates, and monetary and fiscal policies are creating seismic shifts in the investment landscape. The types of companies that benefited most from the past decade’s zero interest rate, low inflation, and low nominal growth regime—specifically, mega-caps and growth stocks—are unlikely to lead going forward.” Under this backdrop, the two gave their perspective which is that, “the unfolding macro environment appears to be set for quality small caps to capture and sustain long-term outperformance over large cap” through an uncertain period that is characterized by a near certain transition.
If tech stocks again falter because rates rise, advancement slows, or competition grows, the appearance of the S&P 500 large cap index stocks performing well could diminish. “Market gains continue to be dominated by uber-caps, masking the fact that 48% of S&P 500 member stocks are down year to date,” wrote Chris Harvey, chief U.S. equity strategist at Wells Fargo, on May 12.
Within the same index family (S&P), is the S&P 600, which is a small cap index. It is not currently having a positive year, and is down about 3%. Interestingly, the reverse argument can be made for this benchmark since it is overweighted in one specific sector. Financials, which have taken a beating this year is the largest sector weighting in the S&P 600. It accounts for just over a fifth of the performance. This has dragged the index lower, as regional banks have seen billions of depositor dollars walk out the door as savers and investors move assets to higher-yielding money-market funds. This, as we know, has caused liquidity problems at many banks, and caused some to fail.
2023 has been a challenging market for stocks despite the S&P 500 performance. It has been challenging for small caps too, but not as challenging as the S&P 600 performance would have one believe without looking under the hood. Small caps, independent of the high weighting of financials in the benchmark are positive on the year. One very real concern large cap investors are now facing is whether the flow into large cap funds have overly inflated the value, based on most stock valuation metrics, above where they would naturally trade if not for indexed funds.
The economy is not expected to get much stronger this year. Higher interest rates have already begun to stress the US economy, and banking problems are expected to cause tighter lending and consumer spending. And as mentioned a few times, the widely quoted S&P 500’s performance, is covering up what has mostly been a tough equity market.
But while large caps look expensive, for the reasons mentioned, respected experts say small caps look cheap. The S&P 600’s aggregate forward price/earnings multiple is just under 13 times – this compares with the S&P 500 which is 18 times. While on the surface, this doesn’t seem striking, it is! While the difference between 13 times and 18 times doesn’t sound wide, it marks a 30% difference. That is a massive discount. Historically the small cap index trades at a slight premium to its large-cap counterpart, but even in times of economic stress, it doesn’t trade at such a wide discount. In March of 2020, the height of pandemic risk aversion, its multiple was only 25% below the S&P 500.
Take Away
It has been a tougher year for stocks than the performance of the large cap S&P 500 would have one think without digging below the surface and netting out its largest sector weighting. The small cap S&P 600 is down, but largely because of its own largest sector weighting. This is one of the many problems inherent in how popular index investing has become. While stocks in general seem to be facing increasing headwinds, investors that selectively evaluate small cap names for inclusion in the equity portion of their portfolio may find the payoff is better than the alternatives.
Evaluating small cap opportunities is easy with Channelchek as the platform specializes in supplying data, information, and no-nonsense research on smaller opportunities. Please feel free to explore further by scrolling up to the search bar and typing in an industry, company name, or ticker. Channelchek is a free platform designed to help investors and opportunities find each other.
Short Changing Investment Returns By Ignoring Time Horizon
Time horizon is part of every investor’s buy decision, or at least it ought to be. For example, in 2022 the 60/40 investment portfolio had its worst performance since 2008. This is despite a 5.3% increase in value during the fourth quarter of that year. Many headlines had read that the classic 60% stocks and 40% bonds portfolio is “broken.” After it’s stellar performance during Q4 2022, the first quarter of 2023 brought even higher performance – again compounding by an additional 5.9%. This example can highlight that time horizon is dependent on the investment goals proving 60/40 probably is not dead after all. The 60/40 diversification is considered conservative, it’s often implemented for retirement portfolios, typically portfolios with a lot of lead time to achieve its goal of historical returns. Goals should dictate investment strategy and they should include a realistic time horizon.
To Be Patient or Not to Be Patient
Entering the second quarter of 2023, economic trends, including commodity prices, interest rates, political power, inflation, and even peace between nations, all seem to be sending off mixed signals on future trends. A clear market read is far more difficult today than most years. This leaves a lot of questions on what to do with one’s money. If you leave it in the bank, inflation is likely to erode your purchasing power. If you move it to the U.S. government-backed treasury market, a rise in rates (as promised by the Fed) can leave you hurting like a few banks that saw their assets value plummet. Should stocks take a leading role – even if holdings wind up moving sideways or even down for the rest of this year?
As mentioned, this depends on your goal. If you can be patient and have a time horizon to achieve performance of more than a year, the tendency for reversion to mean suggests the answer is probably yes. However, if during the next six to 12 months, this money may need to be deployed for a purchase, it may be best to continually roll treasuries maturing in under a year.
For investments expected to be held longer than a year, there is the lazy way and a more hands-on approach that takes a little more digging. The lazy way says you plop a large percentage of your portfolio in an index fund and earn market returns. A more involved management approach of one’s portfolio would suggest that you’d prefer to avoid stocks considered overvalued or in a weakening industry. If, instead, one can achieve adequate diversity by owning many companies in different industries, and do enough evaluation (i.e., exploring trusted research) to have a sense of whether holding them would suit your needed time horizon, then the stocks selected as your holdings may avoid expected dogs weighing it down. It would make sense that this argues for patience, with expectations that not only will stocks follow history and go up over time, but your holdings have a reasonable expectation to outperform the market.
Time Horizon
Time horizon is a critical factor in investing. It refers to the length of time an investor is willing to hold onto their investments. The time horizon can range from a few months to several decades, depending on an investor’s goals, risk tolerance, and investment strategy. Most benchmarks are viewed daily, quarterly, and monthly. If your time horizon is five years, the quarterly or even annual returns should be a low consideration. Cathie Wood, CEO and founder of Ark Invest, says she invests on a five-year time horizon, considering the speculative growth names her funds have invested in, such as Tesla (TSLA), Roku (ROKU), Zoom Video Communications (ZM), Exact Sciences (EXAS), etc. she could not manage her funds properly if she looked shorter in term.
At least each quarter Portfolio Manager Chuck Royce and Co-CIO Francis Gannon of Royce Funds publish text of a “conversation” between the two. The subject is usually past market performance, expectations of the future, and even stocks that they believe, with the appropriate time horizon, will pay off.
In the discussion between the two, Francis Gannon covered the case for more extended time horizon investors to explore the small-cap sector. His expectation is that various sectors (viewed by market cap) will fall in line with historical performance averages. “The stocks that performed best under the previous decade’s regime of zero interest rates, low inflation, and low nominal growth—which were mega-caps and small-cap growth—are unlikely to lead going forward, regardless of what direction the U.S. economy ultimately takes. Conversely, those areas of the equity market that lagged during this long period are likely, in our view, to capture long-term leadership,” said Gannon. This is when Chuck Ross very clearly explained the importance of knowing one’s time horizon for maximum potential gain.
“We think small cap is ready to roll and expect the next three to five years to be strong on both an absolute and relative basis.” Said Mr. Royce. He explained that rising rates could help companies that can that don’t need to borrow from the outside. “Equally important, the Russell 2000’s valuation remained near its lowest rate in 20 years compared to the Russell 1000’s, based on our preferred valuation metric of the median last 12 months’ enterprise value to earnings before taxes (LTM EV/EBIT).” Royce explained.
The chart above shows that the 20-year performance of small-cap stocks averages 102.9% above that of large-cap equities. The underperformance began five years ago, and the current 20-year low in relative performance in small-caps could play out to be a long lag. With a long enough time horizon, one might expect that small-cap investors get rewarded for the additional risk and reduced liquidity in the sector.
Investment Strategy
While not everyone has five years or more to wait for performance to improve, intentional stock selection among small-caps could help those who do. A recent Barron’s article argued that “Small-Cap Stocks Look Ready to Rally,” the investment publication also believed that stock selection within the sector could pay off. The author wrote that as of March 31, “the Russell 2000 was at 44% of the S&P 500’s level, a ratio the index touched in early 2020 when the advent of Covid-19 had left the economy in perilous waters.” The publication then reported that the level is a technical low point, a support that wasn’t even breached with pandemic concerns and skyrocketing large-cap tech stocks. Expressed in the within the April 3 article was to a methodology of filtering stocks by reviewing companies with market caps of at least $200 million and free cash flow minimum of 4.5% of the share price. This would put them in line with the overall Russell 2000.
Then look at the consensus earnings forecasts among analyst, have they risen? A high short interest in the stock could also be part of the screening process for possible buys.
Take Away
The importance of time horizon in investing lies in the fact that different investment opportunities have different risk and return profiles over different time periods. Short-term investments tend to have lower risk but lower returns, while long-term investments tend to have higher risk but potentially higher returns. By understanding your time horizon, you can choose investments that align with your investment goals and risk tolerance.
For investors that can span many years holding and waiting for scenarios to play out, but don’t, perhaps are leaving long-term return on the table by investing as though their time horizon is short. Investible cash sitting in a bank will be eroded by inflation, the Fed with its deep pockets has said it is resolved to instigate a further bear market in bonds. Longer term, stocks outperform, what’s more, well-selected companies can outperform stock indixes that only promise to match the average of good and bad companies.
If you aren’t receiving equity research in your daily email, sign up here now.
