Will the Stock Market Survive COVID-19

Black Swans, Falling Knives, and Market Corrections

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

The word “correction” has been used more than usual on CNBC and other business news programs this week.  At first, it seemed to make sense; after all, on Monday, the S&P 500 dropped by 3.4%. Then on Tuesday, it shed another 3.03%. By the market close on Tuesday, the broad index was down a total of 7.6% from its all-time high – the all-time high was less than a week earlier!

After a 28.9% run-up in value through 2019, then occasional pauses for significant events such as the exchange of fire between the U.S. and Iran, we continued to experience equities breaking new ground as buyers’ optimism remained high. A quick Google search uncovers stories from most major outlets that report on the stock markets wrote an article warning of the “The Next Correction” or “How to Recognize a Correction” over the last six months. Ignoring these warnings, the market continued to trade higher.

The trend toward higher levels seems to have finally been derailed. But, the word “correction” as it has been used historically, may not fit the dramatic shift in direction the past few days. The market move is much more likely to fall in the category of a “black swan event.” The distinction is worth understanding in that the reasons for the decline in market prices are different. It’s important to understand the nuances as the recovery from each is different. 

Black
Swan

Among waterbirds, black swans are known to be erratic and nomadic. The term “black swan event” was adopted by the business world to refer to events that are extremely rare and produce a dramatic impact. The occurrences generally fall into the unforeseen category. Investors with an eye toward risk, manage assets with the knowledge that black swan events cannot be forecast. Although with almost every black swan event there are people who say they saw it coming, or in hindsight, try to figure out how to forecast the next time the same situation will happen, in most cases, the events are “one-offs” that are a combination of factors that will never occur again.

An Example of an event that helps define this category is the meltdown of the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) in 1998. This black swan event almost brought the global financial system with it. Others include the dot-com bubble of 2001 and the financial crisis of 2008. These are pure examples in that they were sudden and unforeseen as to timing and impact.  Another example used quite often is the attacks on the U.S. on Tuesday, September 11, 2001. Both the NYSE and the Nasdaq did not even open that day and stayed closed until Monday, September 17th. This was the longest shutdown of the exchanges since 1933. On the reopening of the NYSE, the DOW fell 7.1% setting a record for the largest one-day loss in history. By Friday of that week, it had declined by 14%. The unforeseen circumstance erased $1.4 trillion in stock U.S. stock market value in five trading days.

Stock market recoveries from black swan events are as different and uncertain as to the events themselves. The sell-offs are not part of the regular market “price-discovery” push and pull. The quick reaction to the uncertainty of a new situation is typically severe. Then, once enough light is shed on the “new” situation allowing the market to evaluate the possibilities, it typically acts “rationally.” One month after September 11, 2001, the S&P, Nasdaq, and Dow had recouped all of their losses — A 16.28% increase within 30 days.

Correction

The term “correction” is a market term for sell-off as a reaction to excess. Although most market participants don’t enjoy corrections, they are considered healthy. They are painful yet beneficial, not unlike a brush fire that prevents a wildfire, or the diet that one goes on after eating too much during the holidays, or even the paying down of charge cards after returning from an elaborate vacation. A stock market correction serves to pair the lofty gains accumulated in stocks from greed or speculation that got a bit ahead of itself. Without occasional sell-offs that become corrections, the market would be at a higher risk of a larger crash.

Corrections are often predicted by technical or fundamental market analysts. Using either of these analytical methods, predictions of turning points, and too much market strength are made. A common definition of a market correction is a decline of 10% or more in price movement. This decline is seldom all at once, so market participants have time to evaluate whether they think the market is in a correction stage. There’s a warning. As it declines, some will take money out, while others will view it as an opportunity to buy at lower prices. If the sellers exceed the buyers, prices generally decline until that imbalance reverses. If the market is down 10% or more, it is then that the writers of history will “officially” label the period a correction.

The
Difference Between a Black Swan Event and Correction is Important

Black Swan events are not corrections. If a forest has a brush fire that burns off leaves and twigs, thereby reducing the “fuel” that could lead to a devastating blaze, then the fire lowers the risk of an uncontrollable fire. Brush fires are expected and are somewhat cyclical. The brush fire is not unlike a market correction. If the same forest is unexpectedly in the path of lava from a volcano which suddenly erupts, that is similar to a black swan event. Unexpected events have unexpected length and duration.

COVID-19 (coronavirus) and its impact on stocks is not part of the normal market cycle. It was not foreseen and has had a sudden and large impact on market direction. This fits the definition of a black swan event. With the market reaching higher highs the previous year, there were many who were calling for a correction. This may be why so many are currently referring to what has happened in the past couple of days as a correction.

Recovery from a correction is not predictable, but far more predictable than a recovering from a black swan event. After September 11, the markets were closed for six days, and no one had any idea at what price level they would open or trade when they did. This type of event had never happened before so there was no history to assess and project the future. The COVID-19 event can be likened to Sept. 11 in that it has very little similarity to anything that has happened before. 

The virus has severely impacted the Chinese level of economic activity, yet we don’t have a good read on what is really happening there. We don’t know if it will continue to spread if a cure for the sick or a preventative will be found effective, we don’t know if it will fade as viruses before it have or mutate into something deadlier. There is not enough information for the market to feel comfortable enough to make a forecast with enough conviction to act. Once some answers are found, early buyers are likely to set the tone for higher prices.

Falling Knives

Until there is more clarity, there is not likely to be a large retracing of market losses. There is a Wall St. axiom, which says, “don’t try to catch a falling knife.” This warns against buying when the market has significant downward momentum. The chance of your catching it just right is low compared to the chance of your getting hurt. It’s too dangerous.

Like most Wall Street axioms, there is an equal and opposite axiom. This, presumably, is what makes markets. The alternative advice suggests, “buy low sell high.” In real terms, if you liked the S&P last Thursday as it was breaking new highs, you should love it today while it’s 7.6% cheaper.

Investors of safe-haven stocks such as those tied to the price of gold and other precious metals have historically done well during shocks to the other markets. Many investment advisors aim to reduce risk by diversifying their client portfolios. Part of this protection involves allocating a percent of the portfolio to invest in gold and gold mining companies.  Gold soared following September 11. On Monday of this week, the price of gold surged to its highest level since February 2013. It’s easy to see how stocks uncorrelated to the broader markets belong in portfolios that seek to protect themselves from unforeseen shocks.

Applicable to the current black swan event, another, albeit lesser-known bit of Wall Street wisdom was once uttered by Wall Street icon Art Cashin. He said, “Never bet on the end of the world. It only happens once.”

 

 

Suggested
Reading:

Containing Coronavirus has Caused an
“Oil Demand Shock”

Is the Market Disregarding Earnings
Results?

The Economic Symptoms from Epidemics
Have Been Felt Before

Sources:

Everyone seems to be
bullish on the stock market right now. Here’s what could go wrong

Wikipedia Black Swan (Cygnus
atratus)

Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM)

Dot-Com Bubble

How September 11
Affected The U.S. Stock Market

Falling Knife

Opportunity Zone Investment Funds Provide a Triple Tax Break

Is the Triple-Tax Break for “Opportunity Zone” Investing Worthwhile?

In 2017, Congress passed the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  Since the tax act passed, more than 500 qualified OZ funds have opened.  The fund’s popularity seems to be growing with some $2 billion of $6.7 billion invested in December alone.  As a rule, 90% of a fund must be invested in one of 8,700 qualified opportunity zones and receive at least 50% of the gross income from the zone.  Most of these funds are run by money managers and/or real estate developers. 

The funds allow investors to defer capital gains tax from stocks, real estate or other investments by rolling over the proceeds into an Opportunity Zone (OZ) fund that invest in low-income communities.  In addition to deferring capital gains taxes, investors may be able to reduce their cost basis and eliminate capital gains on any increase in value during the fund’s life.  Sound too good to be true? As you would expect, there are negative aspects associated with the funds, specifically high management costs and a loss of liquidity.  Still the funds may be worth considering for wealthy investors.

The Positive

Capital Gains are deferred.  Investors can defer federal capital gains tax by putting it into an OZ fund.  The funding investment could have been almost anything including stocks or real estate.  If the investor invests in the OZ fund within 180 days of the asset sale, he will be allowed to defer the payment of capital gains tax until the time the investment in the OZ fund is sold or until December 31, 2026.  Note that if the fund dissolves, capital gains will become due.  With the market near all-time highs, many investors would like to diversify away from the stock market or individual stocks that have performed well and become a larger part of their portfolio.  Investors may feel trapped into holding the stock because of large capital gains.  OZ funds allow the investor to exit the stock without large tax payments.  Investing in an OZ fund may also make sense for investors selling a real estate property with large capital gains who want more diversity than utilizing a 1031 exchange to purchase another real estate property.

Cost basis is reduced over time.  In addition to deferring an investment’s capital gains tax, investing in an OZ fund may even lower the tax.  Investors who hold the fund for five years get a 10% reduction on the capital gain.  If they hold the fund seven years, the reduction will increase to 15%.  However, the tax benefits end December 31, 2026 whether the investor has sold its ownership in the OZ fund or not.  Therefore, investors must invest in an OZ fund by December 31, 2021 to get the 10% reduction.  Investors must have already invested in the fund to qualify for the full exemption.

Capital gains of the fund may be eliminated.  As a final incentive, investors who invest in an OZ fund and hold it for ten years will get an additional tax benefit.  Any gain in the investment in the fund is tax free.  This is true even if the fund is sold after December 31, 2026.  So, for example, if an investor puts $5 million into a fund in 2020 and sells it in 2031 for $12 million, he will escape paying capital gains tax on $7 million.  He will have paid capital gains tax on December 31, 2026 for the capital gains from the initial investment that was deferred.

 

The Negative

Management costs are high.  The fee structure of an OZ fund is comparable to that of a hedge fund.  Typically, investors pay 1.5%-2.0% in expenses and 20% of any excess return over a designated return (6-10%). 

Investor must be accredited investors.  To qualify to invest in a fund, investor must have a net worth of $1 million (excluding primary residence) or have two consecutive years of at least $200,000 in annual income ($300,000 for joint filers).  Investors in OZ funds can invest in a fund only one time to defer capital gains tax, and the investment can’t exceed the proceeds from the sale of the original investment.   

There is a loss of liquidity associated with the funds.  Some funds require investors to hold their investment a full ten years.  Others allow investors to sell their investment in an OZ fund at any time.  Doing so, however, will often mean forfeiting tax breaks.  OZ funds should be viewed as a long-term investment with a time window of at least five years.

Short management track record.  OZ funds have been in existence for only three years.  As a result, the managers of these funds do not have a long track record on which an investor can make comparisons.  Many of these managers are long-time real estate managers who have been successful.  Others are not.  Investor should become familiar with a fund’s management team to decide if the large fees are justified.

 

Big Picture

Like most investments, there are positives and negatives associated with investing in an Opportunity Zone fund.  OZ funds offer a great way to defer and possibly avoid taxes.  On the other hand, the funds have large management fees and require long holding periods.  Investors should become familiar with the details of any OZ fund before considering an investment and consult their financial advisor and tax consultant to determine if the fund is appropriate for the investor.

 

https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1fjptxryzv07y/Is-Anyone-Actually-Investing-in-Opportunity-Zone-Funds, Alicia McElhaney, Institutional Investor, May 23, 2019

https://www.kiplinger.com/article/investing/T041-C000-S002-opportunity-zone-investing-is-it-for-you.html, Ryan Ermey, Kiplinger, June 5, 2019

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/opportunity-zones-frequently-asked-questions, IRS

https://smartasset.com/investing/opportunity-zone-funds, Ashley Chorpenning, Smartasset, January 27, 2020.

https://www.fool.com/millionacres/taxes/complete-guide-real-estate-opportunity-zones/, Liz Brumer-Smith, millionacres

Research – Kelly Services Inc. (KELYA) – Can the New Growth Plan Work?

Friday, February 14, 2020

Kelly Services Inc. (KELYA)

Can the New Growth Plan Work?

Kelly Services Inc is a provider of workforce solutions and consulting and staffing services. The company’s operations are divided into three business segments namely Americas Staffing, Global Talent Solutions (“GTS”) and International Staffing. It provides staffing solutions through its branch networks in Americas and International operations and also provides a suite of innovative talent fulfilment and outcome-based solutions through GTS segment. Americas Staffing generates maximum revenue from its operations.

Joe Gomes, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

New Growth Strategy. New CEO Peter Quigley is rolling out a new, aggressive organic and inorganic growth plan to build a sustainable and profitable specialty talent solutions provider. We believe Kelly has the means, capability, and opportunity to successfully implement the plan.

4Q19 Results.  Fourth quarter results were mixed. Revenue fell short of expectations due to ongoing softness in select U.S. niches, continued disruption from the early 2019 restructuring of U.S. operations, and economic headwinds in Europe. However, better mix lead to improved gross margin and…



Get the full report on Channelchek desktop.

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst
certification and important disclosures included in the full report. 
NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of
this research summary.  Proper due diligence is required before
making any investment decision.
 

Research kelly services inc- kelya can the new growth plan work

Friday, February 14, 2020

Kelly Services Inc. (KELYA)

Can the New Growth Plan Work?

Kelly Services Inc is a provider of workforce solutions and consulting and staffing services. The company’s operations are divided into three business segments namely Americas Staffing, Global Talent Solutions (“GTS”) and International Staffing. It provides staffing solutions through its branch networks in Americas and International operations and also provides a suite of innovative talent fulfilment and outcome-based solutions through GTS segment. Americas Staffing generates maximum revenue from its operations.

Joe Gomes, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

New Growth Strategy. New CEO Peter Quigley is rolling out a new, aggressive organic and inorganic growth plan to build a sustainable and profitable specialty talent solutions provider. We believe Kelly has the means, capability, and opportunity to successfully implement the plan.

4Q19 Results.  Fourth quarter results were mixed. Revenue fell short of expectations due to ongoing softness in select U.S. niches, continued disruption from the early 2019 restructuring of U.S. operations, and economic headwinds in Europe. However, better mix lead to improved gross margin and…



Get the full report on Channelchek desktop.

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst
certification and important disclosures included in the full report. 
NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of
this research summary.  Proper due diligence is required before
making any investment decision.
 

Thirty-Something Homeownership has Declined, Have Millennials Given Up?

Thirty-Something Homeownership has Declined, Have Millennials Given Up?

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

In 1990, baby boomers whose median age was 35, owned nearly one-third of American real estate.  In 2019, the millennial generation, whose median age is 31, own only 4%.  The reasons for the sharp decline are many.  Millennials face increased debt from student loans and do not have the financial ability to take on additional debt to buy a home.  Millennials are delaying raising a family, which favors renting over buying.  Whatever the reasons, it’s clear that buying habits have changed.  The millennial generation that grew up watching the real estate and stock markets crash in 2007 is less trusting of traditional investments and more likely to focus on near-term spending.  Is the American dream of home ownership dying, or is the next generation simply taking a more realistic approach to investing?

Long Story Short: Renting over buying is fine, but spending over investing is not.

Thirty-Something Homeownership has Declined, Have Millennials Given Up?

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

In 1990, baby boomers whose median age was 35, owned nearly one-third of American real estate.  In 2019, the millennial generation, whose median age is 31, own only 4%.  The reasons for the sharp decline are many.  Millennials face increased debt from student loans and do not have the financial ability to take on additional debt to buy a home.  Millennials are delaying raising a family, which favors renting over buying.  Whatever the reasons, it’s clear that buying habits have changed.  The millennial generation that grew up watching the real estate and stock markets crash in 2007 is less trusting of traditional investments and more likely to focus on near-term spending.  Is the American dream of home ownership dying, or is the next generation simply taking a more realistic approach to investing?

The Quick Spread of Coronavirus is Impacting Global Economies and Markets

The Quick Spread of Coronavirus is Impacting Global Economies and Markets

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

The coronavirus, first identified on December 31, has killed 81 people in China and infected more than 2,800 worldwide including five in the United States.  Coronavirus is an animal virus that has evolved to infect people.  It is constantly adapting and mutating making controlling the outbreak a challenge.  It can be spread between people not unlike the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) viruses.   Given the rapid escalation of reported infections, the virus has the potential to spread to a point where it has an impact on companies involved in travel, vacation and health care.  Further escalation could even impact the economic growth rate of China and its trading partners.  World health officials are scrambling to contain the spread of the coronavirus.  But are officials prepared to contain the spread of the impact of the virus on the world’s economies?

Long Story Short: The Economic Symptoms from Epidemics Have Been Felt Before

The Quick Spread of Coronavirus is Impacting Global Economies and Markets

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

The coronavirus, first identified on December 31, has killed 81 people in China and infected more than 2,800 worldwide including five in the United States.  Coronavirus is an animal virus that has evolved to infect people.  It is constantly adapting and mutating making controlling the outbreak a challenge.  It can be spread between people not unlike the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) viruses.   Given the rapid escalation of reported infections, the virus has the potential to spread to a point where it has an impact on companies involved in travel, vacation and health care.  Further escalation could even impact the economic growth rate of China and its trading partners.  World health officials are scrambling to contain the spread of the coronavirus.  But are officials prepared to contain the spread of the impact of the virus on the world’s economies?

Impact Investing Challenges Traditional Methods for Promoting Social Good

Impact Investing Challenges Traditional Methods for Promoting Social Good

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

Impact investing is a strategy to invest in companies, organizations and funds with the intention to generate a positive social or environmental impact while earning a financial return.  Impact investing challenges the view that social and environmental issues should only be addressed by charitable donations, and that financial investments should focus only on returns.  The Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) estimates that over 1,340 organizations managed US$502 billion in impact investing assets worldwide in 2018 and these numbers are expected to grow.  Alternative asset managers are starting funds dedicated to meeting environmental, social and governance targets as they seek to diversify product offerings, increase fees and meet growing demand from investors.

Long Story Short: Impact Investing – Doing Well by Doing Good

Impact Investing Challenges Traditional Methods for Promoting Social Good

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

Impact investing is a strategy to invest in companies, organizations and funds with the intention to generate a positive social or environmental impact while earning a financial return.  Impact investing challenges the view that social and environmental issues should only be addressed by charitable donations, and that financial investments should focus only on returns.  The Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) estimates that over 1,340 organizations managed US$502 billion in impact investing assets worldwide in 2018 and these numbers are expected to grow.  Alternative asset managers are starting funds dedicated to meeting environmental, social and governance targets as they seek to diversify product offerings, increase fees and meet growing demand from investors.

Do Budget Deficits Matter? U.S. Deficit Tops $1 Trillion in First 11 Months of Fiscal Year

Do Budget Deficits Matter? U.S. Deficit Tops $1 Trillion in First 11 Months of Fiscal Year

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

The U.S. budget deficit topped $1 trillion in calendar 2019 according to Treasury Department figures released on Monday.  The $1.02 trillion deficit was an increase of 17.1% from the previous year.  The U.S. deficit has expanded for four consecutive years. This is the first time this has happened since the early 1980s.  With the latest figures, the national debt has now grown to $23.2 trillion.  Budget plans for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, anticipate a deficit of $1.1 trillion. This is based on government spending of $4.75 trillion and revenue of $3.65 trillion.  Kimberly Amadeo, of The Balance, cites three reasons for the increase in the budget deficit in recent years.  First, she points to increased defense spending ($989 billion) in response to an expanded war on terrorism.  Second, tax cuts have added $3 trillion to the national debt greatly increasing debt servicing costs ($479 billion).  Finally, she points to a growth in unfunded mandatory spending for programs such as Medicaid ($419 billion) and Medicare ($645 billion).  Put succinctly, more than half of government spending is going toward programs that would be very difficult to cut.  So, is the federal deficit a runaway train about to derail (Bear case), or is the increase a manageable outcome of an expanding economy (Bull case)?

Long Story Short: The Budget Deficit Growth Shows No Signs of Slowing Down

Do Budget Deficits Matter? U.S. Deficit Tops $1 Trillion in First 11 Months of Fiscal Year

(Note: companies that
could be impacted by the content of this article are listed at the base of the
story [desktop version]. This article uses third-party references to provide a
bullish, bearish, and balanced point of view; sources are listed after the
Balanced section.)

The U.S. budget deficit topped $1 trillion in calendar 2019 according to Treasury Department figures released on Monday.  The $1.02 trillion deficit was an increase of 17.1% from the previous year.  The U.S. deficit has expanded for four consecutive years. This is the first time this has happened since the early 1980s.  With the latest figures, the national debt has now grown to $23.2 trillion.  Budget plans for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, anticipate a deficit of $1.1 trillion. This is based on government spending of $4.75 trillion and revenue of $3.65 trillion.  Kimberly Amadeo, of The Balance, cites three reasons for the increase in the budget deficit in recent years.  First, she points to increased defense spending ($989 billion) in response to an expanded war on terrorism.  Second, tax cuts have added $3 trillion to the national debt greatly increasing debt servicing costs ($479 billion).  Finally, she points to a growth in unfunded mandatory spending for programs such as Medicaid ($419 billion) and Medicare ($645 billion).  Put succinctly, more than half of government spending is going toward programs that would be very difficult to cut.  So, is the federal deficit a runaway train about to derail (Bear case), or is the increase a manageable outcome of an expanding economy (Bull case)?

Research – Kelly Services Inc. (KELYA) – Latest Acquisition Adds to Educational Services segment

Thursday, January 1, 2020

Kelly Services Inc. (KELYA)

Latest Acquisition Adds to Educational Services Segment

Kelly Services Inc is a provider of workforce solutions and consulting and staffing services. The company’s operations are divided into three business segments namely Americas Staffing, Global Talent Solutions (“GTS”) and International Staffing. It provides staffing solutions through its branch networks in Americas and International operations and also provides a suite of innovative talent fulfilment and outcome-based solutions through GTS segment. Americas Staffing generates maximum revenue from its operations.

Joe Gomes, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

Acquires Insight. After the market closed on Tuesday, Kelly announced the acquisition of Insight, a fast growing educational services staffing company serving some 60 school districts across four states. The Insight acquisition continues Kelly’s strategy of expanding its business in key specialties, in our view.

Strengthens Existing Markets. Insight strengthens Kelly’s presence in existing markets, although in three states, NJ, IL, and MA, it is almost like greenfield territory, while in PA, Insight will be additive to existing operations. Insight brings to the table a tech focus which may prove useful to Kelly’s existing operations. Key management is expected to remain with…



Get the full report on Channelchek desktop.

This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst
certification and important disclosures included in the full report. 
NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of
this research summary.  Proper due diligence is required before
making any investment decision.