What is a Stock Split?




Why Stocks Split and the Possible Impact to Investors

 

Reason for a Company to Split its Stock

When stocks split, it is most often a decision by the company to lower its trading price range to a level small enough to attract more investors and enhance the liquidity of trading in its shares.

Variations of Splits

A company’s board of directors may decide to split the stock by any ratio. For example, the most common is 2:1 (the stockholder receives two shares for each one they own), but 3:1, even 5:1 is not uncommon. In a 2:1 split there will be double the amount of shares trading, the price per share will approximate half of what it was before the split.

Impact to Market Cap

Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the total number of shares outstanding by the price per share. For example, if XYZ Corp. has 10 million shares outstanding and the shares are trading at $20 Its market cap will be 200 million. If the company’s board of directors decides to split the stock 2:1 the number of shares outstanding would double to 20 million, while the share price would be roughly halved to $10.

Reasons for a Stock Split

The decision to go through the administrative expense is usually based on one or two of the following:

First, stocks traditionally traded in “round-lots” of 100 and multiples of 100. Companies often decide on a split when the stock price has reached a level where it is preventing those that the company would most likely want as owners from investing in round-lots.  

Second, the lower priced, higher number of shares outstanding can result in greater liquidity for the stock. This is because it facilitates transactions and could narrow the spread between bid and offer.

Increased liquidity helps owners large and small find buyers when they are looking to sell, and sellers when they are looking to buy. With high liquidity, a large number of shares can be traded without much impact on price levels. While this is positive for all who transact in the shares, companies that may look to repurchase their shares also don’t have as much concern about escalating the price they’re paying. Management can also exercise their ability to sell large amounts they may have acquired as part of their compensation without causing the price to plummet.

Stock Price

While a split, in theory, should have no effect on a stock’s price, it often results in renewed investor interest, which can have a positive effect. Stock splits by large heavily traded companies are often bullish for their market capitalization numbers, and positive for investors.

When You Own Shares

When a stock you own splits, shareholders of record are credited with their additional shares. For instance, in a 2:1 stock split, if you owned 100 shares that were trading at $20 just before the split, you would then own 200 shares at about $10 each. Your broker would handle this automatically, so there is nothing you need to do.

Will a Stock Split Affect My Taxes?

No. The cost basis of each share owned after the stock split will be half of what it was before the split for tax purposes.

 

Are Stock Splits Good or Bad?

Stock splits are usually done when the share price has risen so high that it might reduce trading. This means investors were driving the company valuation higher. So splits often happen in healthy growing companies. Plus, a stock that has just split may see an uptick in interest as it attracts new investors at the lower price tag per share.

 

Suggested Reading



What is Fed Tightening?



What is the Yield Curve?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Regulators May Add New Guard Rails to Temper Investment Risk



Image Credit: Image Image: Eric Ward (Flickr)


Retail Investors May Soon See More Safety Measures Including Coursework and Testing

 

The decline in cost, ease of use, and low cost of money have been positive for both investors and the brokerage industry. However, over the past few years, there has also been much greater use of what the regulators have referred to as “complex” investment products. These could include leveraged ETFs, options, or even structured interest rate products. It has been a while since groups of investors have been stung by derivative-based investments or others with risk that difficult to assess. Both FINRA and the SEC are considering whether the rules on availability should be reworked for both investors and those giving investment advice.

 

FINRA Taking Action

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), is an authority working under the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that writes and enforces rules that govern the activities of all registered broker-dealer firms and registered brokers in the U.S. It measures best practices, required practices, and protects the investing public against fraud and bad behavior of professionals.

FINRA recently released a regulatory notice to brokerage firms, reminding them of the risks of “complex” products and the legal obligations they have of making sure their investors are offered only suitable investment products. The notice said, “The number of accounts trading in complex products and options has increased significantly in recent years.” It went on to state that, “… important regulatory concerns arise when investors trade complex products without understanding their unique characteristics and risks.”

 


Not long ago, a live financial professional was the primary means of opening an account and learning of suitable investment products.  Image: Campus Production (Pexels)

FINRA, which is a self-regulating entity promoting and enforcing its rules, is now seeking comments on whether the current regulatory framework is adequate to protect investors. It noted that the old rules were adopted when most financial products were bought through direct contact with financial professionals, whereas today many of these products are bought and sold through self-direct trading platforms like Robinhood or other online brokers.

Defining “Complex”

FINRA describes a complex product in its regulatory notice as “a product with features that may make it difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the product and its risks (including the payout structure and how the product may perform in different market and economic conditions).” These can include “Mutual funds and ETFs that offer strategies employing cryptocurrency futures.” It also lists leveraged and inverse exchange-traded products, volatility-linked ETPs, structured products, and defined outcome ETFs, which offer exposure to the performance of a market.

“We continue to believe that the features of these products are such that they may be difficult for a retail investor to understand the essential characteristics of the products and their risks and, are, therefore complex,” FINRA said.

 


Access to all markets has become much easier. Image Credit: Techdaily.ca

 

Self-Directed Brokerage Platform

“These concerns may be heightened when a retail customer is accessing these products through a self-directed platform and without the assistance of a financial professional, who may be in a position to explain the key features and risks of the product to the retail investor,” FINRA expressed.

As part of the regulatory notice, FINRA opened a comment period to ask what additional requirements may be necessary to protect investors from a much faster and easier investing environment that includes new products without enough history to fully understand, particularly at the retail investor level. FINRA specifically asked as it relates to retail investors and self-directed platforms, “are additional guardrails needed for these types of platforms?”

Tests for Retail Transactions

FINRA may also be leaning toward retail investors needing to demonstrate adequate knowledge of the products they are risking money on.

The notice asks whether retail customers should be required “to demonstrate their understanding of those common characteristics and risks of complex products by completing a knowledge check and, if the customer fails to show the requisite knowledge, requiring the completion of a learning course and additional assessment?” In other words, a test, and perhaps a class.

Standard Options Trades

Most retail investors with a brokerage account never even considered the notion of trading options. That has changed.  FINRA writes that listed options trading volume has grown by 30% over 2020 and is almost 100% higher than in 2019.

“Similar to transactions in complex products, buying or selling options can be risky for retail investors who trade options without understanding their vocabulary, strategies and risks. Members should consider whether investors understand the various risks of trading options…” FINRA said.

Take-Away

Regulators, in any industry are wrestling with a rapidly changing world. The investment business has transformed rapidly with no-cost transactions, portable apps, and game-like point and execute functionality. FINRA is looking at its current safeguards and policies designed to protect the clients of those it regulates and is likely to make some adjustments after the comment period.

FINRA encourages all interested parties to comment on this request for comment. Comments must be received by May 9, 2022.

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

 

Suggested Reading



SEC Investigates Digital Engagement Practices in Broker Apps



SEC Climate Change Disclosure Rules and Challenges





Why Some are More Vulnerable to Financial Scams



Bitcoin ETFs Again Experience Extreme Caution from SEC

 

Sources

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/22-08

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Precious Metals Seem to be Ignoring the Feds Message



Image credit: Michael Steinberg (Pexels)


Wake Up, Gold Market! Otherwise Inflation Will Step on You

 

The Fed’s hawkish alerts seem like a voice in the wilderness to gold investors. However, a carefree attitude can backfire on them – in just a few months.

An epic battle is unfolding across the financial markets as the Fed warns investors about its looming rate hike cycle and the latter ignores the ramifications. However, with perpetually higher asset prices only exacerbating the Fed’s inflationary conundrum, a profound shift in sentiment will likely occur over the next few months.

The Fed has turned the hawkish dial up to 100. Yet, it’s remarkable how much the precious metal’s domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Yet, prices remain elevated, investors remain sanguine, and the bullish bands continue to play.

However, with inflation still rising and the Fed done playing games, the next few months should elicit plenty of fireworks. For example, with another deputy sounding the hawkish alarm, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said on Mar. 22: “Inflation has persisted for long enough that people are starting to wonder how long it will persist. I’m already focused on making sure this doesn’t get embedded and we see those longer-term inflation expectations drift up.”

As a result, Daly wants to ensure that the “main risk” to the U.S. economy doesn’t end up causing a recession.

 

“Even though we have these uncertainties around Ukraine, and we have uncertainties around the pandemic, it’ still time to tighten policy in the United States,” Daly said at a Brookings Institute event. “marching” rates up to the neutral level and perhaps even higher to a level that would restrict the economy to ensure inflation comes down.

            Reuters

 

Likewise, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard reiterated his position on Mar. 22, telling Bloomberg that “faster is better,” and that “the 1994 tightening cycle or removal of accommodation cycle is probably the best analogy here.”

 

“The Fed needs to move aggressively to keep inflation under control.” Bullard said in an interview Tuesday on Bloomberg Television with Michael McKee. “We need to get to neutral at least so we’re not putting upward pressure on inflation during this period when we have much higher inflation than we’re used to in the U.S.”

            Bloomberg


Falling on Deaf Ears

To that point, while investors seem to think that the Fed can vastly restrict monetary policy without disrupting a healthy U.S. economy, a major surprise could be on the horizon. For example, the futures market has now priced in nearly 10 rate hikes by the Fed in 2022. As a result, should we expect the hawkish developments to unfold without a hitch?

 

 

To explain, the light blue, dark blue, and pink lines above track the number of rate hikes expected by the Fed, BoE, and ECB. If you analyze the right side of the chart, you can see that the light blue line has risen sharply over the last several days and months. For your reference, if you focus your attention on the material underperformance of the pink line, you can see why I’ve been so bearish on the EUR/USD for so long.

Also noteworthy, have a look at the U.S. 2-Year Treasury yield minus the German 2-Year Bond yield spread. If you analyze the rapid rise on the right side of the chart below, you can see how much short-term U.S. yields have outperformed their European counterparts in 2021/2022.

 


Source: Bloomberg

More importantly, though, with Fed officials’ recent rhetoric encouraging more hawkish re-pricing instead of talking down expectations (like the ECB), they want investors to slow their roll. However, investors are now fighting the Fed, and the epic battle will likely lead to profound disappointment over the medium term.

Case in point: when Fed officials dial up the hawkish rhetoric, their “messaging” is supposed to shift investors’ expectations. As such, the threat of raising interest rates is often as impactful as actually doing it. However, when investors don’t listen, the Fed has to turn the hawkish dial up even more. If history is any indication, a calamity will eventually unfold.

 

 

To explain, the blue line above tracks the U.S. federal funds rate, while the various circles and notations above track the global crises that erupted during the Fed’s rate hike cycles. As a result, standard tightening periods often result in immense volatility.

However, with investors refusing to let asset prices fall, they’re forcing the Fed to accelerate its rate hikes to achieve its desired outcome (calm inflation). As such, the next several months could be a rate hike cycle on steroids.

To that point, with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell dropping the hawkish hammer on Mar. 21, I noted his response to a question about inflation calming in the second half of 2022. I wrote on Mar. 22:

“That story has already fallen apart. To the extent it continues to fall apart, my colleagues and I may well reach the conclusion we’ll need to move more quickly and, if so, we’ll do so.”

To that point, Powell said that “there’s excess demand” and that “the economy is very strong and is well-positioned to handle tighter monetary policy.” As a result, while investors seem to think that Powell’s bluffing, enlightenment will likely materialize over the next few months.

 

“The labor market is very strong, and inflation is much too high,” Powell told a National Association for Business Economics Conference. “There is an obvious need to move expeditiously to return the stance of monetary policy to a more neutral level, and then to move to more restrictive levels if that is what is required to restore price stability.”

In particular he added, “if we conclude that it is appropriate to move more aggressively by raising the federal funds rate by more than 25 basis points at a meeting, we will do so.”

           

Reuters

Furthermore, with Goldman Sachs economists noting the shift in tone from “steadily” in January to “expeditiously” on Mar. 21, they also upped their hawkish expectations. They wrote:

“We are now forecasting 50bp hikes at both the May and June meetings (vs. 25bp at each meeting previously). The level of the funds rate would still be low at 0.75-1% after a 50bp hike in May, and if the FOMC is open to moving in larger steps, then we think it would see a second 50bp hike in June as appropriate under our forecasted inflation path.”

“After the two 50bp moves, we expect the FOMC to move back to 25bp rate hikes at the four remaining meetings in the back half of 2022, and to then further slow the pace next year by delivering three quarterly hikes in 2023Q1-Q3. We have left our forecast of the terminal rate unchanged at 3-3.25%, as shown in Exhibit 1.”

 

 

In addition, this doesn’t account for the Fed’s willingness to sell assets on its balance sheet. For context, Powell said on Mar. 16 that quantitative tightening (QT) should occur sometime in the summer and that shrinking the balance sheet “might be the equivalent of another rate increase.” As a result, investors’ lack of preparedness for what should unfold over the next few months has been something to behold. However, the reality check will likely elicit a major shift in sentiment.

 

In contrast, the bond market heard Powell’s message loud and clear, and with the U.S. 10-Year Treasury yield hitting another 2022 high of ~2.38% on Mar. 22, the entire U.S. yield curve is paying attention.

 

 Investing.com

Finally, the Richmond Fed released its Fifth District Survey of Manufacturing Activity on Mar. 22. With the headline index increasing from 1 in February to 13 in March, the report cited “increases in all three of the component indexes – shipments, volume of new orders, and number of employees.” 

Moreover, the prices received index increased month-over-month (MoM) in March (the red box below), while future six-month expectations for prices paid and received also increased (the blue box below). As a result, inflation trends are not moving in the Fed’s desired direction.

 

 Richmond Fed

Likewise, the Richmond Fed also released its Fifth District Survey of Service Sector Activity on Mar. 22, and while the headline index decreased from 13 in February to -3 in March, current and future six-month inflationary pressures/expectations rose MoM.

 

Richmond Fed

The bottom line? While the Fed is screaming at the financial markets to tone it down to help calm inflation, investors aren’t listening. With higher prices resulting in more hawkish rhetoric and policy, the Fed should keep amplifying its message until investors finally take note. If not, inflation will continue its ascent until demand destruction unfolds and the U.S. slips into a recession. As such, if investors assume that several rate hikes will commence over the next several months with little or no volatility in between, they’re likely in for a major surprise.

Summation

Precious metals declined on Mar. 22, as the sentiment seesaw continued. However, as noted, it’s remarkable how much the metals domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Thus, while the Russia-Ukraine conflict keeps them uplifted, for now, the Fed’s inflation problem is nowhere near an acceptable level. As a result, when investors finally realize that a much tougher macroeconomic environment confronts them over the next few months, the shift in sentiment will likely culminate in sharp drawdowns.

 

About the Author:  Przemyslaw
Radomski, CFA
  (PR) writes for and publishes articles that underscore his disposition of being passionately curious about markets behavior. He uses his statistical and financial background to question the common views and profit on the misconceptions.


Suggested Reading



Inflation Seems Persistent, What Now?



The Feds Fight Against Raging Inflation is a Process





What is the Yield Curve?



What is Fed Tightening?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Precious Metals Seem to be Ignoring the Fed’s Message



Image credit: Michael Steinberg (Pexels)


Wake Up, Gold Market! Otherwise Inflation Will Step on You

 

The Fed’s hawkish alerts seem like a voice in the wilderness to gold investors. However, a carefree attitude can backfire on them – in just a few months.

An epic battle is unfolding across the financial markets as the Fed warns investors about its looming rate hike cycle and the latter ignores the ramifications. However, with perpetually higher asset prices only exacerbating the Fed’s inflationary conundrum, a profound shift in sentiment will likely occur over the next few months.

The Fed has turned the hawkish dial up to 100. Yet, it’s remarkable how much the precious metal’s domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Yet, prices remain elevated, investors remain sanguine, and the bullish bands continue to play.

However, with inflation still rising and the Fed done playing games, the next few months should elicit plenty of fireworks. For example, with another deputy sounding the hawkish alarm, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said on Mar. 22: “Inflation has persisted for long enough that people are starting to wonder how long it will persist. I’m already focused on making sure this doesn’t get embedded and we see those longer-term inflation expectations drift up.”

As a result, Daly wants to ensure that the “main risk” to the U.S. economy doesn’t end up causing a recession.

 

“Even though we have these uncertainties around Ukraine, and we have uncertainties around the pandemic, it’ still time to tighten policy in the United States,” Daly said at a Brookings Institute event. “marching” rates up to the neutral level and perhaps even higher to a level that would restrict the economy to ensure inflation comes down.

            Reuters

 

Likewise, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard reiterated his position on Mar. 22, telling Bloomberg that “faster is better,” and that “the 1994 tightening cycle or removal of accommodation cycle is probably the best analogy here.”

 

“The Fed needs to move aggressively to keep inflation under control.” Bullard said in an interview Tuesday on Bloomberg Television with Michael McKee. “We need to get to neutral at least so we’re not putting upward pressure on inflation during this period when we have much higher inflation than we’re used to in the U.S.”

            Bloomberg


Falling on Deaf Ears

To that point, while investors seem to think that the Fed can vastly restrict monetary policy without disrupting a healthy U.S. economy, a major surprise could be on the horizon. For example, the futures market has now priced in nearly 10 rate hikes by the Fed in 2022. As a result, should we expect the hawkish developments to unfold without a hitch?

 

 

To explain, the light blue, dark blue, and pink lines above track the number of rate hikes expected by the Fed, BoE, and ECB. If you analyze the right side of the chart, you can see that the light blue line has risen sharply over the last several days and months. For your reference, if you focus your attention on the material underperformance of the pink line, you can see why I’ve been so bearish on the EUR/USD for so long.

Also noteworthy, have a look at the U.S. 2-Year Treasury yield minus the German 2-Year Bond yield spread. If you analyze the rapid rise on the right side of the chart below, you can see how much short-term U.S. yields have outperformed their European counterparts in 2021/2022.

 


Source: Bloomberg

More importantly, though, with Fed officials’ recent rhetoric encouraging more hawkish re-pricing instead of talking down expectations (like the ECB), they want investors to slow their roll. However, investors are now fighting the Fed, and the epic battle will likely lead to profound disappointment over the medium term.

Case in point: when Fed officials dial up the hawkish rhetoric, their “messaging” is supposed to shift investors’ expectations. As such, the threat of raising interest rates is often as impactful as actually doing it. However, when investors don’t listen, the Fed has to turn the hawkish dial up even more. If history is any indication, a calamity will eventually unfold.

 

 

To explain, the blue line above tracks the U.S. federal funds rate, while the various circles and notations above track the global crises that erupted during the Fed’s rate hike cycles. As a result, standard tightening periods often result in immense volatility.

However, with investors refusing to let asset prices fall, they’re forcing the Fed to accelerate its rate hikes to achieve its desired outcome (calm inflation). As such, the next several months could be a rate hike cycle on steroids.

To that point, with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell dropping the hawkish hammer on Mar. 21, I noted his response to a question about inflation calming in the second half of 2022. I wrote on Mar. 22:

“That story has already fallen apart. To the extent it continues to fall apart, my colleagues and I may well reach the conclusion we’ll need to move more quickly and, if so, we’ll do so.”

To that point, Powell said that “there’s excess demand” and that “the economy is very strong and is well-positioned to handle tighter monetary policy.” As a result, while investors seem to think that Powell’s bluffing, enlightenment will likely materialize over the next few months.

 

“The labor market is very strong, and inflation is much too high,” Powell told a National Association for Business Economics Conference. “There is an obvious need to move expeditiously to return the stance of monetary policy to a more neutral level, and then to move to more restrictive levels if that is what is required to restore price stability.”

In particular he added, “if we conclude that it is appropriate to move more aggressively by raising the federal funds rate by more than 25 basis points at a meeting, we will do so.”

           

Reuters

Furthermore, with Goldman Sachs economists noting the shift in tone from “steadily” in January to “expeditiously” on Mar. 21, they also upped their hawkish expectations. They wrote:

“We are now forecasting 50bp hikes at both the May and June meetings (vs. 25bp at each meeting previously). The level of the funds rate would still be low at 0.75-1% after a 50bp hike in May, and if the FOMC is open to moving in larger steps, then we think it would see a second 50bp hike in June as appropriate under our forecasted inflation path.”

“After the two 50bp moves, we expect the FOMC to move back to 25bp rate hikes at the four remaining meetings in the back half of 2022, and to then further slow the pace next year by delivering three quarterly hikes in 2023Q1-Q3. We have left our forecast of the terminal rate unchanged at 3-3.25%, as shown in Exhibit 1.”

 

 

In addition, this doesn’t account for the Fed’s willingness to sell assets on its balance sheet. For context, Powell said on Mar. 16 that quantitative tightening (QT) should occur sometime in the summer and that shrinking the balance sheet “might be the equivalent of another rate increase.” As a result, investors’ lack of preparedness for what should unfold over the next few months has been something to behold. However, the reality check will likely elicit a major shift in sentiment.

 

In contrast, the bond market heard Powell’s message loud and clear, and with the U.S. 10-Year Treasury yield hitting another 2022 high of ~2.38% on Mar. 22, the entire U.S. yield curve is paying attention.

 

 Investing.com

Finally, the Richmond Fed released its Fifth District Survey of Manufacturing Activity on Mar. 22. With the headline index increasing from 1 in February to 13 in March, the report cited “increases in all three of the component indexes – shipments, volume of new orders, and number of employees.” 

Moreover, the prices received index increased month-over-month (MoM) in March (the red box below), while future six-month expectations for prices paid and received also increased (the blue box below). As a result, inflation trends are not moving in the Fed’s desired direction.

 

 Richmond Fed

Likewise, the Richmond Fed also released its Fifth District Survey of Service Sector Activity on Mar. 22, and while the headline index decreased from 13 in February to -3 in March, current and future six-month inflationary pressures/expectations rose MoM.

 

Richmond Fed

The bottom line? While the Fed is screaming at the financial markets to tone it down to help calm inflation, investors aren’t listening. With higher prices resulting in more hawkish rhetoric and policy, the Fed should keep amplifying its message until investors finally take note. If not, inflation will continue its ascent until demand destruction unfolds and the U.S. slips into a recession. As such, if investors assume that several rate hikes will commence over the next several months with little or no volatility in between, they’re likely in for a major surprise.

Summation

Precious metals declined on Mar. 22, as the sentiment seesaw continued. However, as noted, it’s remarkable how much the metals domestic fundamental outlooks have deteriorated in recent weeks. Thus, while the Russia-Ukraine conflict keeps them uplifted, for now, the Fed’s inflation problem is nowhere near an acceptable level. As a result, when investors finally realize that a much tougher macroeconomic environment confronts them over the next few months, the shift in sentiment will likely culminate in sharp drawdowns.

 

About the Author:  Przemyslaw
Radomski, CFA
  (PR) writes for and publishes articles that underscore his disposition of being passionately curious about markets behavior. He uses his statistical and financial background to question the common views and profit on the misconceptions.


Suggested Reading



Inflation Seems Persistent, What Now?



The Feds Fight Against Raging Inflation is a Process





What is the Yield Curve?



What is Fed Tightening?

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is the Yield Curve




Why Investors Monitor the Yield Curve and Yield Curve Changes

 

The difference between interest rates being paid for all available maturities of the same credit quality bonds and notes forms the yield curve. When these points are plotted on a line graph, the shape of the line is the “curve.” The US Treasury Yield curve is by far the most discussed. However, there are yield curves for corporate bonds, mortgage securities, municipal bonds, and other interest rate products. But these are often quoted as an interest rate spread to the US Treasury yield curve.

 

Data: US
Department of Treasury

 

The shape of a yield curve—where the Y-axis is interest rates, and the X-axis shows increasing time to maturity— can take on different shapes. The most common are upward sloping or “normal yield curve,”
downward sloping,
or “inverted yield curve,” and flat.

The significance of these shapes has historically been used by
stock
market
investors as a gauge of future expectations of economic activity and inflation. A normal yield curve indicates expectations of a growing economy, and the risk of rates being pushed up over time. A downward-sloping yield curve indicates expectations of a contracting economy or one where interest rates may need to be lowered in the future. A flat yield curve typically indicates expectations of a stagnant economy. This is also viewed as negative for stocks because equity investors like to see economic growth.

Shifts in Curve

Changes in rates from one period to the next will cause changes in the shape or steepness of the curve. The graph above shows the shift in yields from March 1, 2022 to March 23, 2022 – the Fed
tightened
overnight rates by 25 bp on March 16, then on March 21, indicated a need to further increase rates. This caused a steepening.

Shifts in the curve indicate whether bond investor sentiment for higher rates is increasing or decreasing. Historically this has been based on an accelerating or decelerating economy and a changed inflation forecast. Bond market investors want to be compensated for inflation. In recent years the US Federal Reserve has taken steps that include buying bonds to adjust longer rates or add liquidity to the market. This impacts the usefulness of the curve, so investors ought to take these actions into account. There is now increased importance of Fed
announcements
surrounding these purchase activities (sometimes referred to as yield-curve-control, quantitative easing, or QE). A reduction in Fed purchases (
tapering) will tend to push longer-term rates up as the Fed has been a significant buyer of the maturity range they targeted with QE. 

 

You May Also Be Interested In:



What is Fed Tightening



Merger of a SPAC

 

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is the Yield Curve?




Why Investors Monitor the Yield Curve and Yield Curve Changes

 

The difference between interest rates being paid for all available maturities of the same credit quality bonds and notes forms the yield curve. When these points are plotted on a line graph, the shape of the line is the “curve.” The US Treasury Yield curve is by far the most discussed. However, there are yield curves for corporate bonds, mortgage securities, municipal bonds, and other interest rate products. But these are often quoted as an interest rate spread to the US Treasury yield curve.

 

Data: US
Department of Treasury

 

The shape of a yield curve—where the Y-axis is interest rates, and the X-axis shows increasing time to maturity— can take on different shapes. The most common are upward sloping or “normal yield curve,”
downward sloping,
or “inverted yield curve,” and flat.

The significance of these shapes has historically been used by
stock
market
investors as a gauge of future expectations of economic activity and inflation. A normal yield curve indicates expectations of a growing economy, and the risk of rates being pushed up over time. A downward-sloping yield curve indicates expectations of a contracting economy or one where interest rates may need to be lowered in the future. A flat yield curve typically indicates expectations of a stagnant economy. This is also viewed as negative for stocks because equity investors like to see economic growth.

Shifts in Curve

Changes in rates from one period to the next will cause changes in the shape or steepness of the curve. The graph above shows the shift in yields from March 1, 2022 to March 23, 2022 – the Fed
tightened
overnight rates by 25 bp on March 16, then on March 21, indicated a need to further increase rates. This caused a steepening.

Shifts in the curve indicate whether bond investor sentiment for higher rates is increasing or decreasing. Historically this has been based on an accelerating or decelerating economy and a changed inflation forecast. Bond market investors want to be compensated for inflation. In recent years the US Federal Reserve has taken steps that include buying bonds to adjust longer rates or add liquidity to the market. This impacts the usefulness of the curve, so investors ought to take these actions into account. There is now increased importance of Fed
announcements
surrounding these purchase activities (sometimes referred to as yield-curve-control, quantitative easing, or QE). A reduction in Fed purchases (
tapering) will tend to push longer-term rates up as the Fed has been a significant buyer of the maturity range they targeted with QE. 

 

You May Also Be Interested In:



What is Fed Tightening



Merger of a SPAC

 

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Bitcoin ETFs Again Experience Extreme Caution from SEC




SEC Cryptocurrency ETFs are Not Getting Decided Upon on Schedule

 

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is requiring more time to review two Cryptocurrency ETFs that were nearing the agency’s decision dates. In its notice informing that it would need a longer period, the SEC indicated it was still reviewing issues raised during the comment period and that it maintains concerns over potential manipulation and bad actors.

The SEC gave notice in a filing on Monday (March 21) that it will delay the decision on an application by WisdomTree for a spot-based Bitcoin ETF. The original deadline was March 31; the SEC has now moved that out 45 days until May 15. The WisdomTree fund has been rejected by the agency before, back in December, it resubmitted a proposal in February and was approaching the original “decision date” of March 31. WisdomTree and others interested in the future of spot-based crypto ETFs now will have to wait up to another 45 days for an SEC approval or disapproval.

The regulator also gave itself 60 days after April 3 to decide on a proposal by One River Digital Asset Management for a fund it has proposed that tracks the price of Bitcoin adjusted for the carbon toll of mining tokens. The ETF would be called, One River Carbon Neutral Bitcoin Trust. The securitized trust would hold bitcoin and value its shares with an additional adjustment for the cost of offsetting carbon credits.


Excerpt: SEC Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule Change 3/21/22

The agency is apparently still grappling with concerns and prefers to err on the side of caution. It has indicated before that it isn’t comfortable with a Bitcoin ETF based on spot prices. The SEC has rejected several such applications, including an attempt by the corporate owners of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) to convert that private-placement trust into an ETF. The Commission has said it is concerned with the lack of surveillance between the U.S. Securities regulators and the unregulated crypto markets.

One River is trying to address the SEC’s concerns by avoiding the issue of an ETF owning Bitcoin directly. Its proposed ETF wouldn’t buy, sell or hold Bitcoin directly through the spot market. Rather, it would use a creation-redemption process with “authorized participants” to guard against “bad actors” trying to manipulate prices and NAV calculations, according to its filing.

 

Take-Away

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler would prefer not to rush on approval of a novel Bitcoin ETF based on spot prices rather than futures contracts. The agency also delayed a similar decision on an application by Bitwise in February. Gensler, who taught cryptocurrency at MIT would prefer to take time and measure any concerns.  The agency did approve several futures-based crypto ETFs last Fall including The ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (ticker: BITO), Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BTF), and VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF (XBTF).

 

Paul Hofman

Managing Editor, Channelchek

 

Suggested Reading



Imagine a Bitcoin ETF With No Underlying Bitcoin Assets



Stealth Digital Asset Bill Surprises Crypto Market





SEC Approves ETF for Bitcoin Revolution Investors



Cryptocurrencies and the Howey Test

 

Sources

https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/cboebzx/2022/34-94476.pdf

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1863687/000110465921070846/tm2116981d1_s1.htm

https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2021/05/24/asset-manager-one-river-files-for-carbon-neutral-bitcoin-etf-in-us/

https://www.theblockcrypto.com/linked/138680/sec-punts-on-wisdomtree-one-river-spot-bitcoin-etf-proposals

https://www.barrons.com/articles/sec-bitcoin-etfs-51647893798?mod=hp_LEAD_3

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is Fed Tightening




What it Means When the Federal Reserve Bank Tightens Monetary Policy

 

When the US Federal Reserve expects that the economy is growing at a pace that may cause inflation above its target, it will try to slow the pace of growth, perhaps even cause a contraction of growth.

Tightening or tighter Fed monetary policy sometimes referred to as “taking the punch bowl away,” is implemented by the Fed by its own transactions in the bond market. The most common form of tightening involves the Fed selling bonds. These are secondary issues they purchased when “easing.”

Selling bonds takes money out of the hands of businesses and individuals and increases the float of bonds. This drives up rates as there is less money in the economy and more bonds competing for it – money is tighter across the economy.

Interest rates rise as a result of fewer dollars/more bonds money in the system, so the price of it (interest rates) increases. Increased rates, or more expensive money, causes fewer transactions. The decrease in transactions has a reverse snowball effect that shrinks growth.

The main interest rate that the Federal Reserve tries to impact has historically been the overnight rate that banks use to lend to each other to satisfy imbalances through the banking system at the end of the day. This overnight rate called the Fed Funds rate impacts rates (yields) in longer maturities. So While the Fed may tighten by 0.25% or 25 basis points, for overnight loans, this increase can impact longer maturities in the same direction, but not necessarily the same magnitude.

How this Works

The impact of fewer dollars chasing the same goods with a higher cost to borrow is lower economic activity. An example from just one segment of the market is housing: , if mortgage rates rise, fewer homes are sold, fewer homes cause fewer people decorating or renovating, fewer purchases equates to fewer needs for businesses to hire to manufacture, ship or sell goods. Lower employment needs create less stress on the wage component of inflation. There is also less stress on manufacturing inputs like materials. Shipping experiences reduced demand and may adopt more competitive pricing.

Overall the above chain reaction occurs in most industries as money becomes tighter and therefore more valuable. More valuable dollars is the opposite of inflation which reduces the dollars ability to purchase goods or services.

 

When Would a Central Bank Use Tight Monetary Policy?

The Fed has two primary goals when it comes to U.S. monetary policy: maximum employment and price stability.

When it comes to price stability, the long-run goal for average inflation is stated as 2%. When the outlook for average inflation is higher than 2%, the Federal Reserve will look to enact tight monetary policy. When inflation is persistently higher, the Fed will balance a tighter policy for the purpose of price stability with maximum employment.

 

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Doubling Down on Stocks Advancing



Image: Trafigura (Flickr)


Why JP Morgan’s Guru has Maintained a Positive Stance on Stocks

 

A month back, JP Morgan released a research note indicating the bull market in stocks is “far from over” despite investors’ increasing concerns about a hawkish Federal Reserve. Since then, Russia has invaded Ukraine, interest rates have risen, and the major indices have fallen another 3.00-5.50%. Yesterday (March 15), JP Morgan’s “quant guru,” Marko Kolanovic doubled down on the positive stance with the notion that the S&P 500’s year-to-date decline of 12% represents an opportunity that investors with a medium-term time horizon should take advantage of.

Priced for Negativity

With interest rates already having begun their climb, a spike in producer prices, and a full-blown war between two large European countries, the stock market has reacted to hit after hit of news and events to feel negative over. Despite this, JPMorgan’s, Kolanovic, said Monday the S&P 500’s year-to-date decline of 12% represents an opportunity that investors with a medium-term time horizon should take advantage of. The confidence is largely attributed to the idea that despite the disruptions, he doesn’t expect the US economy to enter a recession. He highlighted that consumers and corporations currently have healthy balance sheets.

 

 

“We think that outright recession should not be a base case given continued favorable financing conditions, very strong labor markets, an unleveraged consumer, strong corporate cash flows, strong bank balance sheets, a turn for the better in the China policy outlook, and the COVID-19 impact should be fading further,” Kolanovic said. This is “quant speak” for recession shouldn’t be the expectation since rates are still low, people are not heavily in debt, they have jobs, banks will continue to lend, and the China situation along with the pandemic drag is fading.

Of course, there are still risks that were pointed out. While Russia is not a large trading partner with the US, it is a substantial producer of commodities that can slow US economic growth as prices for raw materials rise globally. Despite all of this, the expectations he believes are largely built into prices, none of these are a surprise, they have already had their impact. “A lot of risk is already priced in, sentiment is depressed and investor positioning is low, so we would add to risk with a medium-term horizon,” Kolanovic said.

 

Monetary Policy Impact

Kolanovic points out that prior periods of Fed rate hikes have proven to be bullish for the broader stock market. “Equities tended to firm up 3-4 months after the first hike, and make fresh all-time highs within 6-12 months,” he said.

Take-Away

Is the worst close to over? JP Morgan seems to think so. While the Global Head of Macro Quantitative and Derivatives Research at the bank thinks the broader market may treat investors well, he also cautions that this view is intended for medium-term investors. This means the turnaround may not occur for a while.

The risk to this position is that more or new negativity occurs. There is hardly a limit on events that could frighten the market. On the flip side, there is risk in not being invested when prices are down, the rates being paid for being in cash, even after a Fed rate hike are below current inflation.

 

Suggested Reading



New Economic Variables Confound Fed’s Future Path



Investors Have Added Money to the Markets a Record 71.4% After Dips





Carl Icahn Selling into Warren Buffet’s Buying, Can they Both be Right?



What it Means When the Federal Reserve Bank Tightens Monetary Policy

 

Sources

https://www.linkedin.com/in/marko-kolanovic-a335b6/

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-outlook-bull-market-far-from-over-dovish-fed-2022-2

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-outlook-economy-will-avoid-recession-jpmorgan-kolanovic-inflation-2022-3

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

What is Fed Tightening?




What it Means When the Federal Reserve Bank Tightens Monetary Policy

 

When the US Federal Reserve expects that the economy is growing at a pace that may cause inflation above its target, it will try to slow the pace of growth, perhaps even cause a contraction of growth.

Tightening or tighter Fed monetary policy sometimes referred to as “taking the punch bowl away,” is implemented by the Fed by its own transactions in the bond market. The most common form of tightening involves the Fed selling bonds. These are secondary issues they purchased when “easing.”

Selling bonds takes money out of the hands of businesses and individuals and increases the float of bonds. This drives up rates as there is less money in the economy and more bonds competing for it – money is tighter across the economy.

Interest rates rise as a result of fewer dollars/more bonds money in the system, so the price of it (interest rates) increases. Increased rates, or more expensive money, causes fewer transactions. The decrease in transactions has a reverse snowball effect that shrinks growth.

The main interest rate that the Federal Reserve tries to impact has historically been the overnight rate that banks use to lend to each other to satisfy imbalances through the banking system at the end of the day. This overnight rate called the Fed Funds rate impacts rates (yields) in longer maturities. So While the Fed may tighten by 0.25% or 25 basis points, for overnight loans, this increase can impact longer maturities in the same direction, but not necessarily the same magnitude.

How this Works

The impact of fewer dollars chasing the same goods with a higher cost to borrow is lower economic activity. An example from just one segment of the market is housing: , if mortgage rates rise, fewer homes are sold, fewer homes cause fewer people decorating or renovating, fewer purchases equates to fewer needs for businesses to hire to manufacture, ship or sell goods. Lower employment needs create less stress on the wage component of inflation. There is also less stress on manufacturing inputs like materials. Shipping experiences reduced demand and may adopt more competitive pricing.

Overall the above chain reaction occurs in most industries as money becomes tighter and therefore more valuable. More valuable dollars is the opposite of inflation which reduces the dollars ability to purchase goods or services.

 

When Would a Central Bank Use Tight Monetary Policy?

The Fed has two primary goals when it comes to U.S. monetary policy: maximum employment and price stability.

When it comes to price stability, the long-run goal for average inflation is stated as 2%. When the outlook for average inflation is higher than 2%, the Federal Reserve will look to enact tight monetary policy. When inflation is persistently higher, the Fed will balance a tighter policy for the purpose of price stability with maximum employment.

 

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Tighter But Still Easy Money



Image Credit: Federal Reserve (Flickr)


New Economic Variables Confound Fed’s Future Path

 

Federal Reserve Chairman Jay Powell tends to tell the markets exactly what to expect from the Fed. Last week he said he’d propose raising interest rates by 25bp (up from 0.00-0.25) after the March 15-16 FOMC meeting. This would be the first increase since 2018. Earlier this year, Powell set expectations for the possibility of raising rates by twice as much; he also suggested the Fed might need to eventually raise borrowing costs to a level designed to deliberately slow economic growth. This was the chairman’s thinking before the war broke out in Europe. The uncertainty of its impact on growth here in the US is the main reason to be cautious now. What are the variables?

 

Uncertain Impact

While the Fed Chairman is just one of 12 voting members, past FOMC meeting minutes show that the vote on monetary policy change, after debate and deliberations, most often goes along with the Fed Chairman’s judgment. Prior to the war-related global economic upheaval, the big risk was inflation caused by a number of variables, including tight labor markets, supply chain problems, raw material shortages, etc. A 0.50% hike could have added enough pressure on the economic brake pedal to temper some of these price pressures while letting other problems such as shortages work their way out of the system.

The market was pricing itself for 0.50% prior to the invasion of Ukraine, now a 50bp hike would surprise and disrupt the markets. While market levels are not part of the Fed’s mandate, a severe downturn in stock and bond markets could pummel spending and economic growth. So, the Fed is cognizant of market reaction. And with recent uncertainty, likely to err on the side of doing too little.

 

Decision and Outlook

If not for the international upheaval of unknown length and consequences, a half percentage hike would have been the most likely action after this meeting. But after Powell’s more recent comments, the decision on what to say after the rate announcement is likely the bigger decision at the meeting. In 2022 we are accustomed to an extremely overt Fed, anything but clarity and confidently setting expectations will leave markets uneasy.

The last time inflation was running in 8% territory (decades ago), the Fed did not signal its intentions, nor did it announce a change. Its actions backe then were just another variable in the market that participants needed to analyze and speculate on. If it eased or tightened was not certain until the FOMC meeting minutes were published three weeks after the next FOMC meeting. And the rate changes were most often between meetings. The need to guide expectations and fear of catching the market off-guard was not a part of any decision. Secrecy and being covert was its own powerful tool.

Today all involved want to be told what to expect, and when. Currently, the markets (stock, commodity, real estate, currency, and bond) are pricing themselves for the 0.25% expectation newly set by the Fed Chair. But speculation is running high on the guidance statement that follows the two-day meeting. The interest-rate path that is signaled will indicate the US central bank’s best evaluation of the most likely economic outlook. And the updated outlook in the face of stiff economic sanctions with trading partners, which could slow the US economy and at the same time add to some root causes of inflation, is highly anticipated. The markets want to know what the Fed sees and what it views as its path.

 

Take-Away

The Fed Announcement will be the most important in nearly two years. Three months ago, almost all Fed voting members indicated they felt a need for between two and four rate rises this year. This has changed, we’ll learn by how much soon.

The market has expectations that the Fed will raise rates 25bp and the market reaction at this point, if that is the level, will be minimal. Perhaps relieved. However, the announcement following at 2 pm, Wednesday (March 16) is likely to show that Fed officials are on guard for either weakness related to changed global circumstances or strength based on recent US economic numbers.  This is what is most anticipated.

What is certain about the statement afterward is the Fed will sound confident in its assessment; uncertainty would roil markets further.

 

Suggested Reading



The Detrimental Impact of Fed policy on Savers



Money Supply is Like Caffeine for Stocks





Deflation Not Inflation is Risk Says Cathie Wood



The Limits of Government Economic Tinkering (June 2020)

 

Sources

https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-wrestles-with-the-challenge-of-how-quickly-to-raise-interest-rates-11647336602?mod=hp_lead_pos2

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

A Look at NFTs Past and Future One Year After Beeple Sale


Image: ARS Electronica (Flickr)


NFTs: One Year After Beeple Sale, Non-Fungible Tokens Have Become Mainstream

 

One year ago, an artwork was sold for US$69 million (£52.6 million) by the prestigious auction house Christie’s. This was no lost Matisse or rarely seen Van Gogh. Instead, it was a composite collection of digital art by the then relatively unknown artist Beeple.

What makes this piece, Everydays: the First 5000 Days, truly remarkable, is that it was sold as a non-fungible token (NFT). In the year since that sale, NFTs have gone from a relatively obscure tech-world phenomenon to the mainstream.

NFTs are tokens that exist on a secure record-keeping system called a blockchain. These tokens are akin to certificates of ownership a gallery might give to an art collector, but for digital items.

Celebrities such as Eminem and Jimmy Fallon have helped raise the profile of NFTs through the Bored Ape Yacht Club profile picture collection. These collections have become so popular that Twitter now allows users to use their NFTs as their profile image.

For the collectors, NFTs are arguably a digital extension of benign hobbyist pursuits. In recent generations, collectors may have sought rare Magic The Gathering cards or obscure stamps. Today, those with an impulse to own rare items are attracted to a world where rarity can be transparently recorded and easily verified.

For the creators, NFTs provide a clear path toward monetization. Artists have historically struggled to make money from their work, but NFTs are sold through marketplaces that provide creators with royalties. The Ethereum economy sustained by NFTs earned its creators US$3.5 billion (£2.7 billion) in 2021.

The Right-Click Approach

Despite their growing popularity, NFTs still baffle most people. This is because we are not used to the concept of owning digital art. After all, can’t I just right-click and save an image to my own computer? I could, naturally, but this would be to miss the point.

As with all currencies, NFTs have value because of the meaning a community ascribes to them. In the online culture NFTs belong to, “on-chain” blockchain items are meaningful – and some have more value than others.

The characteristic missed by the right-click perspective is that when you own an item on the blockchain, everyone in your community can see this. This can translate into prestige, for example, when outrageously wealthy entrepreneurs bid on rare NFT items, like Beeple’s work or a rare cryptopunk. Or it can simply be a sign to other community members that you belong.

Mainstream Attention

Popular attention is not always positive. As NFTs grow, so has the proliferation of cash grabs and scams, especially from social media influencers. Elsewhere I have called this the trash moat that surrounds legitimate projects in the cryptocurrency and NFT world. YouTubers Logan and Jake Paul, in particular, are notorious for their litany of low-quality NFT “rug pulls”, when a crypto project is abandoned by their creators once the money flows in.

Melania Trump, to pick another example, has released several NFT projects. However, blockchain analysts were able to uncover how one of these projects was bought by none other than the creator of the NFT themselves. This practice, known as wash trading, involves NFT creators buying their own works either to save face due to a lack of interest or to generate hype around an influencer or artist and boost the price of the next sale.

 

Photo of Beeple – Mike Winkelmann (US) at Expanded
Animation, Courtesy of ARS Electronica (Flickr)

 

Yet another capacity of NFTs has emerged in their potential for fundraising. In what started as a meme, Constitution, DAO was created by a group of cryptocurrency enthusiasts to buy a rare copy of the US constitution that was on auction at Sotheby’s. This group sold a token in exchange for the cryptocurrency Ether that was then used to bid on the constitution. Within a week, ConstitutionDAO raised US$47 million (£35.8 million). This was not enough to win the auction, but it revealed just how financially powerful this corner of the web has become.

Failure, or the Future?

Perhaps the harshest critiques of NFTs come from the socially conscious art world that sees the infrastructure of NFTs as the problem. NFTs mostly exist on the Ethereum blockchain, which relies on vast computational resources to function, generating a huge carbon footprint. Ethereum is transitioning away from its current mechanism to another, which will hopefully alleviate this concern.

Perhaps the more subtle defence of NFTs resides in how they push the medium of digital art in interesting directions. Damien Hirst’s The Currency playfully challenges the collector to choose whether to keep the NFT (the digital token) or exchange it later for a physical artwork. This forces the collector to make a bet on the future: physical or digital, which retains the most value?

This places NFTs in a curious spot. They appear at once a benign hobbyist pursuit, a means to value and make money from scarce digital art, a cash grab for unscrupulous influencers and celebrities, a new mechanism for online fundraising and an explored avenue for legitimate art. However you view them, NFTs have crossed fully into the mainstream and deserve our attention.

 

This article was republished with permission from  The Conversation, a news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It represents the research-based findings and thoughts of Paul Dylan-Ennis, Lecturer/Assistant Professor in Management Information Systems, University College Dublin

 

Suggested Reading



Russia/Ukraine War and Reliance on Crypto and Blockchain



Digital Currencies Gain Value on Biden Executive Order





The Era of Flying Cars May Have Just Dawned



NFT Fractional Ownership and Metaverse Museums

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Digital Currencies Gain Value on Biden Executive Order



Further Optimism on Digital Currency Based on White House Order

 

Crypto participants believe a better-defined market is positive news for the asset class.

Digital assets’ potential benefits and the related technology usage are to get a “whole-of-government approach” according to an Executive Order signed by President Biden today (March 9). The Order outlines the U.S. policy for digital assets across six key priorities. The crypto market has reacted extremely positively with bitcoin (BTC) up over 20% since news of the order began circulating on Tuesday. Other cryptocurrencies like ethereum (ETH), and dogecoin (DOGE) have pushed higher as well.

The President’s six key priorities are: consumer and investor protection; financial stability; illicit finance; U.S. leadership in the global financial system and economic competitiveness; financial inclusion; and responsible innovation. Specific to each of these priorities, the order:

 

  • Explore a U.S. Central Bank
    Digital Currency (CBDC)
     by placing urgency on research and development of a potential United States CBDC, should issuance be deemed in the national interest. The Order directs the U.S. Government to assess the technological infrastructure and capacity needs for a potential U.S. CBDC in a manner that protects Americans’ interests. The Order also encourages the Federal Reserve to continue its research, development, and assessment efforts for a U.S. CBDC, including development of a plan for broader U.S. Government action in support of their work. This effort prioritizes U.S. participation in multi-country experimentation and ensures U.S. leadership internationally to promote CBDC development that is consistent with U.S. priorities and democratic values.

  • Protect U.S. Consumers, Investors, and Businesses by directing the Department of the Treasury and other agency partners to assess and develop policy recommendations to address the implications of the growing digital asset sector and changes in financial markets for consumers, investors, businesses, and equitable economic growth. The Order also encourages regulators to ensure sufficient oversight and safeguard against any systemic financial risks posed by digital assets.
  • Protect U.S. and Global Financial Stability and Mitigate Systemic Risk by encouraging the Financial Stability Oversight Council to identify and mitigate economy-wide (i.e., systemic) financial risks posed by digital assets and to develop appropriate policy recommendations to address any regulatory gaps.
  • Mitigate the Illicit Finance
    and National Security Risks Posed by the Illicit Use of Digital Assets
     by directing an unprecedented focus of coordinated action across all relevant U.S. Government agencies to mitigate these risks. It also directs agencies to work with our allies and partners to ensure international frameworks, capabilities, and partnerships are aligned and responsive to risks.

  • Promote U.S. Leadership in
    Technology and Economic Competitiveness to Reinforce U.S. Leadership in
    the Global Financial System
     by directing the Department of Commerce to work across the U.S. Government in establishing a framework to drive U.S. competitiveness and leadership in, and leveraging of digital asset technologies. This framework will serve as a foundation for agencies and integrate this as a priority into their policy, research and development, and operational approaches to digital assets.

  • Promote Equitable Access to Safe
    and Affordable Financial Services
     by affirming the critical need for safe, affordable, and accessible financial services as a U.S. national interest that must inform our approach to digital asset innovation, including disparate impact risk. Such safe access is especially important for communities that have long had insufficient access to financial services.  The Secretary of the Treasury, working with all relevant agencies, will produce a report on the future of money and payment systems, to include implications for economic growth, financial growth and inclusion, national security, and the extent to which technological innovation may influence that future.

  • Support Technological Advances
    and Ensure Responsible Development and Use of Digital Assets
     by directing the U.S. Government to take concrete steps to study and support technological advances in the responsible development, design, and implementation of digital asset systems while prioritizing privacy, security, combating illicit exploitation, and reducing negative climate impacts.

 

Biden’s order asks the Justice Department to look at whether a new law is needed to create a new currency, with the Treasury, Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Financial Protection Commission and other agencies to study the impact on consumers. Although the Order uses words like ‘explore” and “potential” and provides financial market regulators a higher ability to place restrictions and reporting requirements on the asset class, it is a move forward that speculators in the crypto market have shown they believe further legitimizes current crypto.

Digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, have seen explosive growth in recent years, surpassing $3 trillion in circulation last November, up from $14 billion just five years prior. Around 16 percent of adult Americans – approximately 40 million people – have invested in, traded, or used cryptocurrencies. Over 100 countries are exploring or piloting Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) – digital forms of the country’s sovereign currency.

 

Suggested Reading



Elon Musk Weighs in on Unrealized Capital Gains Tax Idea



The Era of Flying Cars May Have Just Dawned





Investing in the Businesses in and Around Crypto



What is the Feds position on Crypto, Stablecoin, and CBDCs?

 

Sources

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/09/fact-sheet-president-biden-to-sign-executive-order-on-ensuring-responsible-innovation-in-digital-assets/

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0644

 

Stay up to date. Follow us: