Inflation Archives - Page 9 of 9

September’s FOMC Meeting and Powell’s Unflinching Resolve

Posted on September 21, 2022September 22, 2022 by cpatches

The FOMC Votes to Raise Rates for Fourth Time

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted to raise overnight interest rates from a target of 2.25%-2.50% to the new level of 3.00% – 3.25% at the conclusion of its September 2022 meeting. The monetary policy shift in bank lending rates was as expected by economists, although many have urged the Fed to be more dovish, others suggest the central bank is behind and should move more quickly. The early reaction from the U.S. Treasury 10-year note ( a benchmark for 30-year mortgage rates) is downward slightly, while the S&P sold off 26 points and the Russell 2000 remained unfazed. Equities later sold off as the Chairman held a press conference.

The statement accompanying the policy shift also included a discussion on U.S. economic growth continuing to remain positive. The FOMC statement said recent indicators point to modest growth in spending and production. Job gains were also seen as strong in recent months, and the unemployment rate remains low.

However, the statement points out that inflation remains elevated. The Fed believes this reflects supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic, higher food and energy prices, and broader price pressures.

Russia’s war against Ukraine is causing tremendous human and economic hardship, according to the Fed. The statement indicated the inflation risks related to the is an area they are paying attention to.

Source: FOMC Statement (September 21, 2022)

The Federal Reserve made clear it was continually assessing the appropriate actions related to monetary policy and the implications of incoming information on the economic outlook. The Committee says it is prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede reaching the Committee’s goals. This is to include a wide range of information, including readings on public health, labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments, according to the statement.

*Source: Federal Reserve Board and Federal Open Market Committee release economic projections from the September 20-21 FOMC meeting*

Each member of the Federal Open Market Provides forward-looking assumptions on expected growth, employment, inflation, and individual projections of future interest rate policy. The table above indicates the range of expectations.

Take-Away

Higher interest rates can weigh on stocks as companies that rely on borrowing may find their cost of capital has increased. The risk of inflation also weighs on the markets. Additionally, investors find that alternative investments that pay a known yield may, at some point, be preferred to equities. For these reasons, higher interest rates are of concern to the stock market investor. However, an unhealthy, highly inflationary economy also comes at a cost to the economy, businesses, and households.

The next FOMC meeting is also a two-day meeting that takes place July 26-27. If the pace of employment and overall economic activity is little changed, the Federal Reserve is expected to again raise interest rates.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases.htm

When Stocks Instead of TIPS are Better Hedges Against Inflation

Posted on September 20, 2022September 20, 2022 by cpatches

What’s the Best Inflation Fighter for Your Savings? Stocks or TIPS?

At a minimum, an investor with an eye toward having more, not less, in the future needs to beat the rate of inflation. Ideally, since the investor ties up their money, the buying power in their account should provide the current inflation rate plus a risk premium over the medium to long term. During the past few months, a number of long-term savers/investors have asked me what I thought about TIPS as a means of exceeding inflation. I have strong opinions on these Treasury securities. My thoughts are rooted in having been a portfolio manager for the country’s second-largest fixed income fund manager back in 1996 when the U.S. Treasury asked for our input on the design of the new bond. The Treasury wanted us to approve of the bonds enough to invest in them – in early 1997 I pulled the trigger on $100 million in the first ever TIPS auction – that was 25 years ago, and there is now enough data to compare the performance of Stocks, TIPS and the rate of inflation. Which one provides better inflation “protection”?

Some Details on TIPS

If you aren’t aware of the intricacies and history of the Treasury Inflation-Indexed Securities, dubbed TIPS, as the working name for the project back in 1996, here’s what you should know in a two paragraphs.

Interest rates were declining through the late 1990s and the Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin had a plan to lessen the government’s interest rate burden by issuing a bond with costs that would be lower with the declining inflation and interest rates. The Canadians, British, and Australians all had a bond type that floated with the countries’ inflation index. The Canadian-style bond had a fixed rate of interest where the principal accreted upward with an inflation index. On this new principal, an unaffected fixed-rate (coupon) would pay interest. The British and the Aussies paid the inflation addition with the coupon, the bondholder didn’t have to wait until maturity to be compensated for price increases. The U.S. adopted the Canadian system of accreting to principal.

The new bond was to be helpful to the U.S. Treasury, the conservative investor, and even the Federal Reserve. Inflation was sinking at the time, so investors were attracted in part to the idea that the securities effectively have a floor since the Treasury would never lower the principal accretion to below zero even if deflation became a problem. Retirees were told they should be thrilled to have a low-risk investment to choose from that paid inflation plus. The U.S. Treasury was looking forward to being able to reduce the interest costs of its debt as there were still bonds outstanding that were paying 14%. As for the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, he was thrilled he’d have a constantly updating investor-driven mechanism that would indicate the market’s current expectation of inflation.

Inflation “Get Real”

Through the late seventies and into the early eighties, inflation was a big influencer on all household decisions. Durable items like washing machines were purchased sooner rather than later because they may cost much more later. Even borrowing to buy made good financial sense. As for investing or saving, buying short bonds or CDs that always paid more than inflations and then reinvesting similarly when it came due provided the investor with a little more income than inflation (and sometimes a free toaster). The stock market had years where it had negative returns, but for the medium or long-term saver, it far exceeded inflation. This has not seemed to have changed.

“Get Real” is a slogan that had been used by brokers trying to build enthusiasm for TIPS when they first came out. It refers to real yield, or put another way, the yield after inflation. TIPS were designed to pay the inflation rate plus an interest rate, so the investor earns a real yield. What no one anticipated when the securities were designed is the real yield could go negative, thus providing the investor with inflation minus whatever supply and demand decided.

The chart below demonstrates that over a recent 11-year period, TIPS paid negative real rates about a third of the time. They did not provide the investors with a return above the rate of inflation as originally envisioned.

Stocks are not designed to be correlated with the rate of inflation, but they generally do well when the economy is flourishing or expected to flourish (these periods tend to be associated with inflation). And equities fall off when there is a contraction or expectations of a bad business climate. The chart below uses the Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index as a measure of stock market performance. The period shown demonstrates that if one is looking to keep up with or beat inflation by any margin, Small-Cap stocks can be viewed as far superior to TIPS.

During the period from August 2012 until August 2022, prices have risen a combined amount of 28.558%, according to a calculator provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. During the same period, an investment in TIPS provided 13.11% to the saver/investor. This equates to a real return of negative 15% over ten years. If the purpose of the investor is to keep up with and beat inflation, TIPS have failed as a decent option.

As for stocks, the downside over short periods has been much larger and deeper declines than TIPS. However, after year one, the declines were never large enough to show underperformance. TIPS failed its main goal of inflation plus. If an investor instead put money in small-cap stocks, they would have exceeded inflation by 110%.

While this is not predictive of the future, it is compelling evidence for anyone with a time horizon beyond a few years to look at the true risk profile of each. TIPS have performed worse than inflation. One reason for this is that bond prices have been held lower than the market would naturally have them because the Fed has taken so many on its balance sheet.

Take Away

The performance of the stock market over the medium to long term has a long history of beating returns of other assets, especially those of bonds. Treasury Inflation-Indexed Securities, the official name for the bond, does not have a “P” in it. The “P” was supposed to stand for “Protected.” Just prior to the first auction, the name was changed as government lawyers pointed out these may not protect the investor from inflation.

The Federal Reserve owns a third of the outstanding U.S. Treasuries, including a large allocation of TIPS. This unnatural demand holds prices artificially below where the market would price them without the Fed’s impact. This skewing of the results would have been upsetting to former Fed head Alan Greenspan who felt the main appeal to the security was their ability to help predict future inflation.

Stocks have risks, and bonds have risks, if it’s inflation you’re looking to overcome, inflation-linked bonds have been historically off the mark.

Paul Hoffman Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.nytimes.com/1982/02/05/business/record-set-on-30-year-us-bonds.html

https://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/annceresult/tipscpi/tipscpi.htm

https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm

How New Technology Reduces Inflation Data

Posted on September 19, 2022September 19, 2022 by cpatches

Why Apple Can Hold the Line on iPhone Prices and Keep Getting Relatively Cheaper

Inflation in the U.S. is surging to near a 40-year high, with prices on food, fuel and pretty much everything seeming to rise more every month.

Smartphones may be an exception.

Apple, for example, recently announced its new versions of the iPhone and other gadgets, and turned a lot of heads when it said it wouldn’t charge more despite higher costs to make the devices.

This is puzzling because companies typically raise prices in line with inflation – or at least enough to cover the increased costs of making their products.

Consumer price data tells an even more befuddling story. The latest consumer price index data suggests smartphone prices are actually down 20.4% in August from a year ago, according to an index released on Sept. 13, 2022. That’s the biggest drop of any detailed expenditure item the Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks, and contrasts with the overall 8.3% increase in prices.

What’s going on?

As an economist teaching business school students, I enjoy exploring and explaining these economic puzzles. I believe there are two basic explanations – one for the data and another for Apple.

Why Consumer Prices on Smartphones Fell

The story behind the consumer price index data is easier to explain, if a bit technical.

The 20% drop over the past year isn’t unusual for smartphones. In fact, according to the index, they almost always go down from month to month. Since the end of 2019, smartphone prices have come down a whopping 40%.

And though smartphones are showing the biggest drop in the index, tech gear more broadly – from computers to smartwatches – also tend to fall over time. In the previous 12 months, televisions are down 19% and what the government calls information technology commodities are down 8.8%.

Part of the reason for their steady decline is found buried in the Bureau of Labor Statistics website. The consumer price index tries to measure a constant quality of goods and services in the economy. This means it seeks to track the price changes of the exact same set of goods and services each month. It’s comparing the price today with the price of the exact same thing a month or year ago.

For most goods, it’s not really an issue because their quality doesn’t change much over relatively small periods of time. For example, an apple you bite into today is pretty much the same as an apple you ate a year ago.

Smartphones and other technology-heavy gadgets are different. Because smartphones are constantly improving in quality – with the latest updates of an iPhone or Samsung Galaxy awaited breathlessly every year – it is more difficult to ensure you’re comparing prices of products of the exact same quality.

For rapidly improving items, the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses what are called “hedonic regression models” to estimate these changes in quality over time. Hedonic models measure the same amount of satisfaction. While this sounds complicated, the goal is simple: to figure out how much each new smartphone feature changes the price.

As a consumer, you are essentially doing this whenever you decide whether it is worth paying the extra money for that marginally better camera or extended battery life when buying a new phone.

And so, the 20.4% drop doesn’t mean you’re going to pay less for a new smartphone. But it does suggest you’re getting 20% more bang for your buck versus the same phone a year earlier. Whether it’s worth it is another question.

Why Apple Kept Prices Flat

That brings us to why Apple didn’t change its prices, even as the quality of the iPhone improved and supply chain costs went up.

Beyond the quality issues, one of the main ways supply chain problems are affecting phones is in the shortage of computer chips. If there is any product dependent on computer chips, it is smartphones. The shortage has resulted in delays to produce cars, trucks and many other consumer items.

The shortage has also increased the price of semiconductor parts. The U.S. government’s producer price index shows the price of semiconductor parts like chips and wafers steadily rising since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020, after falling for years. Chip prices are likely going up 20% in the next year.

For these and other reasons, analysts were expecting Apple to increase its prices.

Instead, Apple released its latest iPhone models at the same prices as the last two models, or US$799 for the iPhone 14 and $999 for the pro version. Keeping prices constant during inflationary times means iPhones are getting relatively cheaper.

So why isn’t Apple increasing prices? Is it just being kind to its customers, who have fueled tremendous profits for the company over the past decade?

Probably not.

With a gross profit margin of over 40% – meaning that’s how much it makes over the cost of producing all its products and services – Apple can probably afford to absorb increased chip and other component costs.

My best guess, since the smartphone market is fairly competitive, is that Apple is keeping prices the same to build market share in the U.S. – beyond the record 50% it recently hit – so the iPhone remains one of the best-selling smartphones.

So while the cost of almost everything we buy is rising, you can take some comfort in knowing at least one item is getting both better over time and not succumbing to an inflationary price spiral.

This article was republished with permission from The Conversation, a news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It represents the research-based findings and thoughts of Jay L. Zagorsky, Clinical associate professor, Boston University.

How Much More Will Your Paycheck be When Tax Brackets Adjust for Inflation?

Posted on September 15, 2022September 15, 2022 by cpatches

Increased Take Home Pay in 2023 Thanks to the IRS (and Inflation)

If two negatives make a positive, what do you get when you cross inflation with the IRS?

In addition to receiving much higher COLA increases on Social Security payments, and earning an interest rate in excess of 9% on US Savings Bonds, those making an income in 2023 are likely to see more take-home pay. This should happen whether or not they get a raise. An IRS calculation devised to prevent bracket creep is to thank for this. While high inflation is destructive, at least there are a few things that are put in place that will automatically adjust and help ease the pain.

The adjustment to tax brackets typically has had a minimal impact on workers paychecks. But the tax formulas that are law and the persistent inflation through 2022 point to significant impact on workers 2023 tax bill. Next year when income tax thresholds and the standard deductions are raised, if all else is unchanged, there will be more money in the income earners’ pockets, and less going to the government.

How Much More?

According to an accounting professor at Northern Illinois University named Jim Young, a single taxpayer with $100,000 in adjusted gross income in 2023 could experience a tax savings of about $500, or $42 each month.

Contribution maximums are also expected to be raised where tax-advantaged savings for retirement could also help reduce tax burdens in the coming years. Estate and gift tax thresholds would also automatically be increased by as much as $2 million more for a couple.

The IRS makes the adjustments based on formulas and inflation data spelled out in the tax code. This is different than the headline CPI-U which is most often reported.

The inflation measure used for the tax and contribution adjustments is the Chained Consumer Price Index (C-CPI-U), which takes into account the substitutions customers make when costs rise. The average of the chained CPI from September 2021 through August 2022 is used to calculate the 2023 adjustments, which the IRS will announce next month. These ultimately affect tax returns for the 2023 tax year filed in early 2024.

Price increases eroding purchasing power are running at the most rampant pace in forty years. Based on the current average of the C-CPI-U, here are estimates on what to expect, according to the American Enterprise Institute:

Tax levels and other tax bracket thresholds and breakpoints will increase by around 7% over 2022. The 2022 increase over 2021 was around 3%, which was the largest percentage increase in four years. For the tax year 2023, income earners will see the breakpoints moved by the most in 35 years.

The top federal income tax threshold in 2023 is expected to rise by nearly $50,000 next year for married couples, and that 37% rate will apply to income above $693,750. For individuals, the top tax bracket will start at $578,125.

The standard deduction for married couples is expected to be $27,700 for 2023, up from $25,900 this year, and $13,850 for individuals, up from $12,950. This is the amount that those who do not itemize deductions can reduce their W-2 federal income by before being subject to income tax.

The federal estate tax exclusion amount, what a person can protect from estate taxes, is $12.06 million this year. That’s expected to rise to $12.92 million by 2023, meaning a married couple can shield nearly $26 million from estate taxes.

The annual tax-free gift limit is expected to rise from $16,000 this year to $17,000 by 2023.

The maximum contribution amount for an individual retirement account is expected to jump to $6,500 for 2023, up from $6,000, where it has been since 2019. The maximum contribution allowed for a flexible health account is expected to increase to $3,050 in 2023, up from $2,850 this year.

The maximum contribution amount for a 401(k) or similar workplace retirement plan is governed by yet another formula that uses September inflation data. It is estimated that the contribution limit will increase to $22,500 in 2023 from $20,500 this year and the catch-contribution amount for those age 50 or more will rise from $6,500 to at least $7,500.

The child tax credit under current law is $2,000 per child is not adjusted for inflation. But the additional child tax credit, which is refundable and available even to taxpayers that have no tax liability, is adjusted for inflation. It is expected to increase from $1,500 to $1,600 in 2023.

For those that look forward to capping out payments to Social Security, there is bad news. This has also increased. According to the 2022 Social Security Trustees Report, the wage base tax rate is projected to increase 5.5% from $147,000 to $155,100 in 2023.

Costs are rising, but so are deductions. It’s improbable that the reduced taxes will offset skyrocketing inflation, but at least there is one financial category that is helped by the increases.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-provides-tax-inflation-adjustments-for-tax-year-2022

https://www.wsj.com/articles/one-upside-to-high-inflation-lower-tax-bills-11663174727?mod=livecoverage_web

https://www.spamchronicles.com/high-inflation-brings-changes-to-your-tax-bill/

The Fed Gets Inflation Tips from Cathie Wood

Posted on September 9, 2022September 9, 2022 by cpatches

Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood Finds the Federal Reserve Quixotic

On Wall Street, staying with the herd guarantees average gains or losses. Wandering far from the herd adds two more possibilities. You may still have average performance, you may exceed the averages, or you may get slaughtered. ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood likes to explore her own field in which to graze, far from the herd. This preference shows in her funds performance. At times her returns have far exceeded competing hedge funds, and at other times they fall well below the pack.

In October of 2021, before Fed Chairman Powell changed his thinking that inflation may not be transitory, the renowned hedge fund manager, and market guru, Cathie Wood began sounding alarm bells about her fear of deflationary pressures. At the same time, she warned of job losses due to displacement as technology would reduce costs and the need for the current skill sets in the labor force.

For months renowned investor Cathie Wood has said that the Federal Reserve should stop raising interest rates, that the economy is seeing deflation rather than inflation, and that it is in a recession.

Even as others in the”transitory” camp have come more in line with the official position of the Fed on inflation, she has remained steadfast to her idea that new technology will solve supply issues. Supply is an important inflation input, and that innovation may oversupply to a point where the economy may struggle with falling prices.

This week she tweeted a few reasons for her forecast and shared her thoughts on Jerome Powell’s address at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium.

Her view is that the Fed has overshot the target. Wood, who was already working on Wall Street during the high inflation 1970’s, tweeted her reasons for this belief. High on her list is the price of gold (expressed in dollars) which she says is one of the best inflation gauges. Gold, she tweeted, “peaked more than two years ago.”

She also reminded followers of the price movements of other commodities, all down. These include lumber’s price decrease of 60%, iron ore 60%, oil 35%, and copper 30%. Much closer to final consumer prices, she highlighted that retailers are flush with inventories that don’t match the selling season. They’re discounting to clear shelves which could result in a deflation print in one of the more popular inflation gauges.

The Fed chairman who last fought inflation with unblinking resolve is Paul Volcker. Ms. Wood reminded her Twitter followers that the inflation he was battling had been “brewing and building for 15 years.” In comparison, she said inflation under Jay Powell’s watch is only 15 months old and Covid-related. She thinks the current Fed Chair has gone too far, and “I wouldn’t be surprised to see a significant policy pivot over the next three to six months,” Wood said.

A Quixotic Fed?

Powell and his colleagues are looking at the wrong data, Wood tweeted. “The Fed is basing monetary policy decisions on backward indicators: employment and core inflation,” she tweeted. “Inflation is turning into deflation,” she said in another tweet.

Wood said, comparing the two Fed chairpersons, Powell invoked Volcker’s name four times in the Jackson Hole speech. Her tweets explained inflation was much higher in Volker’s era. “Until Volker took over [of the Fed] In 1979, 15 years after the start of the Vietnam War and the Great Society, did the Fed launch a decisive attack on inflation,” Wood detailed.

“Conversely, in the face of two-year supply-related inflationary shocks, Powell is using Volker’s sledgehammer and, I believe, is making a mistake.”

Take Away

Without different opinions and different investment holding periods, there would be no market. We’d all speculate on the same things, and they’d continue upward until the last dollar was invested.

Ark Invest’s flagship Arc Innovation ETF (arkk) has fallen 55% this year, more than double the fall-off of the indexes. When discussing current performance Wood has defended her strategy by reminding others that she has an investment horizon of five years. As of Sept. 7, Arc Innovation’s five-year annualized return was 5.81%.

Cathie Wood has continued an almost year-long campaign warning of deflation and saying the Federal Reserve should stop raising interest rates, and that the economy is in a recession. If she is right and has selected the investments that benefit from being correct, then those invested in her funds will be glad they placed some of their investment funds away from the herd.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://twitter.com/CathieDWood/status/1567648675635073025

www.koyfin.com

What Powell is Doing About this Vexing Inflation Contributor

Posted on September 8, 2022September 15, 2022 by cpatches

Fed Chairman Powell Shows His Steady Hand and Firm Conviction at Monetary Conference

In what is his last scheduled public appearance before the post-FOMC statement expected on Sept. 21, Fed Chairman Powell did not say anything that would change expectations of another 75bp Fed Funds rate hike. He instead emphasized the Fed’s commitment to reduce inflation and believes it can be done and at the same time avoid “very high social costs.”

“It is very much our view, and my view, that we need to act now forthrightly, strongly, as we have been doing, and we need to keep at it until the job is done,” Powell said Thursday (Sept. 8) at the 40^th annual Monetary Conference held virtually by the Cato Institute.

The discussion was held after it was known that the Eurozone Central Bank had just raised rates by 75bp. Powell’s talk and the interest rate hike overseas didn’t upset U.S. markets as U.S. Jobless claims had been reported earlier and showed a very strong labor market which helped demonstrate that the Fed’s actions to return inflation to a more acceptable level are not severely hurting business.

The Federal Reserve Chairman continued to reiterate what he has been saying, that the U.S. central bank is focused on bringing down high inflation to prevent it from becoming entrenched as it did in the 1970s. The core theme, most recently heard at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, is that he is resolved to return inflation to the Fed’s 2% target.

Mr. Powell said it is critical to prevent households and businesses from ongoing expectations that inflation will rise. He said this is a key lesson taken from the persistent inflation of the 1970s. “The public had really come to think of higher inflation as the norm and to expect it to continue, and that’s what made it so hard to get inflation down in that case,” Powell said. The takeaway for policymakers, he added, is that “the longer inflation remains well above target, the greater the risk the public does begin to see higher inflation as the norm, and that has the capacity to really raise the costs of getting inflation down.”

Speaking the day before at the Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy at The Clearing House and Bank Policy Institute Annual Conference, Fed Vice Chairwoman Lael Brainard, didn’t express a preference on the size of the next increase but underscored the need for rates to rise and stay at levels that would slow economic activity. “We are in this for as long as it takes to get inflation down,” she said.

Fed officials have raised rates this year at the most rapid pace since the early 1980s. The federal funds rate, the percentage banks charge each other for overnight borrowing, rose from near zero in March to a range between 2.25% and 2.5% in July, which is where it sits today.

Take Away

The Fed’s two mandates are to keep inflation at bay and to make sure there are adequate jobs in the U.S. The lessons of the past indicate that expectations of inflation are inflationary themselves. The Fed Chairman and Fed Vice Chairwoman would undermine their goals if they did not talk tough on inflation. With the economy not having sunk into a deep recession, and joblessness at acceptable levels, their actions are likely to match their tough talk.

The stock market typically behaves well when confident that the Fed is fighting inflation and has a steady grasp of what too far is. Overly tight money would dampen business growth.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/calendar.htm

https://www.cato.org/events/40th-annual-monetary-conference

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/09/08/business/ecb-meeting-inflation-interest-rates

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-weekly-jobless-claims-fall-three-month-low-2022-09-08/