Tag: Biden

Biden Blocks $14 Billion US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Over National Security Concerns

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com
Key Points:
– President Biden blocked the $14 billion sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel, citing national security concerns.
– US Steel and Nippon Steel criticized the decision as political and suggested they may pursue legal action.
– The move highlights bipartisan resistance to foreign acquisitions in critical American industries.

In a decision underscoring Washington’s protectionist stance, President Joe Biden on Friday blocked the $14 billion acquisition of Pittsburgh-based US Steel (X) by Japan’s Nippon Steel, citing national security concerns. The move has created significant uncertainty for the iconic 124-year-old steelmaker, whose shares fell more than 7% in morning trading following the announcement.

President Biden stated that the acquisition would “place one of America’s largest steel producers under foreign control and create risk for our national security and critical supply chains.” This rejection aligns with longstanding concerns over foreign influence on critical U.S. industries, even as the Japanese buyer had committed to retaining the US Steel name, headquarters in Pittsburgh, and making significant investments in its plants.

The decision came after months of review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which could not reach a consensus. Biden’s executive order now requires the companies to abandon the deal within 30 days unless extended by CFIUS.

The deal faced fierce opposition from the United Steelworkers union, which argued that the acquisition would harm domestic workers and the nation’s steel production capabilities. Biden echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the need for domestic steelmakers to safeguard national interests.

“We need major US companies representing the major share of US steelmaking capacity to keep leading the fight on behalf of America’s national interests,” Biden stated.

In a joint statement, US Steel and Nippon Steel criticized the decision as a “political” move unsupported by credible national security concerns. They hinted at pursuing legal action, stating, “We are left with no choice but to take all appropriate action to protect our legal rights.”

The companies also highlighted their commitments to new investments and ensuring key directors and executives would remain U.S. citizens. They argued that their pledges would strengthen, not undermine, national security.

This decision reflects a growing trend of economic nationalism in U.S. policy. Both Biden and President-elect Donald Trump opposed the deal, signaling bipartisan resistance to foreign acquisitions of critical American industries.

Analysts suggest the decision could deter foreign companies from investing in the U.S. “It’s been a highly politicized process,” said Josh Spoores, CRU North American steel analyst, who pointed out that the decision sends a chilling message to allied countries.

It remains unclear if US Steel will seek a new buyer or pivot its strategy. The rejection is a significant setback after the company spent much of 2024 lobbying for approval. Meanwhile, the steelmaker must navigate the challenges of remaining competitive in a volatile industry.

The Biden administration’s stance may leave long-lasting implications on U.S.-foreign trade relations, especially as protectionist policies continue to shape economic strategy.

Biden Administration’s Clean Hydrogen Tax Credit Draws Mixed Reactions from Environmental Groups

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com
Key Points:
– The Biden administration finalized a tax credit offering up to $3 per kilogram for cleaner hydrogen production under the Inflation Reduction Act.
– Groups cautiously support the move but warn about potential loopholes rewarding “dirty” hydrogen producers.
– Clean hydrogen is expected to aid hard-to-electrify industries like steel manufacturing, aviation, and marine shipping in reducing carbon emissions.

The Biden administration has introduced finalized rules for a tax credit that promises billions of dollars to support cleaner hydrogen production. The rules, released Friday, aim to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels in industries like transportation, steelmaking, and manufacturing, sectors that are notoriously challenging to decarbonize.

Hydrogen, hailed as a potential clean energy solution, is primarily produced today from natural gas, which emits significant greenhouse gases. However, it can also be produced using renewable or low-emission energy sources like solar, wind, or nuclear power. The new credit, part of the Inflation Reduction Act, is designed to encourage such low-carbon methods.

Under the final rules, producers using renewable energy to split water into hydrogen and oxygen can qualify for the full $3-per-kilogram credit. Producers relying on natural gas may also receive the full credit if they employ carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Alternative methods, such as using biogas or methane from landfills, could also qualify for varying levels of support.

Environmental groups have expressed cautious optimism about the rules. The Clean Air Task Force lauded the policy’s potential to reduce emissions by incentivizing cleaner hydrogen production methods.

“If the hydrogen qualifies for a credit, it means it’s being produced with fewer emissions than the fossil fuels it aims to replace,” said Conrad Schneider, senior director at the Clean Air Task Force.

However, concerns remain. Earthjustice highlighted the risk of “dirty hydrogen” producers exploiting loopholes. Critics worry that hydrogen derived from natural gas, even with carbon capture, might not meet stringent climate goals if methane emissions from gas extraction and transportation are not adequately monitored.

Treasury Deputy Secretary Wally Adeyemo emphasized that the credit, coupled with the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, represents a transformative step for clean hydrogen development.

“We are advancing the world’s most ambitious policies to support clean hydrogen,” Adeyemo stated, pointing to its potential to replace fossil fuels in hard-to-decarbonize sectors like aviation and marine shipping.

The Fuel Cell & Hydrogen Energy Association, which includes over 100 members across the hydrogen value chain, welcomed the clarity provided by the finalized rules. However, Frank Wolak, the association’s president, expressed uncertainty about how the tax credit would impact industry investment decisions.

“The big question is whether this tax credit will universally spur confidence and drive investments or only work for certain players,” Wolak remarked.

As the clean hydrogen industry begins to navigate this new policy landscape, it faces challenges in ensuring the accurate tracking of emissions, particularly for hydrogen produced using natural gas. The effectiveness of the credit in advancing clean energy solutions while avoiding loopholes remains to be seen.

Biden Taps Historic Amounts of Emergency Reserve Oil to Fight Prices – But Will it Work?

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

In a bold move to combat surging fuel prices and rampant inflation, President Biden is unleashing a flood of black gold onto the markets. The White House is planning to tap a massive 180 million barrels of crude oil from the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) – the biggest withdrawal in the reserve’s history.

The news sent oil prices tumbling 5% in early trading as speculators reacted to the supply boost. But will the SPR floodgates really succeed in taming the oil price beast that has economists worried about recession?

The sheer size of the release, equivalent to two full days of global oil consumption, grabbed headlines. Set to be gradually emptied over several months, Biden’s SPR unleashing is meant to act like a shot of bear tranquilizer for the raging oil market.

Ever since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, reduced supply from the world’s No. 2 exporter combined with surging demand has driven prices to their highest levels since 2008. Brent crude already flirted with a mind-boggling $140 per barrel in March. Even after the SPR news-driven dip, benchmark oil remains stubbornly high at around $105.

For Biden, doling out the emergency crude is a midterm elections Hail Mary pass. Painfully high gas prices have contributed to the president’s dismal approval ratings. Tapping the SPR to lower fuel costs may be his best bet to avoid Democrats enduring a disastrous drubbing by the Republicans in November.

Beyond politics, uncorking America’s oil reserves also sends an important message to the market. It signals the Administration’s determination to fight an inflation rate that keeps printing four-decade highs. Few things impact inflation expectations like changes in oil prices. A meaningful drop could help tamp down the runaway price increases eroding consumer confidence.

But will the effort succeed or will it flounder like past attempts? With global crude inventories at historic lows, many analysts see the SPR release as a mere band-aid solution. It provides some short-term relief but doesn’t fix the supply and demand imbalance.

Goldman Sachs estimates the 180 million barrel slug will help rebalance markets this year. But it warned the move doesn’t resolve the structural deficit caused by excluding Russian exports.

Previous SPR releases also failed to produce lasting effects. Oil prices quickly rebounded after 60 million barrels were tapped in November 2021 and another 30 million in March 2022.

This time, the White House is also counting on allies for help. The International Energy Agency meets soon to potentially coordinate a collective release from its members’ reserves.

But Biden’s SPR gambit already seems at odds with other moves meant to restrict oil supply and fight climate change. Canceling the Keystone XL pipeline permit and banning new federal drilling auctions counterproductively worsened the supply crunch. A of couple million extra daily barrels from those sources would have eased pressure on prices.

The Administration now finds itself trying to fix with one hand problems partly created by the other. That internal tension undermines the large SPR release’s credibility.

Traders also scoffed when OPEC refused to boost production more than a token amount after the U.S. lobbied for extra output. With the cartel and allies like Russia benefitting handsomely from $100+ oil, they have little incentive to pump much more.

Meanwhile, risks of a demand-killing recession loom if the Fed’s inflation fight requires jumbo interest rate hikes. And Covid lockdowns in China already hurt oil demand in the world’s largest importer.

So while Biden’s SPR flow should offer some near-term relief at the pump, it may not move the needle much for long. Markets fear what happens if 180 million barrels merely postpones the supply day of reckoning rather than preventing it.

With inventories low, spare capacity shrinking, geopolitical unrest continuing, and ESG considerations constraining investment, oil looks poised to remain highly volatile. While the SPR release was historic in size, it likely won’t fully tranquilize the energy markets.

Take a moment to take a look at Noble Capital Markets’ Senior Research Analyst Michael Heim’s Energy Industry Report.

President Biden Makes History by Joining UAW Picket Line

Posted on by slightbourne@noblecapitalmarkets.com

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023, President Joe Biden made history by joining striking United Auto Workers (UAW) members on the picket line in Wayne County, Michigan. It was the first time a sitting president had ever joined an ongoing strike.

Biden’s visit came as the UAW was in its 12th day of a strike against General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis, demanding better wages, benefits, and job security. The strike had caused significant disruptions to the auto industry and had put thousands of workers out of work.

Despite the risks, Biden was determined to show his support for the UAW and for working families. He arrived at the picket line early in the morning and was greeted by cheers and applause from the strikers.

“It’s an honor to be here with you today,” Biden said to the strikers. “You are fighting for the middle class. You are fighting for the soul of this nation.”

Biden went on to praise the UAW for its long history of fighting for the rights of workers and their families. He also pledged his support for the union and said that he would continue to work to create an economy that works for everyone.

“I want to be clear: I stand with the UAW,” Biden said. “I will always stand with workers who are fighting for a fair deal.”

Biden’s visit to the picket line was a significant show of support for the UAW and for labor unions in general. It came at a time when unions are facing increasing attacks from corporations and anti-union politicians.

Biden’s visit was also a reminder of his commitment to working families. He has repeatedly said that he will fight to create an economy that works for everyone, not just the wealthy few.

Biden’s visit to the picket line could have a number of positive consequences for the UAW and for labor unions in general.

First, it could help to raise public awareness of the strike and the union’s demands. This could put pressure on the auto companies to settle the strike on the union’s terms.

Second, Biden’s visit could help to boost morale among the strikers. It could show them that they have the support of the president and that they are not alone in their fight.

Third, Biden’s visit could help to strengthen the labor movement as a whole. It could show that unions are still a powerful force and that they can win when they stand together.

Biden’s visit to the picket line was also significant for its historical implications. It was the first time a sitting president had ever joined an ongoing strike. This sent a powerful message that the president stands with working families and that he supports the right of workers to organize and bargain collectively.

Biden’s visit to the picket line was a courageous and important act. It showed that he is a president who is not afraid to stand up for working families, even when it is politically difficult.

The UAW strike is a critical test for Biden’s presidency. If the union is able to win a fair contract, it will be a victory for working families and for the labor movement as a whole. It will also be a sign that Biden is delivering on his promise to create an economy that works for everyone.

The strike is also a test for the Biden administration’s commitment to industrial policy. Biden has repeatedly said that he wants to revitalize the American manufacturing sector. The UAW strike is an opportunity for Biden to show that he is serious about this commitment.

The Biden administration can support the UAW strike in a number of ways. First, it can put pressure on the auto companies to settle the strike on the union’s terms. Second, it can provide financial assistance to the strikers and their families. Third, it can use its regulatory authority to make it easier for workers to organize and bargain collectively.

The UAW strike is a critical moment for working families and for the labor movement. The outcome of the strike will have a major impact on the future of the American economy. Biden’s visit to the picket line was a significant show of support for the UAW and for working families. It is now up to the Biden administration to follow through on its promises and to ensure that the UAW strike is a victory for working families.

Debt Ceiling Risk and Solutions to be Addressed by Biden and McCarthy

Posted on by phoffman@channelchek.com
Image: President Biden reads newspaper before a phone call with Kevin McCarthy, Aug. 23, 2021 (The White House)

Could the Debt Ceiling Challenges be Ironed Out Before the Eleventh Hour?

The market-moving potential of key meetings in Washington on Wednesday, February 1st, includes more than the FOMC decision on monetary policy. Up the road from the Federal Reserve building, also scheduled for the first of the month, will be another important meeting for the markets. House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy will be headed to the Oval Office for a discussion to resolve other risks to the US economy, risks that could quickly spin out of control. High on the list is the national debt limit. Without a plan, the inability for the government to borrow above the current debt ceiling, could impact trust in the credit rating of US debt. This would move bond prices lower as rates would naturally rise at even the smallest prospect of a US default.  

Why It’s Critical to Markets

A debt limit increase would allow the government to finance existing obligations. These obligations have, as in the past, expanded beyond the borrowing cap imposed on the US Treasury. An inability to roll existing maturing debt or afford additional interest rate costs would cause a default. The reverberations of this can not be understated as US Treasuries, like US currency, is the backbone of the worlds financial system.

An actual default could precipitate a mega financial crisis, threatening jobs, asset values, and trust.  

The US reached its technical borrowing limit of $31.4 trillion in January. US Treasury Secretary Yellen enacted planned accounting moves that will allow the federal government to pay its bills until sometime in June by postponing some obligations. Before then, a solution must be devised by lawmakers that would then be signed by the President in order for the government to take on new debt and fund its responsibilities.

The Meeting Agenda

President Biden and House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy will meet at the White House to find common negotiating ground to avert a default. They currently seem far apart on a potential solution as the President’s party wishes to raise the debt ceiling quickly and resume business as usual in DC, while many in the House Speaker’s party are looking for concessions and spending cuts before they agree to raise the borrowing limit.

Republican lawmakers don’t currently support a measure that would let the country pay its debts unless there is agreement on various spending cuts going forward. The White House, which must sign or veto anything passed in Congress, has said raising the debt limit is critical and non-negotiable, citing the risk to the US economy from a default.

Both Biden and McCarthy will want to come away from this meeting with something their constituents and the onlooking financial markets can be comfortable with, and at the same time provides assurance to the world that is also looking on.

Congress has always passed an increase in the debt limit. Since 1960, Congress has acted 78 separate times to permanently raise, temporarily extend, or change the definition of the debt limit. Congressional leaders in both parties have believed in the end that it is best. However, the negotiations tend to go to the eleventh hour with escalating showmanship on all sides.

The eleventh hour comes sometime in June. Skeptics of any success of this face-to-face talk have a long history on which to hang their skepticism. However, McCarthy being new to his role and Biden having an aggressive spending agenda may help to shape a quicker outcome than in the past.

On Sunday, January 9th, McCarthy said that Republicans would not allow a US default that cuts into Social Security and Medicare, this would be “off the table” in any debt ceiling negotiations.

“The President will ask Speaker McCarthy if he intends to meet his Constitutional obligation to prevent a national default, as every other House and Senate leader in US history has done,” a White House spokesperson said.

The statements following, both by the White House and the Speakers camp, may cause a sigh of relief or elevate the level of panic.

Politics Involved

House Speaker McCarthy, in order to be elected speaker, agreed to rules that made it easier for his party to oust him over policy disagreements. He said he’d focus on discretionary spending, which has increased dramatically in the past two years with infrastructure and semiconductor legislation and a green-energy bill supported by Democrats.

“I think everything, when you look at discretionary, is sitting there,” McCarthy said. “We shouldn’t just print more money, we should balance our budget. So I want to look at every single department. Where can we become more efficient, more effective and more accountable?”

Biden, who is contemplating seeking re-election in 2024, has been sharply critical of McCarthy’s Republican caucus. He characterized them as “fiscally demented” earlier this month, threatened to veto their legislation and accused them of trying to balloon the deficit, favoring billionaires, raising middle-class taxes and threatening benefit programs.

Take Away

In the past, debt ceiling news typically made the top headline when the negotiations are truly in the eleventh hour. The meeting on Wednesday between two politicians that have a lot to gain from a successful outcome may avert a late Spring crisis and provide calm in what is already a cloudy economic environment. An agreement would be positive for the markets – lack of agreement will likely be taken as business as usual.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

Sources

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-markets-financial-institutions-and-fiscal-service/debt-limit

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-were-going-have-discussion-about-us-debt-with-house-leader-2023-01-20/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2021/10/06/the-debt-ceiling-an-explainer/