Schwazze Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Smoking Gun, LLC & Smoking Gun Land Company, LLC


Schwazze Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Smoking Gun, LLC & Smoking Gun Land Company, LLC

 

Schwazze Continues to widen its Colorado Expansion Strategy

DENVER, Nov. 15, 2021 /CNW/ – Schwazze, (OTCQX: SHWZ) (“Schwazze” or the “Company”), announced that it has signed definitive documents to acquire the assets of Smoking Gun, LLC and Smoking Gun Land Company, LLC (“Smoking Gun”).

The Smoking Gun dispensary and assets are located on a prime retail corner on Colorado Blvd. in Glendale, Colorado in the center of the greater Denver metro area. This acquisition is part of the Company’s continuing retail expansion plan in Colorado bringing the total number of dispensaries including announced acquisitions to 20.   

Total consideration for the acquisition will be $4 million in cash and 100,000 shares in Schwazze common stock upon closing. The acquisition is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2021, subject to closing conditions and covenants customary for this type of transaction, including, without limitation, obtaining Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division and local licensing approval.

About Schwazze
Schwazze (OTCQX: SHWZ) is building the premier vertically integrated cannabis company in Colorado and plans to take its operating system to other states where it can develop a differentiated leadership position.  Schwazze is the parent company of a portfolio of leading cannabis businesses and brands spanning seed to sale.  The Company is committed to unlocking the full potential of the cannabis plant to improve the human condition.  Schwazze is anchored by a high-performance culture that combines customer-centric thinking and data science to test, measure, and drive decisions and outcomes.  The Company’s leadership team has deep expertise in retailing, wholesaling, and building consumer brands at Fortune 500 companies as well as in the cannabis sector.  Schwazze is passionate about making a difference in our communities, promoting diversity and inclusion, and doing our part to incorporate climate-conscious best practices.  Medicine Man Technologies, Inc. was Schwazze’s former operating trade name.  The corporate entity continues to be named Medicine Man Technologies, Inc.

Schwazze derives its name from the pruning technique of a cannabis plant to enhance plant structure and promote healthy growth.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements.” Such statements may be preceded by the words “plan,” “will,” “may,”, “predicts,” or similar words. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future events or performance, are based on certain assumptions, and are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and cannot be predicted or quantified. Consequently, actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, risks and uncertainties associated with (i) our inability to manufacture our products and product candidates on a commercial scale on our own or in collaboration with third parties; (ii) difficulties in obtaining financing on commercially reasonable terms; (iii) changes in the size and nature of our competition; (iv) loss of one or more key executives or scientists; (v) difficulties in securing regulatory approval to market our products and product candidates; (vi) our ability to successfully execute our growth strategy in Colorado and outside the state, (vii) our ability to consummate the acquisition described in this press release or to identify and consummate future acquisitions that meet our criteria, (viii) our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and realize synergies therefrom, (ix) the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, * the timing and extent of governmental stimulus programs, and (xi) the uncertainty in the application of federal, state and local laws to our business, and any changes in such laws. More detailed information about the Company and the risk factors that may affect the realization of forward-looking statements is set forth in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Investors and security holders are urged to read these documents free of charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by law.

SOURCE Medicine Man Technologies, Inc.

Will Small Cap Stocks Outperform in 2022?


Image Credit: Zombiette (Flickr)

Small Caps Could Benefit from Tax Changes, M&A, and Simple Reversion to Mean in 2022

 

In a recent Barron’s article titled “Small-Cap Stocks Are in Line to Be Big Winners in 2022” the publication makes a good case for smaller company stocks. The article demonstrates smaller stocks are “cheap in an expensive market, have attractive fundamentals,” and that large caps may have problems that small-caps could avoid. It also points to a tax law change that could work in favor of smaller companies.

Valuation Comparison

The two most followed benchmark indexes by investors to measure the performance of the small-cap market are the S&P 600 and the Russell 2000. The S&P 600, views only 30% as many stocks as the Russell 2000. Both indexes stood at about 17 times expected earnings over the next 12 months, compared to about 22 times for the large-cap S&P 500. In the past, small-caps have traded at a premium multiple. The S&P 600’s 17-times multiple is in line with its historical average since 2000. In a market where most stocks are trading well above their average, a company or index trading closer to a historical mean suggests potential outperformance if stocks revert to their mean average.

 

Image/Data: Koyfin

 

Playing Catch up?

Jill Carey Hall, the head of U.S. small and midcap strategy at Bank of America Securities, has recently said, “The historical relationship between valuation and subsequent returns suggests small-caps should lead large-caps over the next decade, and points to slightly negative annualized price returns for the S&P 500 but high-single-digit annualized price returns for the Russell 2000.”  The small-cap sector is beginning to show increased relative performance after a long period of malaise.

Over the past 30 days, while the S&P was up a comfortable 4.73%, the two small-cap indexes were substantially higher at 6.72% (Russell 2000) and 6.73% (S&P 600). One notable difference in how stocks are selected for these two indexes is that the S&P requires companies to have four consecutive quarters where the total earnings sum is positive.

As interest rates are expected to rise, large-tech and consumer discretionary stocks are expected to be impacted both by longer-term borrowing needs and dividend yield comparisons. More than 40% of the S&P 500’s market cap is in the technology and consumer-discretionary sectors. In comparison, the S&P 600 has only a quarter of its market value in tech and consumer discretionary, and about 45% combined in financials, industrials, materials, and energy.

Tax Changes Benefitting Small-Cap Stocks?

Washington tax policy proposals bode well for small-cap and even the smaller microcap sectors. Although it’s still being debated in Washington, lawmakers controlling the direction of new tax policy plan a 15% minimum tax for companies that report earnings of at least $1 billion in a year. Based on results over the past year, that would affect just one company in the S&P 600, Genworth Financial, while many larger companies in the larger S&P 500 index could be impacted as early as next year.

Mergers and Acquisitions

U.S. mergers-and-acquisitions activity has been running high in 2021, and cash is still abundant on many corporate balance sheets and private equity firms. The conditions remain ripe for more acquisitions going forward. This, of course, benefits these companies that are small enough to be attractive and still affordable to companies that feel their business is complimentary. Small companies don’t necessarily need to be acquired to experience a rise in value, as their competitors are gobbled up, it’s reasonable to presume their own value will increase.

Take-Away

Do you remember when small-cap stocks came from behind in 2020? This sector has consistently outperformed large-caps from November through February. The performance differential, along with recent movement, provides reason to believe that this sector is again gaining momentum to rise to where it “should” be in relation to higher capitalized stocks.

A tax change that imposes a minimum tax on companies above a certain profit limit would create maneuvering among investors, and companies right on the cusp. This shifting also could bode well for the smaller stocks held in portfolios.

Channelchek provides information on over 6,000 small and microcap companies, register today to receive research and timely articles each day in your inbox. 

Paul Hoffman

Managing Editor, Editor

Suggested Reading:



Small-Caps are Bigger than Ever, Investors Need to Adjust



Is Biden Tightening the Reins on Large Companies?





Index Funds Still May Fall Apart over Time



Does Insider Selling Indicate Bearishness on the Company

 

Sources:

 https://app.koyfin.com/share/9e8ca3c111

https://www.barrons.com/quote/index/us/s&p%20us/spx

https://www.barrons.com/articles/small-company-barrons-stock-picks-51636763348?tesla=y

https://www.barrons.com/articles/cheap-small-company-stocks-51636763053?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_3

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Treating Age-Related Changes in Cells to Reduce Age-Related Diseases


Image Credit: Raleigh McElvery and Sebastian Swanson (MIT)

For Stem Cells, Bigger Doesn’t Mean Better

 

MIT Biologists Show that Enlargement of Blood Stem Cells Restricts their Ability to Generate New Blood Cells During Aging

Anne Trafton | MIT News Office

MIT biologists have answered an important biological question: Why do cells control their size?

Cells of the same type are strikingly uniform in size, while cell size differs between different cell types. This raises the question of whether cell size is important for cellular physiology.

The new study suggests that cellular enlargement drives a decline in the function of stem cells. The researchers found that blood stem cells, which are among the smallest cells in the body, lose their ability to perform their normal function — replenishing the body’s blood cells — as they grow larger. However, when the cells were restored to their usual size, they behaved normally again.

The researchers also found that blood stem cells tend to enlarge as they age. Their study shows that this enlargement contributes to stem cell decline during aging.

“We have discovered cellular enlargement as a new aging factor in vivo, and now we can explore if we can treat cellular enlargement to delay aging and aging-related diseases,” says Jette Lengefeld, a former MIT postdoc, who is now a principal investigator at the University of Helsinki.

Lengefeld is the lead author of the study, which appears today in Science Advances. The late Angelika Amon, an MIT professor of biology and member of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, is the senior author of the study.

Outsized Effects

It has been known since the 1960s that human cells grown in a lab dish enlarge as they become senescent — a nondividing cellular state that is associated with aging. Every time a cell divides, it can encounter DNA damage. When this happens, division is halted to repair the damage. During each of these delays, the cell grows slightly larger. Many scientists believed that this enlargement was simply a side effect of aging, but the Amon lab began to investigate the possibility that large cell size drives age-related losses of function.

Lengefeld studied the effects of size on stem cells — specifically, blood stem cells, which give rise to the blood cells of our body throughout life. To study how size affects these stem cells, the researchers damaged their DNA, leading to an increase in their size. They then compared these enlarged cells to other cells that also experienced DNA damage but were prevented from increasing in size using a drug called rapamycin.

After the treatment, the researchers measured the functionality of these two groups of stem cells by injecting them into mice that had their own blood stem cells eliminated. This allowed the researchers to determine whether the transplanted stem cells were able to repopulate the mouse’s blood cells.

They found that the DNA-damaged and enlarged stem cells were unable to produce new blood cells. However, the DNA-damaged stem cells that were kept small were still able to produce new blood cells.

In another experiment, the researchers used a genetic mutation to reduce the size of naturally occurring large stem cells that they found in older mice. They showed that if they induced those large stem cells to become small again, the cells regained their regenerative potential and behaved like younger stem cells.

“This is striking evidence supporting the model that size is important for the functionality of stem cells,” Lengefeld says. “When we damage the stem cells’ DNA but keep them small during the damage, they retain their functionality. And if we reduce the size of large stem cells, we can restore their function.”

Until now, studying the function of cell size has been difficult to do, says Jan Skotheim, a professor of biology at Stanford University.

“We know that cells, through various mechanisms, operate to keep their size within a specific range, but we haven’t really understood why,” says Skotheim, who was not involved in the research. “This is really the first work showing the function of cell size in any animal.”

Keeping Cells Small

When the researchers treated mice with rapamycin, beginning at a young age, they were able to prevent blood stem cells from enlarging as the mice got older. Blood stem cells from those mice remained small and were able to build blood cells like young stem cells even in mice 3 years of age — an old age for a mouse.

Rapamycin, a drug that can inhibit cell growth, is now used to treat some cancers and to prevent organ transplant rejection, and has raised interest for its ability to extend lifespan in mice and other organisms. It may be useful in slowing down the enlargement of stem cells and therefore could have beneficial effects in humans, Lengefeld says.

“If we find drugs that are specific in making large blood stem cells smaller again, we can test whether this improves the health of people who suffer from problems with their blood system — like anemia and a reduced immune system — or maybe even help people with leukemia,” she says.

The researchers also demonstrated the importance of size in another type of stem cells — intestinal stem cells. They found that larger stem cells were less able to generate intestinal organoids, which mimic the structure of the intestinal lining.

“That suggested that this relationship between cell size and function is conserved in stem cells, and that cellular size is a marker of stem cell function,” Lengefeld says.

The research was funded, in part, by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the Koch Institute Support (core) grant from the National Cancer Institute, and the MIT Stem Cell Initiative.

 

Suggested Reading:



Cells that Can be Produced from Stem Cells



Preventing the Immune System from Rejecting Gene Therapy





Pros and Cons of FDA Being Funded in Part by Drug Companies



Therapeutic Research Advanced by Stem Cell Science

 

The Investor Forum at the World Stem Cell Summit

Corporate presentations and Q&As with executives representing breakthroughs in medical science. Increasing longevity. Avoiding and curing diseases. Investment Ideas.

View Presentations

 

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Allegiant Prepares For Expansion Drilling At Its 100% Owned Eastside Gold Deposit With Commencement Of Road Construction


Allegiant Prepares For Expansion Drilling At Its 100% Owned Eastside Gold Deposit With Commencement Of Road Construction

 

Reno, Nevada /November 15, 2021 – Allegiant Gold Ltd. (“Allegiant” or the “Company”) (AUAU: TSX-V) (AUXXF: OTCQX) is pleased to announce the commencement of road construction in anticipation of drilling at its 100% owned Eastside Gold Deposit in Nevada (“Eastside”).

The road building is planned to commence in and around the recently discovered high-grade zone within the western edge of the Original Pit Zone (“OPZ”). Allegiant plans to drill up to nine diamond core (“Core”) holes to test the high-grade area at Eastside, where drilling returned:

  • Hole 243 included 2.55 g/t Au over 147.8 metres (including 13.49 g/t Au over 24.4m)
  • Hole 239 included 111.3m of 1.45 g/t Au including 3.1 metres of 39 g/t at the bottom of the hole at 418 metres
  • Hole 244 included 76 metres of mineralization including 6.1m of 1.48 g/t Au
  • Hole 245 included 15.2 metres of 3.4 g/t Au at a depth of 177 metres

Additional road construction will occur in and around areas to the east and west of the OPZ to test additional targets. It is expected that, in addition to the Core holes, Allegiant will drill up to 20-30 reverse-circulation (“RC”) holes at relatively shallow depths (see drill map below).

Map 1: 2021-2022 Original Pit Zone Drilling Map
https://allegiantgold.com/site/assets/files/2209/auau_eastside_2021-2022_drill_holes.jpg

Peter Gianulis, CEO of Allegiant Gold, commented: “The recently acquired permit expansion at Eastside has opened up significant drill targets in and around the Original Pit Zone. Road construction is an important next step to having the RC and Core rigs in place for this highly anticipated drilling program.”

Eastside is open in several directions and presently hosts an inferred resource of 1.09 million ounces of gold at 0.55 grams per tonne at the Original Pit Zone and an inferred resource of 314,000 gold ounces at 0.49 g/t Au in the Castle Area, both within pit-constrained models at a cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t Au, US$1,750/ounce gold price and a US$21.88 silver price. Eastside also hosts significant silver resources of 8.7 million ounces at 4.4 g/t Ag at the OPZ.

EASTSIDE RESOURCE ESTIMATE

The updated resource estimate (“Updated Resource Estimate and NI 43-101 Technical Report, Eastside and Castle Gold-Silver Project Technical Report, Esmeralda County, Nevada”) was conducted by Mine Development Associates (“MDA”), a division of RESPEC of Reno, Nevada with an effective date of July 30, 2021. Contained pit-constrained Inferred Resources (cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t) of 1,090,00 Au ounces in 61,730,000 tonnes at 0.55 g/t Au and 8,700,000 Ag ounces at 4.4 g/t Ag at the Original Pit Zone and 314,000 Au ounces in 19,986,000 tonnes at 0.49 g/t Au at the Castle Area. In accordance with NI 43-101, the MDA Technical Report dated July 30, 2021, was filed on SEDAR on August 16, 2021. This report builds on and supersedes the NI 43-101 reports of Ristorcelli (December 2016), Ristorcelli (July 2017), Ristorcelli (January 2020) and Ristorcelli (November 2020) titled “Amended Updated Resource Estimate and NI 43-101 Technical Report, Eastside and Castle Gold-Silver Project, Esmeralda County, Nevada” prepared for Allegiant with an Effective Date of December 30, 2019.

QUALIFIED PERSON

Andy Wallace is a Certified Professional Geologist (CPG) with the American Institute of Professional Geologists and is the Qualified Person under NI 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, who has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical content of this press release.

ABOUT ALLEGIANT

Allegiant owns 100% of 10 highly-prospective gold projects in the United States, seven of which are located in the mining-friendly jurisdiction of Nevada. Four of Allegiant’s projects are farmed-out, providing for cost reductions and cash-flow. Allegiant’s flagship, district-scale Eastside project hosts a large and expanding gold resource and is located in an area of excellent infrastructure. Preliminary metallurgical testing indicates that both oxide and sulphide gold mineralization at Eastside is amenable to heap leaching.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Peter Gianulis
CEO

For more information contact:

Investor Relations
(604) 634-0970 or
1-888-818-1364
ir@allegiantgold.com

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Certain statements and information contained in this press release constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable U.S. securities laws and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, which are referred to collectively as “forward-looking statements”. The United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for certain forward-looking statements.Allegiant Gold Ltd.’s (“Allegiant”) exploration plans for its gold exploration properties, the drill program at Allegiant’s Eastside project, the preparation and publication of an updated resource estimate in respect of the Original Zone at the Eastside project, Allegiant’s future exploration and development plans, including anticipated costs and timing thereof; Allegiant’s plans for growth through exploration activities, acquisitions or otherwise; and expectations regarding future maintenance and capital expenditures, and working capital requirements. Forward-looking statements are statements and information regarding possible events, conditions or results of operations that are based upon assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action. All statements and information other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “budget”, “plan”, “estimate”, “continue”, “forecast”, “intend”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential”, “target”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, “will” and similar words or phrases (including negative variations) suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Such forward-looking statements are based on a number of material factors and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking information. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Some of the known risks and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements are described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in Allegiant’s Listing Application, dated January 24, 2018, as filed with the TSX Venture Exchange and available on SEDAR under Allegiant’s profile at www.sedar.com. Actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Allegiant undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this press release if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change, except as otherwise required by applicable law.

Release – Allegiant Prepares For Expansion Drilling At Its 100% Owned Eastside Gold Deposit With Commencement Of Road Construction


Allegiant Prepares For Expansion Drilling At Its 100% Owned Eastside Gold Deposit With Commencement Of Road Construction

 

Reno, Nevada /November 15, 2021 – Allegiant Gold Ltd. (“Allegiant” or the “Company”) (AUAU: TSX-V) (AUXXF: OTCQX) is pleased to announce the commencement of road construction in anticipation of drilling at its 100% owned Eastside Gold Deposit in Nevada (“Eastside”).

The road building is planned to commence in and around the recently discovered high-grade zone within the western edge of the Original Pit Zone (“OPZ”). Allegiant plans to drill up to nine diamond core (“Core”) holes to test the high-grade area at Eastside, where drilling returned:

  • Hole 243 included 2.55 g/t Au over 147.8 metres (including 13.49 g/t Au over 24.4m)
  • Hole 239 included 111.3m of 1.45 g/t Au including 3.1 metres of 39 g/t at the bottom of the hole at 418 metres
  • Hole 244 included 76 metres of mineralization including 6.1m of 1.48 g/t Au
  • Hole 245 included 15.2 metres of 3.4 g/t Au at a depth of 177 metres

Additional road construction will occur in and around areas to the east and west of the OPZ to test additional targets. It is expected that, in addition to the Core holes, Allegiant will drill up to 20-30 reverse-circulation (“RC”) holes at relatively shallow depths (see drill map below).

Map 1: 2021-2022 Original Pit Zone Drilling Map
https://allegiantgold.com/site/assets/files/2209/auau_eastside_2021-2022_drill_holes.jpg

Peter Gianulis, CEO of Allegiant Gold, commented: “The recently acquired permit expansion at Eastside has opened up significant drill targets in and around the Original Pit Zone. Road construction is an important next step to having the RC and Core rigs in place for this highly anticipated drilling program.”

Eastside is open in several directions and presently hosts an inferred resource of 1.09 million ounces of gold at 0.55 grams per tonne at the Original Pit Zone and an inferred resource of 314,000 gold ounces at 0.49 g/t Au in the Castle Area, both within pit-constrained models at a cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t Au, US$1,750/ounce gold price and a US$21.88 silver price. Eastside also hosts significant silver resources of 8.7 million ounces at 4.4 g/t Ag at the OPZ.

EASTSIDE RESOURCE ESTIMATE

The updated resource estimate (“Updated Resource Estimate and NI 43-101 Technical Report, Eastside and Castle Gold-Silver Project Technical Report, Esmeralda County, Nevada”) was conducted by Mine Development Associates (“MDA”), a division of RESPEC of Reno, Nevada with an effective date of July 30, 2021. Contained pit-constrained Inferred Resources (cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t) of 1,090,00 Au ounces in 61,730,000 tonnes at 0.55 g/t Au and 8,700,000 Ag ounces at 4.4 g/t Ag at the Original Pit Zone and 314,000 Au ounces in 19,986,000 tonnes at 0.49 g/t Au at the Castle Area. In accordance with NI 43-101, the MDA Technical Report dated July 30, 2021, was filed on SEDAR on August 16, 2021. This report builds on and supersedes the NI 43-101 reports of Ristorcelli (December 2016), Ristorcelli (July 2017), Ristorcelli (January 2020) and Ristorcelli (November 2020) titled “Amended Updated Resource Estimate and NI 43-101 Technical Report, Eastside and Castle Gold-Silver Project, Esmeralda County, Nevada” prepared for Allegiant with an Effective Date of December 30, 2019.

QUALIFIED PERSON

Andy Wallace is a Certified Professional Geologist (CPG) with the American Institute of Professional Geologists and is the Qualified Person under NI 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, who has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical content of this press release.

ABOUT ALLEGIANT

Allegiant owns 100% of 10 highly-prospective gold projects in the United States, seven of which are located in the mining-friendly jurisdiction of Nevada. Four of Allegiant’s projects are farmed-out, providing for cost reductions and cash-flow. Allegiant’s flagship, district-scale Eastside project hosts a large and expanding gold resource and is located in an area of excellent infrastructure. Preliminary metallurgical testing indicates that both oxide and sulphide gold mineralization at Eastside is amenable to heap leaching.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Peter Gianulis
CEO

For more information contact:

Investor Relations
(604) 634-0970 or
1-888-818-1364
ir@allegiantgold.com

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Certain statements and information contained in this press release constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable U.S. securities laws and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, which are referred to collectively as “forward-looking statements”. The United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for certain forward-looking statements.Allegiant Gold Ltd.’s (“Allegiant”) exploration plans for its gold exploration properties, the drill program at Allegiant’s Eastside project, the preparation and publication of an updated resource estimate in respect of the Original Zone at the Eastside project, Allegiant’s future exploration and development plans, including anticipated costs and timing thereof; Allegiant’s plans for growth through exploration activities, acquisitions or otherwise; and expectations regarding future maintenance and capital expenditures, and working capital requirements. Forward-looking statements are statements and information regarding possible events, conditions or results of operations that are based upon assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action. All statements and information other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “budget”, “plan”, “estimate”, “continue”, “forecast”, “intend”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential”, “target”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, “will” and similar words or phrases (including negative variations) suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Such forward-looking statements are based on a number of material factors and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking information. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained in this press release. Some of the known risks and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements are described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” in Allegiant’s Listing Application, dated January 24, 2018, as filed with the TSX Venture Exchange and available on SEDAR under Allegiant’s profile at www.sedar.com. Actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Allegiant undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this press release if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change, except as otherwise required by applicable law.

QuickChek – November 15, 2021



Schwazze Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Smoking Gun, LLC & Smoking Gun Land Company, LLC

Schwazze announced that it has signed definitive documents to acquire the assets of Smoking Gun, LLC and Smoking Gun Land Company, LLC

Research, News & Market Data on Schwazze

Watch recent presentation from Schwazze



Ayala Pharmaceuticals Reports Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update

Ayala Pharmaceuticals announced reported financial results for the period ended September 30, 2021 and highlighted recent progress and upcoming milestones for its pipeline programs

Research, News & Market Data on Ayala Pharmaceuticals

Watch recent presentation from Ayala Pharmaceuticals



Cocrystal Pharma Reports Third Quarter Financial Results and Provides an Update on Development Programs and Milestones

Cocrystal Pharma announced financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, and provides updates on its antiviral pipeline, upcoming milestones and business activities

Research, News & Market Data on Cocrystal Pharma

Watch recent presentation from Cocrystal Pharma

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Release – Schwazze Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Smoking Gun LLC Smoking Gun Land Company LLC


Schwazze Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Smoking Gun, LLC & Smoking Gun Land Company, LLC

 

Schwazze Continues to widen its Colorado Expansion Strategy

DENVER, Nov. 15, 2021 /CNW/ – Schwazze, (OTCQX: SHWZ) (“Schwazze” or the “Company”), announced that it has signed definitive documents to acquire the assets of Smoking Gun, LLC and Smoking Gun Land Company, LLC (“Smoking Gun”).

The Smoking Gun dispensary and assets are located on a prime retail corner on Colorado Blvd. in Glendale, Colorado in the center of the greater Denver metro area. This acquisition is part of the Company’s continuing retail expansion plan in Colorado bringing the total number of dispensaries including announced acquisitions to 20.   

Total consideration for the acquisition will be $4 million in cash and 100,000 shares in Schwazze common stock upon closing. The acquisition is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2021, subject to closing conditions and covenants customary for this type of transaction, including, without limitation, obtaining Colorado Marijuana Enforcement Division and local licensing approval.

About Schwazze
Schwazze (OTCQX: SHWZ) is building the premier vertically integrated cannabis company in Colorado and plans to take its operating system to other states where it can develop a differentiated leadership position.  Schwazze is the parent company of a portfolio of leading cannabis businesses and brands spanning seed to sale.  The Company is committed to unlocking the full potential of the cannabis plant to improve the human condition.  Schwazze is anchored by a high-performance culture that combines customer-centric thinking and data science to test, measure, and drive decisions and outcomes.  The Company’s leadership team has deep expertise in retailing, wholesaling, and building consumer brands at Fortune 500 companies as well as in the cannabis sector.  Schwazze is passionate about making a difference in our communities, promoting diversity and inclusion, and doing our part to incorporate climate-conscious best practices.  Medicine Man Technologies, Inc. was Schwazze’s former operating trade name.  The corporate entity continues to be named Medicine Man Technologies, Inc.

Schwazze derives its name from the pruning technique of a cannabis plant to enhance plant structure and promote healthy growth.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements.” Such statements may be preceded by the words “plan,” “will,” “may,”, “predicts,” or similar words. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future events or performance, are based on certain assumptions, and are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and cannot be predicted or quantified. Consequently, actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, risks and uncertainties associated with (i) our inability to manufacture our products and product candidates on a commercial scale on our own or in collaboration with third parties; (ii) difficulties in obtaining financing on commercially reasonable terms; (iii) changes in the size and nature of our competition; (iv) loss of one or more key executives or scientists; (v) difficulties in securing regulatory approval to market our products and product candidates; (vi) our ability to successfully execute our growth strategy in Colorado and outside the state, (vii) our ability to consummate the acquisition described in this press release or to identify and consummate future acquisitions that meet our criteria, (viii) our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses and realize synergies therefrom, (ix) the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, * the timing and extent of governmental stimulus programs, and (xi) the uncertainty in the application of federal, state and local laws to our business, and any changes in such laws. More detailed information about the Company and the risk factors that may affect the realization of forward-looking statements is set forth in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Investors and security holders are urged to read these documents free of charge on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by law.

SOURCE Medicine Man Technologies, Inc.

Release – Ayala Pharmaceuticals Reports Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update


Ayala Pharmaceuticals Reports Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update

 

– Presented Preliminary Clinical Data from 6mg Cohort of Phase 2 ACCURACY Trial of AL101 in R/M ACC Demonstrating 70% Disease Control Rate at ESMO 2021 –

– Presented Pre-Clinical Proof of Concept Data for Enhanced Activity of AL101 in Combination with Approved Cancer Therapies in ACC-

– Published Case Studies Highlighting Clinical Activity of AL101 with Long-Lasting Responses in Patients with Desmoid Tumors –

– Enrollment in All Ongoing Studies is on Track and Have Progressed as Planned –

– Multiple Milestones Across Clinical-Stage Pipeline Expected in 2022 –

REHOVOT, Israel & WILMINGTON, Del., Nov. 15, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: AYLA), a clinical-stage oncology company focused on developing and commercializing small molecule therapeutics for patients suffering from rare and aggressive cancers, primarily in genetically defined patient populations, today reported financial results for the period ended September 30, 2021 and highlighted recent progress and upcoming milestones for its pipeline programs.

“As we gear up for multiple important milestones in 2022 across all of our clinical-stage programs in various indications, including desmoid tumors, triple negative breast cancer, adenoid cystic carcinoma and potentially multiple myeloma, we remain steadfast in our approach to developing gamma secretase inhibitors to treat these genetically defined cancers,” said Roni Mamluk, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of Ayala. “We are incredibly pleased with the safety and efficacy profile of AL101 for the treatment of recurrent/metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma harboring Notch-activating mutations, as presented at ESMO in September, as well as the strong preclinical rationale for potential combination treatment in this indication and other tumor types. We also continued to progress our pivotal RINGSIDE trial evaluating AL102 for the treatment of desmoid tumors as enrollment continues across multiple sites globally and look forward to reporting preliminary results from this trial in mid-2022. In addition, we are very pleased with our ongoing collaboration with Novartis and the status of the study of our AL102 in combination with their anti BCMA agent for multiple myeloma.”

Recent Business Highlights and Upcoming Milestones:

  • Published Two Case Studies Highlighting Clinical Activity of AL101 in Desmoid Tumors in Current OncologyIn September 2021, Ayala published two case studies of adult patients with desmoid tumors treated with AL101. Both patients experienced significant tumor burden and symptomatic and life-threatening disease due to disease bulk and location. With AL101 treatment, both subjects achieved long-lasting partial responses with a maximal decrease in tumor size from baseline of 41% after approximately 1 year (55 weeks) of treatment in Case One, and a maximal decrease in tumor size from baseline of 60% after about 1.6 years (82 weeks) of treatment in Case Two.

  • On Track to Report Initial Interim Data from Part A of the Pivotal Phase 2/3 RINGSIDE Trial for the Treatment of Desmoid Tumors in Mid-2022: Enrollment continues to progress globally in the Phase 2/3 RINGSIDE Trial of AL102. Ayala expects to report an initial interim data read-out from part A of the trial in mid-2022, with part B of the study commencing thereafter.

  • Phase 1 Trial of AL102 in Combination with Novartis’ BCMA Targeting Agent, WVT087 for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Continues to Progress: Enrollment progresses as planned in the Phase 1 combination trial of AL102 with Novartis’ investigational anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) agent, WVT078, for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM).

  • Presented Preliminary Clinical Data from the Ongoing Phase 2 ACCURACY Trial and ACC at European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Virtual Congress 2021: In September 2021, Ayala presented updated interim data from the 6mg cohort of its ongoing Phase 2 ACCURACY study of AL101 for the treatment of recurrent/metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (R/M ACC) harboring Notch activating mutations. The data demonstrated meaningful clinical activity of AL101 6mg monotherapy with a 70% disease control rate across 33 evaluable patients. Partial responses were observed in three subjects (9%) and stable disease was observed in 20 subjects (61%). The 6mg dose of AL101 was well tolerated with manageable side effects consistent with those observed in the 4mg cohort.

  • Presented Preclinical Proof of Concept Data of AL101 in Combination with Approved Cancer Therapies in ACC at ESMO: In September 2021, Ayala also presented a preclinical study evaluating the potential of combination therapy of AL101 in PDX models of ACC, comparing the differential gene expression of ACC tumors versus normal matched tissue regardless of Notch activation status. AL101 in combination demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition, including regressions, compared to each drug alone, and the study indicated that crosstalk between signaling pathways may increase the efficacy of AL101 in R/M ACC regardless of Notch mutational status.

  • Phase 2 TENACITY Trial of AL101 for the Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Continues to Progress: Ayala continues to enroll patients in the Phase 2 TENACITY clinical trial of AL101, for the treatment of patients with Notch-activated recurrent or metastatic (R/M) triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The Company expects to report preliminary data from this ongoing trial in 2022.

Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results

  • Cash Position: Cash and cash equivalents were $40.8 million as of September 30, 2021, as compared to $42.0 million as of December 31, 2020.
  • Collaboration Revenue: Collaboration revenue was $0.6 million for the third quarter of 2021, as compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2020.
  • R&D Expenses: Research and development expenses were $7.4 million for the third quarter of 2021, compared to $5.4 million for the same period in 2020. The increase was primarily driven by the advancement in our clinical trials.
  • G&A Expenses: General and administrative expenses were $2.2 million for the third quarter of 2021, compared to $1.9 million for the same period in 2020.
  • Net Loss: Net loss was $9.8 million for the third quarter of 2021, resulting in a basic and diluted net loss per share of $0.68. Net loss was $7.4 million for the same period in 2020, resulting in a basic and diluted net loss per share of $0.59.

About Ayala Pharmaceuticals

Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a clinical-stage oncology company focused on developing and commercializing small molecule therapeutics for patients suffering from rare and aggressive cancers, primarily in genetically defined patient populations. Ayala’s approach is focused on predicating, identifying and addressing tumorigenic drivers of cancer through a combination of its bioinformatics platform and next-generation sequencing to deliver targeted therapies to underserved patient populations. The company has two product candidates under development, AL101 and AL102, targeting the aberrant activation of the Notch pathway with gamma secretase inhibitors to treat a variety of tumors including Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma, Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL), Desmoid Tumors and Multiple Myeloma (MM) (in collaboration with Novartis). AL101, has received Fast Track Designation and Orphan Drug Designation from the U.S. FDA and is currently in a Phase 2 clinical trial for patients with ACC (ACCURACY) bearing Notch activating mutations and in a Phase 2 clinical trial for patients with TNBC (TENACITY) bearing Notch activating mutations and other gene rearrangements. AL102 is currently in a Pivotal Phase 2/3 clinical trials for patients with desmoid tumors (RINGSIDE) and is being evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial in combination with Novartis’ BMCA targeting agent, WVT078, in Patients with relapsed/refractory Multiple Myeloma. For more information, visit www.ayalapharma.com.

Investors:
Julie Seidel
Stern Investor Relations, Inc.
+1-212-362-1200
Julie.seidel@sternir.com

Ayala Pharmaceuticals:
+1-857-444-0553
info@ayalapharma.com

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including statements relating to our development of AL101 and AL102, the promise and potential impact of our preclinical or clinical trial data, the timing of and plans to initiate additional clinical trials of AL101 and AL102, upcoming milestones, including without limitation the timing and results of any clinical trials or readouts and patient enrollment. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations. The words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations, including our preclinical studies and clinical trials, and the continuity of our business; we have incurred significant losses, are not currently profitable and may never become profitable; our need for additional funding; our cash runway; our limited operating history and the prospects for our future viability; the lengthy, expensive, and uncertain process of clinical drug development, including potential delays in regulatory approval; our requirement to pay significant payments under product candidate licenses; the approach we are taking to discover and develop product candidates and whether it will lead to marketable products; the expense, time-consuming nature and uncertainty of clinical trials; enrollment and retention of patients; potential side effects of our product candidates; our ability to develop or to collaborate with others to develop appropriate diagnostic tests; protection of our proprietary technology and the confidentiality of our trade secrets; potential lawsuits for, or claims of, infringement of third-party intellectual property or challenges to the ownership of our intellectual property; risks associated with international operations; our ability to retain key personnel and to manage our growth; the potential volatility of our common stock; costs and resources of operating as a public company; unfavorable or no analyst research or reports; and securities class action litigation against us. These and other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 24, 2021 and our other filings with the SEC could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this press release. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible to predict all risk factors and uncertainties. While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.



AYALA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

    September 30     December 31  
    2021     2020  
    (Unaudited)        
CURRENT ASSETS:            
Cash and Cash Equivalents   $ 40,840     $ 42,025  
Short-term Restricted Bank Deposits     120       90  
Trade Receivables     373       681  
Prepaid Expenses and other Current Assets     2,991       1,444  
Total Current Assets     44,324       44,240  
LONG-TERM ASSETS:                
Other Assets   $ 272     $ 305  
Property and Equipment, Net     1,148       1,283  
Total Long-Term Assets     1,420       1,588  
Total Assets   $ 45,744     $ 45,828  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                
CURRENT LIABILITIES:                
Trade Payables   $ 2,888     $ 3,726  
Other Accounts Payables     2,979       3,151  
Total Current Liabilities     5,867       6,877  
LONG TERM LIABILITIES:                
Long-term Rent Liability     493       553  
Total Long-Term Liabilities   $ 493     $ 553  
STOCKHOLDERS’ STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                
Common Stock of $0.01 par value per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020; 13,685,554 and 12,824,463 shares issued at September 30, 2021 and, respectively December 31, 2020; 13,549,362 and 12,728,446 shares outstanding at September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively   $ 135     $ 128  
Additional Paid-in Capital     140,341       109,157  
Accumulated Deficit     (101,092 )     (70,887 )
Total Stockholders’ Equity     39,384       38,398  
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity   $ 45,744     $ 45,828  



AYALA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share & per share amounts)

     For the Three Months Ended       For the Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2021     2020     2021     2020  
Revenues from licensing agreement   $ 625     $ 658     $ 2,360     $ 2,704  
Cost of services     (625 )     (658 )     (2,360 )     (2,704 )
Gross profit                        
Operating expenses:                                
Research and development     7,368       5,421       22,414       15,616  
General and administrative     2,198       1,862       7,037       4,719  
Operating loss     (9,566 )     (7,283 )     (29,451 )     (20,335 )
Financial Income (Loss), net     (63 )     (40 )     (177 )     (38 )
                                 
Loss before income tax     (9,629 )     (7,323 )     (29,628 )     (20,373 )
Taxes on income     (167 )     (115 )     (577 )     (375 )
Net loss attributable to common stockholders     (9,796 )     (7,438 )     (30,205 )     (20,748 )
Net Loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted   $ (0.68 )   $ (0.59 )   $ (2.14 )   $ (2.33 )
Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted     14,483,629       12,664,485       14,130,993       8,894,182  

Release – Cocrystal Pharma Reports Third Quarter Financial Results and Provides an Update on Development Programs and Milestones


Cocrystal Pharma Reports Third Quarter Financial Results and Provides an Update on Development Programs and Milestones

 

  • Submitted pre-IND briefing package to the FDA for intranasal/pulmonary CDI-45205 for the treatment of COVID-19 and sets goal of initiating IND-enabling study and Phase 1 in 2022
  • Advance oral COVID-19 program with goal of initiating IND-enabling study and Phase 1 in 2022
  • Received regulatory clearance to initiate a Phase 1 trial in Australia with orally administered CC-42344 for the treatment of pandemic and seasonal influenza A

BOTHELL, Wash., Nov. 15, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (Nasdaq: COCP) (“Cocrystal” or the “Company”), a clinical-stage biotechnology company, reports financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021, and provides updates on its antiviral pipeline, upcoming milestones and business activities.

“Today we are reporting progress with our promising COVID-19 antiviral development programs along with setting the goal of beginning first-in-human clinical studies with our novel SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitors in 2022,” said Sam Lee, Ph.D., co-interim CEO and President of Cocrystal. “We expect comments from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by mid-December on our pre-IND briefing package for our intranasal/pulmonary-delivered SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitor CDI-45205, our most advanced SARS-CoV-2 program. The FDA’s comments will be useful in designing the Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trial protocols for this program.

“Under our second SARS-CoV-2 program, this one targeting oral administration, by year-end 2021 we expect to select a lead candidate from novel SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitors discovered using our proprietary structure-based technology,” he added. “We will then prepare a pre-IND briefing package to submit to the FDA with the goal of initiating a clinical trial in 2022. Work also continues with a third COVID-19 program using our platform to discover oral replication inhibitors for the treatment of COVID-19.

“Regarding our influenza programs, our supplier is manufacturing our novel PB2 inhibitor CC-42344 for pandemic and seasonal influenza A. We expect patient enrollment in our Phase 1 trial to begin in early 2022 with data readouts later that same year,” said Dr. Lee. “With the influenza A/B program, we anticipate providing an update on the development of the compounds jointly discovered with Merck using our technology platform in the first quarter 2022.”

“With the proceeds from financings completed earlier this year and a clean balance sheet, we believe our capital is sufficient to fund planned operations. This outlook includes our goal of having multiple high-value antiviral compounds in clinical development next year as we advance our programs toward commercialization,” said James Martin, co-interim CEO and CFO. “We are aggressively pursuing the advancement of these potent compounds as we navigate a challenging global supply chain. Thankfully our strong partnership with CROs has benefited us to that extent.”

Antiviral Pipeline Overview

COVID-19 and Other Coronavirus Programs

  • Intranasal/Pulmonary Protease Inhibitor
    • Our lead therapeutic molecule CDI-45205 was among the broad-spectrum viral protease inhibitors obtained from Kansas State University Research Foundation (KSURF) under an exclusive license agreement announced in 2020. We believe the protease inhibitors obtained from KSURF have the ability to inhibit the inactive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase replication enzymes into an active form.
    • CDI-45205 and several analogs showed potent in vitro activity against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta (India/B.1.617.2), Gamma (Brazil/P.1), Alpha (United Kingdom/B.1.1.7) and Beta (South African/B.1.351) variants, surpassing the activity observed with the original or wild-type Wuhan strain.
    • CDI-45205 demonstrated good bioavailability in mouse and rat pharmacokinetic studies via intraperitoneal injection, and no cytotoxicity against a variety of human cell lines. CDI-45205 also demonstrated a strong synergistic effect with the FDA-approved COVID-19 medicine remdesivir.
    • A proof-of-concept animal study demonstrated that daily injection of CDI-45205 exhibited favorable in vivo efficacy in mice infected with MERS-CoV-2.
  • Oral Protease Inhibitors
    • Using our drug discovery platform, we discovered and are developing novel SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitors and anticipate identifying a preclinical 3CL lead for oral administration by the end of 2021.
    • We plan to submit a pre-IND briefing package to the FDA in the first half of 2022 to support an IND application, with the goal of progressing to IND-enabling study and Phase 1 in late 2022.
    • The main SARS-CoV-2 protease inhibitors showed potent in vitro pan-viral activity against human common coronaviruses, rhinoviruses, and respiratory enteroviruses that frequently cause the common cold, as well as against noroviruses that can cause symptoms of acute gastroenteritis.
  • Replication Inhibitors
    • We are using our platform to seek to discover replication inhibitors for developing orally administered therapeutic and prophylactic treatments for SARS-CoV-2. Replication inhibitors have the potential to work with protease inhibitors in a combination therapy regimen.

Influenza Programs

  • Pandemic and Seasonal Influenza A
    • Our novel PB2 inhibitor CC-42344 has shown excellent antiviral activity against influenza A strains, including pandemic and seasonal strains, as well as strains resistant to Tamiflu and Xofluza. CC-42344 also has favorable pharmacokinetic and drug-resistance profiles.
    • We have completed preclinical IND-enabling studies with CC-42344 and have received clearance from the Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC) to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial. Our supplier is manufacturing drug and we expect to begin patient enrollment in the first quarter of 2022.
  • Pandemic and Seasonal Influenza A/B program
    • In January 2019 we entered into an Exclusive License and Research Collaboration Agreement with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. to discover and developed certain proprietary influenza A/B antiviral agents that are effective against both influenza A and B strains. This agreement includes milestone payments of up to $156 million plus royalties on sales of products discovered under the agreement.
    • In January 2021 we announced completion of all research obligations under the agreement. Merck is now solely responsible for further preclinical and clinical development of the influenza A/B antiviral compounds discovered under this agreement. We anticipate providing a program update during the first quarter of 2022.
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates there are approximately 1 billion cases of influenza annually worldwide, resulting in 3 million to 5 million cases of severe illness and 290,000 to 650,000 deaths. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that since 2010 influenza has caused 9 million to 45 million illnesses in the U.S. annually, resulting in 140,000 to 810,000 hospitalizations and 12,000 to 61,000 deaths each year.

Norovirus Program

  • We are developing certain proprietary broad-spectrum antiviral compounds to treat norovirus infections.
  • Norovirus is a global public health problem responsible for nearly 90% of epidemic, non-bacterial outbreaks of gastroenteritis around the world.

Hepatitis C Program

  • We are seeking a partner to advance the development of CC-31244 following completion of a Phase 2a trial. This compound has shown favorable safety and preliminary efficacy in a triple regimen Phase 2a study in combination with Epclusa (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir) for the ultra-short duration treatment of individuals infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV).
  • HCV is a viral infection of the liver that causes both acute and chronic infection. According to the WHO, in 2017 an estimated 71 million people worldwide had chronic HCV infection, including 3.5 million in the U.S. Approximately 399,000 people die each year from HCV infection, mostly from cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Third Quarter Financial Results

Throughout 2020 Cocrystal reported quarterly revenues under an influenza A/B collaboration with Merck consisting of research and development (R&D) services performed by Cocrystal and reimbursed by Merck.

As discussed above, in January 2021 Merck assumed all activities and expenses associated with the continued development of the influenza A/B compounds discovered under this collaboration. As anticipated, Cocrystal reported no revenues for the third quarter of 2021 compared with $489,000 in revenues for the third quarter of 2020. Under the terms of the Merck collaboration, Cocrystal is eligible to receive up to $156 million in payments related to designated developments, regulatory and sales milestones, as well as royalties on product sales.

R&D expenses for the third quarter of 2021 were $2.2 million compared with $2.1 million for the third quarter of 2020, with the increase primarily related to COVID-19 and influenza programs advancement. The Company expects R&D expenses to increase in the fourth quarter of 2021 due to the advancement of our influenza A program into clinical trials and progress with our pre-clinical COVID-19 program toward clinical development. General and administrative (G&A) expenses for the third quarter of 2021 were $1.8 million compared with $1.1 million for the prior-year quarter, with the increase primarily due to litigation settlements.

The net loss for the third quarter of 2021 was $3.9 million, or $0.04 per share, compared with a net loss for the third quarter of 2020 of $2.7 million, or $0.05 per share.

Year to Date Financial Results

The Company reported no revenues for the first nine months of 2021 versus $1.5 million for the first nine months of 2020. The 2020 revenues were from reimbursed R&D services performed under the influenza A/B program with Merck.

R&D expenses for the first nine months of 2021 increased 22% to $6.5 million and G&A expenses decreased 6% to $4.0 million, both compared with the first nine months of 2020. The higher R&D expenses in 2021 were primarily due to COVID-19 and influenza programs advancement.

The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 was $10.5 million, or $0.12 per share, compared with a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 of $8.2 million, or $0.16 per share.

The Company reported unrestricted cash of $61.6 million as of September 30, 2021 compared with $33.0 million as of December 31, 2020. The Company reported working capital of $61.2 million as of September 30, 2021.

About Cocrystal Pharma, Inc.
Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company discovering and developing novel antiviral therapeutics that target the replication process of influenza viruses, coronaviruses (including SARS-CoV-2), hepatitis C viruses and noroviruses. Cocrystal employs unique structure-based technologies and Nobel Prize-winning expertise to create first- and best-in-class antiviral drugs. For further information about Cocrystal, please visit www.cocrystalpharma.com.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding our goals of initiating Phase 1 studies in 2022, selection of a lead candidate for our second SARS-CoV-2 program by year end, our attempts to discover replication inhibitors, our initiation of the Australian clinical trial, our development of antiviral treatments for norovirus, our expectations concerning R&D expenses, our plans to provide a program update on the Merck influenza A/B research, and our liquidity. The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “will,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events. Some or all of the events anticipated by these forward-looking statements may not occur. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the risks arising from supply chain disruptions on our ability to obtain products including raw materials and test animals as well as similar problems with our vendors and our current CRO and future CROs and CMOs, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the national and global economy, the ability of our CROs to recruit volunteers for, and to proceed with, clinical trials, possible delays resulting from the lockdown in Australia, the cooperation of the FDA in accelerating development in our COVID-19 program, our reliance on Merck for further development in the influenza A/B program under the license and collaboration agreement, our collaboration partners’ technology and software performing as expected, the results of future preclinical and clinical trials, general risks arising from clinical trials, receipt of regulatory approvals, regulatory changes, and development of effective treatments and/or vaccines by competitors, including as part of the programs financed by the U.S. government. Further information on our risk factors is contained in our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. Any forward-looking statement made by us herein speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

Investor Contact:
LHA Investor Relations
Jody Cain
310-691-7100
jcain@lhai.com

Financial Tables to follow

 COCRYSTAL PHARMA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)

    September 30, 2021     December 31, 2020  
    (unaudited)        
Assets                
Current assets:                
Cash   $ 61,644     $ 33,010  
Restricted cash     50       50  
Accounts receivable           556  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     747       399  
Total current assets     62,441       34,015  
Property and equipment, net     493       591  
Deposits     46       46  
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net (including $167 and $37, respectively, to related party)     526       498  
Goodwill     19,092       19,092  
Total assets   $ 82,598     $ 54,242  
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable and accrued expenses   $ 961     $ 1,080  
Current maturities of finance lease liabilities     29       39  
Current maturities of operating lease liabilities (including $167 and $39, respectively, to related party)     204       178  
Derivative liabilities     34       61  
Total current liabilities     1,228       1,358  
Long-term liabilities:                
Finance lease liabilities     14       34  
Operating lease liabilities     344       345  
Total long-term liabilities     358       379  
Total liabilities     1,586       1,737  
Commitments and contingencies (note 9)                
Stockholders’ equity:                
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000 shares authorized; 97,469 and 70,439 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively     98       71  
Additional paid-in capital     336,322       297,342  
Accumulated deficit     (255,408 )     (244,908 )
Total stockholders’ equity     81,012       52,505  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 82,598     $ 54,242  

COCRYSTAL PHARMA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)

    Three months ended
September 30,
    Nine months ended
September 30,
 
    2021     2020     2021     2020  
                         
Revenues:                                
Collaboration revenue   $     $ 489     $     $ 1,504  
            489             1,504  
Operating expenses:                                
Research and development     2,165       2,077       6,489       5,336  
General and administrative     1,788       1,121       4,030       4,284  
Total operating expenses     3,953       3,198       10,519       9,624  
                                 
Loss from operations     (3,953 )     (2,709 )     (10,519 )     (8,120 )
                                 
Other income (expense):                                
Interest expense, net     (1 )     (2 )     (4 )     (6 )
Foreign exchange loss     (4 )           (4 )      
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities     17       41       27       (29 )
Total other income (expense), net     12       39       19       (35 )
Net loss   $ (3,941 )   $ (2,670 )   $ (10,500 )   $ (8,155 )
                                 
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted   $ (0.04 )   $ (0.05 )     (0.12 )     (0.16 )
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted     97,469       57,555       85,301       50,491  

Source: Cocrystal Pharma, Inc.

Helius Medical Technologies (HSDT)(HSM:CA) – 3Q21 Results Raises $9.8 million net

Monday, November 15, 2021

Helius Medical Technologies (HSDT)(HSM:CA)
3Q21 Results; Raises $9.8 million, net

Helius Medical Technologies is a neurotech company focused on neurological wellness. The Company’s purpose is to develop, license and acquire unique and non-invasive platform technologies that amplify the brain’s ability to heal itself. The Company’s first commercial product is the Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator (PoNSTM). For more information, visit www.heliusmedical.com.

Joe Gomes, Senior Research Analyst, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Gregory Aurand, Senior Research Analyst, Healthcare Services & Medical Devices, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

    3Q21 Operating Results. Revenue of $109,000 and a net loss of $4.7 million, or $2.01 per share. This compares to revenue of $131,000 and a net loss of $3.5 million, or $2.70 per share, in the third quarter last year. (Share count increased to 2.4 million from 1.3 million y-o-y.) We had forecast revenue of $79,000 and a net loss $4.2 million, or $1.75 per share.

    Early Days.  Helius remains in the top of the first inning in terms of PoNS commercialization. The better than expected revenue is due to a slow re-opening of Canada from COVID restrictions. The Company has established 36 clinics throughout the country. The main difference in the loss is due to $0.9 million of severance cost related to the former CFO …



This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary.  Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision. 

Was the Inflation of 1982 Like Today’s?


Image: President Reagan addresses the nation, July 1981 (Public Domain)

Lessons from How the Back of Inflation Finally Broke in 1982

 

by Tim Sablik – Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Prior to the 2007-09 recession, the 1981-82 recession was the worst economic downturn in the United States since the Great Depression. Indeed, the nearly 11 percent unemployment rate reached late in 1982 remains the apex of the post-World War II era (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis). Unemployment during the 1981-82 recession was widespread, but manufacturing, construction, and the auto industries were particularly affected. Although goods producers accounted for only 30 percent of total employment at the time, they suffered 90 percent of job losses in 1982. Three-fourths of all job losses in the goods-producing sector were in manufacturing, and the residential construction industry and auto manufacturers ended the year with 22 percent and 24 percent unemployment, respectively (Urquhart and Hewson 1983, 4-7).

 

The economy was already in weak shape coming into the downturn, as a recession in 1980 had left unemployment at about 7.5 percent. Both the 1980 and 1981-82 recessions were triggered by tight monetary policy in an effort to fight mounting inflation. During the 1960s and 1970s, economists and policymakers believed that they could lower unemployment through higher inflation, a tradeoff known as the Phillips Curve. In the 1970s, the Fed pursued what economists would call “stop-go” monetary policy, which alternated between fighting high unemployment and high inflation. During the “go” periods, the Fed lowered interest rates to loosen the money supply and target lower unemployment. During the “stop” periods, when inflation mounted, the Fed would raise interest rates to reduce inflationary pressure. However, the Phillips Curve tradeoff proved unstable in the long-run, as inflation and unemployment increased together in the mid-1970s. While unemployment trended down slightly by the end of the decade, inflation continued to rise, reaching 11 percent in June 1979 (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis).

 

Paul Volcker was appointed chairman of the Fed in August 1979 in large part because of his anti-inflation views. He had previously served as president of the New York Fed and had dissented from Fed policies he regarded as contributing to inflation expectations. He felt strongly that mounting inflation should be the primary concern for the Fed: “In terms of economic stability in the future, [inflation] is what is likely to give us the most problems and create the biggest recession” (FOMC transcript 1979, 16). He also believed that the Fed faced a credibility problem when it came to keeping inflation in check. During the previous decade, the Fed had demonstrated that it did not place much emphasis on maintaining low inflation, and public expectation of such continued behavior would make it increasingly difficult for the Fed to bring inflation down. “[F]ailure to carry through now in the fight on inflation will only make any subsequent effort more difficult,” he remarked (Volcker 1981b).

 

Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors Paul Volcker holds his head in his hand at a meeting in Washington, D.C.(Photo: Bettmann/Bettmann/Getty Images)

 

Volcker shifted Fed policy to aggressively target the money supply rather than interest rates. He took this approach for two reasons. First, mounting inflation made it difficult to know which interest rates targets were appropriately tight. While the nominal rates the Fed targeted could be quite high, the real interest rates (that is, the effective interest rates after adjusting for inflation) could still be quite low due to the expectation of inflation. Second, the new policy was meant to signal to the public that the Fed was serious about low inflation. The expectation of low inflation was important, as current inflation is driven in part by expectations of future inflation.

 

Volcker’s first attempt to lower inflation and inflationary expectations proved insufficient. The credit-control program initiated in March 1980 by the Carter administration precipitated a sharp recession (Schreft 1990). As unemployment mounted, the Fed eased up, an action reminiscent of the “stop-go” policies the public had come to expect. In late 1980 and early 1981, the Fed once again tightened the money supply, allowing the federal funds rate to approach 20 percent. Despite this, long-run interest rates continued to rise. The ten-year Treasury bond rate increased from about 11 percent in October 1980 to more than 15 percent a year later, possibly because the market believed the Fed would back down from its tight policy when unemployment rose (Goodfriend and King 2005). This time, however, Volcker was adamant that the Fed not back down: “We have set our course to restrain growth in money and credit. We mean to stick with it” (Volcker 1981a).

 

The economy officially entered a recession in the third quarter of 1981, as high interest rates put pressure on sectors of the economy reliant on borrowing, like manufacturing and construction. Unemployment grew from 7.4 percent at the start of the recession to nearly 10 percent a year later. As the recession worsened, Volcker faced repeated calls from Congress to loosen monetary policy, but he maintained that failing to bring down long-run inflation expectations now would result in “more serious economic circumstances over a much longer period of time” (Monetary Policy Report 1982, 67).

 

Ultimately, this persistence paid off. By October 1982, inflation had fallen to 5 percent and long-run interest rates began to decline. The Fed allowed the federal funds rate to fall back to 9 percent, and unemployment declined quickly from the peak of nearly 11 percent at the end to 1982 to 8 percent one year later (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Goodfriend and King 2005). The threat of inflation was not completely gone, as the Fed would face a number of “inflation scares” throughout the 1980s. However, the commitment of Volcker and his successors to aggressively targeting price stability helped ensure that the double-digit inflation of the 1970s would not return.

 

Suggested Reading:



CPI and PPI Both Suggests Persistent Inflation



Why the Most Conservative Investors Could Help Small Stock Performance

 

 

Sources:

https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/recession-of-1981-82

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Was the Inflation of 1982 Like Todays?


Image: President Reagan addresses the nation, July 1981 (Public Domain)

Lessons from How the Back of Inflation Finally Broke in 1982

 

by Tim Sablik – Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Prior to the 2007-09 recession, the 1981-82 recession was the worst economic downturn in the United States since the Great Depression. Indeed, the nearly 11 percent unemployment rate reached late in 1982 remains the apex of the post-World War II era (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis). Unemployment during the 1981-82 recession was widespread, but manufacturing, construction, and the auto industries were particularly affected. Although goods producers accounted for only 30 percent of total employment at the time, they suffered 90 percent of job losses in 1982. Three-fourths of all job losses in the goods-producing sector were in manufacturing, and the residential construction industry and auto manufacturers ended the year with 22 percent and 24 percent unemployment, respectively (Urquhart and Hewson 1983, 4-7).

 

The economy was already in weak shape coming into the downturn, as a recession in 1980 had left unemployment at about 7.5 percent. Both the 1980 and 1981-82 recessions were triggered by tight monetary policy in an effort to fight mounting inflation. During the 1960s and 1970s, economists and policymakers believed that they could lower unemployment through higher inflation, a tradeoff known as the Phillips Curve. In the 1970s, the Fed pursued what economists would call “stop-go” monetary policy, which alternated between fighting high unemployment and high inflation. During the “go” periods, the Fed lowered interest rates to loosen the money supply and target lower unemployment. During the “stop” periods, when inflation mounted, the Fed would raise interest rates to reduce inflationary pressure. However, the Phillips Curve tradeoff proved unstable in the long-run, as inflation and unemployment increased together in the mid-1970s. While unemployment trended down slightly by the end of the decade, inflation continued to rise, reaching 11 percent in June 1979 (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis).

 

Paul Volcker was appointed chairman of the Fed in August 1979 in large part because of his anti-inflation views. He had previously served as president of the New York Fed and had dissented from Fed policies he regarded as contributing to inflation expectations. He felt strongly that mounting inflation should be the primary concern for the Fed: “In terms of economic stability in the future, [inflation] is what is likely to give us the most problems and create the biggest recession” (FOMC transcript 1979, 16). He also believed that the Fed faced a credibility problem when it came to keeping inflation in check. During the previous decade, the Fed had demonstrated that it did not place much emphasis on maintaining low inflation, and public expectation of such continued behavior would make it increasingly difficult for the Fed to bring inflation down. “[F]ailure to carry through now in the fight on inflation will only make any subsequent effort more difficult,” he remarked (Volcker 1981b).

 

Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors Paul Volcker holds his head in his hand at a meeting in Washington, D.C.(Photo: Bettmann/Bettmann/Getty Images)

 

Volcker shifted Fed policy to aggressively target the money supply rather than interest rates. He took this approach for two reasons. First, mounting inflation made it difficult to know which interest rates targets were appropriately tight. While the nominal rates the Fed targeted could be quite high, the real interest rates (that is, the effective interest rates after adjusting for inflation) could still be quite low due to the expectation of inflation. Second, the new policy was meant to signal to the public that the Fed was serious about low inflation. The expectation of low inflation was important, as current inflation is driven in part by expectations of future inflation.

 

Volcker’s first attempt to lower inflation and inflationary expectations proved insufficient. The credit-control program initiated in March 1980 by the Carter administration precipitated a sharp recession (Schreft 1990). As unemployment mounted, the Fed eased up, an action reminiscent of the “stop-go” policies the public had come to expect. In late 1980 and early 1981, the Fed once again tightened the money supply, allowing the federal funds rate to approach 20 percent. Despite this, long-run interest rates continued to rise. The ten-year Treasury bond rate increased from about 11 percent in October 1980 to more than 15 percent a year later, possibly because the market believed the Fed would back down from its tight policy when unemployment rose (Goodfriend and King 2005). This time, however, Volcker was adamant that the Fed not back down: “We have set our course to restrain growth in money and credit. We mean to stick with it” (Volcker 1981a).

 

The economy officially entered a recession in the third quarter of 1981, as high interest rates put pressure on sectors of the economy reliant on borrowing, like manufacturing and construction. Unemployment grew from 7.4 percent at the start of the recession to nearly 10 percent a year later. As the recession worsened, Volcker faced repeated calls from Congress to loosen monetary policy, but he maintained that failing to bring down long-run inflation expectations now would result in “more serious economic circumstances over a much longer period of time” (Monetary Policy Report 1982, 67).

 

Ultimately, this persistence paid off. By October 1982, inflation had fallen to 5 percent and long-run interest rates began to decline. The Fed allowed the federal funds rate to fall back to 9 percent, and unemployment declined quickly from the peak of nearly 11 percent at the end to 1982 to 8 percent one year later (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Goodfriend and King 2005). The threat of inflation was not completely gone, as the Fed would face a number of “inflation scares” throughout the 1980s. However, the commitment of Volcker and his successors to aggressively targeting price stability helped ensure that the double-digit inflation of the 1970s would not return.

 

Suggested Reading:



CPI and PPI Both Suggests Persistent Inflation



Why the Most Conservative Investors Could Help Small Stock Performance

 

 

Sources:

https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/recession-of-1981-82

 

Stay up to date. Follow us:

 

Harte Hanks (HRTH) – A Well-Oiled More Efficient Cash Flow Machine

Friday, November 12, 2021

Harte Hanks (HRTH)
A Well-Oiled, More Efficient, Cash Flow Machine

Harte-Hanks is a marketing services company that provides multichannel marketing solutions as well as consulting, data analytics, and strategic assessment. The company’s offerings focus on business-to-business, retail, finance, and automotive segments through digital, social, mobile, and print media offerings. Harte-Hanks strives to develop better customer relationships through its marketing and analytical services for clients. The majority of its revenue is derived from its marketing services in the retail, technology, and consumer brand segments.

Michael Kupinski, Director of Research, Noble Capital Markets, Inc.

Refer to the full report for the price target, fundamental analysis, and rating.

    A surprisingly strong Q3. Total company revenue increased a surprising 4.0% to $49.6 million, well above our $45.3 million estimate, fueled by a 10.2% increase in its Customer Care segment revenues. Customer Care revenues beat our estimate by a whopping 29.2%, as the Covid related customer did not go away as anticipate and the company gained additional clients. The company reported its 6th consecutive quarter of positive EBITDA, with adj. EBITDA beating expectations, $6.1 million versus our $3.3 million estimate.

    Favorable momentum.  Customer Care is expected to be stronger than originally expected as the Covid related business is not expected to fall off until next year. As a result, we are raising our Q4 total company revenue expectation from $42.5 million to $48.7 million. We are raising our Q4 adj. EBITDA estimate from $3.1 million to $4.4 million, bringing our full year 2021 adj. EBITDA estimate to …



This Company Sponsored Research is provided by Noble Capital Markets, Inc., a FINRA and S.E.C. registered broker-dealer (B/D).

*Analyst certification and important disclosures included in the full report. NOTE: investment decisions should not be based upon the content of this research summary.  Proper due diligence is required before making any investment decision.