Coinbase Aims for Crypto Crown as Binance Stumbles

With the U.S. government cracking down on Binance, slapping the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange with $4.3 billion in fines and forcing its maverick founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao to relinquish control, arch-rival Coinbase sees an opening to reclaim market share by playing the role of the “good guy” traded on Wall Street.

Coinbase shares have jumped some 18% over the past week to around $118 as CEO Brian Armstrong asserted last Tuesday’s settlement finally “closes that chapter of crypto’s history” in which Binance flouted global regulations while handling over $15 trillion in trades since 2017. By contrast, Armstrong now aims to position Nasdaq-listed Coinbase as the compliant, institutional exchange best positioned to capitalize on the crypto industry’s shift toward greater oversight.

“Building a company offshore, skirting regulation, it’s just not going to work,” Armstrong told CNBC, taking a shot across the bow of both Binance as well as consumers who transacted on the exchange drawn by its swift listings of new – often risky – digital assets. With federal agencies now policing crypto’s “Wild West” era, Armstrong wants to reassure investors that Coinbase will work hand-in-hand with authorities, supporting his belief that crypto can operate by the same rules as traditional finance.

Whether such harmony emerges remains clouded by legal issues confronting Coinbase itself, including an ongoing SEC lawsuit filed last June. While Armstrong feels “very good” about Coinbase’s defense and his aim is full regulatory clarity, such certainty seems distant given bitcoin’s recent plunge marking another crypto winter. Nonetheless, the humbling of the industry’s one-time dominant exchange gives his company a momentary edge.

Binance’s astronomical rise represented a meteoric challenge to Coinbase’s early market supremacy following its 2012 launch and 2017 debut on public markets weeks before bitcoin hit a historic peak near $20,000. Former Bloomberg programmer and Tokyo Stock Exchange developer Changpeng Zhao founded Binance in Shanghai in 2017, developing technical capabilities allowing it to scale at warp speed by listing new cryptocurrencies faster than cautious Coinbase.

With an opaque corporate structure based initially in Asia and subsequently the Cayman Islands, Binance also dodged oversight as global regulators sounded alarms. But its explosive growth quickly afforded Zhao celebrity status as one of crypto’s biggest whales and most vocal proselytizers. Meanwhile, to keep pace with its insurgent rival now commanding the majority of trading volumes, Coinbase rushed to expand its offerings but continued adhering to compliance standards in order to maintain institutional investor confidence.

Yet as U.S. authorities targeted Binance last year with a series of harsh punitive actions, momentum swung back toward its compliant competitor. Both the CFTC and SEC ultimately launched suits against Zhao’s exchange for allegedly violating investor protection statutes, culminating in extensive settlement terms compromising Binance’s autonomy going forward. With its renegade era under CZ seemingly finished, Armstrong aims to leverage Coinbase’s head start collaborating openly with financial watchdogs.

Despite his bravado about closing an ignominious chapter for crypto, Armstrong must still confront lingering suspicions from regulators like the SEC about whether any exchanges can provide adequate investor protections around highly speculative digital assets. Coinbase itself has fought SEC assertions that it facilitated unregistered securities trades.

While the two suits differ, both target core business models questioning whether current legislation written before crypto’s advent can properly govern such technologies. Beyond exacting large fines, authorities want to slow crypto trading – putting platforms like Coinbase and Binance in an existential vice grip complicated by token assets’ fluctuation between currency and security classifications.

How Congress and agencies like the SEC ultimately delineate acceptable crypto activity under existing statutes or new legislation could determine which exchanges remain standing. Ironically victories could stem as much from legal ingenuity as technology innovation. But with Binance at least temporarily defanged, Coinbase remains well positioned to shape crypto’s second act blending Wall Street’s institutional trust with Silicon Valley’s disruptive daring.

Clearly the crypto landscape entering 2024 stands on shifting sands, clouded by bitcoin’s swoon, regulatory turbulence and possible global recession. Yet should pioneer blockchain currencies and exchanges somehow emerge resilient, Coinbase sits ready to seize the market share boon a humbled Binance left on the table. After years sparring in crypto’s octagon, this match’s decision appears nearer – though mainstream adoption stays stubbornly out of reach.

Binance CEO Pleads Guilty to Money Laundering

In a watershed moment for cryptocurrency oversight, Changpeng Zhao, billionaire founder of crypto exchange Binance, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to charges related to money laundering and sanctions violations. Binance itself also pleaded guilty to similar criminal charges for failing to prevent illegal activity on its platform.

The guilty pleas are part of a sweeping, coordinated crackdown on Binance by U.S. law enforcement and regulators. As part of the settlement, Binance agreed to pay over $4 billion in fines and penalties to various government agencies. Zhao himself will personally pay $200 million in fines and has stepped down as CEO.

The implications of this development on the broader crypto sector could be profound. As the world’s largest crypto trading platform, Binance has played an outsized role in the growth of the industry. Its legal troubles and the record penalties imposed call into question the viability of exchanges that flout compliance rules in the name of rapid expansion.

Prosecutors allege that Binance repeatedly ignored anti-money laundering obligations and allowed drug traffickers, hackers, and even terrorist groups like ISIS to freely use its platform. According to the Department of Justice, Binance processed transactions for mixing services used to launder money and facilitated over 1.5 million trades in violation of U.S. sanctions.

U.S. authorities were unequivocal in their criticism of Binance’s focus on profits over meeting regulatory requirements. This suggests that other exchanges that aggressively pursued growth while turning a “blind eye” to compliance may face similar crackdowns in the future. The $3.4 billion civil penalty imposed on Binance also sets a benchmark for potential fines other non-compliant entities may confront.

The charges against the world’s largest crypto exchange and its high-profile leader represent federal authorities’ most aggressive action yet to rein in lawlessness in the cryptocurrency industry. Officials made clear they will continue targeting crypto companies that break laws around money laundering, sanctions evasion, and other illicit finance.

More broadly, CZ’s guilty plea underscores the pressing need for sensible guardrails if crypto is to shed its reputation as primarily facilitating illegal activity. Though blockchain technology offers many potential benefits, its pseudonymous nature makes it vulnerable to abuse by criminals and terrorists financing unless exchanges rigorously verify customer identities and the source of funds.

For the wider crypto sector, the Binance takedown may spur valuable change. Many experts argue overly lax regulation allowed crypto exchanges to ignore Anti-Money Laundering rules other financial institutions must follow. The billion-dollar penalties against Binance could convince the industry it’s cheaper to self-regulate.

The Binance case may accelerate calls for a regulatory framework tailored to the unique risks posed by cryptocurrencies. Rather than stifle innovation in this nascent industry, thoughtful policies around KYC, anti-money laundering, investor protections and other issues could instill greater confidence in cryptocurrencies among mainstream investors and financial institutions.

Of course, because cryptocurrency transactions are pseudonymous, crypto will likely remain appealing for certain unlawful activities like narcotics sales and ransomware. But with Binance’s guilty plea, regulators sent the message that flagrant non-compliance will not fly. Exchanges allowing outright criminal abuse may face existential legal threats.

For exchanges determined to operate legally, the Binance debacle highlights the existential risks of non-compliance. No matter how large or influential, exchanges that refuse to meet their regulatory responsibilities risk jeopardizing their futures. Expect most exchanges to immediately review their KYC and AML policies in the wake of the Binance penalties.

At minimum, the charges will likely damage Binance’s reputation. Although the company remains operational, it could lose market share to competitors perceived as more law-abiding. For crypto investors, the uncertainty and loss of trust surrounding such a dominant player create fresh volatility in already turbulent markets.

Perhaps most profoundly, seeing handcuffs slapped on crypto’s one-time “king” punctures the industry’s former aura of impunity. After the Binance takedown, ongoing federal probes into FTX and other exchanges, and Sam Bankman-Fried’s criminal conviction, crypto fraudsters might finally fear the consequences many avoided for so long. For better or worse, crypto is evolving.

Sam Bankman-Fried Found Guilty on All Counts in FTX Fraud Trial

Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder and former CEO of the failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, has been found guilty on all charges related to fraud and money laundering. The verdict was handed down on Thursday by a jury in a Manhattan federal court following over a month of dramatic testimony in one of the most high-profile white collar criminal trials in recent history.

Bankman-Fried faced seven criminal counts tied to allegations he defrauded FTX customers and investors out of billions of dollars. The jury deliberated for approximately four hours before returning guilty verdicts on all counts, affirming the prosecution’s allegations that the 30-year-old knowingly misled investors and misappropriated customer deposits to cover losses at his hedge fund, Alameda Research.

Each fraud count carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, while the money laundering conviction includes up to another 20 years. This brings the total maximum sentence to 115 years behind bars for Bankman-Fried. His sentencing hearing is scheduled for March 2024, where the exact prison term will be determined by Judge Lewis Kaplan.

Rapid Downfall of a Crypto Pioneer

The verdict represents a dramatic demise for Bankman-Fried, who was once hailed as a pioneer within the crypto industry. The MIT graduate founded FTX in 2019, and it grew rapidly to become one of the largest global cryptocurrency exchanges with a valuation of over $30 billion at its peak.

But FTX collapsed almost overnight last November after a report revealed a leaked balance sheet showing Alameda Research owed billions of dollars in loans to FTX. The news triggered a liquidity crisis and customer withdrawals that quickly bankrupted both companies.

Prosecutors presented evidence over the course of the trial that Bankman-Fried had secretly transferred customer funds from FTX to cover losses at Alameda as the hedge fund made a series of failed investments. In total, an estimated $8 billion in customer money vanished.

When asked on the witness stand whether he stole funds, Bankman-Fried testified “I never intended to commit fraud.” But the 12-person jury ultimately sided with the prosecution in deeming his actions fraudulent.

Watershed Moment for Crypto Accountability

The guilty verdict represents a major victory for authorities seeking greater accountability within the largely unregulated crypto industry. Bankman-Fried’s conviction on all criminal charges related to the FTX collapse will likely spur further calls for regulation to protect investors participating in digital asset markets.

Many Industry observers believe the prosecution and ultimate guilty verdict for Bankman-Fried will serve as a warning for other crypto executives. His undoing may deter similar misconduct, as leaders now know they can face severe criminal repercussions for defrauding customers.

While the FTX saga damaged trust in cryptocurrencies broadly, the decisive guilty verdict helps restore some faith that justice can be served. Investors who lost their savings when FTX failed may find some solace knowing its founder and chief architect will now likely serve substantial prison time.

For Bankman-Fried himself, the future now looks increasingly bleak. His sentencing in March 2024 will determine exactly how many years he’ll spend incarcerated for the crimes that led to FTX’s epic collapse and wiped out billions in customer funds. But the outcome is already clear – his fraud conviction ensures Bankman-Fried will go down in history as a disgraced figure instead of the visionary entrepreneur he once portrayed himself to be.

Is Bitcoin Primed for a Resurgence? BTC Tops $35,000

In a recent rally, Bitcoin briefly surpassed the $35,000 mark, marking a significant milestone not seen since May 2022. This resurgence has breathed new life into the world’s foremost cryptocurrency and left many wondering if Bitcoin is poised for a remarkable comeback.

A Rally of Remarkable Proportions:

The year 2023 has unfolded with tremendous vigor for Bitcoin enthusiasts. The cryptocurrency has ascended over 100% since the year’s inception, igniting optimism among investors and speculators alike. This remarkable rally could, in part, be attributed to a phenomenon known as a “short squeeze.” In essence, some investors who had bet against Bitcoin found themselves in a precarious position, compelled to buy Bitcoin to cover their short positions, thus driving its price higher.


Short Liquidations and Regulatory Hopes:

A staggering $167 million in short liquidations, predominantly on offshore exchanges, serves as evidence of the short squeeze’s impact. However, the Bitcoin market’s dynamics extend beyond short-term speculation. The recent decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) not to appeal a ruling in Grayscale’s lawsuit has sparked optimism in the cryptocurrency community. The hope is that this decision could pave the way for the approval of a Bitcoin-related exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the coming months. Momentum has been building as firms vying for a Bitcoin ETF updated their filings, and prominent investors such as Ark’s Cathie Wood and Galaxy’s Mike Novogratz have highlighted a shift in the SEC’s tone. The regulatory body appears to be engaging more positively with the cryptocurrency industry, increasing the odds of a Bitcoin ETF receiving the green light.

The Significance of a Bitcoin ETF:

A Bitcoin ETF would represent a pivotal development for both seasoned and novice investors. It would provide a structured and regulated way for individuals to gain exposure to Bitcoin’s price movements without the need to directly own the cryptocurrency. Such an ETF could bridge the gap between traditional financial markets and the digital asset realm, further legitimizing Bitcoin as a viable investment.

Bitcoin’s Checkered History:

To understand the significance of this potential resurgence, it’s crucial to reflect on Bitcoin’s journey. Since its inception in 2009, Bitcoin has weathered numerous storms, experiencing extreme volatility and wild price swings. It reached its all-time high of nearly $65,000 in April 2021 before experiencing a sharp decline.

Regulatory Scrutiny and Industry Challenges:

Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency industry have faced increasing regulatory scrutiny in recent years. The high-profile FTX bankruptcy case and Terraform’s legal troubles, where they are charged with defrauding investors, serve as stark reminders of the challenges the industry faces. Furthermore, the SEC has been actively cracking down on cryptocurrency companies. Firms like Coinbase and Ripple are currently embroiled in legal battles with the SEC, accused of violating securities laws. These legal skirmishes, along with others in the crypto space, have underscored the pressing need for regulatory clarity in the United States. As the industry navigates these challenges, the question that looms is whether Bitcoin is indeed primed for a resurgence. The recent rally, the prospects of a Bitcoin ETF, and the evolving regulatory landscape all point to a cryptocurrency with the potential for a triumphant return, promising exciting times ahead for Bitcoin enthusiasts and investors.

FTX Lawsuit Targets Parents of Disgraced CEO Sam Bankman-Fried

The bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX has taken a surprising legal step by launching a legal battle against Allan Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, the parents of its former CEO and founder, Sam Bankman-Fried. The lawsuit aims to recover both luxury property and millions of dollars in what FTX alleges to be “fraudulently transferred and misappropriated funds.”

FTX, once a rising star in the cryptocurrency world, faced financial turmoil amid allegations of extensive financial misconduct. The exchange’s new leadership has been working tirelessly to locate the billions of dollars in missing assets. Their latest move is an attempt to hold Bankman and Fried accountable.

Legal representatives of the FTX bankruptcy estate assert that Allan Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried “exploited their access and influence within the FTX enterprise to enrich themselves, directly and indirectly, by millions of dollars.” This stunning accusation suggests that Bankman and Fried might have played a significant role in the financial irregularities that led to FTX’s collapse.

One of the most notable claims in the lawsuit is that Bankman and Fried discussed transferring a $10 million cash gift and a $16.4 million luxury property in The Bahamas to their son, Sam Bankman-Fried, despite FTX’s precarious financial situation. This raises questions about whether Bankman and Fried were aware of the exchange’s dire financial straits.

The lawsuit doesn’t stop there. It also alleges that as early as 2019, Allan Bankman actively participated in efforts to cover up a whistleblower complaint that could have “exposed the FTX Group as a house of cards.” The lawsuit cites emails written by Bankman in which he complained about his annual salary being only $200,000 when he believed he was “supposed to be getting $1M/yr.” The suit portrays this as Bankman lobbying his son to significantly increase his own salary.

Take a look at Bit Digital Inc., a sustainability focused generator of digital assets, that has a large-scale bitcoin mining business with operations across the U.S. and Canada.

Shockingly, within two weeks of these discussions, the suit claims that Sam Bankman-Fried collectively gifted his parents $10 million in funds from Alameda. Within three months, Bankman and Fried were deeded the $16.4 million property in The Bahamas. The timing and circumstances of these transactions raise serious questions about their legality and ethical implications.

Moreover, the lawsuit alleges that Bankman-Fried’s parents urged substantial political and charitable contributions, including significant amounts to Stanford University, seemingly aimed at enhancing Bankman and Fried’s professional and social status. Barbara Fried is also accused of encouraging her son and others within the company to avoid or even violate federal campaign finance disclosure rules by engaging in straw donations or concealing the FTX Group as the source of the contributions.

The involvement of Bankman-Fried’s parents in these activities is particularly noteworthy. Both are accomplished legal scholars who have taught at Stanford Law School. Barbara Fried specializes in ethics, while Allan Bankman’s expertise is in taxes. Their involvement in the alleged misconduct at FTX raises questions about their awareness of the situation and their potential role in enabling it.

Sam Bankman-Fried himself is independently facing multiple wire and securities fraud charges related to the alleged multibillion-dollar FTX fraud. Federal prosecutors and regulators have accused him of orchestrating “one of the biggest financial frauds in American history.” Bankman-Fried has maintained his innocence and pleaded not guilty to all charges. His criminal trial is scheduled to commence on October 3 in Manhattan.

The lawsuit against Bankman and Fried asserts that they “either knew or ignored bright red flags revealing that their son, Bankman-Fried, and other FTX Insiders were orchestrating a vast fraudulent scheme.” This suggests that FTX believes the parents played a more significant role in the alleged fraud than previously thought.

In their legal action against Bankman and Fried, FTX seeks various forms of compensatory relief, including punitive damages. The exchange aims to hold them accountable for their alleged “conscious, willful, wanton, and malicious conduct” that contributed to FTX’s financial woes. Additionally, FTX is looking to recover any property or payments made to the couple from the exchange.

The outcome of this legal battle remains uncertain, and it raises questions about how any potential clawbacks may affect Bankman and Fried’s ability to support their son’s legal defense as he faces criminal charges. The legal counsel for Allan Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried has vehemently denied the allegations, characterizing them as “completely false.” They view FTX’s legal action as an attempt to intimidate their clients and undermine the upcoming trial of their child.

Take a a moment to look at Bitcoin Depot Inc., a company that enables users to convert cash to Bitcoin at kiosks located in thousands of name-brand retail locations across North America.

The implications of this legal showdown extend beyond the immediate parties involved. FTX’s efforts to recover lost assets and hold those responsible accountable are a crucial chapter in the cryptocurrency industry’s ongoing struggle with regulatory scrutiny and legal challenges. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how authorities and stakeholders deal with alleged fraud and financial misconduct in the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies.

As the legal battle unfolds, it will be closely watched by industry observers, legal experts, and cryptocurrency enthusiasts alike. The allegations and accusations against the parents of Sam Bankman-Fried have added another layer of complexity to a case that has already drawn significant attention and could have far-reaching consequences for the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

IMF and FSB Offer Policy Recommendations for Crypto Regulation

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) have jointly released a new policy paper laying out recommendations for regulating cryptocurrencies and crypto assets. The paper comes at the request of India, which currently holds the presidency of the G20 intergovernmental forum.

The policy recommendations aim to provide guidance to various jurisdictions on addressing risks associated with crypto activities, particularly those related to stablecoins and decentralized finance (DeFi). However, the paper does not set any new policies or regulatory expectations itself.

Stablecoins have emerged as a major focus area. The IMF and FSB warn that stablecoins pegged to hold a stable value can suddenly become volatile. This may pose threats to financial stability, especially as adoption of stablecoins grows.

The paper also examines risks from the fast-growing DeFi ecosystem. It argues that while DeFi aims to replicate traditional financial functions in a decentralized manner, it does not substantively differ in the services offered. Furthermore, DeFi may propagate similar risks seen in traditional finance around liquidity mismatches, interconnectedness, leverage, and inadequate governance.

However, the IMF and FSB continue to argue against blanket bans on cryptocurrencies. They state that policy should instead focus on understanding and addressing the underlying consumer demand for digital assets and payments.

Take a moment to look at Bit Digital Inc., a sustainability focused generator of digital assets.

Click here for company information and equity research by Noble Capital Markets.

The policy recommendations could have significant impacts on crypto companies. Stablecoin issuers and DeFi platforms would likely face greater regulatory scrutiny and standards around risk management. Exchanges may see heightened AML/CFT rules, while custodial services could get more consumer protection and security requirements. Miners and infrastructure providers may also face new oversight on risks and energy usage.

Crypto firms would likely need to invest substantially in compliance to meet new regulatory mandates. While this could raise costs, it may also boost institutional confidence in the emerging crypto space. As crypto adoption grows globally, regulators are trying to balance innovation with appropriate safeguards.

A different play in the Bitcoin space, Bitcoin Depot (BTM) provides its users with simple, efficient and intuitive means of converting cash into Bitcoin, which users can deploy in the payments, spending and investing space. Users can convert cash to Bitcoin at Bitcoin Depot’s kiosks and at thousands of name-brand retail locations through its BDCheckout product.

Check out Noble Capital Markets’ Analyst Michael Kupinski’s Research Initiation Report on Bitcoin Depot.

The Three Causes Crushing Crypto

Bitcoin’s Throttleback Thursday Explained

Bitcoin and Ethereum had a bad day. After gaining a lot of upward momentum from late June after Blackrock, Fidelity, and Invesco filed to create bitcoin-related exchange traded funds (ETFs), the volatile assets have shown cryptocurrency investors that the bumpy ride is not yet over. What’s causing it this time? Fortunately, it is not fraud or wrongdoing creating the turbulence. Instead, three factors external to the business of trading, mining, or exchanging digital assets are at work.

 Background

On Thursday, August 17, and accelerating on August 18, the largest cryptocurrencies dropped precipitously. Bitcoin even broke down and fell below the psychologically important $26,000 US dollar price level before bouncing. While some are pointing to CME options expiration on the third Friday of each month, most are pointing to a Wall Street Journal article, and blaming Elon Musk, as the reason the asset class was nudged off a small cliff. There are other less highlighted, but important, catalysts that added to the flash-crash; these, along with the WSJ story, will be explained below.

Smells like Musk

What could SpaceX, the company owned and run by Elon Musk, possibly have to do with a crypto selloff? On Thursday, the crypto market had a downward spike around 5 PM ET. It was just after the Wall Street Journal revealed a change in the accounting valuation of SpaceX’s crypto assets. Reportedly, SpaceX marked down the value of its bitcoin assets by a substantial $373 million over the past two years. Additionally, the company has executed on crypto asset divestitures as well. When the reduction took place is uncertain, but cryptocurrency holdings have been reduced both in terms of the amount of coins and the value each coin is held for on the books.

Elon Musk’s reputation is that of a forward thinker, and one that embraces, if not leads, technology. He has significant influence over cryptocurrency valuations, often instigating pronounced market fluctuations brought about by Musk’s influential posts on his social media company, X. The reduction coincides with a similar crypto reduction on the books of publicly held, Musk-led, Tesla (TSLA). The electric car manufacturer had previously disclosed in its annual earnings report that it had liquidated 75% of its bitcoin reserves.

While it should not be surprising that two companies stepped away from speculation on something unrelated to their business or lowered support for the still young blockchain technology, it gave a reason for a reaction to this and other festering dynamics.

Wary of Gary

The Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Gary Gensler, is viewed as a “Whack-a Mole” to crypto stakeholders that prefer more autonomy than regulation. Every time the SEC gets knocked down as a potential regulator, it resurfaces, and crypto businesses have to deal with the agency again.  

Last month, Judge Analisa Torres made a pivotal decision in a case involving payment company Ripple Labs and the Commission. Her verdict declared that a substantial portion of sales of the token XRP did not fall under the category of securities transactions. The SEC claimed it was a security. This judgement was hailed as a triumph for the crypto sector and catalyzed an impressive 20% uptick in the exchange Coinbase’s stock in a single day.

On the same Thursday as the WSJ article, the SEC showed its face again with a strong response to the earlier ruling. Judge Torres allowed the SEC’s request for an “interlocutory” appeal on her ruling. This process will involve the SEC presenting its motion, followed by Ripple’s counterarguments. This is slated to continue until mid-September. Afterward, the Judge will determine whether the agency can effectively challenge her token classification ruling in an appellate court.

The still young asset class, its exchange methods, valuation, and usage techniques, once they are more clearly defined, will serve to add stability and reduce risk and shocks in crypto and the surrounding businesses. The longer the legal system and regulatory entities take, including Congress, the longer it will take for cryptocurrencies to find the more settled mainstream place in the markets they desire.

Rate Spate

The eighteen-month-long spate of rate hikes in the U.S. and across the globe is providing an alternative investment choice instead of what are viewed as riskier assets. Coincidentally, again on Thursday, August 17, the ten-year US Treasury Note hit a yield higher than the markets have experienced in 12 years. At 4.31%, investors can lock in a known annual return for ten years that exceeds the current and projected inflation rate.

Take Away

The volatility in the crypto asset class has been dramatic – not for the weak-stomached investor. On the same day in August, three unrelated events together helped cause the asset class to spike down. These include an article in a top business news publication indicating that one of the world’s most recognized cryptocurrency advocates has reduced bitcoin’s exposure to his companies. The SEC being granted a rematch in a landmark case that it had recently lost, where the earlier outcome gave no provision for the SEC to treat cryptocurrencies like a security. And rounding out the triad of events on crypto’s throttleback Thursday, yields are up across the curve to levels not seen in a dozen years. Investor’s seeking a place to reduce risk can now provide themselves with interest payments in excess of inflation.

But despite the ups and downs, bitcoin is up 56.7% year-to-date, 11.1% over the past 12 months, 110.5% over three years, 300% over five years, and astronomical amounts over longer periods. Related companies like bitcoin miners, crypto exchanges, and blockchain companies have also experienced growth similar to that found in few other industries over the past decade.   

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://finance.yahoo.com/video/bitcoin-sinks-below-28k-crypto-202201698.html

https://www.barrons.com/articles/sec-crypto-regulation-ripple-coinbase-d8143058?mod=hp_DAY_5

https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2023/08/18/bitcoin-drops-to-lowest-level-since-june-amid-wider-crypto-sell-off/?sh=28df65ce55ff

https://app.koyfin.com/share/1d479a881a

The Other BlackRock, Citadel, Bitcoin Story

Unhyped Information to Improve Investment Success

The Ripple XRP Case Creates Many Questions

The Convergence of AI and Cryptocurrency, OpenAI’s Big Project

Worldcoin Crypto Project Launched by OpenAI’s Sam Altman

In a revolutionary move, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman began rolling out Worldcoin on July 24. The cryptocurrency project aims to reinvent the way the world identifies living, breathing humans compared to AI bots. The core offering of Worldcoin is its innovative World ID, often described as a “digital passport” that serves as proof of a person’s human identity. But that is just the beginning of the project goals.

To obtain a World ID, users must undergo an in-person iris scan using Worldcoin’s revolutionary ‘orb.’ This silver ball, about the size of a bowling ball, ensures the legitimacy of the individual’s identity, subsequently creating the unique World ID.

The brains behind this revolutionary project are the San Francisco and Berlin-based organization, Tools for Humanity. During its beta phase, the project amassed an impressive 2 million users, and with the official launch on Monday, Worldcoin is rapidly expanding its ‘orbing’ operations to 35 cities across 20 countries.

In select countries, early adopters will be rewarded with Worldcoin’s own cryptocurrency token, WLD. This incentive has already driven WLD’s price to soar after the announcement. On Binance, the world’s largest, WLD reached a peak price of $5.29 and continued to trade at $2.49 (from an initial starting price of $0.15) as of 11:00 AM ET. Notably, the trading volume on Binance has reached a staggering $25.1 million.

The Role of Blockchain

Blockchains play a crucial role in this project, as they securely store World IDs while preserving user privacy and preventing any single entity from controlling or shutting down the system, according to co-founder Alex Blania.

One key application of World IDs is its ability to distinguish between real individuals and AI bots in the age of generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT, which are  adept at mimicking human language. By leveraging World IDs, online platforms can effectively combat the infiltration of AI bots into human interactions.

Economic Implications of AI

Altman emphasized the economic implications of AI, stating that people will be profoundly impacted by AI’s capabilities. “People will be supercharged by AI, which will have massive economic implications,” he said.

One interesting example of what Altman believes AI can eventually provide is universal basic income (UBI), a social benefits program aimed at providing financial support to every individual. According to Altman, as AI gradually takes over many human tasks, UBI can play a vital role in mitigating income inequality. Since World IDs are exclusive to genuine human beings, they can act as a safeguard against fraud in UBI distributions.

Though Altman acknowledged that a world with widespread UBI is likely in the distant future and the logistics of such a system are still unclear, he believes that Worldcoin paves the way for experiments and solutions to tackle this societal challenge.

The launch of Worldcoin marks a significant step in the convergence of cryptocurrency and AI technologies, with potential far-reaching effects on how we identify ourselves and interact in the digital age. As the project gains momentum, financial market professionals should closely monitor the developments surrounding Worldcoin and its impact on the future of money.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://worldcoin.org/cofounder-letter

https://www.theblock.co/post/219541/sam-altmans-worldcoin-unveils-world-id-protocol-and-sdk?utm_source=basicrss&utm_medium=rss

https://www.reuters.com/technology/openais-sam-altman-launches-worldcoin-crypto-project-2023-07-24/

The Ripple XRP Case Creates Many Questions

Who Will Regulate Crypto if not the SEC?

The cryptocurrency developer Ripple Labs just won a legal victory against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that should provoke cheers from the entire industry, at least those that prefer that digital currency not be treated as a security. If crypto is not viewed as a security, the jurisdiction which the SEC has been pushing hard to cement, may fall apart. This ruling may eventually lead to any future legal framework for digital tokens being designed by the U.S. Congress.

Background

Ripple is a technology company that uses cryptocurrency and blockchain technology to offer financial solutions. Ripple and XRP are two distinct entities. Ripple is a fintech company that builds global payment systems, while XRP is an independent digital asset that can be used by anyone for a variety of reasons.

In 2020, Ripple was charged by the SEC on the grounds that the company illegally raised $1.38 billion in unregistered securities offerings. In a ruling on July 13 of this year, it was decided by a Federal court that Ripple Labs did not violate securities law by selling its XRP tokens on its exchange.  This is being seen as the first major setback for the SEC in a decade of enforcement against the cryptocurrency industry. Other crypto firms accused of illegally operating digital asset exchanges can now explore ways to take advantage of the ruling.

This is an important decision that may alter the expected path of the entire industry. The SEC and the cryptocurrency industry which includes exchanges, crypto-mining, and the tokens themselves, have been at odds, with increasing heat on the industry, mainly by the SEC. Gary Gensler, who chairs the SEC, has described the crypto market as a “Wild West” riddled with fraud. He claims that most crypto tokens are securities. The regulator has been cracking down on crypto exchanges, including the top U.S. exchange Coinbase. If crypto is considered a security, it will fall under the commission’s oversight.

What this Means for the Crypto Industry

Crypto firms have long disputed the SEC’s jurisdiction but until last week had no supporting precedence from a court. This win provides much needed ammunition for the industry to reassert its claims.  

U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in New York ruled that sales on public cryptocurrency exchanges were not offers of securities because purchasers did not have a reasonable expectation of profit that depended on anything Ripple did. This profit expectation was used as a key in determining if XRP was a security at the time.

Crypto supporters are viewing the decision as a watershed and the judge’s reasoning as a new line of defense for the others being targeted by the SEC, such as Coinbase, Binance, and Bittrex.

SEC APPEAL?

It remains to be seen whether the SEC will challenge the ruling in the 2nd U.S. Court of Appeals which could cause judges to delay hearing other pending and new cases that other crypto assets sold on exchanges are not securities.

Ripple Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty said in an interview with Reuters that the company “wouldn’t shy away from an appeal, because the judge was right on her core findings,” adding: “I believe any appellate court looking at this would amplify and endorse those rulings, which would certainly be welcome.”

An appeal is somewhat risky for the SEC. If the 2nd Circuit, whose rulings are binding on federal courts in New York, Connecticut and Vermont, adopts the logic in the Ripple ruling, other cases like the SEC vs. Coinbase case would leave the SEC without much of an argument. This could permanently eliminate any claim the Commission has to regulation over the industry.

With the district court having taken a sledgehammer to the main claim the SEC had to oversight,  the industry may find itself subject to a legislative agreement. Especially with an SEC deprived of the argument that their legal cases were sound, there’s nothing to stop an acceleration of efforts to find a bipartisan agreement on a regulatory framework for crypto assets by the legislative branch.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/07/14/what-ripples-partial-xrp-win-means-for-other-crypto-firms-fighting-sec/

https://www.reuters.com/technology/crypto-firms-facing-us-sec-charges-find-hope-ripple-ruling-experts-say-2023-07-17/

https://www.fnlondon.com/articles/why-the-ripple-ruling-wont-spell-the-end-of-the-secs-crypto-crackdown-20230717?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D04828691964107368544310185344499067435%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1689601964

Bitcoin Versus Bitcoin Cash

Is Bitcoin Cash More Functional as a Currency than Bitcoin?

What cryptocurrency is performing better this year than Bitcoin?  

The other Bitcoin, that’s what.

Recent headlines related to BlackRock’s application for a Bitcoin ETF, followed by Citadel, Schwab, and Fidelity’s plans to create a joint crypto exchange, further legitimized the digital asset class at a time when it seemed under fire from the SEC. The combined news of such big players caused an epic rally in BTC. But it also put BCH (the lesser-known Bitcoin “step-child”) on the radar of crypto investors. Bitcoin Cash (BCH) experienced price gains far greater than BTC.

About Bitcoin Cash

Bitcoin Cash sprang to life in 2017 as the Bitcoin blockchain developers were torn between two directions. The divide was resolved with a split in order to address the disagreement. At issue was the scalability and transaction capacity of Bitcoin “classic”. There were two different schools of thought, the big blockers and the small blockers, each with different solutions. The big blockers felt strongly that larger blocks of transactions were best, in August 2017, a separate ledger for Bitcoin Cash was created, it has its own development team and uses big block design.

The split is often referred to as the Bitcoin Cash fork, it resulted in two separate blockchains, Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH). The larger block size of BCH allows for more transactions per second.

Recent plans to include Bitcoin Cash on a new platform, owned by big Wall Street firms has ushered in a shift in market perception of the “step-child” cryptocurrency. Despite its being born out of dispute, Bitcoin Cash’s recent performance suggests that it is gaining traction in the eyes of investors.

The ticker symbol is “BCH”. However, some exchanges use the ticker symbol “BCH.X” to distinguish between Bitcoin Cash and other cryptocurrencies with the BCH ticker symbol, similar to “BTC” and “BTC.X” for Bitcoin.

Source: Koyfin

Performance Drivers of BCH

Bitcoin Cash is up 138% so far in 2023, with much of that gain coming since the BlackRock SEC filing for a spot ETF, and the Citadel/Schwab/Fidelity exchange announcement. The exchange, called EDX Markets, backed by financial giants, is not registered with the SEC but carries significant weight due to its powerful partners. The platform lists only four cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash.

This exclusive list has been interpreted by the market as a vote of confidence or an ordaining of sorts of those digital assets that will endure. This confidence has become even more important as the SEC has intensified its scrutiny of other blockchain projects.

BlackRock‘s application to the SEC isn’t the only one. It apparently has set off a wave of Bitcoin spot ETF applications. Bitcoin ETFs will allow greater participation in the asset class. Thus the sudden bullish sentiment across cryptocurrencies

Key Differences

Block size: Bitcoin Cash has a block size of 32 MB, while Bitcoin’s block size is 1 MB. This means that Bitcoin Cash can process more transactions per second than Bitcoin.

Development team: Bitcoin Cash is developed by a different team than Bitcoin. The Bitcoin Cash team is focused on increasing the scalability of the blockchain and making it more user-friendly.

Roadmap: Bitcoin Cash has a different roadmap than Bitcoin. The Bitcoin Cash roadmap includes plans to implement features such as Schnorr signatures and Segregated Witness.

Overall, Bitcoin Cash is a different cryptocurrency than Bitcoin. It has a larger block size, a different development team, and a different roadmap. Whether or not Bitcoin Cash is a better investment than Bitcoin is a matter of opinion and what it is to be used for.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-26/bitcoin-offshoot-has-more-than-doubled-over-the-last-week

https://bitcoincash.org/

FTX, What Happened and Should Non-Crypto Investors Care

Image Credit: Phillip Pessar (Flickr)

Dramatic Collapse of the Cryptocurrency Exchange FTX Contains Lessons for Investors but Won’t Affect Most People

In the fast-paced world of cryptocurrency, vast sums of money can be made or lost in the blink of an eye. In early November 2022, the second-largest cryptocurrency exchange, FTX, was valued at more than US$30 billion. By Nov. 14, FTX was in bankruptcy proceedings along with more than 100 companies connected to it. D. Brian Blank and Brandy Hadley are professors who study finance, investing and fintech. They explain how and why this incredible collapse happened, what effect it might have on the traditional financial sector and whether you need to care if you don’t own any cryptocurrency.

What Happened?

In 2019, Sam Bankman-Fried founded FTX, a company that ran one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges.

FTX is where many crypto investors trade and hold their cryptocurrency, similar to the New York Stock Exchange for stocks. Bankman-Fried is also the founder of Alameda Research, a hedge fund that trades and invests in cryptocurrencies and crypto companies.

Sam Bankman-Fried founded both FTX and the investment firm Alameda Research. News sources have reported some less-than-responsible financial dealings between the two companies. Image via The Conversation.

Within the traditional financial sector, these two companies would be separate firms entirely or at least have divisions and firewalls in place between them. But in early November 2022, news outlets reported that a significant proportion of Alameda’s assets were a type of cryptocurrency released by FTX itself.

A few days later, news broke that FTX had allegedly been loaning customer assets to Alameda for risky trades without the consent of the customers and also issuing its own FTX cryptocurrency for Alameda to use as collateral. As a result, criminal and regulatory investigators began scrutinizing FTX for potentially violating securities law.

These two pieces of news basically led to a bank run on FTX.

Large crypto investors, like FTX’s competitor Binance, as well as individuals, began to sell off cryptocurrency held on FTX’s exchange. FTX quickly lost its ability to meet customer withdrawals and halted trading. On Nov. 14, FTX was also hit by an apparent insider hack and lost $600 million worth of cryptocurrency.

That same day, FTX, Alameda Research and 130 other affiliated companies founded by Bankman-Fried filed for bankruptcy. This action may leave more than a million suppliers, employees and investors who bought cryptocurrencies through the exchange or invested in these companies with no way to get their money back.

Among the groups and individuals who held currency on the FTX platform were many of the normal players in the crypto world, but a number of more traditional investment firms also held assets within FTX. Sequoia Capital, a venture capital firm, as well as the Ontario Teacher’s Pension, are estimated to have held millions of dollars of their investment portfolios in ownership stake of FTX. They have both already written off these investments with FTX as lost.

Image: OTPP

Did a Lack of Oversight Play a Role?

In traditional markets, corporations generally limit the risk they expose themselves to by maintaining liquidity and solvency. Liquidity is the ability of a firm to sell assets quickly without those assets losing much value. Solvency is the idea that a company’s assets are worth more than what that company owes to debtors and customers.

But the crypto world has generally operated with much less caution than the traditional financial sector, and FTX is no exception. About two-thirds of the money that FTX owed to the people who held cryptocurrency on its exchange – roughly $11.3 billion of $16 billion owed – was backed by illiquid coins created by FTX. FTX was taking its customers’ money, giving it to Alameda to make risky investments and then creating its own currency, known as FTT, as a replacement – cryptocurrency that it was unable to sell at a high enough price when it needed to.

In addition, nearly 40% of Alameda’s assets were in FTX’s own cryptocurrency – and remember, both companies were founded by the same person.

This all came to a head when investors decided to sell their coins on the exchange. FTX did not have enough liquid assets to meet those demands. This, in turn, drove the value of FTT from over $26 a coin at the beginning of November to under $2 by Nov. 13. By this point, FTX owed more money to its customers than it was worth.

In regulated exchanges, investing with customer funds is illegal. Additionally, auditors validate financial statements, and firms must publish the amount of money they hold in reserve that is available to fund customer withdrawals. And even if things go wrong, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation – or SIPC – protects depositors against the loss of investments from an exchange failure or financially troubled brokerage firm. None of these guardrails are in place within the crypto world.

Why is this a Big Deal in Crypto?

As a result of this meltdown, the company Binance is now considering creating an industry recovery fund – akin to a private version of SIPC insurance – to avoid future failures of crypto exchanges.

But while the collapse of FTX and Alameda – valued at more than $30 billion and now essentially worth nothing – is dramatic, the bigger implication is simply the potential lost trust in crypto. Bank runs are rare in traditional financial institutions, but they are increasingly common in the crypto space. Given that Bankman-Fried and FTX were seen as some of the biggest, most trusted figures in crypto, these events may lead more investors to think twice about putting money in crypto.

If I Don’t Own Crypto, Should I Care?

Though investment in cryptocurrencies has grown rapidly, the entire crypto market – valued at over $3 trillion at its peak – is much smaller than the $120 trillion traditional stock market.

While investors and regulators are still evaluating the consequences of this fall, the impact on any person who doesn’t personally own crypto will be minuscule. It is true that many larger investment funds, like BlackRock and the Ontario Teachers Pension, held investments in FTX, but the estimated $95 million the Ontario Teachers Pension lost through the collapse of FTX is just 0.05% of the entire fund’s investments.

The takeaway for most individuals is not to invest in unregulated markets without understanding the risks. In high-risk environments like crypto, it’s possible to lose everything – a lesson investors in FTX are learning the hard way.

This article was republished with permission from The Conversation, a news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It represents the research-based findings and thoughts of D. Brian Blank, Assistant Professor of Finance, Mississippi State University and Brandy Hadley, Associate Professor of Finance and the David A. Thompson Professor in Applied Investments, Appalachian State University

Does BNY Mellon’s Crypto Plans Have Hamilton Rolling Over in His Grave?

Image Credit: Todd Martin (Flickr)

The United States Oldest Bank Embraces Safekeeping Cryptocurrency Alongside Other Assets

The nation’s oldest bank, founded in 1784, began taking deposits of cryptocurrency today. BNY Mellon, with roots in the Bank of New York and Alexander Hamilton, is now the first large U.S. bank to custody client’s bitcoin and ether.

The bank will store the keys required to access and transfer crypto and provide the same bookkeeping services on digital currencies it offers for stocks, bonds, commodities, and other assets. BNY Mellon is one of the largest and most trusted in the business of traditional safekeeping; they now have made history by adding this additional service for investment managers to clear, service and safe keep digital assets.

As America’s oldest bank, BNY Mellon has a 238-year legacy on which to build. As a company it provided the first loan to the U.S. to fund the Revolutionary War and has weathered as many different financial eras as the country that it has helped build. Back in February 2021, BNY Mellon formed its enterprise Digital Assets Unit to develop services for digital asset technology. The goal was to launch the industry’s first multi-asset platform that provides safekeeping for digital and traditional assets.

“Touching more than 20% of the world’s investable assets, BNY Mellon has the scale to reimagine financial markets through blockchain technology and digital assets,” said Robin Vince, Chief Executive Officer and President at BNY Mellon. “We are excited to help drive the financial industry forward as we begin the next chapter in our innovation journey.”

Image Credit: Mark Holler (Flickr)

BNY Mellon recognizes the significant institutional demand for a resilient, scalable financial infrastructure designed to accommodate digital assets alongside traditional ones. The bank had previously surveyed money managers that use their safekeeping services and found almost all institutional investors (91%) are interested in investing in tokenized products. Additionally, 41% of institutional investors hold cryptocurrency in their portfolios today, with an additional 15% planning to hold digital assets in their portfolios within the next two to five years. Safekeeping them all under one system will benefit clients.

BNY Mellon has been working closely with market-leading fintech firms. The firm tapped digital asset technology specialists Fireblocks and Chainalysis to integrate their technology in order to meet the present and future security and compliance needs of clients across the digital asset space.

 BNY Mellon is a global investment company helping its clients manage and service their financial assets throughout the investment lifecycle. Clients include institutions, corporations, and individual investors. It delivers investment management, wealth management, and investment services in 35 countries. As of June 30, 2022, BNY Mellon had $43.0 trillion in assets under custody and/or administration and $1.9 trillion in assets under management. BNY BNY Mellon is the corporate brand of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (NYSE: BK).

“As the world’s largest custodian, BNY Mellon is the natural provider to create a safe and secure Digital Asset Custody Platform for institutional clients,” said Caroline Butler, CEO of Custody Services at BNY Mellon. “We will continue to innovate, embrace new technology and work closely with clients to address their evolving needs.”

“With Digital Asset Custody, we continue our journey of trust and innovation into the evolving digital assets space, while embracing leading technology and collaborating with fintechs,” said Roman Regelman, CEO of Securities Services & Digital at BNY Mellon.

Take Away

The world is changing, and even the oldest bank in the U.S. is getting on board with the changes. The addition of BNY Mellon as a holder of cryptocurrency keys is a big nod to the crypto management industry. Portfolio managers of all sizes are now able to provide statements with a wider variety of asset classes held. Does this mean the newcomers that now transact and hold cryptocurrency will either be bought or lose potential large customers? That remains to be seen.

 Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://www.bnymellon.com/us/en/about-us/newsroom/press-release/bny-mellon-launches-new-digital-asset-custody-platform-130305.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/crypto-could-threaten-financial-system-federal-risk-panel-warns-11664826496?mod=article_inline

https://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-oldest-bank-bny-mellon-will-hold-that-crypto-now-11665460354?mod=djemalertNEWS

Voyager Digital (VYGVQ) – A Winner Declared?


Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Voyager Digital Ltd.’s (TSX: VOYG) (OTCQX: VYGVF) (FRA: UCD2) US subsidiary, Voyager Digital, LLC, is a fast-growing cryptocurrency platform in the United States founded in 2018 to bring choice, transparency, and cost-efficiency to the marketplace. Voyager offers a secure way to trade over 100 different crypto assets using its easy-to-use mobile application. Through its subsidiary Coinify ApS, Voyager provides crypto payment solutions for both consumers and merchants around the globe. To learn more about the company, please visit https://www.investvoyager.com.

Joe Gomes, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Joshua Zoepfel, Research Associate, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

Auction Completed. Voyager announced the completion of the Company’s auction process. The Company has selected West Realm Shires Inc. (“FTX US”) as the highest and best bid for its assets. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors supports FTX US’s winning bid.

The Winning Bid with a Caveat. FTX US’s winning bid for Voyager’s assets was for $1.422 billion, which comprises the fair market value of all Voyager cryptocurrency at a to-be-determined date in the future, which at current market prices is estimated to be $1.311 billion, and additional consideration that is estimated as providing approximately $111 million of incremental value. However, FTX US has the potential to be outbid over the next couple of weeks, as the objection deadline is the final day of allowing higher bids to be placed.


Get the Full Report

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary. Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision.