Lucid CEO Defends $1.75 Billion Capital Raise Amid Stock Decline

Key Points:
– Lucid’s CEO calls the $1.75 billion raise a strategic decision to ensure growth and stability.
– Investors reacted negatively, resulting in an 18% stock drop, the worst since 2021.
– Lucid remains focused on long-term investments, including expanding production and launching new models.

Lucid Group’s CEO, Peter Rawlinson, defended the company’s recent decision to raise $1.75 billion through a public offering after the move triggered an 18% stock drop last week. Rawlinson explained that the capital raise was a timely, strategic decision intended to secure Lucid’s ongoing operations and growth, particularly as the company gears up to expand production and develop new electric vehicle (EV) models.

The capital raise, which included the sale of nearly 262.5 million shares of common stock, came just two months after Lucid received a $1.5 billion cash infusion from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF). Despite this, the stock market reacted harshly, with analysts questioning the timing and necessity of the move, especially given Lucid’s reported liquidity of over $5 billion at the end of the third quarter.

Rawlinson, speaking to CNBC from the company’s offices in suburban Detroit, addressed the concerns by stating that the raise was anticipated. He noted that it was necessary to avoid issuing a “going concern” disclosure, which is required by Nasdaq-listed companies within 12 months of a potential financial runway issue.

However, Wall Street analysts, including Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas, saw the capital raise as premature, noting it was “slightly larger and earlier than expected.” RBC Capital’s Tom Narayan echoed these concerns, pointing out that the raise followed closely after the PIF investment, leading some investors to question why Lucid needed additional funds at a time when its share price was depressed.

Despite the market’s negative reaction, Rawlinson remained steadfast, emphasizing that the capital raise extends Lucid’s financial stability through 2026. This financial security will allow Lucid to proceed with its long-term investment plans, which include expanding its factory in Arizona, building a new facility in Saudi Arabia, launching the new Gravity SUV, and enhancing its next-generation powertrain technology.

The stock dilution that accompanied the raise also caused concern among individual investors. However, Rawlinson noted that the continued backing of the PIF—Lucid’s largest shareholder—should be seen as a positive signal of confidence in the company’s future. PIF’s affiliate, Ayar Third Investment Co., purchased an additional 374.7 million shares of Lucid common stock as part of a pro-rata agreement to maintain its 59% ownership stake.

“If we didn’t go pro rata, it surely would be a signal that the PIF were losing faith in us,” Rawlinson emphasized.

Lucid has reported record deliveries in 2024 for its flagship all-electric sedan, the Air, and expects to produce 9,000 vehicles this year. The company also plans to begin production of the Gravity SUV by the end of 2024. However, despite these milestones, Lucid has faced challenges scaling its sales and financial performance due to high costs, slower-than-anticipated EV demand, and brand awareness issues.

Rawlinson acknowledged the capital-intensive nature of the company’s current operations but stressed that these investments are crucial for long-term growth.

Ford Shifts EV Strategy, Delays Electric SUV and Truck Launches

Ford Motor Company has pumped the brakes on its plans to rapidly electrify its vehicle lineup, announcing delays for two hotly anticipated all-electric models – a three-row SUV and a pickup truck. The automaker cited the need to allow more time for consumer demand and new battery technologies to develop further before committing to these capital-intensive vehicle programs.

The multi-row electric SUV initially targeted for production in 2025 at Ford’s Oakville, Canada plant has been pushed back to at least 2027. And the electric pickup previously slated for late 2025 is now not expected until 2026. This recalibrated roadmap represents a significant detour from Ford’s earlier aggressive EV roadmap, and has notable implications both for Ford and the overall electric vehicle market trajectory.

For Ford, the delays allow the company to be more judicious with its investments at a time when EV adoption has been slower and more costly than many projected. Ford lost $4.7 billion on its electric vehicle efforts in 2023 alone. By taking a more measured approach, Ford can hopefully time these program launches better with consumer readiness and technological advancements that could make the vehicles more compelling and profitable.

However, the setbacks also risk Ford falling behind leaders like Tesla, Hyundai/Kia, and Chinese EV makers BYD and Xiaomi in the fierce electric vehicle battle. Both Tesla and Hyundai/Kia outsold Ford’s EV lineup in the first quarter of 2024, while BYD is gearing up to launch its first electric pickup truck to challenge Ford in that key segment.

For investors, Ford’s pulled-back EV plans could be seen as a prudent way to limit the staggering losses in that part of the business for now. But it also injects more uncertainty around Ford’s long-term EV positioning and market share outlook. Competition is intensifying rapidly with new electric offerings from virtually every major automaker, including emerging players like Xiaomi looking to grab a piece of the EV pie.

Tesla maintains a clear lead, but its growth has slowed as rivals have released more compelling electric models across more vehicle segments. If companies like Hyundai, GM, Volkswagen, BYD and others can continue gaining traction, Ford could find itself scrambling if it is late to market with mainstream electric SUV and truck options that are so pivotal to its product mix.

The EV delays underscore the challenging transitions legacy automakers face in balancing investments for the electric future while still deriving most of their profits from sales of internal combustion engine vehicles today. Stock investors seem to be giving Ford the benefit of the doubt for now, with shares trading close to 52-week highs. But delivering on execution with these postponed electric models has become even more crucial for Ford to remain relevant and profitable over the long haul as new EV competitors emerge.

Detroit Rocked as Auto Workers Unite in Strike Against Big 3

The United Auto Workers union made history by simultaneously going on strike against Detroit’s Big 3 automakers – Ford, General Motors and Stellantis. For the first time, UAW is picketing factories across Michigan and Ohio in a dramatic show of force to win contract demands.

On the picket lines are 13,000 auto workers who assemble some of America’s most storied vehicles, including the Ford F-150 pickup, the Jeep Wrangler SUV and the Chevy Silverado truck. Their walkout could reverberate through the economy if dealer inventories dwindle and vehicle production stalls. But UAW contends this risky stand is necessary.

The union is insisting on higher wages after years of concessions, the restoration of pensions and cost-of-living raises to combat high inflation. But the automakers reject these proposals as unaffordable, warning they could force vehicle price increases.

This high-stakes standoff will shape the future of the legendary UAW and the Detroit automakers as they undergo a historic transition from internal combustion engines to electric vehicles. It also tests President Biden’s promise to be the most pro-labor president in history.

Rather than initiate a full-scale walkout, the union has targeted key plants to pressure automakers to raise their offers while preserving UAW’s $825 million strike fund. Top negotiators remain far apart, with the automakers offering 20% raises over 4 years versus the union’s demand of 36%.

On picket lines in Michigan and Ohio, workers want their pay and benefits restored after bailing out the automakers during tough times over the past decade. But executives counter their offers are strong given economic uncertainty.

UAW’s escalation coincides with a new, more aggressive approach under President Shawn Fain. The union aims to regain some of the concessions made during the Great Recession that preserved the automakers but cost workers.

With UAW flexing its muscles more forcefully, Motor City has become ground zero for labor’s resurgence. All eyes are on Detroit as its workers unite to reshape their contract. The outcome will echo through the auto industry and economy at large.

UAW insists the automakers can afford their proposals, arguing labor costs are minimal compared to profits and executive pay. But Ford, GM and Stellantis contend ballooning expenses will destroy their competitiveness against foreign automakers operating U.S. plants.

This dicey labor dispute encapsulates the shifting power dynamics between America’s workers and corporations. Coming out of the pandemic, unions are demanding a greater share of profits across industries.

The auto sector highlights this trend with UAW navigating a precarious situation. It must balance restoring worker pay and benefits while avoiding costs that could jeopardize the automakers’ stability.

UAW’s last major strike against GM lasted over a month in 2019, costing the company billions. With UAW now pressuring all three automakers concurrently, the economic risks are amplified.

Beyond pay, the union aims to secure jobs for members as Ford, GM and Stellantis scale EV production. This includes unionizing joint venture battery plants that represent the auto industry’s future.

UAW vows to hold the picket line for as long as it takes to win an equitable contract. With UAW doubling down on more aggressive collective bargaining, Detroit is at the epicenter of labor’s resurgence.

The outcome of the auto showdown will determine UAW’s direction. It will also impact America’s manufacturing landscape and the Biden administration’s pro-union bona fides. All eyes are on Motor City as workers stand united.