FINRA Says Only 14 Percent of Investors Think ESG Naturally Outperforms the Market


Image Credit: Scott (Flickr)


FINRA Survey Suggests Many ESG Investors May be Unaware Followers

 

Are ESG investors like airline passengers? A recent FINRA survey indicates, yes.

Perhaps you do this; when I get off the plane in a strange airport, I follow the crowd until I figure out where the baggage claim is. Sometimes, after a couple of minutes, I’ll ask someone that looks confident and was on my plane, where baggage is. I often find out they don’t know either; they have just been following others like me.

Survey of Investors About ESG

Gerri M. Walsh is the president of the FINRA Investor Education Foundation. Along with the NORC of the University of Chicago, they surveyed retail investors on their knowledge of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing. Investing in funds and securities that have been designated as ESG has been a hot trend. Growth in ETFs alone has gone from $78 billion in 2019 to $378 billion earlier this year. This is a 485% increase in just over three years.

Since the trend toward investing in the ESG category is showing rampant growth, one might expect those among the herd know where they’re headed. This survey discovered instead that about one in four people believes the acronym stands for “earnings, stock, growth,” according to this well-formulated study.

 

Global Growth ESG ETF Assets from 2006 to February 2022 ($Billion)

 

Data: Statista


Survey Results

“Retail investors don’t understand ESG investing—only 9% say that they have ESG-related investments, and the familiarity with the concept is not as high or as broad as some of the coverage on the topic of ESG investing might suggest,” says Gerri Walsh.

Of the 1,228 investors surveyed, only 24% could correctly define ESG investing, and just 21% knew what the letters in ESG stood for. Walsh says this discovery is “both surprising and concerning.”

“If people are going to be thinking about these issues, we need to make sure that investors understand what we’re talking about, especially retail investors,” says FINRA’s president of investor education. “We need to make sure that people understand the terminology that’s being used, and what’s behind ESG investing.”

 

As uncovered by the survey, respondents said environmental factors were the least important when investing. The most important consideration respondents said are financial factors, including whether an investment has the potential for high returns, the related risk, and the associated fees. Perhaps the massive inflow into ESG funds has been performance-driven much more than the criteria followed by ESG funds.

The survey did, however, find that intentional ESG investors are highly motivated by ESG factors, especially the environment. When it comes to ESG funds’ performance, the greater part of investors (41%) believes that returns for companies that prioritize their impact on the environment and society will be the same as the overall market. Only 14% expect ESG investments to outperform the market.

Recent Performance Comparison

For the year 2021, a year strong year for stocks when the broader market was up 28.7% ($IVV), sustainable index funds produced similar returns. According to Morningstar data, the 13 ESG index funds available to U.S. investors that follow broad, diversified indexes of U.S. large-cap stocks posted gains ranging from 25.6% to 31.7%. Their average return was 29.2%, or 0.50% higher than the broad non-ESG specific measure.

Take-Away

There are all styles of investing. This is part of what makes markets. One conclusion that can be drawn from a recent collaboration by investment and research organizations is that ESG investors while growing in numbers, may not be intentionally investing in stocks of environmental, social, and corporate governance-minded companies. Perhaps this means investors were just following the amplified buzz around these investments. Or, it could hint that they were chasing returns that, in some cases, were running higher than the overall market.

What is now empirically shown is that only 14% believe that ESG will naturally outperform non-categorized investments. However, investing in ESG, whether intentional or not, has not been a bad move.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

 

Suggested Reading



Issues Driving ESG Investing



What’s an ESG Score?





ESG Growing Pains Include Greenwashing



Are Small-Cap Stocks Smart Investments?

 

Sources

https://www.finra.org/about/executives/gerri-walsh

https://www.barrons.com/articles/esg-meaning-sustainable-investing-study-51649719876

https://www.morningstar.com/products/esg-investing

https://www.statista.com/topics/7463/esg-and-impact-investing/

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Morningstar Analyst Peeks Behind AARK Curtain and Calls Fund Wretched



Morningstar Analyst Cites Many Reasons to Downgrade Cathie Wood’s Flagship Fund

 

When it rains, it pours on ARK Invest. Morningstar has dropped Cathie Wood’s flagship Fund, the ARK Innovation ETF (AARK), to the lowest level on its analyst scale. The influential research firm’s analyst has a long list of reasons to be so hard on the “disruptive” tech fund. He also directs advice specifically at Cathie Wood as manager of the firm she founded.

 

Source: Morningstar

 

Morningstar Actions

In a research note released earlier this week, fund analyst Robby Greengold, CFA, downgraded ARKK to Negative from Neutral. He simultaneously dropped the fund’s People and Parent ratings to Below Average from Average. He explains in a laundry list of issues the reasons for the downgrades. Many of them describe a seat-of-the-pants, lack of benchmarking strategy, that he says is employed by the chief investment officer, Cathie Wood.

Fund Downgrade

In his write-up titled Why We’ve Downgraded ARK
Innovation
, Greenwold is critical right from his first sentence, he writes, “ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) shows few signs of improving its risk management or ability to successfully navigate the challenging territory it explores.”

He goes on to find risk in the funds diversification, AARK holds only 35 stocks (down from 60 last year). The holdings are all companies of Wood’s highest conviction ideas. Part of the issue here is that many of these companies have highly correlated stock prices, and several of them are unprofitable. 

Other criticisms explained with the fund downgrade include:

“Manager Cathie Wood has since doubled down on her perilous approach in hopes of a repeat of 2020, when highly volatile growth stocks were in favor.”

“Since its meteoric rise in 2020, the strategy’s exchange-traded fund has been one of the worst-performing U.S.-sold funds, as the aggressive-growth stocks it held fell back to earth.”

“She has saddled the portfolio with greater risk by slashing its number of stocks to 35 from 60 less than a year ago–thereby amplifying stock-specific risk.”

“Rather than gauge the portfolio’s aggregate risk exposures and simulate their effects during a variety of market conditions, the firm uses its past as a guide to the future…”

 

People and Parent Downgrade

As part of the ratings downgrade for People and Parent of the ETF, Robby Greenwold discusses the lack of depth and succession planning:

“ARK has in place a poor succession plan for the 66-year-old Wood, who is essential as the firm’s majority owner and lone portfolio manager. Director of research Brett Winton would succeed her if needed, but his 15 years of industry experience include none as a manager. Exacerbating that key-person risk is the firm’s inability to develop and retain talent: Many of its analysts have come and gone, and most of the nine remaining lack deep industry experience.”

Philosophical Differences

The Morningstar analyst seems to be at disagreement with the philosophy that investors in funds choose the sector or sub-sector and leave the investing in the hands of a fund manager they deem capable. And, if the manager is not fully invested, they are interfering with the investor’s allocation strategy. Under this philosophy, any diversification away from a sector is for the investor. Instead, Greenwold says, “Wood has suggested that risk management lies not with her but with those who invest in ARK’s funds.”  He believes that a fund manager should be the one calling the market, and not just looking for long-term winners within the confines of the prospectus. Greenwold writes, “ARK could do more to avert severe drawdowns of wealth, and its carelessness on the topic has hurt many investors of late. It could hurt more in the future.”

 

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

 

Suggested Reading



SPACs, Equity Research, and Bowling



SPAC Supply Provides Rare Opportunity





The Appeal of EVs with Bidirectional Charging



Are Small-cap Stocks Smart Investments?

 

Sources

https://www.morningstar.com/articles/1086987/why-weve-downgraded-ark-innovation

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

The SEC Wants to Extend Investor Protections to Crypto Platforms


Image Credit: Third Way Think Tank (Flickr)


Looming Cryptocurrency Regulation and SEC Thoughts

 

Gary Gensler, the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked the Commission’s staff to study how to extend investor protections to cryptocurrency platforms. The staff was also tasked with determining how to regulate platforms where securities and non-securities, like cryptocurrencies, trade together. This information was made public by the SEC chairman at the annual conference of the Penn Law Capital Markets Association at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (Monday, April 4).

Platforms that enable trading in tokens and even lending platforms, whether centralized or decentralized, are averaging volume of more than $100 billion worth of cryptocurrencies a day. The majority of transactions, a full 99% of all trading is done on only five platforms. DeFi, or decentralized finance, is similarly concentrated with the top five platforms accounting for about 80% of trading, he said.

The SEC oversees brokers that trade securities, so Gensler has asked those that report to him at the  SEC “how best to register and regulate platforms where the trading of securities and non-securities is intertwined.” He said the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, using their respective authorities, should jointly address platforms that might trade both crypto-based security tokens and some commodity tokens.

“These crypto platforms play roles similar to those of traditional regulated exchanges,” the chairman said. “Thus, investors should be protected in the same way.”

Gensler expects the same set of rules would help the crypto/securities platforms. He said if a company builds a crypto market that protects investors against fraud and manipulation and safeguards market integrity, “then customers will be more likely to trust and have greater confidence in that market.”

He offered help from the authorities, Gensler said, if a security is being offered to the public and not registering or making the requisite disclosures, he would suggest: “Come in, work with us, and get registered.”

 

The current SEC head, a former Wall Street executive and MIT crypto professor, said he wants crypto platforms to be registered and regulated to protect customers’ assets. Unlike traditional exchanges, centralized crypto trading platforms take custody of their customers’ assets, Gensler noted. And last year, a whopping $14 billion was stolen.

Gensler also asked if crypto platforms’ market-making functions should be separated. His reasoning, cryptocurrency trading platforms can also act as market makers, trading for their own accounts against customer trades. This poses conflicts of interest, the kind which are regulated against at traditional exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange. He also said tokens that are securities should be registered with the agency. “Issuers of crypto tokens that are securities must register their offers and sales of these assets with the SEC and comply with our disclosure requirements, or meet an exemption.”

Yet there is little incentive for token creators to go through the registration process. If there is no exchange to list them, registration would leave them no place to trade. The exchanges may have to change their requirements and definitions first. “Until the platforms are registered and regulated, I don’t think the tokens will significantly come in and register,” Gensler said.

It is a chicken and egg conundrum. If crypto assets have forms or disclosures with which they “truly cannot comply [with], our staff is here to discuss and evaluate those concerns,” he said. However, if a token is in structure also a security, Gensler said it must “…play by the same market integrity rulebook as other securities under our laws.“  Crypto may offer new ways for entrepreneurs to raise money to fund their projects and for investors to trade, but “when a new technology comes along, our existing laws don’t just go away,” he said.

Take-Away

Broadly, at the Penn Law Capital Markets Association, SEC Chair Gensler made a renewed call for comprehensive regulations to protect investors and allow the crypto market to grow with uniform rules. He expressed the auto industry, benefitted from speed limits, with police enforcing them, and traffic lights. “If we hadn’t done that, would we have sold as many cars? No way,” he said. “Our capital markets and our economy benefit from some basic rules of the road.”

 

Suggested Reading



Will the SEC Allow ETFs to Own Cryptocurrency?



SEC Climate Change Disclosure Rules and Challenges





SEC Investigates Digital Engagement Practices in Broker Apps



Cryptocurrencies in 2022, a View from Academics

 

Sources

https://www.investopedia.com/sec-chair-regulate-crypto-platforms-like-exchanges-5224794

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tedknutson/2022/04/04/crypto-regulatory-loopholes-could-undermine-90-years-of-securities-law-warns-sec-chairman-gensler

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

What is the PCE Price Index (In 500 Words or Less)




The Lesser-Known Inflation Indicator is Preferred By Fed Officials

 

Most people quote inflation based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index or CPI.  But the metric the Federal Reserve is said to find more valuable is the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, or PCE Price Index.

What is it that makes this measure considered more relevant to gauge inflation, and economic impact?

First, the number is composed of a very broad range of expenditures far broader than CPI. The PCE Price Index is also weighted by data reported through business surveys. Businesses account for and document transactions far better than households. CPI is consumer or household-based.

While CPI is based on a basket of goods and services that is revised infrequently, The PCE Price Index uses a formula that allows for changes in consumer behavior and changes that occur in the short term. For example, if gas prices rise and consumers drive less or switch to a lower octane fuel, this information is more useful than just noting that gas prices are up. These adjustments in consumer behavior are not made in the CPI calculation. This makes the PSE Price Index a more comprehensive metric for measuring price changes that impact the economy.

 

Advantages / Disadvantages of PCE Price Data

Personal consumption expenditures provide a glimpse of how the economy is going. When people are spending without any hesitation, it usually means that the economy is doing well. But when they cut back, it points to problems in the overall economic picture. Monitoring whether consumers are increasing spending, decreasing, or finding replacements that are less expensive is meaningful to recognizing and forecasting trends. This helps the Fed assess economic needs that may be assisted through monetary policy.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is the PCE Price Index (In 500 Words or Less)?




The Lesser-Known Inflation Indicator is Preferred By Fed Officials

 

Most people quote inflation based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index or CPI.  But the metric the Federal Reserve is said to find more valuable is the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, or PCE Price Index.

What is it that makes this measure considered more relevant to gauge inflation, and economic impact?

First, the number is composed of a very broad range of expenditures far broader than CPI. The PCE Price Index is also weighted by data reported through business surveys. Businesses account for and document transactions far better than households. CPI is consumer or household-based.

While CPI is based on a basket of goods and services that is revised infrequently, The PCE Price Index uses a formula that allows for changes in consumer behavior and changes that occur in the short term. For example, if gas prices rise and consumers drive less or switch to a lower octane fuel, this information is more useful than just noting that gas prices are up. These adjustments in consumer behavior are not made in the CPI calculation. This makes the PSE Price Index a more comprehensive metric for measuring price changes that impact the economy.

 

Advantages / Disadvantages of PCE Price Data

Personal consumption expenditures provide a glimpse of how the economy is going. When people are spending without any hesitation, it usually means that the economy is doing well. But when they cut back, it points to problems in the overall economic picture. Monitoring whether consumers are increasing spending, decreasing, or finding replacements that are less expensive is meaningful to recognizing and forecasting trends. This helps the Fed assess economic needs that may be assisted through monetary policy.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is a Stock Split




Why Stocks Split and the Possible Impact to Investors

 

Reason for a Company to Split its Stock

When stocks split, it is most often a decision by the company to lower its trading price range to a level small enough to attract more investors and enhance the liquidity of trading in its shares.

Variations of Splits

A company’s board of directors may decide to split the stock by any ratio. For example, the most common is 2:1 (the stockholder receives two shares for each one they own), but 3:1, even 5:1 is not uncommon. In a 2:1 split there will be double the amount of shares trading, the price per share will approximate half of what it was before the split.

Impact to Market Cap

Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the total number of shares outstanding by the price per share. For example, if XYZ Corp. has 10 million shares outstanding and the shares are trading at $20 Its market cap will be 200 million. If the company’s board of directors decides to split the stock 2:1 the number of shares outstanding would double to 20 million, while the share price would be roughly halved to $10.

Reasons for a Stock Split

The decision to go through the administrative expense is usually based on one or two of the following:

First, stocks traditionally traded in “round-lots” of 100 and multiples of 100. Companies often decide on a split when the stock price has reached a level where it is preventing those that the company would most likely want as owners from investing in round-lots.  

Second, the lower priced, higher number of shares outstanding can result in greater liquidity for the stock. This is because it facilitates transactions and could narrow the spread between bid and offer.

Increased liquidity helps owners large and small find buyers when they are looking to sell, and sellers when they are looking to buy. With high liquidity, a large number of shares can be traded without much impact on price levels. While this is positive for all who transact in the shares, companies that may look to repurchase their shares also don’t have as much concern about escalating the price they’re paying. Management can also exercise their ability to sell large amounts they may have acquired as part of their compensation without causing the price to plummet.

Stock Price

While a split, in theory, should have no effect on a stock’s price, it often results in renewed investor interest, which can have a positive effect. Stock splits by large heavily traded companies are often bullish for their market capitalization numbers, and positive for investors.

When You Own Shares

When a stock you own splits, shareholders of record are credited with their additional shares. For instance, in a 2:1 stock split, if you owned 100 shares that were trading at $20 just before the split, you would then own 200 shares at about $10 each. Your broker would handle this automatically, so there is nothing you need to do.

Will a Stock Split Affect My Taxes?

No. The cost basis of each share owned after the stock split will be half of what it was before the split for tax purposes.

 

Are Stock Splits Good or Bad?

Stock splits are usually done when the share price has risen so high that it might reduce trading. This means investors were driving the company valuation higher. So splits often happen in healthy growing companies. Plus, a stock that has just split may see an uptick in interest as it attracts new investors at the lower price tag per share.

 

Suggested Reading



What is Fed Tightening?



What is the Yield Curve?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

The Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator Has Been Compromised




What is an Inverting Yield Curve and Does it Mean We’re Heading for a Recession?

 

One key predictor of downturns in the economy is what is known as the yield curve. This typically refers to the market for what the US government borrows, by issuing bonds and other securities that mature over different time horizons ranging from weeks to 30 years.

Each of these securities has its own yield (or interest rate), which moves up and down in inverse proportion to the security’s market value – so when bonds are trading at high prices, their yields will be low and vice versa. You can draw a chart that plots the yields of securities at each maturity date to see how they relate to one another, and this is known as the yield curve.

In normal times, as compensation for higher risk, investors expect higher rates of interest for money they lend over a longer time horizon. To reflect this, the yield curve normally slopes up. When it instead slopes down – in other words, when it inverts – it is a sign that investors are more pessimistic about the long term than the short term: they think a downturn or a recession is coming soon.

This is because they expect the Federal Reserve, the US central bank, is going to cut short-term interest rates in the future to stimulate a struggling economy (as opposed to raising rates to cool down an economy that is overheating).

Most closely watched is the relationship between two-year and ten-year US treasury debt. The so-called spread between these two metrics can be seen in the chart below, with the gray areas indicating recessions that have followed shortly after.

 

Spread Between Two-Year and Ten-Year Treasuries


Source: St Louis Fed

 

As you can see, the yields of these two securities are getting very close to being the same, and the trend suggests that the two-year could soon have a higher yield – meaning the curve is inverting. The key question is, does an inverted yield curve hint at an upcoming downturn? Not necessarily. Let me explain why.

Inflation Expectations

One complication is that bond yields don’t only reflect what investors think about future economic growth. They also buy or sell debt securities depending on what they think is going to happen to inflation. It’s generally assumed that prices will rise in the years ahead, and investors need to be compensated for bearing that risk since higher inflation will erode their future purchasing power. For this reason, bond yields contain an element of inflation premium, normally with an increasingly higher premium for bonds with longer maturity dates.

The following chart shows the spread between the inflation expectations built into 10-year and 2-year Treasuries. The fact that it is in negative territory suggests the market thinks that inflation may fall, and this may also explain why yields on longer-dated Treasuries are lower than on shorter-dated ones. And although inflation would fall in the event of an economic slowdown or recession, there could be a situation where inflation fell but the economy remained buoyant. Hence a yield curve inversion doesn’t have to mean that we are up against an imminent recession.

 

Inflation Expectations (Ten-Year vs. Two-Year Treasuries)


Source: St Louis Fed

 

Quantitative Easing

Another factor that is potentially affecting the yield curve is the Federal Reserve’s moves to buy government debt as part of its quantitative easing program (QE). The idea behind QE is that by buying long-term bonds, the Fed is able to keep long-term interest rates low, which decreases the rates on mortgages and other loans, thereby stimulating the economy. Conversely, when sold, lending rates will go up and economic activity will be reduced.

Earlier in March, the Fed started raising the benchmark US interest rate and stopped the asset purchases under the QE program that it launched in 2020 in response to the COVID pandemic. But it also indicated that it would only start selling these assets after several months of hiking the benchmark rate. Since the benchmark rate is a short-term rate, the yield curve inverting might indicate market expectations that short-term interest rates will be higher than long-term ones for the foreseeable future.

 

Which Yield Curve Should We Consider?

It is also sometimes argued that two-year/ten-year spreads are not the most useful relationships to watch and that instead, one should focus on yields at the shorter end of the yield curve. In this setup, if you look at the difference in yields between two-year and three-month treasuries, it is actually steepening: in other words, it is hinting that economic growth is going to increase in the short term.

Economists sometimes argue that these near-term yield curve movements have stronger predictive power than those further out. At the very least, the fact that these are saying something different shows the need to be careful because different data about treasury yields can depict a different (or even opposite) picture depending on what time horizon you are considering.

 

Spread Between Two-Year and Three-Month Treasury Yields


Source: St Louis Fed

To summarise, it doesn’t necessarily follow that an inverted yield curve will be followed by a recession. It certainly could mean that, in which case unemployment would likely rise and inflation would potentially come down more quickly than many are expecting. But for now, it’s too early to say. The debt market is certainly signaling that change is coming, though it’s often easier to say in hindsight what it meant in hindsight.

 

This article was republished with permission from The Conversation, a news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It represents the research-based findings and thoughts of Luciano Rispoli Teaching Fellow in Economics, University of Surrey.

 

Suggested Reading



How Rising Rates Could Make Brokers Like Robinhood More Profitable



The Detrimental Impact of Fed Policy on Savers





Was the Inflation of 1982 Like Today’s?



What is the Yield Curve?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is a Stock Split?




Why Stocks Split and the Possible Impact to Investors

 

Reason for a Company to Split its Stock

When stocks split, it is most often a decision by the company to lower its trading price range to a level small enough to attract more investors and enhance the liquidity of trading in its shares.

Variations of Splits

A company’s board of directors may decide to split the stock by any ratio. For example, the most common is 2:1 (the stockholder receives two shares for each one they own), but 3:1, even 5:1 is not uncommon. In a 2:1 split there will be double the amount of shares trading, the price per share will approximate half of what it was before the split.

Impact to Market Cap

Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the total number of shares outstanding by the price per share. For example, if XYZ Corp. has 10 million shares outstanding and the shares are trading at $20 Its market cap will be 200 million. If the company’s board of directors decides to split the stock 2:1 the number of shares outstanding would double to 20 million, while the share price would be roughly halved to $10.

Reasons for a Stock Split

The decision to go through the administrative expense is usually based on one or two of the following:

First, stocks traditionally traded in “round-lots” of 100 and multiples of 100. Companies often decide on a split when the stock price has reached a level where it is preventing those that the company would most likely want as owners from investing in round-lots.  

Second, the lower priced, higher number of shares outstanding can result in greater liquidity for the stock. This is because it facilitates transactions and could narrow the spread between bid and offer.

Increased liquidity helps owners large and small find buyers when they are looking to sell, and sellers when they are looking to buy. With high liquidity, a large number of shares can be traded without much impact on price levels. While this is positive for all who transact in the shares, companies that may look to repurchase their shares also don’t have as much concern about escalating the price they’re paying. Management can also exercise their ability to sell large amounts they may have acquired as part of their compensation without causing the price to plummet.

Stock Price

While a split, in theory, should have no effect on a stock’s price, it often results in renewed investor interest, which can have a positive effect. Stock splits by large heavily traded companies are often bullish for their market capitalization numbers, and positive for investors.

When You Own Shares

When a stock you own splits, shareholders of record are credited with their additional shares. For instance, in a 2:1 stock split, if you owned 100 shares that were trading at $20 just before the split, you would then own 200 shares at about $10 each. Your broker would handle this automatically, so there is nothing you need to do.

Will a Stock Split Affect My Taxes?

No. The cost basis of each share owned after the stock split will be half of what it was before the split for tax purposes.

 

Are Stock Splits Good or Bad?

Stock splits are usually done when the share price has risen so high that it might reduce trading. This means investors were driving the company valuation higher. So splits often happen in healthy growing companies. Plus, a stock that has just split may see an uptick in interest as it attracts new investors at the lower price tag per share.

 

Suggested Reading



What is Fed Tightening?



What is the Yield Curve?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Regulators May Add New Guard Rails to Temper Investment Risk



Image Credit: Image Image: Eric Ward (Flickr)


Retail Investors May Soon See More Safety Measures Including Coursework and Testing

 

The decline in cost, ease of use, and low cost of money have been positive for both investors and the brokerage industry. However, over the past few years, there has also been much greater use of what the regulators have referred to as “complex” investment products. These could include leveraged ETFs, options, or even structured interest rate products. It has been a while since groups of investors have been stung by derivative-based investments or others with risk that difficult to assess. Both FINRA and the SEC are considering whether the rules on availability should be reworked for both investors and those giving investment advice.

 

FINRA Taking Action

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), is an authority working under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that writes and enforces rules that govern the activities of all registered broker-dealer firms and registered brokers in the U.S. It measures best practices, required practices, and protects the investing public against fraud and bad behavior of professionals.

FINRA recently released a regulatory notice to brokerage firms, reminding them of the risks of “complex” products and the legal obligations they have of making sure their investors are offered only suitable investment products. The notice said, “The number of accounts trading in complex products and options has increased significantly in recent years.” It went on to state that, “… important regulatory concerns arise when investors trade complex products without understanding their unique characteristics and risks.”

 


Not long ago, a live financial professional was the primary means of opening an account and learning of suitable investment products.  Image: Campus Production (Pexels)

FINRA, which is a self-regulating entity promoting and enforcing its rules, is now seeking comments on whether the current regulatory framework is adequate to protect investors. It noted that the old rules were adopted when most financial products were bought through direct contact with financial professionals, whereas today many of these products are bought and sold through self-direct trading platforms like Robinhood or other online brokers.

Defining “Complex”

FINRA describes a complex product in its regulatory notice as “a product with features that may make it difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the product and its risks (including the payout structure and how the product may perform in different market and economic conditions).” These can include “Mutual funds and ETFs that offer strategies employing cryptocurrency futures.” It also lists leveraged and inverse exchange-traded products, volatility-linked ETPs, structured products, and defined outcome ETFs, which offer exposure to the performance of a market.

“We continue to believe that the features of these products are such that they may be difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the products and their risks and, are, therefore complex,” FINRA said.

 


Access to all markets has become much easier. Image Credit: Techdaily.ca

 

Self-Directed Brokerage Platform

“These concerns may be heightened when a retail customer is accessing these products through a self-directed platform and without the assistance of a financial professional, who may be in a position to explain the key features and risks of the product to the retail investor,” FINRA expressed.

As part of the regulatory notice, FINRA opened a comment period to ask what additional requirements may be necessary to protect investors from a much faster and easier investing environment that includes new products without enough history to fully understand, particularly at the retail investor level. FINRA specifically asked as it relates to retail investors and self-directed platforms, “are additional guardrails needed for these types of platforms?”

Tests for Retail Transactions

FINRA may also be leaning toward retail investors needing to demonstrate adequate knowledge of the products they are risking money on.

The notice asks whether retail customers should be required “to demonstrate their understanding of those common characteristics and risks of complex products by completing a knowledge check and, if the customer fails to show the requisite knowledge, requiring the completion of a learning course and additional assessment?” In other words, a test, and perhaps a class.

Standard Options Trades

Most retail investors with a brokerage account never even considered the notion of trading options. That has changed.  FINRA writes that listed options trading volume has grown by 30% over 2020 and is almost 100% higher than in 2019.

“Similar to transactions in complex products, buying or selling options can be risky for retail investors who trade options without understanding their vocabulary, strategies and risks. Members should consider whether investors understand the various risks of trading options…” FINRA said.

Take-Away

Regulators, in any industry are wrestling with a rapidly changing world. The investment business has transformed rapidly with no-cost transactions, portable apps, and game-like point and execute functionality. FINRA is looking at its current safeguards and policies designed to protect the clients of those it regulates and is likely to make some adjustments after the comment period.

FINRA encourages all interested parties to comment on this request for comment. Comments must be received by May 9, 2022.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

 

Suggested Reading



SEC Investigates Digital Engagement Practices in Broker Apps



SEC Climate Change Disclosure Rules and Challenges





Why Some are More Vulnerable to Financial Scams



Bitcoin ETFs Again Experience Extreme Caution from SEC

 

Sources

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/22-08

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Precious Metals Seem to be Ignoring the Feds Message



Image credit: Michael Steinberg (Pexels)


Wake Up, Gold Market! Otherwise Inflation Will Step on You

 

The Fed’s hawkish alerts seem like a voice in the wilderness to gold investors. However, a carefree attitude can backfire on them – in just a few months.

An epic battle is unfolding across the financial markets as the Fed warns investors about its looming rate hike cycle and the latter ignores the ramifications. However, with perpetually higher asset prices only exacerbating the Fed’s inflationary conundrum, a profound shift in sentiment will likely occur over the next few months.

The Fed has turned the hawkish dial up to 100. Yet, it’s remarkable how much the precious metal’s domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Yet, prices remain elevated, investors remain sanguine, and the bullish bands continue to play.

However, with inflation still rising and the Fed done playing games, the next few months should elicit plenty of fireworks. For example, with another deputy sounding the hawkish alarm, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said on Mar. 22: “Inflation has persisted for long enough that people are starting to wonder how long it will persist. I’m already focused on making sure this doesn’t get embedded and we see those longer-term inflation expectations drift up.”

As a result, Daly wants to ensure that the “main risk” to the U.S. economy doesn’t end up causing a recession.

 

“Even though we have these uncertainties around Ukraine, and we have uncertainties around the pandemic, it’ still time to tighten policy in the United States,” Daly said at a Brookings Institute event. “marching” rates up to the neutral level and perhaps even higher to a level that would restrict the economy to ensure inflation comes down.

            Reuters

 

Likewise, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard reiterated his position on Mar. 22, telling Bloomberg that “faster is better,” and that “the 1994 tightening cycle or removal of accommodation cycle is probably the best analogy here.”

 

“The Fed needs to move aggressively to keep inflation under control.” Bullard said in an interview Tuesday on Bloomberg Television with Michael McKee. “We need to get to neutral at least so we’re not putting upward pressure on inflation during this period when we have much higher inflation than we’re used to in the U.S.”

            Bloomberg


Falling on Deaf Ears

To that point, while investors seem to think that the Fed can vastly restrict monetary policy without disrupting a healthy U.S. economy, a major surprise could be on the horizon. For example, the futures market has now priced in nearly 10 rate hikes by the Fed in 2022. As a result, should we expect the hawkish developments to unfold without a hitch?

 

 

To explain, the light blue, dark blue, and pink lines above track the number of rate hikes expected by the Fed, BoE, and ECB. If you analyze the right side of the chart, you can see that the light blue line has risen sharply over the last several days and months. For your reference, if you focus your attention on the material underperformance of the pink line, you can see why I’ve been so bearish on the EUR/USD for so long.

Also noteworthy, have a look at the U.S. 2-Year Treasury yield minus the German 2-Year Bond yield spread. If you analyze the rapid rise on the right side of the chart below, you can see how much short-term U.S. yields have outperformed their European counterparts in 2021/2022.

 


Source: Bloomberg

More importantly, though, with Fed officials’ recent rhetoric encouraging more hawkish re-pricing instead of talking down expectations (like the ECB), they want investors to slow their roll. However, investors are now fighting the Fed, and the epic battle will likely lead to profound disappointment over the medium term.

Case in point: when Fed officials dial up the hawkish rhetoric, their “messaging” is supposed to shift investors’ expectations. As such, the threat of raising interest rates is often as impactful as actually doing it. However, when investors don’t listen, the Fed has to turn the hawkish dial up even more. If history is any indication, a calamity will eventually unfold.

 

 

To explain, the blue line above tracks the U.S. federal funds rate, while the various circles and notations above track the global crises that erupted during the Fed’s rate hike cycles. As a result, standard tightening periods often result in immense volatility.

However, with investors refusing to let asset prices fall, they’re forcing the Fed to accelerate its rate hikes to achieve its desired outcome (calm inflation). As such, the next several months could be a rate hike cycle on steroids.

To that point, with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell dropping the hawkish hammer on Mar. 21, I noted his response to a question about inflation calming in the second half of 2022. I wrote on Mar. 22:

“That story has already fallen apart. To the extent it continues to fall apart, my colleagues and I may well reach the conclusion we’ll need to move more quickly and, if so, we’ll do so.”

To that point, Powell said that “there’s excess demand” and that “the economy is very strong and is well-positioned to handle tighter monetary policy.” As a result, while investors seem to think that Powell’s bluffing, enlightenment will likely materialize over the next few months.

 

“The labor market is very strong, and inflation is much too high,” Powell told a National Association for Business Economics Conference. “There is an obvious need to move expeditiously to return the stance of monetary policy to a more neutral level, and then to move to more restrictive levels if that is what is required to restore price stability.”

In particular he added, “if we conclude that it is appropriate to move more aggressively by raising the federal funds rate by more than 25 basis points at a meeting, we will do so.”

           

Reuters

Furthermore, with Goldman Sachs economists noting the shift in tone from “steadily” in January to “expeditiously” on Mar. 21, they also upped their hawkish expectations. They wrote:

“We are now forecasting 50bp hikes at both the May and June meetings (vs. 25bp at each meeting previously). The level of the funds rate would still be low at 0.75-1% after a 50bp hike in May, and if the FOMC is open to moving in larger steps, then we think it would see a second 50bp hike in June as appropriate under our forecasted inflation path.”

“After the two 50bp moves, we expect the FOMC to move back to 25bp rate hikes at the four remaining meetings in the back half of 2022, and to then further slow the pace next year by delivering three quarterly hikes in 2023Q1-Q3. We have left our forecast of the terminal rate unchanged at 3-3.25%, as shown in Exhibit 1.”

 

 

In addition, this doesn’t account for the Fed’s willingness to sell assets on its balance sheet. For context, Powell said on Mar. 16 that quantitative tightening (QT) should occur sometime in the summer and that shrinking the balance sheet “might be the equivalent of another rate increase.” As a result, investors’ lack of preparedness for what should unfold over the next few months has been something to behold. However, the reality check will likely elicit a major shift in sentiment.

 

In contrast, the bond market heard Powell’s message loud and clear, and with the U.S. 10-Year Treasury yield hitting another 2022 high of ~2.38% on Mar. 22, the entire U.S. yield curve is paying attention.

 

 Investing.com

Finally, the Richmond Fed released its Fifth District Survey of Manufacturing Activity on Mar. 22. With the headline index increasing from 1 in February to 13 in March, the report cited “increases in all three of the component indexes – shipments, volume of new orders, and number of employees.” 

Moreover, the prices received index increased month-over-month (MoM) in March (the red box below), while future six-month expectations for prices paid and received also increased (the blue box below). As a result, inflation trends are not moving in the Fed’s desired direction.

 

 Richmond Fed

Likewise, the Richmond Fed also released its Fifth District Survey of Service Sector Activity on Mar. 22, and while the headline index decreased from 13 in February to -3 in March, current and future six-month inflationary pressures/expectations rose MoM.

 

Richmond Fed

The bottom line? While the Fed is screaming at the financial markets to tone it down to help calm inflation, investors aren’t listening. With higher prices resulting in more hawkish rhetoric and policy, the Fed should keep amplifying its message until investors finally take note. If not, inflation will continue its ascent until demand destruction unfolds and the U.S. slips into a recession. As such, if investors assume that several rate hikes will commence over the next several months with little or no volatility in between, they’re likely in for a major surprise.

Summation

Precious metals declined on Mar. 22, as the sentiment seesaw continued. However, as noted, it’s remarkable how much the metals domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Thus, while the Russia-Ukraine conflict keeps them uplifted, for now, the Fed’s inflation problem is nowhere near an acceptable level. As a result, when investors finally realize that a much tougher macroeconomic environment confronts them over the next few months, the shift in sentiment will likely culminate in sharp drawdowns.

 

About the Author:  Przemyslaw
Radomski, CFA
  (PR) writes for and publishes articles that underscore his disposition of being passionately curious about markets behavior. He uses his statistical and financial background to question the common views and profit on the misconceptions.


Suggested Reading



Inflation Seems Persistent, What Now?



The Feds Fight Against Raging Inflation is a Process





What is the Yield Curve?



What is Fed Tightening?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Precious Metals Seem to be Ignoring the Fed’s Message



Image credit: Michael Steinberg (Pexels)


Wake Up, Gold Market! Otherwise Inflation Will Step on You

 

The Fed’s hawkish alerts seem like a voice in the wilderness to gold investors. However, a carefree attitude can backfire on them – in just a few months.

An epic battle is unfolding across the financial markets as the Fed warns investors about its looming rate hike cycle and the latter ignores the ramifications. However, with perpetually higher asset prices only exacerbating the Fed’s inflationary conundrum, a profound shift in sentiment will likely occur over the next few months.

The Fed has turned the hawkish dial up to 100. Yet, it’s remarkable how much the precious metal’s domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Yet, prices remain elevated, investors remain sanguine, and the bullish bands continue to play.

However, with inflation still rising and the Fed done playing games, the next few months should elicit plenty of fireworks. For example, with another deputy sounding the hawkish alarm, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said on Mar. 22: “Inflation has persisted for long enough that people are starting to wonder how long it will persist. I’m already focused on making sure this doesn’t get embedded and we see those longer-term inflation expectations drift up.”

As a result, Daly wants to ensure that the “main risk” to the U.S. economy doesn’t end up causing a recession.

 

“Even though we have these uncertainties around Ukraine, and we have uncertainties around the pandemic, it’ still time to tighten policy in the United States,” Daly said at a Brookings Institute event. “marching” rates up to the neutral level and perhaps even higher to a level that would restrict the economy to ensure inflation comes down.

            Reuters

 

Likewise, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard reiterated his position on Mar. 22, telling Bloomberg that “faster is better,” and that “the 1994 tightening cycle or removal of accommodation cycle is probably the best analogy here.”

 

“The Fed needs to move aggressively to keep inflation under control.” Bullard said in an interview Tuesday on Bloomberg Television with Michael McKee. “We need to get to neutral at least so we’re not putting upward pressure on inflation during this period when we have much higher inflation than we’re used to in the U.S.”

            Bloomberg


Falling on Deaf Ears

To that point, while investors seem to think that the Fed can vastly restrict monetary policy without disrupting a healthy U.S. economy, a major surprise could be on the horizon. For example, the futures market has now priced in nearly 10 rate hikes by the Fed in 2022. As a result, should we expect the hawkish developments to unfold without a hitch?

 

 

To explain, the light blue, dark blue, and pink lines above track the number of rate hikes expected by the Fed, BoE, and ECB. If you analyze the right side of the chart, you can see that the light blue line has risen sharply over the last several days and months. For your reference, if you focus your attention on the material underperformance of the pink line, you can see why I’ve been so bearish on the EUR/USD for so long.

Also noteworthy, have a look at the U.S. 2-Year Treasury yield minus the German 2-Year Bond yield spread. If you analyze the rapid rise on the right side of the chart below, you can see how much short-term U.S. yields have outperformed their European counterparts in 2021/2022.

 


Source: Bloomberg

More importantly, though, with Fed officials’ recent rhetoric encouraging more hawkish re-pricing instead of talking down expectations (like the ECB), they want investors to slow their roll. However, investors are now fighting the Fed, and the epic battle will likely lead to profound disappointment over the medium term.

Case in point: when Fed officials dial up the hawkish rhetoric, their “messaging” is supposed to shift investors’ expectations. As such, the threat of raising interest rates is often as impactful as actually doing it. However, when investors don’t listen, the Fed has to turn the hawkish dial up even more. If history is any indication, a calamity will eventually unfold.

 

 

To explain, the blue line above tracks the U.S. federal funds rate, while the various circles and notations above track the global crises that erupted during the Fed’s rate hike cycles. As a result, standard tightening periods often result in immense volatility.

However, with investors refusing to let asset prices fall, they’re forcing the Fed to accelerate its rate hikes to achieve its desired outcome (calm inflation). As such, the next several months could be a rate hike cycle on steroids.

To that point, with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell dropping the hawkish hammer on Mar. 21, I noted his response to a question about inflation calming in the second half of 2022. I wrote on Mar. 22:

“That story has already fallen apart. To the extent it continues to fall apart, my colleagues and I may well reach the conclusion we’ll need to move more quickly and, if so, we’ll do so.”

To that point, Powell said that “there’s excess demand” and that “the economy is very strong and is well-positioned to handle tighter monetary policy.” As a result, while investors seem to think that Powell’s bluffing, enlightenment will likely materialize over the next few months.

 

“The labor market is very strong, and inflation is much too high,” Powell told a National Association for Business Economics Conference. “There is an obvious need to move expeditiously to return the stance of monetary policy to a more neutral level, and then to move to more restrictive levels if that is what is required to restore price stability.”

In particular he added, “if we conclude that it is appropriate to move more aggressively by raising the federal funds rate by more than 25 basis points at a meeting, we will do so.”

           

Reuters

Furthermore, with Goldman Sachs economists noting the shift in tone from “steadily” in January to “expeditiously” on Mar. 21, they also upped their hawkish expectations. They wrote:

“We are now forecasting 50bp hikes at both the May and June meetings (vs. 25bp at each meeting previously). The level of the funds rate would still be low at 0.75-1% after a 50bp hike in May, and if the FOMC is open to moving in larger steps, then we think it would see a second 50bp hike in June as appropriate under our forecasted inflation path.”

“After the two 50bp moves, we expect the FOMC to move back to 25bp rate hikes at the four remaining meetings in the back half of 2022, and to then further slow the pace next year by delivering three quarterly hikes in 2023Q1-Q3. We have left our forecast of the terminal rate unchanged at 3-3.25%, as shown in Exhibit 1.”

 

 

In addition, this doesn’t account for the Fed’s willingness to sell assets on its balance sheet. For context, Powell said on Mar. 16 that quantitative tightening (QT) should occur sometime in the summer and that shrinking the balance sheet “might be the equivalent of another rate increase.” As a result, investors’ lack of preparedness for what should unfold over the next few months has been something to behold. However, the reality check will likely elicit a major shift in sentiment.

 

In contrast, the bond market heard Powell’s message loud and clear, and with the U.S. 10-Year Treasury yield hitting another 2022 high of ~2.38% on Mar. 22, the entire U.S. yield curve is paying attention.

 

 Investing.com

Finally, the Richmond Fed released its Fifth District Survey of Manufacturing Activity on Mar. 22. With the headline index increasing from 1 in February to 13 in March, the report cited “increases in all three of the component indexes – shipments, volume of new orders, and number of employees.” 

Moreover, the prices received index increased month-over-month (MoM) in March (the red box below), while future six-month expectations for prices paid and received also increased (the blue box below). As a result, inflation trends are not moving in the Fed’s desired direction.

 

 Richmond Fed

Likewise, the Richmond Fed also released its Fifth District Survey of Service Sector Activity on Mar. 22, and while the headline index decreased from 13 in February to -3 in March, current and future six-month inflationary pressures/expectations rose MoM.

 

Richmond Fed

The bottom line? While the Fed is screaming at the financial markets to tone it down to help calm inflation, investors aren’t listening. With higher prices resulting in more hawkish rhetoric and policy, the Fed should keep amplifying its message until investors finally take note. If not, inflation will continue its ascent until demand destruction unfolds and the U.S. slips into a recession. As such, if investors assume that several rate hikes will commence over the next several months with little or no volatility in between, they’re likely in for a major surprise.

Summation

Precious metals declined on Mar. 22, as the sentiment seesaw continued. However, as noted, it’s remarkable how much the metals domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Thus, while the Russia-Ukraine conflict keeps them uplifted, for now, the Fed’s inflation problem is nowhere near an acceptable level. As a result, when investors finally realize that a much tougher macroeconomic environment confronts them over the next few months, the shift in sentiment will likely culminate in sharp drawdowns.

 

About the Author:  Przemyslaw
Radomski, CFA
  (PR) writes for and publishes articles that underscore his disposition of being passionately curious about markets behavior. He uses his statistical and financial background to question the common views and profit on the misconceptions.


Suggested Reading



Inflation Seems Persistent, What Now?



The Feds Fight Against Raging Inflation is a Process





What is the Yield Curve?



What is Fed Tightening?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is the Yield Curve




Why Investors Monitor the Yield Curve and Yield Curve Changes

 

The difference between interest rates being paid for all available maturities of the same credit quality bonds and notes forms the yield curve. When these points are plotted on a line graph, the shape of the line is the “curve.” The US Treasury Yield curve is by far the most discussed. However, there are yield curves for corporate bonds, mortgage securities, municipal bonds, and other interest rate products. But these are often quoted as an interest rate spread to the US Treasury yield curve.

 

Data: US
Department of Treasury

 

The shape of a yield curve—where the Y-axis is interest rates, and the X-axis shows increasing time to maturity— can take on different shapes. The most common are upward sloping or “normal yield curve,”
downward sloping,
or “inverted yield curve,” and flat.

The significance of these shapes has historically been used by
stock
market
investors as a gauge of future expectations of economic activity and inflation. A normal yield curve indicates expectations of a growing economy, and the risk of rates being pushed up over time. A downward-sloping yield curve indicates expectations of a contracting economy or one where interest rates may need to be lowered in the future. A flat yield curve typically indicates expectations of a stagnant economy. This is also viewed as negative for stocks because equity investors like to see economic growth.

Shifts in Curve

Changes in rates from one period to the next will cause changes in the shape or steepness of the curve. The graph above shows the shift in yields from March 1, 2022 to March 23, 2022 – the Fed
tightened
overnight rates by 25 bp on March 16, then on March 21, indicated a need to further increase rates. This caused a steepening.

Shifts in the curve indicate whether bond investor sentiment for higher rates is increasing or decreasing. Historically this has been based on an accelerating or decelerating economy and a changed inflation forecast. Bond market investors want to be compensated for inflation. In recent years the US Federal Reserve has taken steps that include buying bonds to adjust longer rates or add liquidity to the market. This impacts the usefulness of the curve, so investors ought to take these actions into account. There is now increased importance of Fed
announcements
surrounding these purchase activities (sometimes referred to as yield-curve-control, quantitative easing, or QE). A reduction in Fed purchases (
tapering) will tend to push longer-term rates up as the Fed has been a significant buyer of the maturity range they targeted with QE. 

 

You May Also Be Interested In:



What is Fed Tightening



Merger of a SPAC

 

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is the Yield Curve?




Why Investors Monitor the Yield Curve and Yield Curve Changes

 

The difference between interest rates being paid for all available maturities of the same credit quality bonds and notes forms the yield curve. When these points are plotted on a line graph, the shape of the line is the “curve.” The US Treasury Yield curve is by far the most discussed. However, there are yield curves for corporate bonds, mortgage securities, municipal bonds, and other interest rate products. But these are often quoted as an interest rate spread to the US Treasury yield curve.

 

Data: US
Department of Treasury

 

The shape of a yield curve—where the Y-axis is interest rates, and the X-axis shows increasing time to maturity— can take on different shapes. The most common are upward sloping or “normal yield curve,”
downward sloping,
or “inverted yield curve,” and flat.

The significance of these shapes has historically been used by
stock
market
investors as a gauge of future expectations of economic activity and inflation. A normal yield curve indicates expectations of a growing economy, and the risk of rates being pushed up over time. A downward-sloping yield curve indicates expectations of a contracting economy or one where interest rates may need to be lowered in the future. A flat yield curve typically indicates expectations of a stagnant economy. This is also viewed as negative for stocks because equity investors like to see economic growth.

Shifts in Curve

Changes in rates from one period to the next will cause changes in the shape or steepness of the curve. The graph above shows the shift in yields from March 1, 2022 to March 23, 2022 – the Fed
tightened
overnight rates by 25 bp on March 16, then on March 21, indicated a need to further increase rates. This caused a steepening.

Shifts in the curve indicate whether bond investor sentiment for higher rates is increasing or decreasing. Historically this has been based on an accelerating or decelerating economy and a changed inflation forecast. Bond market investors want to be compensated for inflation. In recent years the US Federal Reserve has taken steps that include buying bonds to adjust longer rates or add liquidity to the market. This impacts the usefulness of the curve, so investors ought to take these actions into account. There is now increased importance of Fed
announcements
surrounding these purchase activities (sometimes referred to as yield-curve-control, quantitative easing, or QE). A reduction in Fed purchases (
tapering) will tend to push longer-term rates up as the Fed has been a significant buyer of the maturity range they targeted with QE. 

 

You May Also Be Interested In:



What is Fed Tightening



Merger of a SPAC

 

 

Stay up to date. Follow us: